Pages:
Author

Topic: The 7950 Megahash thread - page 4. (Read 27640 times)

member
Activity: 136
Merit: 10
tester
August 22, 2012, 03:24:41 PM
#21
mode by my own Smiley

www.shareimage.org/images/85k1ikroyxudomlgen5.jpg
www.shareimage.org/images/uxeu2lqv3sueaa92ld53.jpg
www.shareimage.org/images/vpom3gi38anc83b6ie7.jpg

and this is summer addon Smiley

www.shareimage.org/images/fn410etlca8ijabgdoqz.jpg

now the room is 28C, outside 27C - 23:21
day outside is 41C, room is 34C - 12:00

I can't wait to come winter to overclock a little be more Smiley
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 22, 2012, 02:03:58 PM
#20
i run two HD 7950
they are different revision but that i run them



I hope I was helpful.

Stupid Trend Micro. I can't see the pic until I leave work.
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
August 22, 2012, 01:59:57 PM
#19
i run two HD 7950
they are different revision but that i run them



I hope I was helpful.

What sort of cooling are you using in your case/GPUs?  Those temps are crazy low.
member
Activity: 136
Merit: 10
tester
August 22, 2012, 01:28:13 PM
#18
i run two HD 7950
they are different revision but that i run them



I hope I was helpful.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 22, 2012, 11:48:39 AM
#17
Can you post either your full command line arguments, or your config file? Don't need any pool info, just the GPU settings.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 22, 2012, 11:43:55 AM
#16
Does anyone else have any insights as to why im missing 20mh/s? It's not like im looking for that "Maximum efficency" I just want to see my card it 500.01MH/s
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 11:17:55 PM
#15
hey crazyates d'you have a coin address that i can kick you a tip at?

1De7KzFiYRHUVJCuy7Ap89xYbu2Z4q1F63 Thanks!
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 10:45:49 PM
#14
hey crazyates d'you have a coin address that i can kick you a tip at?
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 12:53:08 PM
#13
Yeah, Going from 4 to 5 gives me 150mh/s lol.
Gonna try DiakGCN Gives me 450mh/s
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 12:51:57 PM
#12
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s

Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
LOTS of rejects

Really?! That's pretty odd.
I agree, But setting it to -8 drops the hashrate by 2mh/sec so... It Kinda makes sense?

Setting I to -8 or 8? There's a big difference  Wink
8, I went back, A set it to 9, Turns out that the last time i didthat, At the same time the pool switched blocks, LOL.
I 9=488-491mh/s
I 7=488-490mh/s

Ok I was just curious. Sometimes I can get upwards of a 10MH/s bump going from 6 -> 9.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 12:49:55 PM
#11
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s

Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
LOTS of rejects

Really?! That's pretty odd.
I agree, But setting it to -8 drops the hashrate by 2mh/sec so... It Kinda makes sense?

Setting I to -8 or 8? There's a big difference  Wink
8, I went back, A set it to 9, Turns out that the last time i didthat, At the same time the pool switched blocks, LOL.
I 9=487-491.3mh/s
I 7=486.8-493mh/s
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 12:39:32 PM
#10
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s

Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
LOTS of rejects

Really?! That's pretty odd.
I agree, But setting it to -8 drops the hashrate by 2mh/sec so... It Kinda makes sense?

Setting I to -8 or 8? There's a big difference  Wink
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 12:32:55 PM
#9
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s

Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
LOTS of rejects

Really?! That's pretty odd.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 12:26:36 PM
#8
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s

Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 12:22:27 PM
#7
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 12:17:49 PM
#6
That's your rate on a 1040Mhz core clock!?!?  I get 480Mh/s on 925Mhz using --intensity 5 as my only switch.  I'm on the same OS/driver/SDK version as you are as well.  Something is very wrong with your setup.  Are you sure you're operating at 1040Mhz core (and it's stable)?
Hellyeah it's stable, It's stable at 1080.

I've flipped around the kernals, getting/loosing 10mh/sec
Phatk seems to do the best, Im gonna retry diablo, Since i think it'd be the best
sr. member
Activity: 303
Merit: 250
August 21, 2012, 12:11:53 PM
#5
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.

sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
August 21, 2012, 12:11:46 PM
#4
That's your rate on a 1040Mhz core clock!?!?  I get 480Mh/s on 925Mhz using --intensity 5 as my only switch.  I'm on the same OS/driver/SDK version as you are as well.  Something is very wrong with your setup.  Are you sure you're operating at 1040Mhz core (and it's stable)?
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 12:06:48 PM
#3
That does sound a little low, but not drastically. What OS/driver/SDK? Try switching kernels? CGMiner also has diabo, phatk, and diakgcn, all of which should be decent. On my 7970 I use "-v 2 -w 256 -I 9 -k diakgcn" and it works great (Win7x64SP1, 12.8, 2.7 here).

@1040MHz you should be getting close to 520MH/s.
LOL, I forgot all the important info!
64bitwin7 12.8, 2.7
How do i tell CGMiner to use a differant kernal? Whats the command line arg?
I think inside the config i can set it to a differant kernal... Im going to poke around..
THANKS!, Im pretty sure it's the kernel,
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 11:53:43 AM
#2
That does sound a little low, but not drastically. What OS/driver/SDK? Try switching kernels? CGMiner also has diabo, phatk, and diakgcn, all of which should be decent. On my 7970 I use "-v 2 -w 256 -I 9 -k diakgcn" and it works great (Win7x64SP1, 12.8, 2.7 here).

@1040MHz you should be getting close to 520MH/s.
Pages:
Jump to: