Pages:
Author

Topic: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals - page 4. (Read 4602 times)

legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from?
I don't understand what you mean by slippery slope BS come from.

That "if you allow gays to marry, what next, animals and humans" et cetera BS.

People who say that kind of bullshit are just revealing what kind of homophobic, ignorant and hateful morons they are so they're not worth even paying attention to.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
The law against pedophilia was an example to prove my
point against his logic sounding something like this "durr
there shouldn't be laws against something just because
people think it's wrong".
Every coin has 2 sides? Sure, I'm sure there are people
enjoying sexual relations with animals that take no harm
from it, and if you think that should be legal, feel free to
petition it.
You might get support from some of society's other outcasts.

Also, who is to judge if the animal took damage? You can't 'measure' psychological damage per say ( yes, this also applies to animals ), and even if there is no visible impact or wounds, would you just assume the animal took no damage?

But once again, please do make a public petition about it, and see for yourself if anyone is willing to support you.



Freak.
You are the one with flawed logic. "durr there shouldn't be laws just because people think it's wrong???" - when did either of us say that?. Also you are mixing me up with the guy you originally quoted but guess your pig eyes are too lazy to read who's posting what. Sure we don't know about wether the dog take psychological damage from having an awesome time, but the odds are against it.

I am the OP btw who said it was about time and explained that it was removed at the same time homolaws were removed. I dont really give a shit if it's legal or not, as me and some other guy stated earlier this will be like torrenting... It's not like you take your dog out on the town square and let it bang you for all to see? The risk you run of getting caught is if you make a movie of it and show your face, which is a bit darwin-ish.
Also calling someone freak for having a fetish is wrong, people are born drawn to animals just as people are drawn to same sex or to kids - sure it's not the most tasteful things around but the people who have them can rarely help it. I am sure you have no fetish mr perfect Smiley

I'd like to see you come back from this, look at the letters piggy.

EDIT: And since you wanted the mod to delete his post you are also against free speach. Shame on you. Crawl back into your mothers basement and watch your loliporn (C WUT I DID THAR)?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong.

So disgusting, sickening and plain wrong should be illegal ? By who's definition ? Someone might find two guys fucking each other just as disgusting, sickening and plain wrong as a woman fucking with a dog.
Also, I suspect not every animal sex act is animal abuse, probably a world of difference between using a hamster as a fleshlight and having a dog mount some girl.
Basically a bullshit law by bullshit "politicians" who got nothing else to do.
Wait what, why are you defending sex with animals even if it wouldn't count as abuse?
Sickening, disgusting and plain wrong are my own words that represent my own view of the matter.
So what you're basically saying is "If you ban sex with animals you might as well ban sex between 2 men"?
How about the abuse of children? Should that also be legal, because after all, hey, it's just "someone who
thought it was wrong" that had made a law against it.

Hope mods delete your post, it's fucking distasteful to be honest.
I read his post as it should be fine as long as the animal doesn't take damage, considering he uses the words "mount a woman". Every coin has 2 sides you know. And you are putting word in his mouth like nothing I've ever seen before. What does children has to do with anything?
The law against pedophilia was an example to prove my
point against his logic sounding something like this "durr
there shouldn't be laws against something just because
people think it's wrong".
Every coin has 2 sides? Sure, I'm sure there are people
enjoying sexual relations with animals that take no harm
from it, and if you think that should be legal, feel free to
petition it.
You might get support from some of society's other outcasts.

Also, who is to judge if the animal took damage? You can't 'measure' psychological damage per say ( yes, this also applies to animals ), and even if there is no visible impact or wounds, would you just assume the animal took no damage?

But once again, please do make a public petition about it, and see for yourself if anyone is willing to support you.



Freak.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 254
Sweden and neighboring states should be monitored closely for any species hopping viruses.

As much as we care for animals, most really don't like us at all and the 1348–50 European black-plague was a biological statement from the animal kingdom.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from?
I don't understand what you mean by slippery slope BS come from.

That "if you allow gays to marry, what next, animals and humans" et cetera BS.
Haha, no idea actually Cheesy I think our batshit retarded politicians just made braindead decisions as per usual.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong.

So disgusting, sickening and plain wrong should be illegal ? By who's definition ? Someone might find two guys fucking each other just as disgusting, sickening and plain wrong as a woman fucking with a dog.
Also, I suspect not every animal sex act is animal abuse, probably a world of difference between using a hamster as a fleshlight and having a dog mount some girl.
Basically a bullshit law by bullshit "politicians" who got nothing else to do.
Wait what, why are you defending sex with animals even if it wouldn't count as abuse?
Sickening, disgusting and plain wrong are my own words that represent my own view of the matter.
So what you're basically saying is "If you ban sex with animals you might as well ban sex between 2 men"?
How about the abuse of children? Should that also be legal, because after all, hey, it's just "someone who
thought it was wrong" that had made a law against it.

Hope mods delete your post, it's fucking distasteful to be honest.
I read his post as it should be fine as long as the animal doesn't take damage, considering he uses the words "mount a woman". Every coin has 2 sides you know. And you are putting word in his mouth like nothing I've ever seen before. What does children has to do with anything?
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from?
I don't understand what you mean by slippery slope BS come from.

That "if you allow gays to marry, what next, animals and humans" et cetera BS.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong.

So disgusting, sickening and plain wrong should be illegal ? By who's definition ? Someone might find two guys fucking each other just as disgusting, sickening and plain wrong as a woman fucking with a dog.
Also, I suspect not every animal sex act is animal abuse, probably a world of difference between using a hamster as a fleshlight and having a dog mount some girl.
Basically a bullshit law by bullshit "politicians" who got nothing else to do.
Wait what, why are you defending sex with animals even if it wouldn't count as abuse?
Sickening, disgusting and plain wrong are my own words that represent my own view of the matter.
So what you're basically saying is "If you ban sex with animals you might as well ban sex between 2 men"?
How about the abuse of children? Should that also be legal, because after all, hey, it's just "someone who
thought it was wrong" that had made a law against it.

Hope mods delete your post, it's fucking distasteful to be honest.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 658
rgbkey.github.io/pgp.txt
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 250
Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong.

So disgusting, sickening and plain wrong should be illegal ? By who's definition ? Someone might find two guys fucking each other just as disgusting, sickening and plain wrong as a woman fucking with a dog.
Also, I suspect not every animal sex act is animal abuse, probably a world of difference between using a hamster as a fleshlight and having a dog mount some girl.
Basically a bullshit law by bullshit "politicians" who got nothing else to do.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
I personally don't think the law will change anything, those who didn't
have sex with animals ( the majority, the normal people ) will still not
 have sex with animals, and the people who used to will most likely continue.
It's nothing you do in public anyways I would guess, and if you're molesting
your dog in your home a law won't change that.
Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong.
Yup, it's like when they outlawed illegal downloading. Like 90% between the ages  13-50 still download illegally because the chances of getting caught are sooo slim. They have made a few examples taking down 3-4 hard working people or so with insane fine amounts. And they have spent millions and millions on anti piracy bureaucracy... Shit's so corrupt..
Exactly my point. Make a law against something people will never get caught for - it won't change a thing.
Make a law against something like robbery where you it's a matter of a public act - less robberies are committed.

It's an excellent example the law against downloading. People won't get caught - people don't stop downloading.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from?
I don't understand what you mean by slippery slope BS come from.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
I personally don't think the law will change anything, those who didn't
have sex with animals ( the majority, the normal people ) will still not
 have sex with animals, and the people who used to will most likely continue.
It's nothing you do in public anyways I would guess, and if you're molesting
your dog in your home a law won't change that.
Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong.
Yup, it's like when they outlawed illegal downloading. Like 90% between the ages  13-50 still download illegally because the chances of getting caught are sooo slim. They have made a few examples taking down 3-4 hard working people or so with insane fine amounts. And they have spent millions and millions on anti piracy bureaucracy... Shit's so corrupt..
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
I personally don't think the law will change anything, those who didn't
have sex with animals ( the majority, the normal people ) will still not
 have sex with animals, and the people who used to will most likely continue.
It's nothing you do in public anyways I would guess, and if you're molesting
your dog in your home a law won't change that.
Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from?
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
Have you ever met someone IRL who likes to make love to animals? O_O I have never men someone like that... I think there are not many people like that.
Not that I know off, it is really rare. The animal protection thingy has gained 227 reports in 35 years.. So the law didn't really matter much either.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
What if the animal is doing the humping?
What if an unsuspecting drunk person is getting rammed from behind by man's best friend?
 Huh
Yeah, been thinking about this myself - I've been to the weird site of the internet and the vid I saw the dog didn't really seem to suffer from it... On the other hand it could have been pumped with  sexual enchancement drugs, who knows. But if it isn't drugged I see no harm, however it's pretty backwards to have it legalized either way.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1004
Have you ever met someone IRL who likes to make love to animals? O_O I have never men someone like that... I think there are not many people like that.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 254
What if the animal is doing the humping?
What if an unsuspecting drunk person is getting rammed from behind by man's best friend?
 Huh
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
I always thought of them as strange, now I have more proof for that...hehe
Pages:
Jump to: