Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?
Yes, I agree with you. There have many projects use a fake name and details than some project call spam or stop invest and some project success their roadmap but investor lost money.So i think every project need to publish there own kyc on their website and need to add a verify system thats people get more details about the owner.I heard and many people complain that kyc sell on the darknet so first publish owner kyc than bounty hunter or investor also pass their kyc. 
Topic: Team also needs to pass KYC - page 7. (Read 1011 times)
Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?
KYC is not for public, of course they will not pass their KYC. KYC itself is for customer though lol. In my opinion it's not about that, but you as a bounty hunter, can check it by yourself by check their linkendin info of their team. Check it 1 by 1 and is it real or not. 
I think you should carefully study the ICO project both before investing in it and before participating in its bounty campaign. I usually go to the Icobench website, which indicates whether the founders of the ICO project passed the KYC procedure. If they have gone through this procedure, that is a certain guarantee of the integrity of their intentions, which means that you can take part in this project.
Agree on this one, i think project owners should also be subjected to compulsory kyc procedure to ensure authenticity and genuiness of their project,
if kyc can be required from investors who are taking a hugr to invest on someone else dream (yet to be real) then those at the receiving end shouldn't have a problem performing kyc,
some ico rating site can provide this info when project owners are verified or not, i mostly use icoholder site to do more research on any project i find interesting enough to take part in - even though not 100% guarantee of success but still better than nothing.
I do not understand why this has not yet become normal, because there are so many situations that could really improve the situation in the markets. All this is very, very ambiguously shows that there is a breakthrough technology today.
I think you should carefully study the ICO project both before investing in it and before participating in its bounty campaign. I usually go to the Icobench website, which indicates whether the founders of the ICO project passed the KYC procedure. If they have gone through this procedure, that is a certain guarantee of the integrity of their intentions, which means that you can take part in this project.
Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?
The team publish their "PROFILE" in their website BUT we are not sure about it if they are really the people behind it, that is the problem,the team can fake their identity without knowing the truth behind their personality. I think ICO must be registered first and publish their certification before operating for the security of investors.
Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?
It is a good and creative idea, which will increase the credibility of the project and attract more investors, projects that do not pass KYC will be judged to be of poor quality . I think projects should do that 
Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?
Whenever you have a company, and that company has employees, of course those employees already need to prove their identities - it happens everywhere already.
Publication of KYC information is really a bad idea though, for obvious reasons. I don't think it should be a requirement that the team publish personal info that can so easily be used for illegal purposes by other people.
I agree with you on this matter. I think KYC requirement is just to avoid scams and make the business transparent. But in some cases, we can see that project team does not get their KYC passed. I have witnessed an crypto exchange scamming many traders of millions of rupees. It is BiteBTC. But the victims are worried as they do not know who is the owner of the exchange. What's surprising is that it is still operating and scamming traders.
I think the major reason why the KYC is set for bounty hunters and investors is that they may confirm more authenticity of participants, meanwhile we may have no write to query the authenticity of the ICO team than to be sure we are joining the valid project. I believe good ICO would be conducted by already screened and certified team.
This is why they reinvented ICOs and that's through STO's.
Most of the people here suggesting that before investing, you should know the team's background of that project before trusting them with your money.
Most of the people here suggesting that before investing, you should know the team's background of that project before trusting them with your money.
I agree with this. I think its not only the bounty hunters and investors that will send their KYC but also the team. Now the question is, are they willing to send their personal information to some random stupid people out there? I don't think so.
I think the best thing is to avoid this projects that requires KYC to the investors and bounty hunters.
I think the best thing is to avoid this projects that requires KYC to the investors and bounty hunters.
I agree that the team members of any project should proof their identity, but it is rather difficult to implement, so Linkenin profiles are the best alternative for this procedure at the moment.
Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?
I realize that this view is very good for investors and bounty hunters can avoid scammers. When the KYC form is applied to Teams, we look forward to your opinion will take place in the next coming time.and of course the project team will not be afraid if their project is real and perhaps by applying KYC to the project team will make investors not hesitate to join their ICO
But to be ready the team must submit their data to do KYC? or make a post on this forum or their website that they have done KYC. but in my opinion it's good team verification is very important.
Kyc is know your CUSTOMER and mostly this is use in investors. Kyc for the team doesn't make sense but if you wanna be sure that they are legit i suggest they should atleast make a video and post it on youtube or somewhere else introducing themselves. That way, they will get their credibility.
Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?
What you say in my opinion is true because if their team provides correct information about their identity, the possibility of the project is not fraud. The team must be transparent for everything and there is nothing they cover. So that the bounty hunters done by KYC will also not be a problem.
Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?
Whenever you have a company, and that company has employees, of course those employees already need to prove their identities - it happens everywhere already.
Publication of KYC information is really a bad idea though, for obvious reasons. I don't think it should be a requirement that the team publish personal info that can so easily be used for illegal purposes by other people.
I realize that this view is very good for investors and bounty hunters can avoid scammers. When the KYC form is applied to Teams, we look forward to your opinion will take place in the next coming time.
this is a brilliant idea .....and of course the project team will not be afraid if their project is real and perhaps by applying KYC to the project team will make investors not hesitate to join their ICO
This is called due diligence. Which in the normal world of investment, you are expected to perform for yourself. At the most simple level due diligence is checking out their whitepaper, and making sure they are solid in the business proposal, the plan, the token economics, etc.
Then in fact, on a deeper level, you have to check the team out, are they actually real people? Are they capable of handling the projects, as in, do they have the right people and skills? A blockchain coder? A marketer? A networker?
KYC is not an ultimate sign of a scam free project people can fake their ID just to scam people its not like those KYC docs gets verified by the issuer.
Forgot about it, if people behind have no intentions of scamming investors then they will really show their faces, their accounts and online profiles. And I think that's the closest that we can know them. However, scammers won't do that, they will simply hide their real identify that's why we really need to be careful and do our due diligence before investing on projects
Jump to: