Topic: The End Of The Bounty. - page 9. (Read 3663 times)
Every year number of icos are increasing as we see, I dont think that till 2020 icos will end, just number of icos are going to decrease after next year but right now I dont think that icos are going to end.
what i only see is that wen more people comes in the project will be fast promoting and it will quickly sell out.
it is indeed the actual result of the more people to promote the project, the better. but its not better in the eyes of bounty hunters. especially if the bounty is not that huge.
I believe that if there is ICO's there will always be bounty campaigns because this is the way to create awareness among the crypto community about the projects that being created. The problem is there's a lot of bounty participants in every bounty but I don't think it is because there are less ICOs. It is just because more and more people are getting into cryptocurrency now than before. The most logical solution, I think, is to limit the participation and screening the legit and promising ICO by the moderator or trusted bounty manager.
Yes I agree the fact that if ICOs are not coming out bounty will also end, but I don't think people will stop releasing ICOs many ICOs are still coming in the future because cryptocurrency is expanding day by day.
Yes, I agree if half of them are scams. And this will make us the more meticulous in choosing projects ICO. Make sure to do some analysis and looking for information on a real project. So we also do not get caught up in scams, if that happens we will surely suffer losses.
what i only see is that wen more people comes in the project will be fast promoting and it will quickly sell out.
You cant create a market for yourself without doing sufficient marketing. Bounty campaigns are should for every project to increase the awareness among the crypto community. I know that real participants are getting less day by day and bots have increased significantly but still, it is a need.
Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less. Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?
If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful
What do you think about this?
If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful
Yes I agree with you, indeed the number of people who participate into bounty increasingly day. Sometimes it's better for the bounty manager to limit the number of participants who can join it. But, I think the more number of people who participate in the crypto signify that crypto is growing and popular.
Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less. Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?
If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful
That is true there are bounty managers who did not limit the number of participants in the bounty campaign and so the payment will become less in time of distribution. I myself will prefer to join bounty campaign who has less of participants who knows that project will hit in the market so we can be lucky. Because less participants will get more payment while more participants will get less. What do you think about this?
If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful
Many of the bounties are not worth the effort at all. Some of the tokens does not even make it to the market talk less of having a good price on it. That is why I always try to take my time to check the white paper and see if there is anything encouraging about the project before I participate in their airdrop or bounty at all.
That effort will give you a good return, there are a lot of ICOs right now and most of them are scam, it's time to be more diligent in investingif we want to be profitable in the long run. In addition, the market is pretty down, so expect the price will drop but it's still good for long term as long as you invest on real project.
Many of the bounties are not worth the effort at all. Some of the tokens does not even make it to the market talk less of having a good price on it. That is why I always try to take my time to check the white paper and see if there is anything encouraging about the project before I participate in their airdrop or bounty at all.
I think bounty crypto currencies are the largest investors in the stock market. because the bounty provides extra wins. Having some bounty scam in recent times has had a negative impact on the market. this may be the end of the bounty.
the first level of clarity we get as a hunter is from bounty managers, but sometimes in every project progress that we follow without clarity from the manager leads to many negative opinions from each participant, so most who think the project under development will be scam.
but we also need to pay attention to ongoing sales as the main benchmark of any development of the project.
but we also need to pay attention to ongoing sales as the main benchmark of any development of the project.
I really do not like it when bounty managers do not limit the number of participants. I believe that this is not right and not fair. Now a lot of people want to participate in the bounty. Often the bounty does not have a lot of money. I've had cases when I got less than 5 dollars for 20 weeks of TW&FB bounty. And such things will faster kill the bounty than anything else.
Yes, I am agree. Some times I do not want to join to very good project only because there are already thousands of participants. I don't want spend my time for 2-3 usd even for a good project
Your words make sense. But do not panic. This kind of awards will work long. There is demand now, demand will be in the future.
The greater number of people doing signature promotions eagerly may validate that quite a few projects mistreat followers when the funds are in their pockets.
I want to be positive but you have a strong point. ICO's now are very unstable and low trust now from the investor because anyone can make their own crypto currency. Also i think the competition is so huge that it is confusing who coin will go to the moon.
Let's face the fact.
There is only 20-30% ICO that become succeeded in the past a year or so, and Bounty hunter is become the most attractive money-making on the internet at the moment. admit it, it is an easy money and almost zero investment for us to participate. the more people coming added with a low chance of success ICO(scam or low-interest project) will conclude to end of the bounty hunter era.
the most logical solution is to limit the participation and screening the legit and promising ICO by the moderator or trusted bounty manager.
There is only 20-30% ICO that become succeeded in the past a year or so, and Bounty hunter is become the most attractive money-making on the internet at the moment. admit it, it is an easy money and almost zero investment for us to participate. the more people coming added with a low chance of success ICO(scam or low-interest project) will conclude to end of the bounty hunter era.
the most logical solution is to limit the participation and screening the legit and promising ICO by the moderator or trusted bounty manager.
It seems to me that the bounty itself will change, now we already have a bounty that limits the number of participants, possibly other restrictions in the ranks of the forum or the number of subscribers in social networks
Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less. Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?
If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful
What do you think about this?
If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful
Surely the reward for the bounty hunter is decreasing, but as of other MMO forms I think it lasts longer.
Jump to: