This did not make sense to me. Did Kohli think that they were only 168 runs short with the lead they had in the first innings? It seems like they wasted the 2nd innings. They could ask WI to follow on and can win the match from there. If needed then they could bat later but now it's impossible (assuming WI will not able to chase the run).
Imagine somehow WI managed to chase this run (Yeah, we all know it's not likely to happen but still)?
May be he wanted to put up a score of 400+ but still it's not logical when you can chase it down. Now if by any chance WI chase it down (highly impossible looking at WI's state), India will lose the match.
But here's an interesting record:
Moving over to the longest format, India have not lost a Test series against West Indies since 2002 even though the number-one ranked team is still behind in the head-to-head series records.
https://www.indiatoday.in/sports/cricket/story/west-indies-vs-india-test-series-stats-preview-ind-look-to-maintain-17-year-unbeaten-streak-in-tests-vs-wi-1587261-2019-08-21And again some weird decisions made by India in 2016 and 17:
2016-2017 India v New Zealand 2016-2017 India v BangladeshIndia declared their first innings after getting 587, 687 runs and then chose not to follow on after having 250-280+ runs for the other team to defend. They ultimately won both the matches by 321 and 208 runs respectively.
It's been only twice that a team who chose not to follow on have lost the match.
Edit:
Arrest warrant against India cricket star Mohammed Shami
Horrible man if it's true.