Topic: T-Rex 0.26.8 ETHW, ETC (+dual mining) GPU miner - page 72. (Read 174982 times)
I love these guys for the work they've done.
problem nvml?
Everything is running well, just try to find out how this intensity is influencing the gain and reports, that with a to high setting the gain was less on exactly the same system running parallel. Like to share it and hope for more shares so that we can set up things easy.
Did a test with my rig, 8 x 1070 under Linux Ubuntu LTE 18.04 Cuda 10.
Trex 0.8.2 first 4 cards intensity 21 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 113 Raven/24h on a miner
Trex 0.8.2 last 4 cards intensity 22 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 98 Raven/24h on a miner.
Great past 24h mining results I must say, blocks flying around
but getting a lower result on a higher intensity makes you think and get nuts. What to do with your settings on a X16r also?
GUI on rig was usable, for graph I do use the internal Intel of course. nvidia-smi shows some spare on the pl of 170W sometimes it jumps a little over it on both settings. GPU use most of the time 100% temps around 69 C and fans running 60%
What bothers me is the intensity, there is just so little usable info for it on a wild algorithm like the x16r and is difficult to prove as well. A day later it react smooth and then really aggressive again. But that?s probably also the reason it backs of the ASIC world of course.
For now I ?am happy and collecting, looking forward on shares of other experiences.
PS! switched now to t-rex 0.8.3 on Linux Ubuntu LTE 18.04 Cuda 10, till now it runs fine for 12 hours again.
Was it on the same rig on the same day or one day after the other.Trex 0.8.2 first 4 cards intensity 21 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 113 Raven/24h on a miner
Trex 0.8.2 last 4 cards intensity 22 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 98 Raven/24h on a miner.
Great past 24h mining results I must say, blocks flying around
but getting a lower result on a higher intensity makes you think and get nuts. What to do with your settings on a X16r also?GUI on rig was usable, for graph I do use the internal Intel of course. nvidia-smi shows some spare on the pl of 170W sometimes it jumps a little over it on both settings. GPU use most of the time 100% temps around 69 C and fans running 60%
What bothers me is the intensity, there is just so little usable info for it on a wild algorithm like the x16r and is difficult to prove as well. A day later it react smooth and then really aggressive again. But that?s probably also the reason it backs of the ASIC world of course.
For now I ?am happy and collecting, looking forward on shares of other experiences.
PS! switched now to t-rex 0.8.3 on Linux Ubuntu LTE 18.04 Cuda 10, till now it runs fine for 12 hours again.
With the difficulty changing everyday you can only compare on the same day with two rigs doing exactly the same hashrate on the same intensity. Then you can do a parallel test with different intensity.
Otherwise, you are comparing oranges to apples
Same miner with 8 cards split in 2 times 4 running parallel on same pool.
I know it's hard to get reliable results only the difficulty switching differs over the past 24h, that's my hole point of sharing it here to get useful info how to setup things well.
Did a test with my rig, 8 x 1070 under Linux Ubuntu LTE 18.04 Cuda 10.
Trex 0.8.2 first 4 cards intensity 21 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 113 Raven/24h on a miner
Trex 0.8.2 last 4 cards intensity 22 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 98 Raven/24h on a miner.
Great past 24h mining results I must say, blocks flying around but getting a lower result on a higher intensity makes you think and get nuts. What to do with your settings on a X16r also?
GUI on rig was usable, for graph I do use the internal Intel of course. nvidia-smi shows some spare on the pl of 170W sometimes it jumps a little over it on both settings. GPU use most of the time 100% temps around 69 C and fans running 60%
What bothers me is the intensity, there is just so little usable info for it on a wild algorithm like the x16r and is difficult to prove as well. A day later it react smooth and then really aggressive again. But that?s probably also the reason it backs of the ASIC world of course.
For now I ?am happy and collecting, looking forward on shares of other experiences.
PS! switched now to t-rex 0.8.3 on Linux Ubuntu LTE 18.04 Cuda 10, till now it runs fine for 12 hours again.
Was it on the same rig on the same day or one day after the other.Trex 0.8.2 first 4 cards intensity 21 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 113 Raven/24h on a miner
Trex 0.8.2 last 4 cards intensity 22 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 98 Raven/24h on a miner.
Great past 24h mining results I must say, blocks flying around
but getting a lower result on a higher intensity makes you think and get nuts. What to do with your settings on a X16r also?GUI on rig was usable, for graph I do use the internal Intel of course. nvidia-smi shows some spare on the pl of 170W sometimes it jumps a little over it on both settings. GPU use most of the time 100% temps around 69 C and fans running 60%
What bothers me is the intensity, there is just so little usable info for it on a wild algorithm like the x16r and is difficult to prove as well. A day later it react smooth and then really aggressive again. But that?s probably also the reason it backs of the ASIC world of course.
For now I ?am happy and collecting, looking forward on shares of other experiences.
PS! switched now to t-rex 0.8.3 on Linux Ubuntu LTE 18.04 Cuda 10, till now it runs fine for 12 hours again.
With the difficulty changing everyday you can only compare on the same day with two rigs doing exactly the same hashrate on the same intensity. Then you can do a parallel test with different intensity.
Otherwise, you are comparing oranges to apples
Did a test with my rig, 8 x 1070 under Linux Ubuntu LTE 18.04 Cuda 10.
Trex 0.8.2 first 4 cards intensity 21 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 113 Raven/24h on a same miner
Trex 0.8.2 last 4 cards intensity 22 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 98 Raven/24h on a same miner.
Great past 24h mining results I must say, blocks flying around but getting a lower result on a higher intensity makes you think and get nuts. What to do with your settings on a X16r also?
GUI on rig was usable, for graph I do use the internal Intel of course. nvidia-smi shows some spare on the pl of 170W sometimes it jumps a little over it on both settings. GPU use most of the time 100% temps around 69 C and fans running 60%
What bothers me is the intensity, there is just so little usable info for it on a wild algorithm like the x16r and is difficult to prove as well. A day later it react smooth and then really aggressive again. But that's probably also the reason it backs of the ASIC world of course.
For now I ?am happy and collecting, looking forward on shares of other experiences.
PS! switched now to t-rex 0.8.3 on Linux Ubuntu LTE 18.04 Cuda 10, till now it runs fine for 12 hours again.
Trex 0.8.2 first 4 cards intensity 21 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 113 Raven/24h on a same miner
Trex 0.8.2 last 4 cards intensity 22 / gpu +50 / men -400 / 170W -pl Brought me to 98 Raven/24h on a same miner.
Great past 24h mining results I must say, blocks flying around
but getting a lower result on a higher intensity makes you think and get nuts. What to do with your settings on a X16r also?GUI on rig was usable, for graph I do use the internal Intel of course. nvidia-smi shows some spare on the pl of 170W sometimes it jumps a little over it on both settings. GPU use most of the time 100% temps around 69 C and fans running 60%
What bothers me is the intensity, there is just so little usable info for it on a wild algorithm like the x16r and is difficult to prove as well. A day later it react smooth and then really aggressive again. But that's probably also the reason it backs of the ASIC world of course.
For now I ?am happy and collecting, looking forward on shares of other experiences.
PS! switched now to t-rex 0.8.3 on Linux Ubuntu LTE 18.04 Cuda 10, till now it runs fine for 12 hours again.
t-rex-0.8.3-linux-cuda10.0.tar.gz its not working for me, when i start empty response and end the script
Hi, could you provide more details please? OS/driver info/logs/screenshots are welcome
t-rex-0.8.3-linux-cuda10.0.tar.gz its not working for me, when i start empty response and end the script
T-Rex 0.8.3 (Windows/Linux) added to https://www.minermonitoring.com/
Join our discord https://discord.gg/aGGaeqq
also, you can check the speed of the miner on different rigs using the benchmark page: https://minermonitoring.com/benchmark
Join our discord https://discord.gg/aGGaeqq
also, you can check the speed of the miner on different rigs using the benchmark page: https://minermonitoring.com/benchmark
T-Rex 0.8.2 (Windows/Linux) added to https://www.minermonitoring.com/
Join our discord https://discord.gg/aGGaeqq
also, you can check the speed of the miner on different rigs using the benchmark page: https://minermonitoring.com/benchmark
Join our discord https://discord.gg/aGGaeqq
also, you can check the speed of the miner on different rigs using the benchmark page: https://minermonitoring.com/benchmark
Quote
0.8.2 ?? where?
and guys i want to run some gpus intensity 22 and another gpus intensity 24 in same rig..is it possible or not?example i have 10 gpus my rig..5 gtx 1060 and 5 gtx 1050ti..iwant to run intensity 24 for my 1060s ..and 22 for 1050ti
and guys i want to run some gpus intensity 22 and another gpus intensity 24 in same rig..is it possible or not?example i have 10 gpus my rig..5 gtx 1060 and 5 gtx 1050ti..iwant to run intensity 24 for my 1060s ..and 22 for 1050ti
0.8.2 available on first page -> Github
use -i 22,22,22,22,22,24,24,24,24,24 in your GPU order
ty so much bro..
Quote
0.8.2 ?? where?
and guys i want to run some gpus intensity 22 and another gpus intensity 24 in same rig..is it possible or not?example i have 10 gpus my rig..5 gtx 1060 and 5 gtx 1050ti..iwant to run intensity 24 for my 1060s ..and 22 for 1050ti
and guys i want to run some gpus intensity 22 and another gpus intensity 24 in same rig..is it possible or not?example i have 10 gpus my rig..5 gtx 1060 and 5 gtx 1050ti..iwant to run intensity 24 for my 1060s ..and 22 for 1050ti
0.8.2 available on first page -> Github
use -i 22,22,22,22,22,24,24,24,24,24 in your GPU order
X22i - Suqa Coin
T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.2 - [CUDA v10.0]
NVIDIA Driver v417.01
T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.2 - [CUDA v10.0]
NVIDIA Driver v417.01
Code:
20181127 19:23:58 Uptime: 14 mins 53 secs
20181127 19:23:58 [ OK ] 301/301 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:06 [ OK ] 302/302 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:25 [ OK ] 303/303 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:25 [ OK ] 304/304 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:26 x22i block 42918, diff 12697.381
20181127 19:24:29 [ OK ] 305/305 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:29 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:110W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:24:29 Shares/min: 19.7952
20181127 19:24:29 Uptime: 15 mins 24 secs
20181127 19:24:32 [ OK ] 306/306 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:34 x22i block 42919, diff 12678.078
20181127 19:24:38 x22i block 42920, diff 13473.737
20181127 19:24:48 [ OK ] 307/307 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:00 [ OK ] 308/308 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:05 [ OK ] 309/309 - 10.07 MH/s, 94ms
20181127 19:25:16 [ OK ] 310/310 - 10.07 MH/s, 95ms
20181127 19:25:16 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:115W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:25:16 Shares/min: 19.1528
20181127 19:25:16 Uptime: 16 mins 11 secs
20181127 19:25:17 [ OK ] 311/311 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:20 [ OK ] 312/312 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:27 [ OK ] 313/313 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:29 [ OK ] 314/314 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:32 [ OK ] 315/315 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:32 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:116W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:25:32 Shares/min: 19.1413
20181127 19:25:32 Uptime: 16 mins 27 secs
20181127 19:25:38 [ OK ] 316/316 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:39 x22i block 42921, diff 17344.239
20181127 19:23:58 [ OK ] 301/301 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:06 [ OK ] 302/302 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:25 [ OK ] 303/303 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:25 [ OK ] 304/304 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:26 x22i block 42918, diff 12697.381
20181127 19:24:29 [ OK ] 305/305 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:29 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:110W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:24:29 Shares/min: 19.7952
20181127 19:24:29 Uptime: 15 mins 24 secs
20181127 19:24:32 [ OK ] 306/306 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:34 x22i block 42919, diff 12678.078
20181127 19:24:38 x22i block 42920, diff 13473.737
20181127 19:24:48 [ OK ] 307/307 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:00 [ OK ] 308/308 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:05 [ OK ] 309/309 - 10.07 MH/s, 94ms
20181127 19:25:16 [ OK ] 310/310 - 10.07 MH/s, 95ms
20181127 19:25:16 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:115W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:25:16 Shares/min: 19.1528
20181127 19:25:16 Uptime: 16 mins 11 secs
20181127 19:25:17 [ OK ] 311/311 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:20 [ OK ] 312/312 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:27 [ OK ] 313/313 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:29 [ OK ] 314/314 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:32 [ OK ] 315/315 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:32 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:116W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:25:32 Shares/min: 19.1413
20181127 19:25:32 Uptime: 16 mins 27 secs
20181127 19:25:38 [ OK ] 316/316 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:39 x22i block 42921, diff 17344.239
0.8.2 ?? where?
and guys i want to run some gpus intensity 22 and another gpus intensity 24 in same rig..is it possible or not?example i have 10 gpus my rig..5 gtx 1060 and 5 gtx 1050ti..iwant to run intensity 24 for my 1060s ..and 22 for 1050ti
X22i - Suqa Coin
T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.2 - [CUDA v10.0]
NVIDIA Driver v417.01
T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.2 - [CUDA v10.0]
NVIDIA Driver v417.01
Code:
20181127 19:23:58 Uptime: 14 mins 53 secs
20181127 19:23:58 [ OK ] 301/301 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:06 [ OK ] 302/302 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:25 [ OK ] 303/303 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:25 [ OK ] 304/304 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:26 x22i block 42918, diff 12697.381
20181127 19:24:29 [ OK ] 305/305 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:29 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:110W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:24:29 Shares/min: 19.7952
20181127 19:24:29 Uptime: 15 mins 24 secs
20181127 19:24:32 [ OK ] 306/306 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:34 x22i block 42919, diff 12678.078
20181127 19:24:38 x22i block 42920, diff 13473.737
20181127 19:24:48 [ OK ] 307/307 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:00 [ OK ] 308/308 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:05 [ OK ] 309/309 - 10.07 MH/s, 94ms
20181127 19:25:16 [ OK ] 310/310 - 10.07 MH/s, 95ms
20181127 19:25:16 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:115W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:25:16 Shares/min: 19.1528
20181127 19:25:16 Uptime: 16 mins 11 secs
20181127 19:25:17 [ OK ] 311/311 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:20 [ OK ] 312/312 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:27 [ OK ] 313/313 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:29 [ OK ] 314/314 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:32 [ OK ] 315/315 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:32 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:116W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:25:32 Shares/min: 19.1413
20181127 19:25:32 Uptime: 16 mins 27 secs
20181127 19:25:38 [ OK ] 316/316 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:39 x22i block 42921, diff 17344.239
20181127 19:23:58 [ OK ] 301/301 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:06 [ OK ] 302/302 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:25 [ OK ] 303/303 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:25 [ OK ] 304/304 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:26 x22i block 42918, diff 12697.381
20181127 19:24:29 [ OK ] 305/305 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:24:29 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:110W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:24:29 Shares/min: 19.7952
20181127 19:24:29 Uptime: 15 mins 24 secs
20181127 19:24:32 [ OK ] 306/306 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:24:34 x22i block 42919, diff 12678.078
20181127 19:24:38 x22i block 42920, diff 13473.737
20181127 19:24:48 [ OK ] 307/307 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:00 [ OK ] 308/308 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:05 [ OK ] 309/309 - 10.07 MH/s, 94ms
20181127 19:25:16 [ OK ] 310/310 - 10.07 MH/s, 95ms
20181127 19:25:16 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:115W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:25:16 Shares/min: 19.1528
20181127 19:25:16 Uptime: 16 mins 11 secs
20181127 19:25:17 [ OK ] 311/311 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:20 [ OK ] 312/312 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:27 [ OK ] 313/313 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:29 [ OK ] 314/314 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:32 [ OK ] 315/315 - 10.07 MH/s, 92ms
20181127 19:25:32 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.07 MH/s, [T:53C, P:116W, F:50%, E:88kH/W]
20181127 19:25:32 Shares/min: 19.1413
20181127 19:25:32 Uptime: 16 mins 27 secs
20181127 19:25:38 [ OK ] 316/316 - 10.07 MH/s, 93ms
20181127 19:25:39 x22i block 42921, diff 17344.239
hello, I have a problem with your t-rex 0.8.1. last drivers 411
0181127 04:55:54 T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.1 - [CUDA v10.0]
20181127 04:55:54
20181127 04:55:54 ERROR: Can't start miner, dlopen(126): failed to load C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvml.dll
0181127 04:55:54 T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.1 - [CUDA v10.0]
20181127 04:55:54
20181127 04:55:54 ERROR: Can't start miner, dlopen(126): failed to load C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvml.dll
download nvml.dll replace in C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvml.dll or u reinstall driver.
hello, I have a problem with your t-rex 0.8.1. last drivers 411
0181127 04:55:54 T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.1 - [CUDA v10.0]
20181127 04:55:54
20181127 04:55:54 ERROR: Can't start miner, dlopen(126): failed to load C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvml.dll
Which driver version do you have?0181127 04:55:54 T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.1 - [CUDA v10.0]
20181127 04:55:54
20181127 04:55:54 ERROR: Can't start miner, dlopen(126): failed to load C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvml.dll
Is there a command for disabling one card ?
you can use -d option, for example -d 0,2,3 for rig with 4 gpu will disable second cardI have 417.01 drivers for 1070
hello, I have a problem with your t-rex 0.8.1. last drivers 411
0181127 04:55:54 T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.1 - [CUDA v10.0]
20181127 04:55:54
20181127 04:55:54 ERROR: Can't start miner, dlopen(126): failed to load C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvml.dll
Which driver version do you have?0181127 04:55:54 T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.1 - [CUDA v10.0]
20181127 04:55:54
20181127 04:55:54 ERROR: Can't start miner, dlopen(126): failed to load C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvml.dll
Is there a command for disabling one card ?
you can use -d option, for example -d 0,2,3 for rig with 4 gpu will disable second card
hello, I have a problem with your t-rex 0.8.1. last drivers 411
0181127 04:55:54 T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.1 - [CUDA v10.0]
20181127 04:55:54
20181127 04:55:54 ERROR: Can't start miner, dlopen(126): failed to load C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvml.dll
0181127 04:55:54 T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.1 - [CUDA v10.0]
20181127 04:55:54
20181127 04:55:54 ERROR: Can't start miner, dlopen(126): failed to load C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvml.dll
RTX 2080 Test SUQA T Rex 0.8.1
https://youtu.be/aAwhhYx9nUQ
https://youtu.be/aAwhhYx9nUQ
Is there a command for disabling one card ?
X22i - Suqa Coin
T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.1 - [CUDA v10.0]
NVIDIA Driver v416.94
damn that's a big improvement from 7.9mh/s to 10mh/s
T-Rex NVIDIA GPU miner v0.8.1 - [CUDA v10.0]
NVIDIA Driver v416.94
damn that's a big improvement from 7.9mh/s to 10mh/s
Quote
20181126 06:42:05 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.20 MH/s, [T:52C, P:117W, F:50%, E:89kH/W]
20181126 06:42:05 Shares/min: 13.1096
20181126 06:42:05 Uptime: 13 mins 20 secs
20181126 06:42:10 [ OK ] 176/176 - 10.20 MH/s, 101ms
20181126 06:42:12 [ OK ] 177/177 - 10.20 MH/s, 101ms
20181126 06:42:17 [ OK ] 178/178 - 10.20 MH/s, 101ms
20181126 06:42:25 [ OK ] 179/179 - 10.20 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:42:29 [ OK ] 180/180 - 10.20 MH/s, 101ms
20181126 06:42:29 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.20 MH/s, [T:53C, P:115W, F:50%, E:89kH/W]
20181126 06:42:29 Shares/min: 13.0949
20181126 06:42:29 Uptime: 13 mins 44 secs
20181126 06:42:33 [ OK ] 181/181 - 10.20 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:42:45 [ OK ] 182/182 - 10.15 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:43:09 [ OK ] 183/183 - 10.06 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:43:11 [ OK ] 184/184 - 10.05 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:43:15 [ OK ] 185/185 - 10.05 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:43:15 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.05 MH/s, [T:53C, P:115W, F:50%, E:87kH/W]
20181126 06:43:15 Shares/min: 12.7471
20181126 06:43:15 Uptime: 14 mins 30 secs
20181126 06:43:16 [ OK ] 186/186 - 10.02 MH/s, 103ms
20181126 06:43:17 [ OK ] 187/187 - 10.02 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:43:20 [ OK ] 188/188 - 10.02 MH/s, 101ms
20181126 06:42:05 Shares/min: 13.1096
20181126 06:42:05 Uptime: 13 mins 20 secs
20181126 06:42:10 [ OK ] 176/176 - 10.20 MH/s, 101ms
20181126 06:42:12 [ OK ] 177/177 - 10.20 MH/s, 101ms
20181126 06:42:17 [ OK ] 178/178 - 10.20 MH/s, 101ms
20181126 06:42:25 [ OK ] 179/179 - 10.20 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:42:29 [ OK ] 180/180 - 10.20 MH/s, 101ms
20181126 06:42:29 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.20 MH/s, [T:53C, P:115W, F:50%, E:89kH/W]
20181126 06:42:29 Shares/min: 13.0949
20181126 06:42:29 Uptime: 13 mins 44 secs
20181126 06:42:33 [ OK ] 181/181 - 10.20 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:42:45 [ OK ] 182/182 - 10.15 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:43:09 [ OK ] 183/183 - 10.06 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:43:11 [ OK ] 184/184 - 10.05 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:43:15 [ OK ] 185/185 - 10.05 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:43:15 GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1070 Ti - 10.05 MH/s, [T:53C, P:115W, F:50%, E:87kH/W]
20181126 06:43:15 Shares/min: 12.7471
20181126 06:43:15 Uptime: 14 mins 30 secs
20181126 06:43:16 [ OK ] 186/186 - 10.02 MH/s, 103ms
20181126 06:43:17 [ OK ] 187/187 - 10.02 MH/s, 102ms
20181126 06:43:20 [ OK ] 188/188 - 10.02 MH/s, 101ms
Jump to: