Does an accusation that someone is a Solana shill really make the question of netflows and valuation of a chain invalid? It clearly does not make the question invalid.
No, of course. But it would make your point a bit clearer and more convincing if you provided some hard facts - completely independently from if you're a shill or not.
Also on your other attempt to weaken the argument on netflows, if the source is a paid package, are you implying that the data on that website is not real? The negative netflows on Ethereum are not happening?
No, this was not an attempt to "weaken the argument", here you misunderstood. It's only that I am not interested enough in that metric to pay the package which includes "netflows", But as you do seem to have access (or know the numbers from another source), I've asked you to publish at least some examples for the netflow growth on SOL and the negative flows on ETH here. It hasn't to be a pic, only the % over the last month or so ...
On Ethereum rollups, there are some people in the cryptospace who are beginning to speculate that these rollups might become vampire attacks on Ethereum mainnet. There was an article about the rollup of Coinbase where it earned $2 million in fees and it only paid onchain fees of $20,000 on mainnet.
I don't think that's bad. I know some Ethereum shills
like their high fees on ETH because then many ETH get burnt in transaction fees and they think ETH gets "more scarce" due to this. However, if the ETH mainnet fees lower due to activity moving to rollups, then it will be again more attractive to move value on-chain on Ethereum's L1. This can have positive effects, and eventually will lead to a new equilibrium.
Compare that with Bitcoin, if people used Lightning more, then it would be better for those who like to transact on-chain, and I'm sure half of the forum would be happy.
I am not declaring that these are
hard facts, however, if you were paying attention to what I was saying, I was speculating that this
Ethereum killer storyline will have different
seasons very much similar to a show on televsion. Read my original post.
Also, the only data I can provide as an argument that Solana might be the Ethereum killer is the data on netflows from this website.
https://app.artemis.xyz/flowsOn Ethereum's high fees, if there are community members who like their high fees then this will certainly strengthen the argument for faster blockchains. Their rollup roadmap also appears to have become an opportunity for Solana to argue for an integrated approach and it appears to be working based on the positive netflows, venture capitalists are increasing, transactions are increasing, the community is growing and SOL/ETH is increasing. Let us eat the popcorn for the tv show hehehehehehhee.