News URL : https://cointelegraph.com/news/wirex-closes-3-mln-japan-funding-round-eyes-asia-expansion
Topic: The Bullish Bitcoin Media Center (The ONLY Bullish Bitcoin News Thread) - page 25. (Read 259678 times)
March 08, 2017, 05:31:37 PM
March 08, 2017, 05:27:45 PM
March 08, 2017, 05:21:10 PM
March 08, 2017, 05:20:22 PM
March 08, 2017, 04:57:06 PM
Thank you Fakhoury,
You make my day over and over again, and are proven right in the process.
Please keep it up, and I continue to HODL my few bitcoins!!
Our dear Bitmore, you are welcome my dear bullish friend, anytime
Keep HODLing, the future is ours
What do think Fakhoury, still a go for the ETF?? Its feeling like it.
Welcome on board our new bullish friend, Jofus, in between your bullish family
Although I'm against it (for the time being ONLY), I've said few weeks ago, it will get approved.
(Spoiler: It's not a bubble)
URL: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/column-boom-bitcoin-bubble-thats-burst/
Uber bullish Hacknoid, amazing article from amazing guy, keep it up my brother
Yes, we didn't enter into the bubble territory yet, when the ETF is approved, you will witness the bubble unfortunately
Bloomburg has ETF listed: Pematurely I might add but listed: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/COIN:US
Super Bullish Dave
Everything is pointing for a potential ETF approval close brother
Bloomburg has ETF listed: Pematurely I might add but listed: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/COIN:US
Dude... Seriously?
It's litteraly written UNLISTED in big at the left of the screen --'
Look dude.... Do you not get it? I know it's unlisted. Why can't they have it "ready" (prepared)? I'm not saying it's listed damn it.
Dear David, I'm extremely sorry for the rudeness of that member, I've deleted the comment, keep calm, I'm always in your back my dear brother, you've always been an elder brother for me
Bloomburg has ETF listed: Pematurely I might add but listed: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/COIN:US
Dude... Seriously?
It's litteraly written UNLISTED in big at the left of the screen --'
Look dude.... Do you not get it? I know it's unlisted. Why can't they have it "ready" (prepared)? I'm not saying it's listed damn it.
Because that might trigger much more speculation in the market as we are already having.
People could see this as a hint for a possible approval.
Bloomberg can not do this I think. If the ETF gets rejected I don't know if investors would have the possibility to sue Bloomberg due to giving false information or whatsoever, depending if a disclaimer would exist or not.
Welcome back our dear bullish brother, Denker
Well said buddy
As Denker said, Dave. It will create more speculation and as you know, Bloomberg have a lot of credibility.
More news on ETF: http://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/regulation/rule_filings/pending/2016/SR-BatsBZX-2016-30.pdf
Just showing what was filed as to WHY the delay; regarding BTC as a "tangible" asset.
what the SEC was analyzing was the BZX Rule 14.11 (e) (4) rule change request. This request was made so that the SEC's understanding of the custody of digital assets, which is something new to them, is accepted. Today the rule says that only tangible assets are accepted as custody and Bitcoin is not tangible. By accepting this change, the Winklevoss Bitcoin (COIN) Shares issued by Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust may be listed on the stock exchange, so the ETF may exist!
Quoted this comment from Sukoi in Tradingview.
Just showing what was filed as to WHY the delay; regarding BTC as a "tangible" asset.
what the SEC was analyzing was the BZX Rule 14.11 (e) (4) rule change request. This request was made so that the SEC's understanding of the custody of digital assets, which is something new to them, is accepted. Today the rule says that only tangible assets are accepted as custody and Bitcoin is not tangible. By accepting this change, the Winklevoss Bitcoin (COIN) Shares issued by Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust may be listed on the stock exchange, so the ETF may exist!
Quoted this comment from Sukoi in Tradingview.
What I'm only afraid of is entering into Bubble territory, reaching $2K - $2.5k then craching to $1.5K, I don't like this !!
More news on ETF: http://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/regulation/rule_filings/pending/2016/SR-BatsBZX-2016-30.pdf
Just showing what was filed as to WHY the delay; regarding BTC as a "tangible" asset.
what the SEC was analyzing was the BZX Rule 14.11 (e) (4) rule change request. This request was made so that the SEC's understanding of the custody of digital assets, which is something new to them, is accepted. Today the rule says that only tangible assets are accepted as custody and Bitcoin is not tangible. By accepting this change, the Winklevoss Bitcoin (COIN) Shares issued by Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust may be listed on the stock exchange, so the ETF may exist!
Quoted this comment from Sukoi in Tradingview.
Just showing what was filed as to WHY the delay; regarding BTC as a "tangible" asset.
what the SEC was analyzing was the BZX Rule 14.11 (e) (4) rule change request. This request was made so that the SEC's understanding of the custody of digital assets, which is something new to them, is accepted. Today the rule says that only tangible assets are accepted as custody and Bitcoin is not tangible. By accepting this change, the Winklevoss Bitcoin (COIN) Shares issued by Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust may be listed on the stock exchange, so the ETF may exist!
Quoted this comment from Sukoi in Tradingview.
That's a nice change, this is also a huge opportunity for the U.S to regulate/maintain and oversee the whole adoption fase, i go for 75% Yes 25% No.
Welcome back again the ultimate bull, Paashaas.
The ETF will bring a lot of money sitting on the side lines.
I go for 95% Yes 5% No.
March 08, 2017, 01:38:29 PM
More news on ETF: http://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/regulation/rule_filings/pending/2016/SR-BatsBZX-2016-30.pdf
Just showing what was filed as to WHY the delay; regarding BTC as a "tangible" asset.
what the SEC was analyzing was the BZX Rule 14.11 (e) (4) rule change request. This request was made so that the SEC's understanding of the custody of digital assets, which is something new to them, is accepted. Today the rule says that only tangible assets are accepted as custody and Bitcoin is not tangible. By accepting this change, the Winklevoss Bitcoin (COIN) Shares issued by Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust may be listed on the stock exchange, so the ETF may exist!
Quoted this comment from Sukoi in Tradingview.
Just showing what was filed as to WHY the delay; regarding BTC as a "tangible" asset.
what the SEC was analyzing was the BZX Rule 14.11 (e) (4) rule change request. This request was made so that the SEC's understanding of the custody of digital assets, which is something new to them, is accepted. Today the rule says that only tangible assets are accepted as custody and Bitcoin is not tangible. By accepting this change, the Winklevoss Bitcoin (COIN) Shares issued by Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust may be listed on the stock exchange, so the ETF may exist!
Quoted this comment from Sukoi in Tradingview.
That's a nice change, this is also a huge opportunity for the U.S to regulate/maintain and oversee the whole adoption fase, i go for 75% Yes 25% No.
March 08, 2017, 01:28:13 PM
More news on ETF: http://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/regulation/rule_filings/pending/2016/SR-BatsBZX-2016-30.pdf
Just showing what was filed as to WHY the delay; regarding BTC as a "tangible" asset.
what the SEC was analyzing was the BZX Rule 14.11 (e) (4) rule change request. This request was made so that the SEC's understanding of the custody of digital assets, which is something new to them, is accepted. Today the rule says that only tangible assets are accepted as custody and Bitcoin is not tangible. By accepting this change, the Winklevoss Bitcoin (COIN) Shares issued by Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust may be listed on the stock exchange, so the ETF may exist!
Quoted this comment from Sukoi in Tradingview.
Just showing what was filed as to WHY the delay; regarding BTC as a "tangible" asset.
what the SEC was analyzing was the BZX Rule 14.11 (e) (4) rule change request. This request was made so that the SEC's understanding of the custody of digital assets, which is something new to them, is accepted. Today the rule says that only tangible assets are accepted as custody and Bitcoin is not tangible. By accepting this change, the Winklevoss Bitcoin (COIN) Shares issued by Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust may be listed on the stock exchange, so the ETF may exist!
Quoted this comment from Sukoi in Tradingview.
March 06, 2017, 06:29:42 AM
Bloomburg has ETF listed: Pematurely I might add but listed: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/COIN:US
Dude... Seriously?
It's litteraly written UNLISTED in big at the left of the screen --'
Look dude.... Do you not get it? I know it's unlisted. Why can't they have it "ready" (prepared)? I'm not saying it's listed damn it.
Because that might trigger much more speculation in the market as we are already having.
People could see this as a hint for a possible approval.
Bloomberg can not do this I think. If the ETF gets rejected I don't know if investors would have the possibility to sue Bloomberg due to giving false information or whatsoever, depending if a disclaimer would exist or not.
March 05, 2017, 08:46:08 PM
Bloomburg has ETF listed: Pematurely I might add but listed: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/COIN:US
Dude... Seriously?
It's litteraly written UNLISTED in big at the left of the screen --'
Look dude.... Do you not get it? I know it's unlisted. Why can't they have it "ready" (prepared)? I'm not saying it's listed damn it.
March 05, 2017, 07:37:04 PM
Bloomburg has ETF listed: Pematurely I might add but listed: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/COIN:US
March 04, 2017, 09:01:23 AM
(Spoiler: It's not a bubble)
URL: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/column-boom-bitcoin-bubble-thats-burst/
March 03, 2017, 05:20:46 PM
What do think Fakhoury, still a go for the ETF?? Its feeling like it.
March 03, 2017, 02:59:03 PM
Thank you Fakhoury,
You make my day over and over again, and are proven right in the process.
Please keep it up, and I continue to HODL my few bitcoins!!
Jump to: