TaaS ICO and Bounty Scam - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Zepher

copper member

Activity: 686

Merit: 603

Electricity is really just organized lightning

Quote from: veeral on May 22, 2017, 07:23:06 AM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on May 22, 2017, 04:48:23 AM

Quote from: veeral on May 22, 2017, 04:37:53 AM

I had subscribed to their newsletter. If they increase I will get some dollars extra.

So where are Lauda and other legendary member. They too didn't fulfill their promise. They didn't tag taas. Maybe they have made a deal with taas.

LMAO you're funny. Noone has made a deal. Taas team doesn't care if tagged or not. They done made their money. This mess is partially your guys faults and the campaign managers fault. The manager should've made the taas team escrow some money or coins to ensure some sort of payment and none of you should have joined a bounty campaign without being assured there was a payment secured.

Stop accusing others of misdeeds when it is not their faults.

Taas team also did fool you. Dont you think that it is possible that they are just pretending to not know about trust on bitcointalk and not caring about it. As someone stated here they even dont know who is Lauda. Doesnt it seem strange.
I' ll give another reason for that. According to the campaign manager , this page has been written by Taas only - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/taas-token-as-service-signature-and-avatar-personal-text-campaign-1804549
Now see what they write there,

Quote

6: Any User get a negative Feedback from any DT2 and Above users will not be eligible for this campaign.

Now what do you think?

You're still blaming the wrong people.

So it is obvious that they do know how the trust system here operates, appreciate the info there BTW.

But as yahoo has already mentioned, they really don't seem to give a shit.

I'll give them 24hrs to respond here, or pay out the bounties. If they don't, I will leave a rating, whether they care or not.

Quote from: veeral on May 22, 2017, 04:37:53 AM

So where are Lauda and other legendary member. They too didn't fulfill their promise. They didn't tag taas. Maybe they have made a deal with taas.

Assumptions like that make you look like an idiot btw.

veeral

full member

Activity: 124

Merit: 100

Quote from: yahoo62278 on May 22, 2017, 04:48:23 AM

Quote from: veeral on May 22, 2017, 04:37:53 AM

I had subscribed to their newsletter. If they increase I will get some dollars extra.

So where are Lauda and other legendary member. They too didn't fulfill their promise. They didn't tag taas. Maybe they have made a deal with taas.

LMAO you're funny. Noone has made a deal. Taas team doesn't care if tagged or not. They done made their money. This mess is partially your guys faults and the campaign managers fault. The manager should've made the taas team escrow some money or coins to ensure some sort of payment and none of you should have joined a bounty campaign without being assured there was a payment secured.

Stop accusing others of misdeeds when it is not their faults.

Taas team also did fool you. Dont you think that it is possible that they are just pretending to not know about trust on bitcointalk and not caring about it. As someone stated here they even dont know who is Lauda. Doesnt it seem strange.
I' ll give another reason for that. According to the campaign manager , this page has been written by Taas only - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/taas-token-as-service-signature-and-avatar-personal-text-campaign-1804549
Now see what they write there,

Quote

6: Any User get a negative Feedback from any DT2 and Above users will not be eligible for this campaign.

Now what do you think?

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 4603

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

Quote from: veeral on May 22, 2017, 04:37:53 AM

I had subscribed to their newsletter. If they increase I will get some dollars extra.

So where are Lauda and other legendary member. They too didn't fulfill their promise. They didn't tag taas. Maybe they have made a deal with taas.

LMAO you're funny. Noone has made a deal. Taas team doesn't care if tagged or not. They done made their money. This mess is partially your guys faults and the campaign managers fault. The manager should've made the taas team escrow some money or coins to ensure some sort of payment and none of you should have joined a bounty campaign without being assured there was a payment secured.

Stop accusing others of misdeeds when it is not their faults.

veeral

full member

Activity: 124

Merit: 100

I had subscribed to their newsletter. If they increase I will get some dollars extra.

So where are Lauda and other legendary member. They too didn't fulfill their promise. They didn't tag taas. Maybe they have made a deal with taas.

Ghani

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 252

Quote from: ShorsHammer on May 20, 2017, 11:57:27 PM

Everyone in this thread is a fraud, saying how you "worked so hard" to earn your bounty now you are all screaming scam like autistic retards despite zero evidence of being a scam.

They are paying out $100k to people who changed their signatures on a forum. I think you all deserve far less and hopefully they dont pay anyone in this thread, you have devoted 100x more effort into slandering Taas than actually promoting it.

Go get a real job and earn some real money you peasants.

Hopefully Taas pays attention to this thread and removes everyone here from Bounties

Hello friend..this will be well maintained if 1 side is good, maybe you don't know much about this forum so easy you say like that.
The essence of the matter is clear, no smoke without fire, no effect without cause..is real!
People here are not for gifts but to get the rights they have done for the TaaS development team

ShorsHammer

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Everyone in this thread is a fraud, saying how you "worked so hard" to earn your bounty now you are all screaming scam like autistic retards despite zero evidence of being a scam.

They are paying out $100k to people who changed their signatures on a forum. I think you all deserve far less and hopefully they dont pay anyone in this thread, you have devoted 100x more effort into slandering Taas than actually promoting it.

Go get a real job and earn some real money you peasants.

Hopefully Taas pays attention to this thread and removes everyone here from Bounties

andron8383

sr. member

Activity: 333

Merit: 250

What a scammy move... up to 2%.... an NOWHERE THEY WROTE that BTT will get only 100k ALWAYS so why they even have given such nuber like 2%...
This is insane and immature. Some people want pay off bill from others peoples pocket. THIS IS BIG RED FLAG for all investors.
If they screw people like that today they will screw people later. Actions speaks LOUDER THAN words - they are GREEDY people and will screw investors in future probably : )
If they will act like it suppose to be and fair maybe i will change mind.

robinsbrown

full member

Activity: 574

Merit: 101

anyway dont forget guys that taas team is all Ukrainian people ......

mackenzied

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: kalpit on May 20, 2017, 07:14:54 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

WTF IS THIS

1. THey said its 2% but no
2. THEY SAID this is going to get listed in poloniex and bittrex after ICO but its not listed after 2 weeks of distribution
3. They said bounty distribution would happen in 18 until now nothing is happening they gave us a fucking 1 week to submit addresses. its a pathetic excuse that they can't distribute the bounty for those who already provided..
4. You fucking extended the signature for another week even your fucking ICO is finished

FUCK TAAS, FUCKING LIARS, FUCKING UNPROFessionals

They didn't guarantee Polo or Bittrex listing.
Don't use those red letters.

And about 2% and all, they are safe since they only wrote "minimum 100,000" and "can be increased"

2% of the coin will be distributed to the entire bounty program, it must be split equally, so their current interpretations are not appropriate, this should be resolved before they make the payment, but They refused.

Lauda, I always trust you, so I hope you can make them change their mind and make a full payment.

kalpit

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

WTF IS THIS

1. THey said its 2% but no
2. THEY SAID this is going to get listed in poloniex and bittrex after ICO but its not listed after 2 weeks of distribution
3. They said bounty distribution would happen in 18 until now nothing is happening they gave us a fucking 1 week to submit addresses. its a pathetic excuse that they can't distribute the bounty for those who already provided..
4. You fucking extended the signature for another week even your fucking ICO is finished

FUCK TAAS, FUCKING LIARS, FUCKING UNPROFessionals

They didn't guarantee Polo or Bittrex listing.
Don't use those red letters.

And about 2% and all, they are safe since they only wrote "minimum 100,000" and "can be increased"

DomainMagnate

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

Since the ico is over and they have already collected lots of funds,I doubt they would care for any neg trust given to their accounts here anymore.
Time community must do something to prevent something like this happening again in future. Sad

Scam Exposer

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Quote from: Zepher on May 20, 2017, 04:29:24 AM

Quote from: Lauda on May 20, 2017, 03:59:55 AM

Quote from: mackenzied on May 20, 2017, 03:57:15 AM

I am quite disappointed with it. I thought they would give the most satisfactory explanation. No explanation.

Indeed. Maybe it would be better to wait till they pay out the existing bounties and then tag them.

What do you think @Zepher?

I have been away for the last day and was hoping to come back to find this resolved. Guess that hasn't happened.

So the bounty payments (100k/2%/w/e) were supposed to be paid on the 18th, and have yet to be paid. This is starting to scream SCAM.

To the devs: I know you are refusing to post here, but that really isn't doing you any good. To not realise how the trust system works here will also be to your detriment.
I suggest that you pay out what is owed to get this over with. It's quite easy really - pay, and this all goes away. Don't pay - and you are putting your whole development on the line when it comes to its' reputation for keeping to its' word. Your call.

.
I think you might not be informed about bounty programmes of other ico going on. That's the way they work. Only a few distribute on decided dates.
Some even pay months later than the decided dates and I'm talking about legit projects. For example Chronobank paid 2-3 months after ICO end (initial plan was 1 week bounty distribution one week after ico ends).

Though there are some that follow the schedules and maintain good communication with investors.

Zepher

copper member

Activity: 686

Merit: 603

Electricity is really just organized lightning

Quote from: Lauda on May 20, 2017, 03:59:55 AM

Quote from: mackenzied on May 20, 2017, 03:57:15 AM

I am quite disappointed with it. I thought they would give the most satisfactory explanation. No explanation.

Indeed. Maybe it would be better to wait till they pay out the existing bounties and then tag them.

What do you think @Zepher?

I have been away for the last day and was hoping to come back to find this resolved. Guess that hasn't happened.

So the bounty payments (100k/2%/w/e) were supposed to be paid on the 18th, and have yet to be paid. This is starting to scream SCAM.

To the devs: I know you are refusing to post here, but that really isn't doing you any good. To not realise how the trust system works here will also be to your detriment.
I suggest that you pay out what is owed to get this over with. It's quite easy really - pay, and this all goes away. Don't pay - and you are putting your whole development on the line when it comes to its' reputation for keeping to its' word. Your call.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: mackenzied on May 20, 2017, 03:57:15 AM

Maybe you're right, however, it has nothing to do with this topic. But, a scammer has no right to denounce others.

Of course that he/she has the right to do this as long as what is presented is valid. The validity of something is entirely dislocated from the person who is presenting it. At least, that is how it should be if you were to follow the principles of logic.

Quote from: mackenzied on May 20, 2017, 03:57:15 AM

I am quite disappointed with it. I thought they would give the most satisfactory explanation. No explanation.

Indeed. Maybe it would be better to wait till they pay out the existing bounties and then tag them.

What do you think @Zepher?

mackenzied

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: Lauda on May 20, 2017, 02:00:05 AM

Useless ad hominem. It is completely irrelevant who made this argument/thread and it does not affect its validity in any way.

Maybe you're right, however, it has nothing to do with this topic. But, a scammer has no right to denounce others.

Quote from: TaaS on May 18, 2017, 02:07:57 PM

Quote from: Lauda on May 18, 2017, 02:06:22 PM

Quote from: TaaS on May 18, 2017, 02:05:36 PM

Quote from: Lauda on May 18, 2017, 01:54:26 PM

Quote from: TaaS on May 18, 2017, 01:51:23 PM

Not sure what that is, why it exists and what it affects. We are not using bitcointalk as our primary source of information.

That's an example of several negative ratings. Don't worry, people can spread the word outside of Bitcointalk considering that your information is public.

And what is the ground for negative rating?

Read the thread.

But you do realize these accusation are false and misleading?

I am quite disappointed with it. I thought they would give the most satisfactory explanation. No explanation.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: mackenzied on May 19, 2017, 10:11:40 AM

You make me laugh when I read everything here, the action of a despicable man, it is you. A scamer trying to denounce their campaign. Unbelievable, you are a villain, you pretend to be kind and condemn others while you are always looking for way to cheat others. I think you are not worthy to continue here and denounce anyone else.
Shabby!

Useless ad hominem. It is completely irrelevant who made this argument/thread and it does not affect its validity in any way.

Quote from: neochiny on May 19, 2017, 12:33:21 PM

Anyway, does jamal manage the other bounties as well or just the signature campaign?
Cause if it's just the sig campaign then it's 100k for the sigs and the remaining 60k goes to the rest.

How did you come up with those numbers? The thread certainly does not say that it needs to be cut off at 100k, it says quite the opposite.]

Here's the PM(s) that they've sent me. I had to explain what negative ratings were and they just completely dismissed the accusation without even spending a minute trying to explain why. Roll Eyes

Quote from: TaaS on May 18, 2017, 02:07:57 PM

Quote from: Lauda on May 18, 2017, 02:06:22 PM

Quote from: TaaS on May 18, 2017, 02:05:36 PM

Quote from: Lauda on May 18, 2017, 01:54:26 PM

Quote from: TaaS on May 18, 2017, 01:51:23 PM

Not sure what that is, why it exists and what it affects. We are not using bitcointalk as our primary source of information.

That's an example of several negative ratings. Don't worry, people can spread the word outside of Bitcointalk considering that your information is public.

And what is the ground for negative rating?

Read the thread.

But you do realize these accusation are false and misleading?

Golfimbul

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: Scam Exposer on May 19, 2017, 06:13:48 AM

Quote from: minorman on May 19, 2017, 05:58:53 AM

Quote from: Scam Exposer on May 19, 2017, 05:50:30 AM

Minorman is right. I'm not him. I used his name.

Please don't take any action against Minorman. He was always playing with the rules.

Sorry minorman for this.

Jamal, I have no association with Minor man. I am someone else you don't even know.

This is no way a joke now

https://i.imgur.com/vfqmcly.png

1.First, you try to abuse the TAAS project.
2.Then you pull me in and say I abuse the project
3.Then you try to steal my bounty and give you details
4.You another account to do the same.

Why dont you come up with your real account which you used in TAAS bounty?

1. Never abused . just raising voice
2. Sorry. But I never said that
3. Never tried to steal. You can ask jamal. Just after I sent that pm I sent another pm saying sorry.
4. I have only two accounts on Bitcointalk. This one and another from which I participated Facebook twitter and signature campaign.

I had more sensible posts from my real account than yours. Even I had more posts then you. And I have more total activity than you. So I'm much more experienced than you.

Cannot disclose my identity. Risk of losing bounty.

And it was clear that jamal would remove anyone saying against him and it happened when I used your name.

Am I the only one thinks that this conversation is basically a one guy talking to himself? Roll Eyes

neochiny

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 503

Crypto.games

Quote from: yahoo62278 on May 19, 2017, 11:22:16 AM

As of now i don't think any bounties have been paid and this thread may have cost everyone who participated. Hope that is not the case.

Oh. Was wondering if they paid up in the end.

Quote

A total 2%, but not less 100,000 (equal of 100,000$), of the TaaS Tokens sold during ICO are reserved for the whole Bounty Program (the Bounty Pool can be increased if we cross the limited target).

The Bounty Pool Divided as Below:

1: Facebook Bounty: 10K Taas Tokens
2: Twitter Bounty: 10K Taas Tokens
3: Email/Website Subscriber Bounty: 5K Taas
4: Signature Campaign 30K Taas
5: Blog Article and Media: 20K Taas
6: Translation Bounty: 20K Taas
7: Slack Joining Bounty: 5K Taas

Anyway, does jamal manage the other bounties as well or just the signature campaign?
Cause if it's just the sig campaign then it's 100k for the sigs and the remaining 60k goes to the rest.

Scam Exposer

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Quote from: yahoo62278 on May 19, 2017, 11:22:16 AM

As of now i don't think any bounties have been paid and this thread may have cost everyone who participated. Hope that is not the case.

This thread can only benefit bounty hunters.

Why wouldn't they pay bounties because of this? Only reason could be if they are big scam (unlikely). And if they were completely scam then taas tokens would not have any value.

As they told me, they would be making a blog post soon to answer all this. Though, I don't think they will increase the bounty. Or they may partially increase. Like we were supposed to get +60% they may pay +30%. Because it was surely a mistake on their part.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 4603

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

As of now i don't think any bounties have been paid and this thread may have cost everyone who participated. Hope that is not the case.

Topic: TaaS ICO and Bounty Scam - page 2. (Read 6504 times)