[SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - New thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1272422.0

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

The SexCoin SXC thread has now moved to https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/sxcnsfw-sexcoin-new-android-client-release-1272422

January 2019 UPDATE

Quote from: lavajumper on January 08, 2019, 03:44:59 PM

::Update::

There is a new client available.

An issue cropped up where the client was segfaulting.

If you have been running your client, and it would mysteriously crash for no reason... The fix is out! Download from the links below.

Windows_64	https://github.com/sexcoin-project/sexcoin/releases/download/0.15.2.0/sexcoin-0.15.2-win64-setup.exe
Mac/OSX	https://github.com/sexcoin-project/sexcoin/releases/download/0.15.2.0/Sexcoin-Qt-0.15.2.dmg

The SexCoin SXC thread has now moved to https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/sxcnsfw-sexcoin-new-android-client-release-1272422

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Just in case you aren't following the current thread:

[size=16pt] ---> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/sxcnsfw-sexcoin-new-android-client-release-1272422 <---[/size]

[quote author=lavajumper link=topic=1272422.msg19920671#msg19920671 date=1499121087]

[size=16pt]V0.10.4.0 is available[/size]:

https://www.sexcoin.info/downloads.php

DON'T USE AGE VERIFICATION FEATURES UNTIL THE NETWORK SHOWS SUPPORT

[/quote]

[quote author=Timelord2067 link=topic=1272422.msg19922567#msg19922567 date=1499133615]
If you use Twitter copy the following:

https://twitter.com/Timelord2067/status/882055574799568897

Code:

#Crypto SexCoin Mandatory Wallet UPGRADE V 0.10.4.0 http://tinyurl.com/SexCoin01040 #SXC Utilise Bootstrap for faster instal https://www.sexcoin.info/downloads.php

It's exactly 160 characters long, links to this thread and to the download page.

(and retweeting helps with HashTag popularity.)
[/quote]

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: Timelord2067 on November 30, 2015, 12:56:08 AM

Android Release!
v0.10.9.0

The New Android Client is out!

Android Sexcoin Wallet APK(direct download link)

Now Reports Euro Exchange Rates
Sync Issues Solved
Fixed file system bloat problem
Ability to Delete application logs
Addressed many stability issues

Source: http://github.com/lavajumper/sexcoin-wallet

The SexCoin SXC thread has now moved to https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/sxcnsfw-sexcoin-new-android-client-release-1272422

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Android Release!
v0.10.9.0

The New Android Client is out!

Android Sexcoin Wallet APK(direct download link)

Now Reports Euro Exchange Rates
Sync Issues Solved
Fixed file system bloat problem
Ability to Delete application logs
Addressed many stability issues

Source: http://github.com/lavajumper/sexcoin-wallet

Nerull

full member

Activity: 195

Merit: 110

I think its a case of a short term pain for a long term gain. Some dumping will occur but the increase in hashrate and the accompanying increase in security will pay off many times over long term.

Equalizer1970

hero member

Activity: 623

Merit: 500

Fortune favours the bold!

Quote from: lavajumper on November 29, 2015, 08:19:00 PM

Quote from: SISAR on November 25, 2015, 09:19:13 AM

In case of major Scrypt pool starting to merge-mine SXC that pool becomes a 51% attacker or much worse. And imagine a situation where that pool or one of pools with huge amount of hashrate stops mining for some reason, SXC difficulty would be so high that the rest of pools and solo-miners combined would need ages to create the next block. But even if doomsday scenario does not happen there would be a constant dumping of SXC by miners who basicaly get it for free, as an extra while mining LTC or whatever else Scrypt they are mining.

I was thinking it would actually stabilize the network hashrate though. If other pools could merge-mine with a coin ( or coins? ) that people mine anyway, then we'd have a sustained hash contribution. Multipools that switch in and out would have a smaller effect on the total hashrate. Am I missing something?

Quote from: portice on November 29, 2015, 07:00:17 PM

No support to sustain the dumps from making it merge mineable

The dumping does worry me.

Yes, there will be dumping but the coin will be more widely distributed and get exposure to people who would not otherwise have taken notice of SXC. The dumping will stabilize and inevitably some of those miners will start to hold their coins.

lavajumper

hero member

Activity: 876

Merit: 1037

Sexcoin Core Dev Team Member

Quote from: SISAR on November 25, 2015, 09:19:13 AM

In case of major Scrypt pool starting to merge-mine SXC that pool becomes a 51% attacker or much worse. And imagine a situation where that pool or one of pools with huge amount of hashrate stops mining for some reason, SXC difficulty would be so high that the rest of pools and solo-miners combined would need ages to create the next block. But even if doomsday scenario does not happen there would be a constant dumping of SXC by miners who basicaly get it for free, as an extra while mining LTC or whatever else Scrypt they are mining.

I was thinking it would actually stabilize the network hashrate though. If other pools could merge-mine with a coin ( or coins? ) that people mine anyway, then we'd have a sustained hash contribution. Multipools that switch in and out would have a smaller effect on the total hashrate. Am I missing something?

Quote from: portice on November 29, 2015, 07:00:17 PM

No support to sustain the dumps from making it merge mineable

The dumping does worry me.

portice

legendary

Activity: 999

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Equalizer1970 on November 29, 2015, 02:26:05 PM

Quote from: lavajumper on November 23, 2015, 07:03:20 PM

I've spent some time getting familiar with merged mining. This stems from my concerns about the network hash rate and the actual solve times I'very been watching on the block chain. I see a hell of a lot of upside to this, and am confident that we can implement it.

My understanding so far is that pools can share hash power from litecoin or dogecoin and use it on sexcoin concurrently.

Is anyone aware of a downside?

What do you think?

My vote is for merge mining with LTC and to this as soon as possible. Get a major pool to get onboard, too.

No support to sustain the dumps from making it merge mineable

Equalizer1970

hero member

Activity: 623

Merit: 500

Fortune favours the bold!

Quote from: lavajumper on November 23, 2015, 07:03:20 PM

I've spent some time getting familiar with merged mining. This stems from my concerns about the network hash rate and the actual solve times I'very been watching on the block chain. I see a hell of a lot of upside to this, and am confident that we can implement it.

My understanding so far is that pools can share hash power from litecoin or dogecoin and use it on sexcoin concurrently.

Is anyone aware of a downside?

What do you think?

My vote is for merge mining with LTC and to this as soon as possible. Get a major pool to get onboard, too.

sasa9

hero member

Activity: 732

Merit: 502