Author

Topic: T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion - page 1404. (Read 249236 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 453
Is this team Australia? seriously! Only 11 runs collected order lost 3 wickets. I'm still having trouble believing. Bangladesh formed a spin-dependent team. So far they seem to have succeeded. Let's see what will happen next.

LoL.. Bangladesh putting home advantage to good use. Their strategy of using the spinners early on seems to have rattled the Australians. You don't see very often in T20 cricket that the initial 5 overs were exclusively bowled by the spinners (Mahedi Hasan, Nasum Ahmed and Shakib Al Hasan). It was a high-risk move taken by the Bangladesh captain (Mahmudullah), and they got rewarded for it. The run chase was supposed to be a cakewalk for the Australians. But now the match looks evenly poised.
sr. member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 323
Bangladesh team has got the result of keeping extra inexperienced players in the squad. No player's strike rate was sufficient. However, the Bangladesh team has never performed very well in the T20 format. Soumya made 2 runs from 9 balls. Shamim Hossain and Nurul Hasan are two young players, the coach relied on them but they both failed today. I thought Bangladesh would collect more than 150 runs. But, end of 20 overs, they collect only 131.

Is this team Australia? seriously! Only 11 runs collected order lost 3 wickets. I'm still having trouble believing. Bangladesh formed a spin-dependent team. So far they seem to have succeeded. Let's see what will happen next.
First 3 over, and 3 wickets gone. Aus: 11/3, that definitely crazy! What a fantastic start for Bangladesh, spinners are doing their part. Bangladesh must tie them up, taking regular wickets, putting the Australians under pressure. This is T20, so anything can happen at any time. Still long way to go..
hero member
Activity: 1792
Merit: 534
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Bangladesh team has got the result of keeping extra inexperienced players in the squad. No player's strike rate was sufficient. However, the Bangladesh team has never performed very well in the T20 format. Soumya made 2 runs from 9 balls. Shamim Hossain and Nurul Hasan are two young players, the coach relied on them but they both failed today. I thought Bangladesh would collect more than 150 runs. But, end of 20 overs, they collect only 131.

Is this team Australia? seriously! Only 11 runs collected order lost 3 wickets. I'm still having trouble believing. Bangladesh formed a spin-dependent team. So far they seem to have succeeded. Let's see what will happen next.
legendary
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1136
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Bangladesh team has got the result of keeping extra inexperienced players in the squad. No player's strike rate was sufficient. However, the Bangladesh team has never performed very well in the T20 format. Soumya made 2 runs from 9 balls. Shamim Hossain and Nurul Hasan are two young players, the coach relied on them but they both failed today. I thought Bangladesh would collect more than 150 runs. But, end of 20 overs, they collect only 131.
sr. member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 453
Watching a match that is very boring. I don't see any boundary or over-boundary. Such a low boundary cannot be expected in a T20 match. Apart from Shakib and Naim, other players could not score properly At the end of 16 overs, Bangladesh scored 96 runs. They scored 96 runs from 96 balls. Run rate is 6.

What you were expecting actually? It was meant to be a lop-sided match and we got exactly that. But it was surprising to see Mitchell Starc conceding so many runs, after his stellar form in West Indies during the ODI series (he had picked 11 wickets in just three matches). But there was no breathing space for Bangladesh, as Josh Hazlewood destroyed the top and middle order. The spinners also bowled well, especially Adam Zampa (picked up the crucial wicket of Mohammad Naim. And as expected, Shakib Al Hasan top scored for the Bangladeshis.
hero member
Activity: 1792
Merit: 534
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Australia is not in great form at this moment, but the same can be said about Bangladesh as well. The advantage for Australia is that they are a well balanced side, while Bangladesh is overdependent on a few players. But I am not discounting the possibility of any upset. First of all, the format is T20, and on top of that Bangladesh has the home advantage. It is a five-match series and therefore it may be difficult for them to attain a series win. But I am sure that they can upset the Australians in at least 1-2 matches.

Australia won the toss and elected to bowl. Bangladesh lost 2 wickets and scored 53 runs. Many players of Bangladesh team seem new. Soumya Sarkar and Mohammad Naim went down in the opening. Although Soumya is a somewhat experienced player, Naim is a new player. Naim was dismissed for 30 off 29 balls. Now Mahmudullah and Sakib are at the crease.

Watching a match that is very boring. I don't see any boundary or over-boundary. Such a low boundary cannot be expected in a T20 match. Apart from Shakib and Naim, other players could not score properly At the end of 16 overs, Bangladesh scored 96 runs. They scored 96 runs from 96 balls. Run rate is 6.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
Australia is not in great form at this moment, but the same can be said about Bangladesh as well. The advantage for Australia is that they are a well balanced side, while Bangladesh is overdependent on a few players. But I am not discounting the possibility of any upset. First of all, the format is T20, and on top of that Bangladesh has the home advantage. It is a five-match series and therefore it may be difficult for them to attain a series win. But I am sure that they can upset the Australians in at least 1-2 matches.

Australia won the toss and elected to bowl. I have just seen, Bangladesh lost 2 wickets and they scored 53 runs. Many players of the Bangladesh team seem new to me, did you notice that? Soumya Sarkar and Mohammad Naim went down in the opening, lol...  Cheesy
Although Soumya is a somewhat experienced player but I think Naim is a new player. Naim was dismissed for 30 runs off 29 balls. Now Mahmudullah and Sakib are at the crease.
I think the Australian team is well-balanced now than Bangladesh as you mentioned above, Don't see enough good players in the Bangladesh team.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1219
Australia is not in great form at this moment, but the same can be said about Bangladesh as well. The advantage for Australia is that they are a well balanced side, while Bangladesh is overdependent on a few players. But I am not discounting the possibility of any upset. First of all, the format is T20, and on top of that Bangladesh has the home advantage. It is a five-match series and therefore it may be difficult for them to attain a series win. But I am sure that they can upset the Australians in at least 1-2 matches.
member
Activity: 200
Merit: 11
The first T20 match between Bangladesh and Australia will be held today. Experienced Tamim Iqbal and Mushfiqur Rahim are not in the squad. This series seems one-sided to me. But in their own field, Bangladesh can become terrible at any time. We have seen many such examples in the past. Australian TV channels also think the series is one-sided. So no TV in Australia will broadcast this series.

The series will be really one-sided. I do not see the possibility of the Bangladesh team winning. The Bangladesh team has not yet found an opener batsman. I heard Sakib Al Hasan will do the opening. He did not open in any format. He is inexperienced in this position. Moreover, the team is dominated by young players. There is no point in experimenting with young players against a strong team like Australia.
Australia are good and surely they are the favorites to win the match and the series but dont understimate bangladesh like that. No this series wont be a one sided affairs and i believe bangladesh will atleast win one match . M.rahim sakib these two are really worlds class players and i am hoping for a good performance from them in the series.
sr. member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 301
20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook
The first T20 match between Bangladesh and Australia will be held today. Experienced Tamim Iqbal and Mushfiqur Rahim are not in the squad. This series seems one-sided to me. But in their own field, Bangladesh can become terrible at any time. We have seen many such examples in the past. Australian TV channels also think the series is one-sided. So no TV in Australia will broadcast this series.

Australian TV channels say the series is unprofitable for them so they are not interested in brodcasting the series. The Australian people is not interested in this series. They think Australia will dominate the series. If Bangladesh loses all the matches of this series, then in future also the Australian channel will not broadcast any series between Bangladesh and Australia. The Australian board may also lose interest in hosting the series against Bangladesh.
full member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 129
The first decentralized crypto betting platform
The first T20 match between Bangladesh and Australia will be held today. Experienced Tamim Iqbal and Mushfiqur Rahim are not in the squad. This series seems one-sided to me. But in their own field, Bangladesh can become terrible at any time. We have seen many such examples in the past. Australian TV channels also think the series is one-sided. So no TV in Australia will broadcast this series.

The series will be really one-sided. I do not see the possibility of the Bangladesh team winning. The Bangladesh team has not yet found an opener batsman. I heard Sakib Al Hasan will do the opening. He did not open in any format. He is inexperienced in this position. Moreover, the team is dominated by young players. There is no point in experimenting with young players against a strong team like Australia.
legendary
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1136
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The first T20 match between Bangladesh and Australia will be held today. Experienced Tamim Iqbal and Mushfiqur Rahim are not in the squad. This series seems one-sided to me. But in their own field, Bangladesh can become terrible at any time. We have seen many such examples in the past. Australian TV channels also think the series is one-sided. So no TV in Australia will broadcast this series.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I am not able to understand this politics what is Pakistan controlled Kashmir, India holds the other half  Cheesy, PCB is conducting the Kashmir premier league and BCCI does not want to participate in the series, the players from India are not participating in any tournaments conducted by Pakistan and none of the players are playing in PSL and i have not heard anyone criticizing that move and why now. I am not a fan of mixing politics in cricket but the ICC is also not saying anything about it.

BCCI has already termed it as a deliberate provocation. The team from Pakistan-controlled part of Kashmir takes part in the domestic competitions in Pakistan (and the same is the case with Indian controlled part of Kashmir, which takes part in Indian domestic competitions). But the issue here is that for the first time Pakistan has sanctioned a franchise T20 league, which will see the involvement of foreign players. So far, foreign players have stayed out of cricket in this region, and now PCB is trying to change the status quo.
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 535
LOL.. the BCCI and the PCB seems to be in a war of words over the proposed Kashmir Premier League. The BCCI has made it clear that any player (current ones, or retired) taking part in this league would be banned from all the events organized by the board. Herschell Gibbs has already criticized the move from the BCCI, saying that it is pure bullying. The tournament is supposed to start from this week (6th August), and will involve 6 teams from the Pakistan controlled part of Kashmir - Muzaffarabad, Rawalakot, Bagh, Mirpur and Kotli.
I am not able to understand this politics what is Pakistan controlled Kashmir, India holds the other half  Cheesy, PCB is conducting the Kashmir premier league and BCCI does not want to participate in the series, the players from India are not participating in any tournaments conducted by Pakistan and none of the players are playing in PSL and i have not heard anyone criticizing that move and why now. I am not a fan of mixing politics in cricket but the ICC is also not saying anything about it.

hero member
Activity: 1792
Merit: 534
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I am in favor of distancing sports from politics.
Basically sports must lead to good relationships but having military actions and sports events at a time is definitely not making sense.
Ideally sports should be kept away from politics. But that is not possible nowadays, because the prime minister of Pakistan himself is the former Pakistan cricket team captain. Some of the other players, such as Shahid Afridi have also got themselves associated in politics. In the Indian side also, a number of ex-players have joined politics. The most famous of them may be Gautam Gambhir, who was recently elected as the member of Parliament from Delhi. I am afraid that this is not going to end well for Pakistan, given the dominance of the BCCI in the world of cricket.
Players should keep cricket away from politics. Cricket could have been kept out of politics if the boards had wanted it. Neither the PCB nor the BCCI wants to keep cricket out of politics. Moreover, the conflict between India and Pakistan is not being resolved. As long as the PCB and BCCI do not try to resolve their differences, cricket and politics in India and Pakistan will continue to coalesce.
Regarding the status of Kashmir, both countries have complicated historical backgrounds. The possibility of cricket matches being played without word wars is extremely unlikely in such areas. Kashmir is a high voltage political issue in the subcontinent, so we cannot minimize the political agenda behind it. As cricket lovers, we demand a familiar atmosphere, but things aren't as straightforward as we think.

You are right, both countries are very excited about the Kashmir issue. No one will make any concessions to anyone. So both the country and the cricket board should try to control the situation by avoiding conflict. Sports should not be used as a political tool.
sr. member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 323
I am in favor of distancing sports from politics.
Basically sports must lead to good relationships but having military actions and sports events at a time is definitely not making sense.

Ideally sports should be kept away from politics. But that is not possible nowadays, because the prime minister of Pakistan himself is the former Pakistan cricket team captain. Some of the other players, such as Shahid Afridi have also got themselves associated in politics. In the Indian side also, a number of ex-players have joined politics. The most famous of them may be Gautam Gambhir, who was recently elected as the member of Parliament from Delhi. I am afraid that this is not going to end well for Pakistan, given the dominance of the BCCI in the world of cricket.

Players should keep cricket away from politics. Cricket could have been kept out of politics if the boards had wanted it. Neither the PCB nor the BCCI wants to keep cricket out of politics. Moreover, the conflict between India and Pakistan is not being resolved. As long as the PCB and BCCI do not try to resolve their differences, cricket and politics in India and Pakistan will continue to coalesce.
Regarding the status of Kashmir, both countries have complicated historical backgrounds. The possibility of cricket matches being played without word wars is extremely unlikely in such areas. Kashmir is a high voltage political issue in the subcontinent, so we cannot minimize the political agenda behind it. As cricket lovers, we demand a familiar atmosphere, but things aren't as straightforward as we think.
hero member
Activity: 1792
Merit: 534
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I am in favor of distancing sports from politics.
Basically sports must lead to good relationships but having military actions and sports events at a time is definitely not making sense.

Ideally sports should be kept away from politics. But that is not possible nowadays, because the prime minister of Pakistan himself is the former Pakistan cricket team captain. Some of the other players, such as Shahid Afridi have also got themselves associated in politics. In the Indian side also, a number of ex-players have joined politics. The most famous of them may be Gautam Gambhir, who was recently elected as the member of Parliament from Delhi. I am afraid that this is not going to end well for Pakistan, given the dominance of the BCCI in the world of cricket.

Players should keep cricket away from politics. Cricket could have been kept out of politics if the boards had wanted it. Neither the PCB nor the BCCI wants to keep cricket out of politics. Moreover, the conflict between India and Pakistan is not being resolved. As long as the PCB and BCCI do not try to resolve their differences, cricket and politics in India and Pakistan will continue to coalesce.
sr. member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 301
20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook
I knew cricket was a gentleman's game. But these behaviors cannot be of any gentleman. Such behavior from BCCI is never desirable. We know that relations between India and Pakistan are not good. That is why I did not think that BCCI would take such a decision. Each player is independent. Those who are qualified should be given the freedom to play in all the leagues as they wish.

Being an Indian, I can't agree with your POV. This is a deliberate provocation from the PCB. Why they are not organizing any tournament in their provinces that are not in dispute? I am talking about Sindh, West Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Why all of a sudden they are organizing a franchise league in the sparsely populated Kashmir region, where not even 2% of the Pakistani population resides? Ideally they should target the more populous provinces such as Punjab and Sindh, right? I am in favor of distancing sports from politics. But here the provocation came from Pakistani side.

I'm not a pakistani supporter. You say it is a provocation of the PCB. That may not be the case. Cricket is less popular in Kashmir. Such a decision may be taken to increase the popularity of cricket in Kashmir. On the other hand, we assume it is the provocation of the PCB. If BCCI wanted, they could have organized a league in Kashmir. And if BCCI had organized a league in Kashmir, I think it would have been much better than the PCB.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1219
I am in favor of distancing sports from politics.
Basically sports must lead to good relationships but having military actions and sports events at a time is definitely not making sense.

Ideally sports should be kept away from politics. But that is not possible nowadays, because the prime minister of Pakistan himself is the former Pakistan cricket team captain. Some of the other players, such as Shahid Afridi have also got themselves associated in politics. In the Indian side also, a number of ex-players have joined politics. The most famous of them may be Gautam Gambhir, who was recently elected as the member of Parliament from Delhi. I am afraid that this is not going to end well for Pakistan, given the dominance of the BCCI in the world of cricket.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1150
Each player is independent. Those who are qualified should be given the freedom to play in all the leagues as they wish.
Each cricket board is different. If a player look for maintaining smooth relationship then must obey all their regulations of a board. BCCI usually is not allowing its current players (except women batters) to participant in any other leagues and this time, they are extending their enforcement to international players as well for political reasons. We cannot blame such a decision because political things decide everything everywhere.

I am in favor of distancing sports from politics.
Basically sports must lead to good relationships but having military actions and sports events at a time is definitely not making sense.
Jump to: