Pages:
Author

Topic: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs - page 30. (Read 148746 times)

full member
Activity: 646
Merit: 100
tozex.io
ok added the nodes to Cypherfunk.conf, and it worked but now it is behind 2 hrs and will not go past block 769463
full member
Activity: 646
Merit: 100
tozex.io
Also someone should make a slack or telegram for this coin.
full member
Activity: 646
Merit: 100
tozex.io
hope dev can give a update soon
full member
Activity: 260
Merit: 217
Yes, the coin has potential to 10x if the necessary changes are made.

Yes definetly! This will be exactly like the cv2 revival.. this can go to 3-4sat easy lol. Im buying more

Wise choice.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Yes, the coin has potential to 10x if the necessary changes are made.

Yes definetly! This will be exactly like the cv2 revival.. this can go to 3-4sat easy lol. Im buying more
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Good project. Do you have any bonus activities for everyone?
full member
Activity: 260
Merit: 217
Yes, the coin has potential to 10x if the necessary changes are made.
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Will there be a swap from FUNK coins into said ERC 23 token?

I bought alot of funk because I thought you guys will revive it, I hope there is a swap in place.

That swap has been in the works since ETH came out ... oooh two years ago now Cheesy

I vote to fork into current LTC Core while ETH boys do their ETH thing ... just think of the news twice Smiley

... ya know ... the whole point of crypto is open sauce .. which should mean if you can do it, you should do it .. or something like that. Trouble is that sheeple love a good shepherd Smiley

Basically the code can be updated without the proposed hard forks as well... It's a matter of a few hours coding and testing. In any case I would vote for the soft forks at least (BIP65, BIB66, CSV, SegWit).

edit: with properly added fixed nodes those bootstrapping issues would disappear, no more .conf file.
full member
Activity: 646
Merit: 100
tozex.io
cool, thanks for help
legendary
Activity: 1130
Merit: 1000
No good deed goes unpunished
Also the wallet is saying no blocks found, is there a way to get it working?

No block source? You'll need the Cypherfunk.conf file

Quote
listen=1
server=1
daemon=1
rpcuser=cypherfunk
rpcpassword=feelthefunk
rpcport=23666
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
addnode=149.210.168.71
addnode=184.164.129.202
addnode=188.134.72.213
addnode=192.169.6.147
addnode=217.175.119.125
addnode=23.94.55.149
addnode=45.79.170.139
addnode=5.149.251.99
addnode=51.254.196.222
addnode=58.169.223.210
addnode=71.207.13.6
addnode=78.70.227.72
addnode=81.170.67.142
addnode=86.184.84.190
addnode=86.83.78.80
addnode=89.13.210.197
addnode=89.14.97.82
addnode=90.252.161.176
addnode=91.134.233.254
addnode=91.205.238.18
addnode=98.115.147.74
addnode=98.218.208.252
addnode=149.202.102.73:33666
addnode=149.210.168.71:33666
addnode=192.169.6.147:33666
addnode=23.94.55.149:33666
addnode=82.200.205.30:33666
addnode=109.105.40.15:33666
addnode=104.200.67.31:33666
addnode=78.248.188.112:33666
legendary
Activity: 1130
Merit: 1000
No good deed goes unpunished
so is the devs lying and there will be no swap in the near future?

Those are three questions:

1) I don't think devs are lying ... there isn't a dev per se, but the will of the whales is there.
2) There will be a swap
3) Depends what you call near future
 - a) less than a month? - No chance
 - b) Between 1-3 months - ehh .. perhaps
 - c) In the next year - probably

If they miss 4th anniversary in 5 months, it will be a missed opportunity to remind people there was a FUNK coin in early 2014.

Smiley
full member
Activity: 646
Merit: 100
tozex.io
Also the wallet is saying no blocks found, is there a way to get it working?
full member
Activity: 646
Merit: 100
tozex.io
so is the devs lying and there will be no swap in the near future?
legendary
Activity: 1130
Merit: 1000
No good deed goes unpunished
I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Will there be a swap from FUNK coins into said ERC 23 token?

I bought alot of funk because I thought you guys will revive it, I hope there is a swap in place.

That swap has been in the works since ETH came out ... oooh two years ago now Cheesy

I vote to fork into current LTC Core while ETH boys do their ETH thing ... just think of the news twice Smiley

... ya know ... the whole point of crypto is open sauce .. which should mean if you can do it, you should do it .. or something like that. Trouble is that sheeple love a good shepherd Smiley
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Will there be a swap from FUNK coins into said ERC 23 token?

I bought alot of funk because I thought you guys will revive it, I hope there is a swap in place.
full member
Activity: 260
Merit: 217
I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Will there be a swap from FUNK coins into said ERC 23 token?
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 260
I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
 please help with getting FUNK listed on Cryptofolio -

http://cryptofolio.info/welcome/vote

scroll down to where the # of votes goes to zero, then just up a bit, as i just gave it it's first vote and uploaded the logo

  you can vote every hour, they will also accept BTCitcoin


VOTED  Grin
Lets start the voting-marathon...


87 votes... keep on voting  Grin




Don't worry mate... when we are set up I'll push some paid votes in
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
 please help with getting FUNK listed on Cryptofolio -

http://cryptofolio.info/welcome/vote

scroll down to where the # of votes goes to zero, then just up a bit, as i just gave it it's first vote and uploaded the logo

  you can vote every hour, they will also accept BTCitcoin


VOTED  Grin
Lets start the voting-marathon...


87 votes... keep on voting  Grin


member
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)
Pages:
Jump to: