Author

Topic: Test Cricket Prediction and Discussion Thread [self - mod] - page 568. (Read 125832 times)

hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 614
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Furthermore, David Warner will not be resting in the 2nd test and he will play even though he had the damaged rib. I remember that warner did not field in the second innings of the 1st test match. I don't understand why Australians need to play him even though he is not fully fit.
This decision may be beneficial to England  Huh


Similar mistake was made by England by giving chance to injured Ben stokes in first test and he was not able to perform. Its better to include a fit average player in playing 11 then to include an injured good player. Meanwhile Jhye Richardson will replace injured Josh Hazlewood in 2nd test at Adelaide.
If Aussies are going with injured Warner in 2nd test then surely it will benefit England. 

I think the Australian teams are in trouble at the moment with injured players. Since Josh Hazlewood will not be playing, the Australians are forced to play David Warner. Hopefully, he might have recovered by now and that's why the selectors opted for him to play.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
~snip~
Management and coach Silverwood playing 4d chess (they are big on rotation policy which is not helping anymore), for some weird reasons they believe that pink ball setup suits their team's strength and they wanted their best bowlers to fresh for the Pink ball hence no Broad-Jimmy. Bizarre thinking considering whenever they play Pink ball test in away condition, they gets hammered by opposition.

I personally believe they decided to surprise Australia thinking it would work for them, but the jokes on them because it backfired spectacularly. Furthermore their over reliance on Stokes shows how weak their planning actually is, and for this the selectors and the board too should take responsibility for failing to prepare a competitive side.
I doubt if they wanted to surprise Australia, in my reading i think they didn't gave themselves much chance at Gabba as they were already convinced that they will lose the first match, even before series started. Their batters are in bad form so i can understand over reliance on Stokes and Root. Stokes is big match player and Root is the only batter who is in excellent form.

12 men squad, same batting line up. Now for the first pink ball test they are relying on Broad-Jimmy duo. Would be interesting to watch who they are going to leave out. Leach or Woakes-Jimmy-Broad?
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 311

Furthermore, David Warner will not be resting in the 2nd test and he will play even though he had the damaged rib. I remember that warner did not field in the second innings of the 1st test match. I don't understand why Australians need to play him even though he is not fully fit.
This decision may be beneficial to England  Huh


Similar mistake was made by England by giving chance to injured Ben stokes in first test and he was not able to perform. Its better to include a fit average player in playing 11 then to include an injured good player. Meanwhile Jhye Richardson will replace injured Josh Hazlewood in 2nd test at Adelaide.
If Aussies are going with injured Warner in 2nd test then surely it will benefit England. 
sr. member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 356
Every pundit focusing on bowler's fault, kinda weird cause main culprits were batters.
True, but the fact that bowlers like Broad and Anderson who have basically established themselves as legends in the test format weren't included in the line-up surprised many fans around the world which led to Root getting criticised.

The English batsmen excluding Root need to step up their game though since their batting averages which you shared in one of your previous posts are mediocre.
Management and coach Silverwood playing 4d chess (they are big on rotation policy which is not helping anymore), for some weird reasons they believe that pink ball setup suits their team's strength and they wanted their best bowlers to fresh for the Pink ball hence no Broad-Jimmy. Bizarre thinking considering whenever they play Pink ball test in away condition, they gets hammered by opposition.

I personally believe they decided to surprise Australia thinking it would work for them, but the jokes on them because it backfired spectacularly. Furthermore their over reliance on Stokes shows how weak their planning actually is, and for this the selectors and the board too should take responsibility for failing to prepare a competitive side.

Furthermore, David Warner will not be resting in the 2nd test and he will play even though he had the damaged rib. I remember that warner did not field in the second innings of the 1st test match. I don't understand why Australians need to play him even though he is not fully fit.
This decision may be beneficial to England  Huh

hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 686
Every pundit focusing on bowler's fault, kinda weird cause main culprits were batters.
True, but the fact that bowlers like Broad and Anderson who have basically established themselves as legends in the test format weren't included in the line-up surprised many fans around the world which led to Root getting criticised.

The English batsmen excluding Root need to step up their game though since their batting averages which you shared in one of your previous posts are mediocre.
Management and coach Silverwood playing 4d chess (they are big on rotation policy which is not helping anymore), for some weird reasons they believe that pink ball setup suits their team's strength and they wanted their best bowlers to fresh for the Pink ball hence no Broad-Jimmy. Bizarre thinking considering whenever they play Pink ball test in away condition, they gets hammered by opposition.

I personally believe they decided to surprise Australia thinking it would work for them, but the jokes on them because it backfired spectacularly. Furthermore their over reliance on Stokes shows how weak their planning actually is, and for this the selectors and the board too should take responsibility for failing to prepare a competitive side.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
Every pundit focusing on bowler's fault, kinda weird cause main culprits were batters.
True, but the fact that bowlers like Broad and Anderson who have basically established themselves as legends in the test format weren't included in the line-up surprised many fans around the world which led to Root getting criticised.

The English batsmen excluding Root need to step up their game though since their batting averages which you shared in one of your previous posts are mediocre.
Management and coach Silverwood playing 4d chess (they are big on rotation policy which is not helping anymore), for some weird reasons they believe that pink ball setup suits their team's strength and they wanted their best bowlers to fresh for the Pink ball hence no Broad-Jimmy. Bizarre thinking considering whenever they play Pink ball test in away condition, they gets hammered by opposition.
sr. member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 328
Every pundit focusing on bowler's fault, kinda weird cause main culprits were batters.
True, but the fact that bowlers like Broad and Anderson who have basically established themselves as legends in the test format weren't included in the line-up surprised many fans around the world which led to Root getting criticised.

The English batsmen excluding Root need to step up their game though since their batting averages which you shared in one of your previous posts are mediocre.
This was shocking decision from Root about Anderson/Broad just because of this he faced some serious criticized from cricket community because their batting is not helping them in last few years with many dumb players only Root alone doing some better with the help of these legendary bowlers and this time he tries some experiment which give them big lesson hopefully now in second test they could be able to have some better result.

Still they need to do some good work for test quality batsmen as they have world's best domestic set up, but it's not able to give them good quality better technique batsmen. Now, Australia also having some problems with injuries, but their bench power is very good for them to handle these things in better way.
hero member
Activity: 3080
Merit: 970
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
Every pundit focusing on bowler's fault, kinda weird cause main culprits were batters.
True, but the fact that bowlers like Broad and Anderson who have basically established themselves as legends in the test format weren't included in the line-up surprised many fans around the world which led to Root getting criticised.

The English batsmen excluding Root need to step up their game though since their batting averages which you shared in one of your previous posts are mediocre.
sr. member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 299
These sort of decisions can go both ways. This time it failed and Root needs to admit his mistake. He went ahead with the combination of Chris Woakes/Ollie Robinson/Mark Wood. These three bowlers took 9 wickets in total, after conceding 239 runs. As you can see, these figures doesn't look too bad. The failure was from the part of the spinners (Jack Leach) and the part-time bowler (Ben Stokes). Anyway, it was a blunder to leave out two of the most experienced pacers (who are among the top wicket takers in test cricket at this point).
Good thing he admits his mistake but still they are not doing good things which give them very poor result mean batting in both innings they have nothing special from any batsman and now still going with these culprits which are not able to perform here in these conditions on other side they are having some good confidence on Stokes which is not fully fit for this series because of his injury and having not good practice for some long time.
 
Now less than 36 hours in start of second test and too much talk about bowling from England side is good, but they need some good at batting as well which is surely again going to create problems for them in presence of quality Aussies bowlers at their own home.
member
Activity: 148
Merit: 10
- Jimmy-Broad are available for the selection. Every pundit focusing on bowler's fault, kinda weird cause main culprits were batters.
- Rohit Sharma is ruled out from the South Africa Test series due to serious hamstring injury.
- Priyank Panchal replaces Rohit as test opener. (He's playing with India A in South Africa already). My boii Vihari is also there and looking good so far.
Absolutely right the main culprit in the first ashes test were batsman. They collapsed in 1st innings and also in second innings after the partnership between root and malan they collapsed. This is the major issue for them at the moment their batting. Even the return of broad and anderson wont make any difference if their batting unit keep performing like this.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
- Jimmy-Broad are available for the selection. Every pundit focusing on bowler's fault, kinda weird cause main culprits were batters.
- Rohit Sharma is ruled out from the South Africa Test series due to serious hamstring injury.
- Priyank Panchal replaces Rohit as test opener. (He's playing with India A in South Africa already). My boii Vihari is also there and looking good so far.
legendary
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Root is usually good at delivering interviews, but messed up big-time this time around. What on earth was he thinking leaving out both Anderson and Broad from the lineup? Stupid and nonsensical strategy.

Almost everyone are criticising him for these decisions. Root along with his team need to seriously rethink their strategies.

Also, England are great at bowling in Adelaide and Melbourne which could rattle the Australian batting line-up. Warner and Hazlewood getting injured and replaced adds to their woes. Expecting intense contests.

These sort of decisions can go both ways. This time it failed and Root needs to admit his mistake. He went ahead with the combination of Chris Woakes/Ollie Robinson/Mark Wood. These three bowlers took 9 wickets in total, after conceding 239 runs. As you can see, these figures doesn't look too bad. The failure was from the part of the spinners (Jack Leach) and the part-time bowler (Ben Stokes). Anyway, it was a blunder to leave out two of the most experienced pacers (who are among the top wicket takers in test cricket at this point).
sr. member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 329
Root is usually good at delivering interviews, but messed up big-time this time around. What on earth was he thinking leaving out both Anderson and Broad from the lineup? Stupid and nonsensical strategy.

Almost everyone are criticising him for these decisions. Root along with his team need to seriously rethink their strategies.

Also, England are great at bowling in Adelaide and Melbourne which could rattle the Australian batting line-up. Warner and Hazlewood getting injured and replaced adds to their woes. Expecting intense contests.
England's start is not good as they are messed up with bowlers selection and their batting is also not having some good out put which is the biggest concern right now, Root is doing some bad mistakes which are causing more problems. Now they are heading for Adelaide where Australia having very good record against them 18 wins 8 loses and just 3 draws in last 2 matches Australia won very comfortably. With current batting line-up and preferring injured Stokes to Broad was very poor from them now they have to do some better strategy if they want to have some better result of this test match.
hero member
Activity: 3080
Merit: 970
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
News coming in are that both Anderson and Broad are fit and will be included in second match squad. Its stunning to see Root defending the omission of these two bowlers from first test.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/inews.co.uk/sport/cricket/england-cricket-team-news-joe-root-2nd-ashes-test-selection-adelaide-1347909/amp
Root is usually good at delivering interviews, but messed up big-time this time around. What on earth was he thinking leaving out both Anderson and Broad from the lineup? Stupid and nonsensical strategy.

Almost everyone are criticising him for these decisions. Root along with his team need to seriously rethink their strategies.

Also, England are great at bowling in Adelaide and Melbourne which could rattle the Australian batting line-up. Warner and Hazlewood getting injured and replaced adds to their woes. Expecting intense contests.
sr. member
Activity: 952
Merit: 281

I believe it's big blunder from English team that they are dependent on an injured player and having no faith in Stuart Broad which was good and inform bowler now they need to do some good changes for second test as now they have very small-time for preparations in next few days 2 tests are waiting for them. They need some good changes into batting line-up as well their most batsmen have no good experience to play here in Australia and bowling attack is also very strong, so they have very few chances with these things hopefully now in second test match we will have legendary duo of Anderson and Broad back into attack.

News coming in are that both Anderson and Broad are fit and will be included in second match squad. Its stunning to see Root defending the omission of these two bowlers from first test.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/inews.co.uk/sport/cricket/england-cricket-team-news-joe-root-2nd-ashes-test-selection-adelaide-1347909/amp

Jack Leach may not be included in second test after seeing his performance in first test. From batting prespective I don't think they have much options, current squad is the best one. They can consider replacing Haseeb but don't have anyother opener in there squad.
sr. member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 299
Here are some interesting facts about first test,

Quote
  • Fast-bowling veterans Jimmy Anderson and Stuart Broad have an incredible 1,156 Test scalps between them, yet were left out.
  • Former Australian captain Ricky Ponting said he was stunned, particularly since Broad removed dangerman David Warner seven times at the last Ashes.

Source: https://sports.ndtv.com/the-ashes-2021-22/ben-stokes-struggles-joe-roots-bad-call-what-we-learned-from-1st-ashes-test-2646504

English team is too much dependent on Ben stokes that even he wasnt 100% fit, he was included in the team. He was having a knee niggle that doesnt allow him to perform his 100%.
I believe it's big blunder from English team that they are dependent on an injured player and having no faith in Stuart Broad which was good and inform bowler now they need to do some good changes for second test as now they have very small-time for preparations in next few days 2 tests are waiting for them. They need some good changes into batting line-up as well their most batsmen have no good experience to play here in Australia and bowling attack is also very strong, so they have very few chances with these things hopefully now in second test match we will have legendary duo of Anderson and Broad back into attack.
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 105
Here are some interesting facts about first test,

Quote
  • Fast-bowling veterans Jimmy Anderson and Stuart Broad have an incredible 1,156 Test scalps between them, yet were left out.
  • Former Australian captain Ricky Ponting said he was stunned, particularly since Broad removed dangerman David Warner seven times at the last Ashes.

Source: https://sports.ndtv.com/the-ashes-2021-22/ben-stokes-struggles-joe-roots-bad-call-what-we-learned-from-1st-ashes-test-2646504

English team is too much dependent on Ben stokes that even he wasnt 100% fit, he was included in the team. He was having a knee niggle that doesnt allow him to perform his 100%.
hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 605
Looks like Australia are in trouble since two of their in-form players(Warner and Hazlewood) got injured in the first test and have already left the squad. Richardson and Khawaja have been called in as their replacements.

Haven't seen either of these players in action for a long time now and this could provide the boost that England desperately needs currently in the series.
Both are important players. Richardson played his last test match against Sri Lanka. During this time he was playing on different other formats of cricket. So, as a right arm fast bowler he needs to help the team in taking early wickets. Khwaja have played against England in his last test match. Both have got a big gap in playing test cricket. Last test match played by them was back in 2019. Lets see what these players gonna contribute.
There is no doubt these both were very good players, but Australia is having some good advantages which are going to help them now in remaining series and with these both players they are not going to have any side effect on team newly both players are also had good experience and can handle their positions in positive way for their winning team.

Currently, all troubles with England which is looking for winning combination which is most important for them in first test we have only Root for them who was on target and give some resistance all other players were not near their positive way and collapse in both innings having not good impression.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
Looks like Australia are in trouble since two of their in-form players(Warner and Hazlewood) got injured in the first test and have already left the squad. Richardson and Khawaja have been called in as their replacements.

Haven't seen either of these players in action for a long time now and this could provide the boost that England desperately needs currently in the series.
Wasn't serious injury but i think they are taking precautionary measure which is necessary in 5 matches series. Jye Richardson did good in some white ball cricket but they should also consider Pattinson, he's scary bowler. Khawaja is one unlucky individual who can't catch a break. He was supposed to bat for Australia at no 3, 4 or 5 but Marnus-Smith and now Travis Head cemented their position for long run. Khawaja is talented tho, he could bat anywhere. Although i would still prefer Warner when playing at home conditions.
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1213
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live
Looks like Australia are in trouble since two of their in-form players(Warner and Hazlewood) got injured in the first test and have already left the squad. Richardson and Khawaja have been called in as their replacements.

Haven't seen either of these players in action for a long time now and this could provide the boost that England desperately needs currently in the series.
Both are important players. Richardson played his last test match against Sri Lanka. During this time he was playing on different other formats of cricket. So, as a right arm fast bowler he needs to help the team in taking early wickets. Khwaja have played against England in his last test match. Both have got a big gap in playing test cricket. Last test match played by them was back in 2019. Lets see what these players gonna contribute.
Jump to: