Topic: Team Black Miner (ETHW ETC Vertcoin Ravencoin Zilliqa +dual +tripple mining ) - page 98. (Read 35053 times)

Thanks for that link.

Switched to CrazyPool and changed xintensity to 256.

Is that still high based on the Difficulty value of 2.00?

For me the very important part is the payout per day. If changing the pool increase the profit +10% it's a nobrainer..

---

https://www.miningpoolsprofits.com/how-it-works

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

Are you able to provide a link on how that data is generated?

Ethermine seems to be making -9.29% ethereum than the best paying pool. (last 7 days) (-7.02% the last 56 days)

07-october-2021:

Just changed xintensity to 224.

Should I wait a few hours for the Current/Average Hashrate to adjust properly on Ethermine?

how many share pls

for me it's very important share / min !

Etheremine doesn't seem to pay for stales.. 2miners, nanopool, miningpoolhub and alot of other pools does

ethermine pays it all. 2% is just my current stales ratio.

Too low difficulty for --xintensity 256. (default) try --xintensity 224

---

You need a pool that pay 100% for the stales / uncle blocks.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

Thanks for that insight.

Based on your reply, it looks like it may not be "great results" based on the average hashrate reporting on Ethermine?

Current: 351.8 MH/s
Average: 362.7 MH/s
Reported: 390.5 MH/s

How close should they be?

Tested it on Ethermine for 12 hours each with default intensity (256), rig of NV 30** series.

TRex : 563 mh/s
TBM : 555 mh/s (reported : 601 mh/s)

That's really a huge gap between the reported hashrate and the pool average effective hashrate. Even though they pay for the stales (2%) and there's no invalid block.

At this point, just provide the right xintensity and the chosen pool to actually see good results. Because I tested 4 different pools and many different xintensity values, and I still didn't find any way to improve my rentability. Actually quite the opposite.


Is 390 mh/s actually your average effective hashrate on ethermine? Just looking at it on your side doesn't mean it's "great results".

Been running TBM v1.11 with xintensity 256 on Ethermine and I am getting great results so far.

868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] us1.ethermine.org (ethash)    PING: 50ms    DIFFICULTY: 1.00     EPOCH: 445
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] ID   BOARD  TYPE TEMP  FAN   CORE  MEM   WATT   kW/h COST/h
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU0   3060       Cuda  61/0  70   1320     8117  143   0.14    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU1   3060       Cuda. 61/0  79   1633     8117  172   0.17    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU2   3060       Cuda. 65/0  70   1354     8117  143   0.14    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU3   3060       Cuda. 53/0  79   1651     8117  172   0.17    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU4   3060       Cuda. 63/0  70   1420     8117  143   0.14    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU5   3060       Cuda. 59/0  70   1358     8117  143   0.14    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381]                                          916   0.92    0.07USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381]
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] ID       BOARD  HASHRATE/W         HASHRATE        AVERAGE          SHARES
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU0   3060     455.28 kH/W            65.11 MH/s   65.10 MH/s   802/2/0 (99.75)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU1   3060       378.53 kH/W            65.11 MH/s   65.11 MH/s   738/1/0 (99.86)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU2   3060       454.90 kH/W            65.05 MH/s   65.05 MH/s   769/5/0 (99.35)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU3   3060       378.20 kH/W            65.05 MH/s   65.11 MH/s   737/0/0 (100.00)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU4   3060       455.06 kH/W            65.07 MH/s   65.06 MH/s   743/0/0 (100.00)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU5   3060       455.36 kH/W            65.12 MH/s   65.11 MH/s   754/0/0 (100.00)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381]                   2577.33 kH/W    390.50 MH/s   390.54 MH/s   4543/8/0 (99.82)

Please keep up the great work!

Radeon VII and Rx Vega 56 needs memtweak to run good.
 
https://github.com/Eliovp/amdmemorytweak

NVIDIA gtx 1080ti, 1080, titanx need "The pill hashrate enlarger"

---

You can install it as a custom miner. Or wait a few more days for the devs to integrate it.

---

High difficulty pools that pay for stale shares seems to be the best for this miner. But ppl report good returns by playing with the --xintensity on other pools as well.

---

Thanks, we are working on improving the speed even further on the lastest AMD models. ETA 1-2 weeks.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

I have two questions for this miner

1. Is this mining software available on hive OS already?
2. How is the performance with HBM2 memory graphic cards like Radeon VII and Rx Vega 56?

Any chance you know what pool it is?

You can add (short options) when you launch the miner f.ex -t 360 -r 20. Or add them into the .conf file

timeout 3 minutes, 20 retries.

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/blob/main/README.md#example-configuration-file

Yeah but I can't use the .sh files. Again, the miner fails if I overclock my GPUs. I'm forced to OC after starting the miner. Which doesn't make the .sh file easy to write.

you can add more retries and longer timeout:

-t --timeout (Set timeout in seconds. Used for connecting and socket timeout)
-r --retries (Set number of retry attempts for connecting to pool)

It's recomended to run the miner in a loop like in the example bat files.

I'm joining the previous request not to stop the miner if the internet connection goes off. No other miner does that. And since TBM doesn't run from OC'ed cards (I have to start the miner before OC'ing), this brings some problems to write a script to handle that (not impossible, but just not stopping if the connection is lost would resolve it).

Hi,

very nice works devs, this is my stats

  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] eu1.ethermine.org (ethash)    PING: 39ms    DIFFICULTY: 1.00     EPOCH: 445
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] ID    BOARD   TYPE    TEMP    FAN     CORE    MEM     WATT    kW/h    COST/h
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] GPU0  5500    OpenCL  0/0     0       0       0       0       0.00    0.00USD
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]                                                       0       0.00    0.00USD
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] ID    BOARD   HASHRATE/W      HASHRATE        AVERAGE         SHARES
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] GPU0  5500    0.00 H/W        27.78 MH/s      27.77 MH/s      891/0/13 (100.00)
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]               0.00 H/W        27.78 MH/s      27.77 MH/s      891/0/13 (100.00)
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]

very good performance (-xintensity 24) with nanominer or phoenix just 25.00 MH/s

and 99 MH/s with RTX3080

Thank you!