...
But I can show you, how this normally looks like:
...
on the last year we had great advancements both in dev and in pr.
I can only see a couple of blog posts. I don't see any dev improvements and the pr is more or less poor.
But that information is fine from an investor point of view als long as there is still the IPO going on... the less the better, you understand?
But if you wan't to tell me, that you did your best already, I have to think, if you can do better, if my investment could grow (after ipo, while IPO there is no chance anyway)
and tell me how can one prove they're not "buying from themselves". I didn't do it, but I don't see how it can be proved.
of course buyers need to have trust, but no more than any other common tech start-up, and much less than almost-all of other projects on the crypto world.
The best trust you can give is a fixed amount of coins, where the investor knows, that it can gain. You talk about a premine of 3%? I tell you, you have a premine of 3% + 97%, because you sell ALL coins anyway.
You do an ipo with 5 million! How many people are working on that project? You can hire 10 high class programmers for a 5 years with that!
