Pages:
Author

Topic: [SYS] SYSCOIN [Unofficial] - Due to censorship & secrecy on Official thread. - page 7. (Read 21682 times)

full member
Activity: 670
Merit: 120
TIME TO BAN THE YOBIT SCAM!!
No one in their right mind would be selling Syscoin at these prices.

Unless they were over $2 500 000 in debt & desperate for cash......like Blockchain Foundry.... Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
bcfn is starting to become profitable as the goal always was.

That's exactly the point & you've just confirmed it. Blockchain Foundry are only interested in BCFN.

Syscoin investors invested in Syscoin, not BCFN. Blockchain Foundry are in such severe financial trouble that they are dumping their SYS to bolster their own worth as well as partnering with shady peermountain ICO's in an effort to get more desperately needed cash.

Blockchain Foundry are bleeding Syscoin dry & ruining it's reputation by censoring any questions from Syscoin investors about what Blockchain Foundry are up to.

In assets terms, this can be described as an attempted aggressive takeover.
fud.. bcfn owns no sys its founders own sys and this is speculation based on no foundation. This is totally false btw.

becoming profitable != not interested in syscoin. Your logic is flawed.

Let me slightly adjust my statement then, not that it makes any difference:

"Blockchain Foundry are in such severe financial trouble that BCFN Founders are dumping their SYS to bolster their own worth as well as partnering with shady peermountain ICO's in an effort to get more desperately needed cash."

def. false. There is no cash issues at bcfn I can assure you. No one in their right mind would be selling Syscoin at these prices.

Most would consider a debt of over $2 500 000 & rising a cash issue......
by definition every startup with no assets to begin looks the same.. this has no bearing on sys since bcf legally doesnt own any sys. The incentives are aligned as personal ownership.
hero member
Activity: 1438
Merit: 574
Always ask questions. #StandWithHongKong
bcfn is starting to become profitable as the goal always was.

That's exactly the point & you've just confirmed it. Blockchain Foundry are only interested in BCFN.

Syscoin investors invested in Syscoin, not BCFN. Blockchain Foundry are in such severe financial trouble that they are dumping their SYS to bolster their own worth as well as partnering with shady peermountain ICO's in an effort to get more desperately needed cash.

Blockchain Foundry are bleeding Syscoin dry & ruining it's reputation by censoring any questions from Syscoin investors about what Blockchain Foundry are up to.

In assets terms, this can be described as an attempted aggressive takeover.
fud.. bcfn owns no sys its founders own sys and this is speculation based on no foundation. This is totally false btw.

becoming profitable != not interested in syscoin. Your logic is flawed.

Let me slightly adjust my statement then, not that it makes any difference:

"Blockchain Foundry are in such severe financial trouble that BCFN Founders are dumping their SYS to bolster their own worth as well as partnering with shady peermountain ICO's in an effort to get more desperately needed cash."

def. false. There is no cash issues at bcfn I can assure you. No one in their right mind would be selling Syscoin at these prices.

Most would consider a debt of over $2 500 000 & rising a cash issue......
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
bcfn is starting to become profitable as the goal always was.

That's exactly the point & you've just confirmed it. Blockchain Foundry are only interested in BCFN.

Syscoin investors invested in Syscoin, not BCFN. Blockchain Foundry are in such severe financial trouble that they are dumping their SYS to bolster their own worth as well as partnering with shady peermountain ICO's in an effort to get more desperately needed cash.

Blockchain Foundry are bleeding Syscoin dry & ruining it's reputation by censoring any questions from Syscoin investors about what Blockchain Foundry are up to.

In assets terms, this can be described as an attempted aggressive takeover.
fud.. bcfn owns no sys its founders own sys and this is speculation based on no foundation. This is totally false btw.

becoming profitable != not interested in syscoin. Your logic is flawed.

Let me slightly adjust my statement then, not that it makes any difference:

"Blockchain Foundry are in such severe financial trouble that BCFN Founders are dumping their SYS to bolster their own worth as well as partnering with shady peermountain ICO's in an effort to get more desperately needed cash."

def. false. There is no cash issues at bcfn I can assure you. No one in their right mind would be selling Syscoin at these prices.
hero member
Activity: 1438
Merit: 574
Always ask questions. #StandWithHongKong
bcfn is starting to become profitable as the goal always was.

That's exactly the point & you've just confirmed it. Blockchain Foundry are only interested in BCFN.

Syscoin investors invested in Syscoin, not BCFN. Blockchain Foundry are in such severe financial trouble that they are dumping their SYS to bolster their own worth as well as partnering with shady peermountain ICO's in an effort to get more desperately needed cash.

Blockchain Foundry are bleeding Syscoin dry & ruining it's reputation by censoring any questions from Syscoin investors about what Blockchain Foundry are up to.

In assets terms, this can be described as an attempted aggressive takeover.
fud.. bcfn owns no sys its founders own sys and this is speculation based on no foundation. This is totally false btw.

becoming profitable != not interested in syscoin. Your logic is flawed.

Let me slightly adjust my statement then, not that it makes any difference:

"Blockchain Foundry are in such severe financial trouble that BCFN Founders are dumping their SYS to bolster their own worth as well as partnering with shady peermountain ICO's in an effort to get more desperately needed cash."
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
bcfn is starting to become profitable as the goal always was.

That's exactly the point & you've just confirmed it. Blockchain Foundry are only interested in BCFN.

Syscoin investors invested in Syscoin, not BCFN. Blockchain Foundry are in such severe financial trouble that they are dumping their SYS to bolster their own worth as well as partnering with shady peermountain ICO's in an effort to get more desperately needed cash.

Blockchain Foundry are bleeding Syscoin dry & ruining it's reputation by censoring any questions from Syscoin investors about what Blockchain Foundry are up to.

In assets terms, this can be described as an attempted aggressive takeover.
fud.. bcfn owns no sys its founders own sys and this is speculation based on no foundation. This is totally false btw.

becoming profitable != not interested in syscoin. Your logic is flawed.
sr. member
Activity: 390
Merit: 250
a huge upgrade is in the plans coming soon.. zdag will be fully functional, with paper coming. Tps test by external performance testing company  is happening with paper coming, most bmd issues fixed, tx delay issue fixed in new release.

soon.... syscoin soon or soon in real world?
hero member
Activity: 1438
Merit: 574
Always ask questions. #StandWithHongKong
In most forums your behavior would result in a perma ban.

Welcome. A ban for moderating my own thread of spam  Huh Cheesy

I'll leave your post "as is" for reference, please ensure that any future posts have a point & are on topic.

Copy/paste:


I have created this topic as self-moderated simply to stop spammers & shills. All legitimate posts are welcome & will not be deleted.

This thread is for members who have had their posts deleted from the Syscoin thread, which you obviously haven't.

While you're here though, I would like to correct you on a few things in your last post on the Syscoin thread:

I doubt this post will be deleted, unless you delete it yourself.

Many posts are being deleted as this thread clearly demonstrates.

-Blockchain Foundry has a vested interest in Syscoin and they seem to me like they are doing a good job

No, they have a vested interest in BCFN only, as the dev sidhujag just confirmed above.

-There is no need for a roadmap,....

What  Huh

And finally you don't need to create another thread, if you suspect censorship....

It is not a case of "suspected" censorship - it is definite & deliberate censorship, as this thread clearly shows.
hero member
Activity: 1492
Merit: 763
Life is a taxable event
Ironically iconfirm has been deleting posts on his (zomg I can't spam? Must be cersnorhsip!) thread.


So I've archived it on archive.org.


In most forums your behavior would result in a perma ban.
hero member
Activity: 1438
Merit: 574
Always ask questions. #StandWithHongKong
bcfn is starting to become profitable as the goal always was.

That's exactly the point & you've just confirmed it. Blockchain Foundry are only interested in BCFN.

Syscoin investors invested in Syscoin, not BCFN. Blockchain Foundry are in such severe financial trouble that they are dumping their SYS to bolster their own worth as well as partnering with shady peermountain ICO's in an effort to get more desperately needed cash.

Blockchain Foundry are bleeding Syscoin dry & ruining it's reputation by censoring any questions from Syscoin investors about what Blockchain Foundry are up to.

In assets terms, this can be described as an attempted aggressive takeover.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
BCFN is not in a deficit of any kind.

Well, after looking at the financial reports of Blockchain Foundry, which are signed by both Daniel Wasyluk (CEO & BCT post deleter) & Christopher Marsh (CFO), that doesn't appear to be the case:

https://webfiles.thecse.com/investorx/BCFN/1805301938226727.pdf?kY9yLTSm3Jn9nsI9HuLoE1nMoeU1.qlm

The documents clearly state:

Quote
The Company has an accumulated deficit of $2,505,196 as at March 31, 2018, and $2,157,124 as at
September 30, 2017. The Company's ability to continue its operations and to realize its assets at their
carrying values is dependent upon obtaining additional financing and generating revenues sufficient to
cover its operating costs, all of which indicates the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

I'm afraid that this really is quite a damning report on Blockchain Foundry. It also confirms the various (deleted) posts from Syscoin users that they are in desperate need for a cash injection, which can explain the dumping of Syscoin & dubious partnership with peermountain & their very, very shady ICO & a non-existent product. It looks like a typical cash-grab & nothing more.

This, together with the censorship & refusal of Daniel, Christopher or Sebastian to answer any question relating to Blockchain Foundry on the Syscoin thread only fuels Syscoin investors concerns. Deleting & censoring is not the way to deal with the situation - it actually makes it worse & creates even more suspicion.

Meanwhile, the dumping continues......
likely you can look at any startup and make similar claims because they start with no assets. That is pronably.the cost of r&d which is expected as it gives ru nway to prove ourself in market.

bcfn is starting to become profitable as the goal always was. We have an edge as early adopters who know their stuff that really helps people in developing solutions.
hero member
Activity: 1438
Merit: 574
Always ask questions. #StandWithHongKong
BCFN is not in a deficit of any kind.

Well, after looking at the financial reports of Blockchain Foundry, which are signed by both Daniel Wasyluk (CEO & BCT post deleter) & Christopher Marsh (CFO), that doesn't appear to be the case:

https://webfiles.thecse.com/investorx/BCFN/1805301938226727.pdf?kY9yLTSm3Jn9nsI9HuLoE1nMoeU1.qlm

The documents clearly state:

Quote
The Company has an accumulated deficit of $2,505,196 as at March 31, 2018, and $2,157,124 as at
September 30, 2017. The Company's ability to continue its operations and to realize its assets at their
carrying values is dependent upon obtaining additional financing and generating revenues sufficient to
cover its operating costs, all of which indicates the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

I'm afraid that this really is quite a damning report on Blockchain Foundry. It also confirms the various (deleted) posts from Syscoin users that they are in desperate need for a cash injection, which can explain the dumping of Syscoin & dubious partnership with peermountain & their very, very shady ICO & a non-existent product. It looks like a typical cash-grab & nothing more.

This, together with the censorship & refusal of Daniel, Christopher or Sebastian to answer any question relating to Blockchain Foundry on the Syscoin thread only fuels Syscoin investors concerns. Deleting & censoring is not the way to deal with the situation - it actually makes it worse & creates even more suspicion.

Meanwhile, the dumping continues......
full member
Activity: 670
Merit: 120
TIME TO BAN THE YOBIT SCAM!!
I take it you've been banned from posting there as well now?.... Roll Eyes

Yup. Not that I'm bothered..... Wink
hero member
Activity: 1438
Merit: 574
Always ask questions. #StandWithHongKong
I saw a post showing that Blockchain Foundry were in deep financial trouble, about $2 milion or so - but that got deleted too & I can't remember who posted it

Yeah, that was me:


This also goes for "Blurryeyed", accounts that are solely used to troll teams will not be tolerated.


That's uncalled for.

Taking your anger & frustration at Blockchain Foundry's poor performance & dire financial status out on Syscoin investors is not wise - they are the ones who keep you in business:

https://webfiles.thecse.com/investorx/BCFN/1805301938226727.pdf?kY9yLTSm3Jn9nsI9HuLoE1nMoeU1.qlm

Page 7:

Quote
The Company has an accumulated deficit of $2,505,196 as at March 31, 2018, and $2,157,124 as at
September 30, 2017. The Company's ability to continue its operations and to realize its assets at their
carrying values is dependent upon obtaining additional financing and generating revenues sufficient to
cover its operating costs, all of which indicates the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

No wonder you're dumping, you need the cash.

Shares down another 5% today as well I see, continuing the trend:

http://thecse.com/en/listings/technology/blockchain-foundry-inc

I was gonna hodl what I extracted Poloniex, but I'm super glad I sold it instead. If you want to turn Blockchain Foundry around, you can start by getting down from your soapbox & losing the attitude.

Blockchain obviously don't want their publicly available financial records available to the public.....lol  Can't say I blame them - they're a freaking mess.....debt up to their eyeballs. I was gonna start a thread about this myself, but seeing as I got rid of my SYS as soon as I got it out of Polo I couldn't be bothered - glad someone done it though. Too much censorship going on.

Pretty obvious what's going on here, they're dumping their stash but need some more wonga, so they're entering into this partnership with peermountain to con some more dumbass investors - whatever they got left over will be put into their own BCFN token while they watch Syscoin fade away.

They don't care about SYS, they care about BCFN.

YES, that's the post I was referring to - thanks for re-posting blurry  Smiley I couldn't even remember the sites where BCFN was listed, I'm going to check it out as soon as I get some spare time.... Wink

I take it you've been banned from posting there as well now?.... Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 1438
Merit: 574
Always ask questions. #StandWithHongKong
Im one of the more active developers in crypto I believe. Your making up crap. I helped you out with Polo btw you did not mention that. BCFN is not in a deficit of any kind.

Hello sidhujag,

Yes you are & yes you did try & help me with Polo, for which I am grateful of course. However, I'm not making up anything - all posts here are quoted or I provide links - everything is verifiable. If the Syscoin thread wasn't so heavily moderated & censored then this thread would not be needed. I & others are not allowed to ask questions about our investment on the Syscoin thread, so this thread gives Syscoin investors that chance again, without recrimination or censorship. As I said on the ANN page here & on the Syscoin thread (which was deleted):

Quote
Investors have every right to ask questions & those who are involved in this project are obligated to answer them as best they can, weather they like the questions or not.

This thread simply gives investors that right again & hopefully answers will be found by the community, because Blockchain, Dan or Sebastian certainly won't answer us.

When posts are deleted from threads by heavy handed censorship for no reason, the poster gets a PM stating:

Quote
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one.

By creating this thread, I am following the BCT rules & suggested resolution.

I'm glad to hear you're not selling, at least somebody isn't. I'm not selling either, despite the treatment I've had on the Syscoin thread. I have always said that you are a good dev & that if you were not involved in this project then I wouldn't be either. However, I no longer have the faith in the "others" you work with or for, but will hold for now as I will make quite a loss by selling at these prices. It's all a risk eh? That's crypto.

I appreciate you posting here sidhujag, it means this thread is making at least some impact on the team & the message is getting across. Thank you  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
im the main developer and im not selling. In fact I dont have an exchange account because I know whats coming. Those that touched exchanges instantly dirty their coins and willl be taxed aswell as targetted likely in future.

Look at github. Im one of the more active developers in crypto I believe. Your making up crap. I helped you out with Polo btw you did not mention that. BCFN is not in a deficit of any kind. We have a dev tip fund proposal that will pay bcfn employees sys to align incentives but the founders are fully incentivized the build on sys you will see.

a huge upgrade is in the plans coming soon.. zdag will be fully functional, with paper coming. Tps test by external performance testing company  is happening with paper coming, most bmd issues fixed, tx delay issue fixed in new release.
full member
Activity: 670
Merit: 120
TIME TO BAN THE YOBIT SCAM!!
I saw a post showing that Blockchain Foundry were in deep financial trouble, about $2 milion or so - but that got deleted too & I can't remember who posted it

Yeah, that was me:


This also goes for "Blurryeyed", accounts that are solely used to troll teams will not be tolerated.


That's uncalled for.

Taking your anger & frustration at Blockchain Foundry's poor performance & dire financial status out on Syscoin investors is not wise - they are the ones who keep you in business:

https://webfiles.thecse.com/investorx/BCFN/1805301938226727.pdf?kY9yLTSm3Jn9nsI9HuLoE1nMoeU1.qlm

Page 7:

Quote
The Company has an accumulated deficit of $2,505,196 as at March 31, 2018, and $2,157,124 as at
September 30, 2017. The Company's ability to continue its operations and to realize its assets at their
carrying values is dependent upon obtaining additional financing and generating revenues sufficient to
cover its operating costs, all of which indicates the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

No wonder you're dumping, you need the cash.

Shares down another 5% today as well I see, continuing the trend:

http://thecse.com/en/listings/technology/blockchain-foundry-inc

I was gonna hodl what I extracted Poloniex, but I'm super glad I sold it instead. If you want to turn Blockchain Foundry around, you can start by getting down from your soapbox & losing the attitude.

Blockchain obviously don't want their publicly available financial records available to the public.....lol  Can't say I blame them - they're a freaking mess.....debt up to their eyeballs. I was gonna start a thread about this myself, but seeing as I got rid of my SYS as soon as I got it out of Polo I couldn't be bothered - glad someone done it though. Too much censorship going on.

Pretty obvious what's going on here, they're dumping their stash but need some more wonga, so they're entering into this partnership with peermountain to con some more dumbass investors - whatever they got left over will be put into their own BCFN token while they watch Syscoin fade away.

They don't care about SYS, they care about BCFN.
sr. member
Activity: 390
Merit: 250
So I was right with my prediction.
Under 2k sats.
With all the problems (no roadmap, only one active dev, stuck tx, no marketing) it is still way overvalued.
hero member
Activity: 1438
Merit: 574
Always ask questions. #StandWithHongKong
@Kenzcoin & @zauberer:

Syscoin shill accounts are not welcome:

I have created this topic as self-moderated simply to stop spammers & shills. All legitimate posts are welcome & will not be deleted.

This thread is for members who have had their posts deleted from the Syscoin thread, which you obviously haven't.

Please keep your shilling to your own Censored Syscoin thread. Any future posts from either of your accounts will be reported to moderators.

Thanks.
hero member
Activity: 1438
Merit: 574
Always ask questions. #StandWithHongKong
I think they did it just to cover up the failed ICO, and want to stop further project development, if it happens to me, as an investor, I'll ask for all the money I've given to be returned and leave the damn project like that, I hope all investors can handle the problem with this project and get things better than this

I presume you meant the failed/scam Peermountain bounty campaign?

It is strange how a supposedly high tech, leading edge global entity like KYC3/Peermountain (?) seems incapable of organizing a simple bounty campaign, isn't it?
Pages:
Jump to: