Topic: T-Rex 0.26.8 ETHW, ETC (+dual mining) GPU miner - page 88. (Read 175032 times)

And free SP miner faster than t-rex - good news.

Testing 0.5.7 on my 1050ti rig. Works perfectly for now with higher hashrate than anything else

Suggestion / feature request

Please add --benchmark -a[algo] parameter.

E.g. for X16r it would benchmark each of the 16 sub-algorithms n times and then report the average hash rate.

In theory this will produce the most accurate hash rate average because over time each sub-algorithm would be run equally often.

Any thoughts?

Version 5.7 constantly works with reject. Up to 5%!
Fix it please

This miner is ~3% faster than Enemy for x16r from what I can see.

To switch use special soft, for example, King-hash miner 2. T-rex and others are included there already.

I think this is good hash power.

but this doesn't work switching algos.

ex) -p x16r,x16s etc...

OK for now I am amazed. Trex gives me 50% more than ccminer. 
I am using 1060 6GB
CCminer ~1050kh
Trex ~1550Kh

I was skeptic but until you try you will not know. 

Can we have colors for failed shares (RED) and success shares (Green) ?

6 x 1060 6G
"phi2": {
            "CryptoDredge_0.8.3": {
                "difficulty": 12,
                "intensity": "6.0",
                "shares": "64",
                "hashrate": 26358852
            },
            "T-Rex_0.5.7": {
                "difficulty": 2,
                "intensity": 21,
                "hashrate": 15399295,
                "shares": 3
            },
            "Dumax_0.9.4": {
                "difficulty": 8,
                "intensity": "18.0",
                "shares": "49",
                "hashrate": 13263134
            },
            "Enemy_1.15": {
                "difficulty": 12,
                "intensity": "20.0",
                "hashrate": 14156240,
                "shares": "41"
            }
        },

that's not true for me. what's your hashrate?
P104-100s got 3.8 Mh\s with z-enemy and 5 Mh\s with CryptoDredge.
1060s got 2.45 Mh\s with z-enemy and 4.5 Mh\s with CryptoDredge.
there's really no comparison here.

z-enemy much faster for phi2 than both cryptodredge/t-rex

Try Forager - Multi-algo switching miner for AMD/NVIDIA/CPU

Continuously developed, with largest selection and latest versions of miners and algos.
Highly configurable, Integrated Afterburner support for power usage and profit calculation

T-Rex support included

It is good that you reported that and thank you much. This will  surely help others as well.

electricity is very cheap in my area so I don't care and run the cards with 100 PL @ 900 mV locked. my P104-100s do 3800 kH/s with CryptoDredge, t-rex is far behind.

Not always. I got 0H/s when 50PL on 1070 (at least)

CryptoDredge 0.8.3 destroys T-Rex in both lyra2z and phi2

For the guys having API integration issues, what normal ccminer api calls is Awesome miner for example making or things that don't work with t-rex?  i'm debating writing up something that would return the same json output ccminer would give you, well of the available data in the current t-rex api.  finally had a minute to write something quick for my own bench program to get the stats i cared about and thought i may be able to port that to something you guys need/want.


Did a quick bench on x17 and lyra2z yesterday and here were my results for 5 minutes each miner.  Rig is running 6 1060 6G
the apps listed were new miners i was testing vs the one that had previously been the top for my particular rig


"x17": {
            "Enemy_1.11": {  previous best
                "difficulty": 0.3,
                "intensity": "20.0",
                "shares": "32",
                "hashrate": 37756105
            },
            "Enemy_1.14": {
                "difficulty": 0.224,
                "intensity": "20.0",
                "shares": "28",
                "hashrate": 40655691
            },
            "Enemy_1.15a": {
                "difficulty": 0.15,
                "intensity": "20.0",
                "hashrate": 31997678,
                "shares": "25"
            },
            "Dumax_0.9.2": {
                "difficulty": 0.15,
                "intensity": "19.0",
                "hashrate": 37887880,
                "shares": "22"
            },
            "Dumax_0.9.3": {
                "difficulty": 0.15,
                "intensity": "19.0",
                "shares": "24",
                "hashrate": 30658698
            },
            "T-Rex_0.5.7": {
                "difficulty": 0.336,
                "intensity": 21,
                "shares": 32,
                "hashrate": 52051373
            },
        },

"lyra2z": {
            "T-Rex_0.5.7": {
                "difficulty": 8,
                "intensity": 21,
                "shares": 17,
                "hashrate": 9274300
            },
            "CryptoDredge_0.6.0": {  previous best
                "difficulty": 8,
                "intensity": "6.0",
                "shares": "16",
                "hashrate": 8050420
            },
            "CryptoDredge_0.7.0": {
                "difficulty": 12,
                "intensity": "6.0",
                "hashrate": 7987070,
                "shares": "9"
            },
         },


testing c11 and then phi2 right now

nope works well in me, and a lot improve hash from 0.5.1

but.. dev fee isnt good. i see my miner keep on and off in pool

my suggest is better use alexis if you want to mine x17

Good news for T-Rex fans!

As T-Rex is gaining in popularity, we have decided to implement it to both minerstat's Linux mining OS and Windows Node.

Happy mining.