https://cryptrade.io/
dex
Topic: the Cryptopia-apocalypse FUND - page 4. (Read 25318 times)
why does something like that happen? it's about assets not about trivial things so that there shouldn't be serious problems that will cause losses to the coin holder
problems like this need to be corrected and as much as possible must be prevented from repeating because such problems will damage the image of the blockchain which is currently very popular and is beginning to be trusted by various sections of society
problems like this need to be corrected and as much as possible must be prevented from repeating because such problems will damage the image of the blockchain which is currently very popular and is beginning to be trusted by various sections of society
After conducting a thorough review, it has been determined that the below coin(s) no longer comply and as such, we are delisting:
CoinonatX(XCXT)
LiteBar(LTB)
Gapcoin(GAP)
Songcoin(SONG)
CompuCoin(CPN)
CryptoJacks(CJ)
Mars(MARS)
CannabisIndustryCoin(XCI)
Eryllium(ERY)
WayaWolfCoin(WW)
CopperCoin(COPPER)
Coinonat(CXT)
Kronecoin(KRONE)
BERNcash(BERN)
Halcyon(HAL)
CoinonatX(XCXT)
LiteBar(LTB)
Gapcoin(GAP)
Songcoin(SONG)
CompuCoin(CPN)
CryptoJacks(CJ)
Mars(MARS)
CannabisIndustryCoin(XCI)
Eryllium(ERY)
WayaWolfCoin(WW)
CopperCoin(COPPER)
Coinonat(CXT)
Kronecoin(KRONE)
BERNcash(BERN)
Halcyon(HAL)
Usually the standard screw over for all.
Socialized.
Reality is it was their screw up. And their response is delete all the POW chains that are low/medium diff.
Instead of setting up blockchain health monitoring.
---
Atomic Swaps
https://atomicwallet.io/assets
BLOCKnet
https://blockdx.co/supported-coins
Socialized.
Reality is it was their screw up. And their response is delete all the POW chains that are low/medium diff.
Instead of setting up blockchain health monitoring.
---
Atomic Swaps
https://atomicwallet.io/assets
BLOCKnet
https://blockdx.co/supported-coins
Just about every reply or notice at Cryptopia seems to be a template with substituted...
I'm not sure about the first-in, first-served model. Someone with a large balance (or a relatively small group of people with a collectively large balance) can withdraw 100% of their funds if they happen to find out about this arrangement before everyone else, who get... nothing. Don't other exchanges typically socialise the losses, giving everyone's balance a haircut to be fair? And do Cryptopia make any attempt at locking the account of the person who did the 51% attack?
I'm not sure about the first-in, first-served model. Someone with a large balance (or a relatively small group of people with a collectively large balance) can withdraw 100% of their funds if they happen to find out about this arrangement before everyone else, who get... nothing. Don't other exchanges typically socialise the losses, giving everyone's balance a haircut to be fair? And do Cryptopia make any attempt at locking the account of the person who did the 51% attack?
Quote
Einsteinium (EMC2) has suffered from a 51% attack. We will be enabling withdrawals from 02:00:00 AM (UTC) on 4 January 2019 in order for users to reclaim their funds. Withdrawals will operate on a first-in, first-served basis, meaning users who withdraw later may not be able to do so. If you do not take action, you risk losing your funds.
Quote
As of today (21 December 2018), 100% of MegaCoin's remaining funds have been claimed by users. Withdrawals of MegaCoin operated on first in, first served basis and there is now zero balance left as a result of the 51% attack on MegaCoin.
After conducting a thorough review, it has been determined that MegaCoin no longer complies with our Listing Policy and as such, MegaCoin is now delisted.
After conducting a thorough review, it has been determined that MegaCoin no longer complies with our Listing Policy and as such, MegaCoin is now delisted.
Quote
As of today (21 December 2018), 100% of Cthulhu Offerings' remaining funds have been claimed by users. Withdrawals of Cthulhu Offerings operated on first in, first served basis and there is now zero balance left as a result of the 51% attack on Cthulhu Offerings.
After conducting a thorough review, it has been determined that Cthulhu Offerings no longer complies with our Listing Policy and as such, Cthulhu Offerings is now delisted.
After conducting a thorough review, it has been determined that Cthulhu Offerings no longer complies with our Listing Policy and as such, Cthulhu Offerings is now delisted.
Even shit responds when well known dev contacts Cryptopia.
I have enquired Cryptopia on the delisting matter. One customer support agent has given me a tinned response and suggested to ask the coin listing team. Those have given me the same tinned response and no more communication. They refer to their delisting policy, but cannot tell what part of it has to do with Halcyon being delisted!
explorer.halcyon.top:2080
After conducting a thorough review, it has been determined that the below coin(s) no longer comply and as such, we are delisting:
TittieCoin(TTC)
NAMO COIN(NAMO)
ZetaCoin(ZET)
SolarflareCoin(SFC)
Granite(GRN)
MarxCoin(MARX)
TittieCoin(TTC)
NAMO COIN(NAMO)
ZetaCoin(ZET)
SolarflareCoin(SFC)
Granite(GRN)
MarxCoin(MARX)
Another idea to mitigate 51% attacks:
1. For small networks, require a significant period of time (not just confirmation count) for a deposit to credit. Something like 24 hours.
2. BUT, coins can be credited to an account earlier if the customer provides collateral.
For example, you make a deposit of coin X, and already have a BTC balance. The exchange places a temporary hold on part of your BTC balance, as collateral, and immediately credits your pending deposit for coin X.
If the deposit period ends without incident, the temporary hold on the collateral is removed. But if instead the coin X deposit is reversed by a 51% attack, and there's no forthcoming re-deposit (this is to ensure legit customers whose deposits are reversed are not penalised by someone else's attack), the exchange settles the discrepancy by keeping the collateral.
This is a variation of an idea I posted 5 years ago to pawn available balance of one coin in order to trade another:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/idea-for-exchange-to-implement-pawn-your-altcoins-355810
1. For small networks, require a significant period of time (not just confirmation count) for a deposit to credit. Something like 24 hours.
2. BUT, coins can be credited to an account earlier if the customer provides collateral.
For example, you make a deposit of coin X, and already have a BTC balance. The exchange places a temporary hold on part of your BTC balance, as collateral, and immediately credits your pending deposit for coin X.
If the deposit period ends without incident, the temporary hold on the collateral is removed. But if instead the coin X deposit is reversed by a 51% attack, and there's no forthcoming re-deposit (this is to ensure legit customers whose deposits are reversed are not penalised by someone else's attack), the exchange settles the discrepancy by keeping the collateral.
This is a variation of an idea I posted 5 years ago to pawn available balance of one coin in order to trade another:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/idea-for-exchange-to-implement-pawn-your-altcoins-355810
@almighty
Yes solutions outside of wholesale delisting are very possible.
I think the SHIFT needs to be more decentralized custodial silos.
We can still trade on niffty looking trade engines.
But they don't hold the coins.
Another counterparty does that [custodial bots].
EXAMPLES
https://tradesatoshi.com/api/public/getcurrencies
ping
GET
Code:
{
"currency": "BTC",
"currencyLong": "Bitcoin",
"minConfirmation": 6,
"txFee": 0.00000000,
"status": "OK"
}1. GUI friendly trade apps
2. pinging dozens of tradesatoshi-like-boards
3. have marginal trading accounts [collateral stuff you mentioned]
4. Users deposit to trade-app not exchange
WHAT'S DIFFERENT?
5. Exchanges can list or delist but it doesn't kill the coin because market is in the cloud api driven.
6. This splits the conventional model of "the exchange" into [api-book-maker matching bids/asks] and [GUI-sexy-style-apps].
7. [GUI-sexy-style-apps] is the mobile future, popular shift to make.
8. This eliminates 2FA/login/thrice confirmation KYC headache nightmare.
9. The wallet as the service model (see BREAD, METAL, PAY, OMG?)
Indonesian Exchange
https://bitsten.com/
https://bitsten.com/
Another idea to mitigate 51% attacks:
1. For small networks, require a significant period of time (not just confirmation count) for a deposit to credit. Something like 24 hours.
2. BUT, coins can be credited to an account earlier if the customer provides collateral.
For example, you make a deposit of coin X, and already have a BTC balance. The exchange places a temporary hold on part of your BTC balance, as collateral, and immediately credits your pending deposit for coin X.
If the deposit period ends without incident, the temporary hold on the collateral is removed. But if instead the coin X deposit is reversed by a 51% attack, and there's no forthcoming re-deposit (this is to ensure legit customers whose deposits are reversed are not penalised by someone else's attack), the exchange settles the discrepancy by keeping the collateral.
This is a variation of an idea I posted 5 years ago to pawn available balance of one coin in order to trade another:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/idea-for-exchange-to-implement-pawn-your-altcoins-355810
1. For small networks, require a significant period of time (not just confirmation count) for a deposit to credit. Something like 24 hours.
2. BUT, coins can be credited to an account earlier if the customer provides collateral.
For example, you make a deposit of coin X, and already have a BTC balance. The exchange places a temporary hold on part of your BTC balance, as collateral, and immediately credits your pending deposit for coin X.
If the deposit period ends without incident, the temporary hold on the collateral is removed. But if instead the coin X deposit is reversed by a 51% attack, and there's no forthcoming re-deposit (this is to ensure legit customers whose deposits are reversed are not penalised by someone else's attack), the exchange settles the discrepancy by keeping the collateral.
This is a variation of an idea I posted 5 years ago to pawn available balance of one coin in order to trade another:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/idea-for-exchange-to-implement-pawn-your-altcoins-355810
@GUN
cool.
---
I think good to investigate.
cool.
---
Looks legit (copied from the Coval forum):
Exchange name: https://instantbitex.com/
Contact person: https://t.me/johnniecrypto
Listing fee and other details are to be discussed in Telegram
Exchange credits:
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/instant-bitex/
https://www.coingecko.com/en/exchanges/instantbitex
https://coincodex.com/exchange/instantbitex/
Exchange name: https://instantbitex.com/
Contact person: https://t.me/johnniecrypto
Listing fee and other details are to be discussed in Telegram
Exchange credits:
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/instant-bitex/
https://www.coingecko.com/en/exchanges/instantbitex
https://coincodex.com/exchange/instantbitex/
I think good to investigate.
Guncoin (GUN) has released a security upgrade (GUN Core V1.5.2, that solves the 0.16 problem and takes care of the situation with Cryptopia. The exchange is running the new code now and should be refilling wallets with GUN to get Guncoin moving again. Hopefully, GUN is out of Maintenance Mode shortly as a result.
CNO block explorer moved from cryptoguru to ccexp.
http://[Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=CNO
http://[Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=CNO
CNO block explorer moved from cryptoguru to ccexp.
http://[Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=CNO
http://[Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=CNO
LOG block explorer moved from cryptoguru to ccexp.
http://[Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=LOG
http://[Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=LOG
QBT block explorer moved from cryptoguru to ccexp.
http://[Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=QBT
http://[Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=QBT
SCIFI block explorer moved from cryptoguru to ccexp.
http://[Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=SCIFI
http://[Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=SCIFI
http:// [Suspicious link removed]/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=SCIFI
http://cc exp .tk/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=SCIFI
tty https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-trinity-tty-sha256d-scrypt-myr-groest-trinamic-block-value-system-1186025
tty https://trinitycointty.weebly.com/
https://www.coinexplorer.net/TRBO
mza https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmZ3s6sqhFPaPgTHthjuEuvZP1oBGE452CmrBsGjKhF6w3
mza https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmeFphaDUMjMhqih5w54g5mvqKzNMibPJJ8DNehhWtaVME
holder of:
Sexcoin(SXC)
Cthulhu Offerings(OFF)
MarxCoin(MARX)
NAMO COIN(NAMO)
ZetaCoin(ZET)
TitCoin(TIT)
SolarflareCoin(SFC)
Granite(GRN)
BolivarCoin(BOLI)
FireFlyCoin(FFC)
GroinCoin(GXG)
GoldCoin(GLD)
Maza(MAZA)
MegaCoin(MEC)
LeaCoin(LEA)
Get Out!
---
TIT https://cryptocurrencytalk.com/topic/3407-titcoin%E2%84%A2-tit-new-developer-discussion-forum-2016-xbiz-awards-nominee/
PR https://cryptocurrencytalk.com/topic/40178-prototanium-pure-pow-sha256-rare-250k/
---
new.funcoin.co/postage.html 交易费率
---
https://github.com/Worldcoin-Network/worldcoin/releases/tag/v0.8.7.5
----------
We get a listing on a new exchange called coffe. The exchange will start on 20th December 2018.
https://coffe.io/
Sexcoin(SXC)
Cthulhu Offerings(OFF)
MarxCoin(MARX)
NAMO COIN(NAMO)
ZetaCoin(ZET)
TitCoin(TIT)
SolarflareCoin(SFC)
Granite(GRN)
BolivarCoin(BOLI)
FireFlyCoin(FFC)
GroinCoin(GXG)
GoldCoin(GLD)
Maza(MAZA)
MegaCoin(MEC)
LeaCoin(LEA)
Get Out!
---
TIT https://cryptocurrencytalk.com/topic/3407-titcoin%E2%84%A2-tit-new-developer-discussion-forum-2016-xbiz-awards-nominee/
PR https://cryptocurrencytalk.com/topic/40178-prototanium-pure-pow-sha256-rare-250k/
---
new.funcoin.co/postage.html 交易费率
---
https://github.com/Worldcoin-Network/worldcoin/releases/tag/v0.8.7.5
----------
We get a listing on a new exchange called coffe. The exchange will start on 20th December 2018.
https://coffe.io/
thank you for your post ot was really interesting to find out some new information but i stoll do not share the global panoc about it
I use this exchange for about a year. Indeed, recently a huge amount of coins began to be delisted from the stock exchange. This has hit my portfolio very much, I hope the exchange team will do something about it. Too many dissatisfied users.
Jump to: