Topic: Tagging both operators and participants of Ponzi schemes is extremely effective (Read 2689 times)

You went full Godwin, never go full Godwin.

While you're at it, stop fucking whining about the concept of being held to account for your harmful actions.

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Niemöller

Thought this is really the issue for me and why I am against blatant bully tactics.
Contact the owner of the forum and stop pissing around with making the trust system worthless.

I don't think good deeds & genial advice is ever wasted.

It is nothing but weapon in this case and this thread particularly.If i am a newbie and visited the forum and made some investments in these rackets and luckily i got some gains the first time but people like devil tagged me for that ,but i am no where a shill and nor connected to the operators by any means.

what impression would you have on me then ? nothing but a power trip troll and even if i lose money, cause you are not educating me but forcing me by making me delete my posts,It is not consequence.

I could kill you and say that is the consequence for taking part in a signature campaign which i don't like or is causing spam etc...

As someone that fought ponzi OPs in the past and will so in the future under certain circumstances I applaud your effort, but I think its wasted. You may or may not see these as counter arguments. I dont really see them as such. They are my personal reasons why I no longer go around in that section and tag people. You can disagree with them without being wrong, they are at least partially subjective or based on my view on the world.

We have to assume people here are grown up. As such we further have to assume they did the proper research or are unable to do so. In either way, a negative rating will not affect them into rethinking their decisions. I see it similar to punishment and not as a consequence. A punishment can change behavior, but does not create insight or understand of the problem. The behavior is simply avoided openly in order to avoid the punishment. You as an external party can not create consequence for the ponzi, the ponzi OP and/or the "investors". A proper consequence would be loss, be that due to the ponzi OP running away or because "the round ended". Even though these consequences are constantly present, people keep "investing".

Any attempt to educate those you hate and distrust will not be fruitful, because you are unable to see their perspective and change it bit by bit to communicate yours. There is no interaction, but you create a barrier instead.

The flashy red warnings (we had them in the past, didnt we?) will like be reported and removed as spam (they did in the past, didnt they?). If not the ponzi operators can and will create self moderated threads to remove the posts.

This forum has a very non nanny state approach and while it creates things I dont like, I think many of these things have to be tolerated in a free society.

I personally draw my line when they advertise their ponzis outside their section, e.g. in their signatures and I will continue to mark those that do so.

Wait, where did that word came from ? I think this all started when you motherfucker started trolling me thinking yourself an Eternal Emperor ? while i was asking a simple question in a very simple post.

because i already told you to do something not basing on your fake believes and likes.

Read this again and i give you the fucking benefit of doubt now,you troll.

Oh really ? like talking bout my Signature throughout this thread ?

If its the argument from the same users who have been opposing pretty much any DT action you're looking for, expect trolling, unrealistic real life comparison and a few derailing the thread along the way.

The only good argument I saw was from Blazr in the other thread, which was overwhelmed by the community(not just a couple of trolls)'s decision.

Yeah, as I said, some people have a dog in the fight through the selling of forum accounts to scammers who want to use them as supporting socks. So, you know, it is understandable that there'll be a little thrashing around through the initial pain.

Eventually they'll get used to it. It's not like they're capable of forming a reasonable argument as is clearly evidenced throughout this thread.

Wow! The way this thread has changed illustrates the collateral damage that can come from Ponzi schemes.
 Ban ponzis and improve posting quality.

Which I duly showed to be the false equivalence that it was and you, erm, I think you tried to claim there was something more to your post but I'm still waiting on exactly what else you believe it contained other than your poorly-conceived opinion.


Colour's what? I see you suffer from the same possessive apostrophe addiction that QS does. Funny that.

You still trapped there ? This is not your court and no one is complaining. You made a thread and i made my post with my point of views.

I am not thinking on how to retaliate 

Do something other than throwing shit, Like ? speaking with facts and not judgments , likes or your fucking fucking fucking fucking believes you asshole.

Ohhhhhh, just another empty tone complaint? Fuck you.


Wow, you and Quickscammer should get together and write a thesis on how similarly you both utterly fail to make an objective argument. It's almost like you're the same person.

If you can't counter the fact that participation in a ponzi is DEMONSTRABLY proving that you don't give a shit where you steal your profit from, then fapping on and on about irrelevance, hearsay and unsubstantiated nonsense is just proving that all you've got in your locker is distraction and deflection.

Then get the Fucking Fucking Fucking Idea and stop saying "fucking" in every post of your's cause the other guy can type the same and as many Fucking Fucking times as he wants.You made a thread  ? you want to discuss ? you have something to say ? then better say it Right.

No you dont.You just speak your points ,your motives,opinions and let people discuss and do the same ...cause this is not your Kingdom and you don't fucking have a Militia standing behind you,you just behind this fucking forum score's (green or red not a big difference to me) and if you have any Idea or Identity or any fucking thing to say then say it loud but keep it right and Logical.

Everything cannot be seen.

Yes,I compared it with which casino's ? maybe the one which Dooglus was promoting in his signature ,Remember ? which scammed users and skipped Nonce in between and particularly with HR's.Why didn't you tagged them before ? I suppose you were lacking proof's ?

Now , how many mining farms or offices have you visited and researched so that you know for sure that what you are tagging is going to scam ? So, this is just basing on facts of other company scam's ? and because the site has similar layout and design you assume it will scam.Fucking Fucking Nice.

If i have some cents to waste and i like Risks.Hence i will invest those cents in some clone website(for fast gains) and i get the profits in a week with very pleasing service and feedback from their staff,I am happy.What is wrong if i say that in their thread ? what is wrong if i say that i was treated well ? You cannot force anyone to not do anything which you don't like or have your doubts on,It's your problem to prove and i appreciate your efforts if you do it and will also thank you that i didn't invested the second time

Your point might be valid after their collapse or failure of service , Like ? Scrypt.cc,No service at all,still running and people crying or Ore-Mine.

Everything cannot be seen,that is why you have 5 senses and a Brain

I literally have no idea what that means.



Yeah, I'm reading it again, in order to give you the benefit of the doubt. I'm not seeing what you think is being misunderstood here.

You tried comparing playing in a Casino to participating in a Ponzi and I pointed out how that was a false equivalence.

Are there words in your post I'm not seeing, perhaps? Do I need special glasses to make them appear and turn it into some magically profound prose of great wisdom?

Pilot cannot be that dousche ?

Let me talk to you in your language: Your argument is horse-shit

Edit: Who is TS anyway?

so TS is giving negative trust to ponzi participants because it is like showing support to the ponzi right? if that is the case TS should also give theymos negative trust for creating that section specially for ponzis

Read the first two and the last two pages, didn't it, in the end, shift from "Blazr defending the ponzis" to "people agreeing that the negative trust was 'good'"?

Which part of, "A Ponzi scheme does not make any money, it steals it from later users and shares it with the earlier collaborators as a reward for helping the scam function." confuses you?

Which part of, "The fact the 'investor' wishes to profit from the theft of money from later participants means he is provably untrustworthy." is difficult for you to comprehend?



Ooooh, burrrrrn! You sure showed me!

I think it is not worth the time.You certainly don't understand anything in my post.