England just blasted India out of the world cup yesterday. But I could find some vulnerabilities in their performance. Sam Curran proved to be very expensive in the depth overs, and Hardik Pandya was able to maintain a strike rate of around 200. Same with Chris Jordan. He got crucial wickets, but leaked a lot of runs. Chris Woakes got the crucial wicket of KL Rahul, but he is not as threatening as Mark Wood. In the last 10 overs, Indian batsmen scored more than 100 runs. England needs to find a way to take care of this.
I mean seriously does the Indian team needed that many changes in their team?
If we just forget about this match which India placed against England and lost the semi final, where they were standing before? They were the best T20 teams as they have won their four matches out of five. So how come after losing one match you need to change most of the players and captain too?
This is not the right way to improve team performance. Whoever will be the new captain, it will create a lot of pressure on him and the team as they know if they lose a match, they would be forced to leave the team.