Ok I can finally post! I've been lurking for a long time, gpu mining a year ago small scale. I just got one of the november jupiters I ordered and it fired right up working great. Avg hash rate in the interface is 660, but I'm getting an average of 10% hw errors. Seems way too high. I've been playing around with making the unit warmer (ambient temp is around 40) but all that did was cause a few of the vrms to have a "fault 4". Max temp on two of the asics was 70c. After resetting the machine and removing the covers that were keeping airflow down, it is still averaging 650-660 with 10% errors. There are only a few cores that get turned off and on occasionally. Never more than 15 cores off total across all the boards. Avg hashrate at my pool is showing near 600, which would be right for 660 - 10%.
Any ideas what I can do to improve it? Do I just need to wait for the knc tuning fw to be released for the Nov units?
Thanks!
BTW. After reading this board for a long time, and wading through all the bickering nonsense that trolls keep saying in this thread, KNC is obviously the only company doing the job right. I waited a long time to get involved in ASICs, but came close to ordering from BFL a few times. I'm glad I didn't. Maybe I would have received a unit by now, but it would be 50gh for about what I spent on each 660 gh jupiter. Cointerra is still a bust, hashfast is still a bust. Why don't the trolls and kids just get out of this thread and get a life
I thought I'd be getting 450-500 gh miners when I ordered them less than a month ago, instead I get 660 and it is a complete unit that fired up in less than five minutes after UPS came. I'm thinking about selling one of these to purchase a Neptune (or two) because I have a strong feeling that KNC will deliver those on time in a few months, with a lot more power than advertised.
My orders started in the 9900s, and started arriving today, tracking numbers received monday.