one little 51% attack and Cypherfunk the full flegged cryptocurrency is all ready to commit suicide and accept everlasting life as an eth token? why?
imo cypherfunk has a better chance of replacing BTC than ethetrium, (price doesn't necessarily reflect value in a heavily controlled market) but what do i klow, lol
I quite agree that would be a silly thing to do, which is why I started a new FUNK thread with new up to date links.
I think if they are adamant on doing a burn into tokens we need to look at the prospect of forking it and having two different FUNK coins a traditional one and the token one.
Ethereum is currently ranked at #2 at Coinmarketcap.com, and FUNK is ranked at #416. I'm not sure why one would think FUNK in it's present form could replace Ethereum?
Crunck you posted a link to another thread before I presented the idea, so it's clearly not the reason why you posted a new thread. It only diverts people away from the original thread.
A FUNK sidechain will enhance the FUNK network privacy, security, make it extensible, and more functional by adding features like smart contracts and confidential transactions.
I'm surprised you guys didn't know that. If you want to keep your traditional tokens that's fine. The new tokens will simply become more valuable, as investors become interested. I think it would be silly to hold on to them if they aren't worth as much after the new token is launched.
absolute blockchain，It is important ,Otherwise ,If doing a burn into tokens ,XCP is better,Xcp is bitcoin blockchain.
Other choice
1. Keep current algorithm, increase security, adding more nodes and checkpoints.
2. Use POW+POS or POS
3. Merged mining
4. Update algorithm, like Scrypt-N, X15, etc.
5. Multi-algorithm ,like DGB ,MYR
