Topic: The beginning of the end for centralized AI? - page 2. (Read 339 times)
I heard rumors about banning the use of ChatGPT, but it's really not clear. But if this happens, it will certainly have a significant impact on decentralized AI projects. ChatGPT and OpenAI are famous and globally influential AI projects, being banned in one country can become a premise for other countries to start banning them as well. This may affect the feasibility of decentralized AI projects and may lead to difficulty in developing these projects globally. If decentralized AI projects are banned or run into difficulties, there will certainly be outcry and protests from the scientific and engineering communities. However, raising these objections may not be enough to prevent bans on AI projects. It is important to find ways to address privacy and security issues openly and collaboratively, to ensure the sustainable development of AI and related technologies.
There is a rumor going around that Centralized ChatGPT is getting banned, I don't know if this is official yet but it is official that in Italy the government is worried about privacy concerns and they put a ban on ChatGPT, is this the beginning of the end for ChatGPT? How will this impact decentralized AI projects because I believe they can't be banned.
Another possibility is if ChatGPT or OpenAI start getting banned in other parts of the world we can see a big rally on AI projects on the blockchain, what do you think?
It's no wonder why ChatGPT is banned, depending on whether it's profitable or not because of the fact that when we ask for someone's data on ChatGPT, we will get it easily. Once again the privacy that is given for free and the data collection make ChatGPT quite dangerous. There are always its own pros and cons. The purpose of ChatGPT was created to help human work easier but being a double-edged sword can make it useful and vice versa. Another possibility is if ChatGPT or OpenAI start getting banned in other parts of the world we can see a big rally on AI projects on the blockchain, what do you think?
There is a rumor going around that Centralized ChatGPT is getting banned, I don't know if this is official yet but it is official that in Italy the government is worried about privacy concerns and they put a ban on ChatGPT, is this the beginning of the end for ChatGPT? How will this impact decentralized AI projects because I believe they can't be banned.
Another possibility is if ChatGPT or OpenAI start getting banned in other parts of the world we can see a big rally on AI projects on the blockchain, what do you think?
Another possibility is if ChatGPT or OpenAI start getting banned in other parts of the world we can see a big rally on AI projects on the blockchain, what do you think?
Why do you think that centralization or decentralization have something to do with AI technology?
Do you really think that blockchain technology can be used for creating and maintaining AI? Maybe it is theoretically possible, I'm not expert in AI, we should ask somebody who knows a thing or two about this subject.
Decentralized AI(or whatever you mean by this term) can be banned. The problem is that the government won't be successful at efficiently imposing that ban. Privacy isn't the only problem of AI. I'm sure that AI bots use lots of copyright protected text and images, without the permission of their authors, which is illegal.
Many countries are afraid of the development of AI technology so that excessive supervision, in my opinion this is a mistake, when creativity is limited, ideas will emerge to fight the policy, AI is the future of technology that can make life better.
I don't think there's anything laws can do to stop the development of artificial intelligence. One reason is that people are paid to work on the development of artificial intelligence. In fact, developing artificial intelligence is their job description. And all these appeals and bans look ridiculous (like the riots against the development of factory production once looked like).
Factory production and the development of artificial intelligence (AI) are completely different categories in terms of the threat to the continued existence of mankind. The development of factory production threatened only a part of the workers who were replaced by machines and deprived of their jobs. Here the situation is radically different. Artificial intelligence is able to learn and in many ways can surpass humans. And this is a threat that it is almost natural and logical that AI will want to destroy humanity. Already, human-piloted military aircraft have been able to hold out against AI in a simulator for only a minute and a half. AI fully predicts human actions and instantly makes the right decisions.Now they predict the emergence of a new version of ChatGPT-5 and this will mean the practical identity of AI with the way a person thinks and realizes.
Such an AI is capable of understanding or learning any intellectual task that humans can perform. This is a direct threat to humanity and therefore it must be approached very seriously.
It's not simple as that for saying if centralized AI get banned, there's will be a decentralized AI will comes up and can't get banned by the government.
There are many smart developers out there, but they will not spend all of his time to create a good project when he doesn't get any benefit, it's wasting time.
There are many smart developers out there, but they will not spend all of his time to create a good project when he doesn't get any benefit, it's wasting time.
This is true, why would anyone dedicate his talent and skills in making a successful project? For sure he would gain something in return by releasing that project. Not only it gain popularity some might try to buy his project with its convenience it gives. Since many people acknowledged this AI, surely geniuses would do something about decentralized AI as government were concerned about Chatgpt. Here in my country once chatgpt was announced in public, most people rely on the information that the website give. Which is kinda scary as it gives fact informations. Chatgpt is a helpful website for people to use, but some would use it to illegal thing. So far government doesn't find it dangerous since there's still no issues about it.
Any government that is uneasy about AI has the right to ban it in their country; to some point, they really know what's best for their citizens.
Possibly, those who are AI lovers will definitely want to fight for it and defend it in any way that they can.
But left to myself, I don't have much interest in this AI, if there is such a thing, in as much as they are good in different areas and render some kinds of support that make things a little bit easier. I still don't buy the idea of making AI as popular as it's becoming now without analyzing the risk factor that it might cause if humans eventually lose control over them; that's for the other AIs, which are not just built for writing purposes.
You cannot be interested in this great technological success, which is being applied in several fields and achieving amazing successes. However, a distinction must be made between artificial intelligence as a useful technology to certain extents, and artificial intelligence chat applications, which are considered one of those bad applications of technology.Possibly, those who are AI lovers will definitely want to fight for it and defend it in any way that they can.
But left to myself, I don't have much interest in this AI, if there is such a thing, in as much as they are good in different areas and render some kinds of support that make things a little bit easier. I still don't buy the idea of making AI as popular as it's becoming now without analyzing the risk factor that it might cause if humans eventually lose control over them; that's for the other AIs, which are not just built for writing purposes.
Like all emerging projects, there are those who will try to exploit them in the worst way, mainly for profitable purposes. It is unfortunate that major companies are trying to employ them in a harmful way in one way or another.
There is a rumor going around that Centralized ChatGPT is getting banned, I don't know if this is official yet but it is official that in Italy the government is worried about privacy concerns and they put a ban on ChatGPT, is this the beginning of the end for ChatGPT? How will this impact decentralized AI projects because I believe they can't be banned.
Another possibility is if ChatGPT or OpenAI start getting banned in other parts of the world we can see a big rally on AI projects on the blockchain, what do you think?
I hear you loud and clear about ChatGPT and the rumor mill that's swirling around it. But let's not get ahead of ourselves here, we gotta dig into the facts before we start shootin' off our mouths. And sure, the Italian government is worried about privacy, but that doesn't mean it's curtains for ChatGPT. Nah, it's actually a chance for ChatGPT to get its act together and make some serious improvements to its security and privacy features.Another possibility is if ChatGPT or OpenAI start getting banned in other parts of the world we can see a big rally on AI projects on the blockchain, what do you think?
Now, when it comes to decentralized AI projects, they're all about stickin' it to the man and avoiding any sort of centralized control. So, even if ChatGPT gets the boot in certain countries, decentralized AI projects are still gonna be on the come up. Think about it, if ChatGPT does get banned, it could actually be a catalyst for the blockchain industry and decentralized AI projects could be the next big thing.
At the end of the day, it's too early to tell what's gonna happen with ChatGPT and the blockchain scene. We gotta stay on top of the latest deets, keep ourselves informed, and throw some support behind decentralized AI projects that are all about privacy and security. So, what's your take on this whole shebang?
I find it funny to only see the negative problem it causes, perhaps we are so used to the service from scientific technology that we gradually lose more independence in creating products.
The benefits or negatives of adopting AI in society are probably out of the question here, but let's be fair with these tools, ethical use is what I feel needs to be universal variable, not the imposition of the risks it poses.
I see the emergence of AI as many modern tools and devices have appeared, it always creates different problems and people who are not able to adapt will find these things dangerous.
The benefits or negatives of adopting AI in society are probably out of the question here, but let's be fair with these tools, ethical use is what I feel needs to be universal variable, not the imposition of the risks it poses.
I see the emergence of AI as many modern tools and devices have appeared, it always creates different problems and people who are not able to adapt will find these things dangerous.
It's not simple as that for saying if centralized AI get banned, there's will be a decentralized AI will comes up and can't get banned by the government.
How it's possible decentralized AI can work? if someone able to create it, do you think he will give it freely to everyone to use it? what's the motive and benefit for him? none.
There are many smart developers out there, but they will not spend all of his time to create a good project when he doesn't get any benefit, it's wasting time.
How it's possible decentralized AI can work? if someone able to create it, do you think he will give it freely to everyone to use it? what's the motive and benefit for him? none.
There are many smart developers out there, but they will not spend all of his time to create a good project when he doesn't get any benefit, it's wasting time.
I highly doubt said bans would last long, they're probably just setting up countermeasures for some "over extensions" of what ChatGPT is able to reach. I also doubt they'd do a full permanent ban in the future, AI capabilities would only continue to evolve from now on after all and they can't stop it, it's like how casinos weren't really able to be stopped even though countries have a countrywide ban for it, not to mention AI which can be really helpful if one knows how to use it.
And imo, AI crypto projects will die off regardless of a countries' stance to crypto.
And imo, AI crypto projects will die off regardless of a countries' stance to crypto.
Italy has their reasons for the ban and it you have done your research well you will see some reasons to it too. For example, Italy already has a policy on data collection and according to them ChatGPT is in violation of that policy despite it being designed to be compliant with various privacy regulations such as GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA. Around March 20th, there was a data breach that happened and a lot of personal data was collected. Maybe they want to follow in the footsteps of countries like China, North Korea, Russia and Iran where Open AI is inaccessible. ChatGPT is overhyped, in my opinion. Even the chat program's developers recognized the threat it posed to people, yet the users seem unconcerned.
You need to distinguish that GPT or Open AI Chat projects are real projects that have been studied for many years and started to operate in recent years. While AI projects in cryptocurrency are imitating the technology to create a trend, and the purpose of these projects is to sell tokens and cheat each other to make money. They are completely different, so even if ChatGPT continues to evolve and AI technology reaches new heights, crypto scam projects will soon disappear when they are no longer monetized. The altcoin market is gambling, no technology there.
I have seen a lot of news that chatgpt has been banned in different parts of the country around the world today, some are in K-12 school districts and some are in university colleges.
There are others in companies for their employees and others. maybe others saw that chatgpt had a bad effect on students so they did it and we can't blame them if that's what they did.
* https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/schools-colleges-banned-chat-gpt-similar-ai-tools/
* https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-20/using-chatgpt-at-work-nearly-half-of-firms-are-drafting-policies-on-its-use#xj4y7vzkg
* https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/41906/central-bank-of-ireland-blocks-staff-use-of-chatgpt
There are others in companies for their employees and others. maybe others saw that chatgpt had a bad effect on students so they did it and we can't blame them if that's what they did.
* https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/schools-colleges-banned-chat-gpt-similar-ai-tools/
* https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-20/using-chatgpt-at-work-nearly-half-of-firms-are-drafting-policies-on-its-use#xj4y7vzkg
* https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/41906/central-bank-of-ireland-blocks-staff-use-of-chatgpt
I don't think there's anything laws can do to stop the development of artificial intelligence. One reason is that people are paid to work on the development of artificial intelligence. In fact, developing artificial intelligence is their job description. And all these appeals and bans look ridiculous (like the riots against the development of factory production once looked like).
Another possibility is if ChatGPT or OpenAI start getting banned in other parts of the world we can see a big rally on AI projects on the blockchain, what do you think?
Blockchain is a database. A very clunky and inefficient one.
AI is a program that first of all requires processing power. Not storage space. It makes zero sense to put "AI on blockchain", it's just technobabble.
And Italy didn't ban AI - they banned a chatbot website because it wasn't complying with Italy's privacy laws. But you can still use GPT-4 and other AIs in Italy in their other forms.
Upon having a short research this is what I've found. Italy became the first Western country to ban ChatGPT
Upon reading that article, not only Italy but also other countries have been increased or other plans to increase restriction reading AI projects.
Centralized or Decentralized systems can still be subject to legal and regulatory frameworks. It might possible that new regulations could be developed specifically targeting decentralized AI technologies.
But this question is still on my mind, I didn't see any official announcement, better to seek out official information and sources before jumping to conclusions because this is only a rumor.
Upon reading that article, not only Italy but also other countries have been increased or other plans to increase restriction reading AI projects.
Centralized or Decentralized systems can still be subject to legal and regulatory frameworks. It might possible that new regulations could be developed specifically targeting decentralized AI technologies.
But this question is still on my mind, I didn't see any official announcement, better to seek out official information and sources before jumping to conclusions because this is only a rumor.
There is a rumor going around that Centralized ChatGPT is getting banned, I don't know if this is official yet but it is official that in Italy the government is worried about privacy concerns and they put a ban on ChatGPT, is this the beginning of the end for ChatGPT? How will this impact decentralized AI projects because I believe they can't be banned.
IMHO, it's just a rule and measure for that country to stop people from using it because it may include the usage from schools and children will be no longer studying well their lessons and assignments and all they have to do is ask chatgpt.Another possibility is if ChatGPT or OpenAI start getting banned in other parts of the world we can see a big rally on AI projects on the blockchain, what do you think?
I've got no idea that it's getting banned somewhere else but it could also happen in some countries that don't see its usage and worth. Relatively to blockchain and crypto, there have been a lot of ai projects even before the chatgpt became popular. 
There is a rumor going around that Centralized ChatGPT is getting banned, I don't know if this is official yet but it is official that in Italy the government is worried about privacy concerns and they put a ban on ChatGPT, is this the beginning of the end for ChatGPT? How will this impact decentralized AI projects because I believe they can't be banned.
Another possibility is if ChatGPT or OpenAI start getting banned in other parts of the world we can see a big rally on AI projects on the blockchain, what do you think?
If it is banned from public access,users will still find the possibility of accessing it,this is obvious and I don’t think that this will cause any problems with access.There are also rumors that not only Italy is interested in blocking,but also other countries of the European Union but how will it be on We'll see in practice.The second point, I don't think there will be a boom in AI-related projects since so far I don't know successful cases of crypto and AI in one project. Another possibility is if ChatGPT or OpenAI start getting banned in other parts of the world we can see a big rally on AI projects on the blockchain, what do you think?
It is expected some regulators could get scared about the impact of artificial intelligence within the society, specially those lawmakers concerned about the displacement of jobs and the privacy of their co-citizens.
However, even though those fears can be fair and justified, I believe that the big technology companies will use their lobbyists to push for loose regulations and controls for the algorithms they are developing. There is just too much money at stake with the implementation of Artificial intelligence, and when there is money in between, security and social concerns are left to one side to welcome the pay-check and the "legal bribery".
One example is what happened to the Train derailed in USA, less controls in security when the disaster happened.
However, even though those fears can be fair and justified, I believe that the big technology companies will use their lobbyists to push for loose regulations and controls for the algorithms they are developing. There is just too much money at stake with the implementation of Artificial intelligence, and when there is money in between, security and social concerns are left to one side to welcome the pay-check and the "legal bribery".
One example is what happened to the Train derailed in USA, less controls in security when the disaster happened.
Jump to: