Pages:
Author

Topic: The EU wants transparency on Cryptocurrencies - page 2. (Read 627 times)

full member
Activity: 326
Merit: 100
If thats concretly is the case then people will begin to avoid hardware wallets, when it's obvious that regulation is coming it seems that governments aren't realizing how difficult it will be to go against bitcoin
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
Stumbled upon this article today.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/security/20180404STO00913/plenary-vote-stricter-eu-rules-on-money-laundering-and-terrorism-financing

According to the European Parliament, in order to fight money laundering and terrorism financing, they proposed a new legislation to regulate cryptocurrencies. Quoting from the article:

Quote
The new legislation would also require virtual currency exchange platforms and custodian wallet providers to exercise due diligence and end the anonymity associated with such exchanges. “Now we say that platform providers and those who keep bitcoins in their wallet need to know their customers just as banks do. It is quite revolutionary,” explains Sargentini.

In simple words, they actually want wallet providers to require more information from us, similar to banks.

What are your thoughts on this? Could this ever happen?

cryptocurrencies are as transparent as their "licensed" and "burocratic" and "legal" bankster cartells.
sr. member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 271
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Whom among us here don't want a transparent transaction? I know that all of us are here because we saw the transparency in cryptocurrency. EU wants to have a fair system in cryptocurrency because right now, people are using it in illegal activities. I guess it is good if all countries will regulate cryptocurrency instead of banning in order for the scammers to prevent the scamming the people.
member
Activity: 243
Merit: 10
even though it happens I guess that new solutions towards those regulations will be found and created in blockchain so it would not affect the privacy too much if anyone wants to keep it private.
hero member
Activity: 2744
Merit: 541
Campaign Management?"Hhampuz" is the Man
Stumbled upon this article today.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/security/20180404STO00913/plenary-vote-stricter-eu-rules-on-money-laundering-and-terrorism-financing

According to the European Parliament, in order to fight money laundering and terrorism financing, they proposed a new legislation to regulate cryptocurrencies. Quoting from the article:

Quote
The new legislation would also require virtual currency exchange platforms and custodian wallet providers to exercise due diligence and end the anonymity associated with such exchanges. “Now we say that platform providers and those who keep bitcoins in their wallet need to know their customers just as banks do. It is quite revolutionary,” explains Sargentini.

In simple words, they actually want wallet providers to require more information from us, similar to banks.

What are your thoughts on this? Could this ever happen?
Semilar to KYC,they want every individuals in their region that transacting here in crypto will be have transfarency things that good for me,the only problem is,if the government takes advantage to the members,since they have the profile of the users,i guess this must have a full security and safeties for all of us
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1024
In my opinion they can easily achieve it because there is a blockchain explorer that they can use in order to see the things that they wanted to see. Most of the cryptocurrencies are already transparent so what kind of transparency is they want. The government can tell people to have an annual report of their cryptocurrency activities so they can get more transparency.
The thing especially with using an exchange to do transaction is that your name and details are already attached to your accounts and all the wallets you generate are as well. It is not a stage we are not prepared for anyway, as we cannot expect the government to keep quiet on the idea of laundering.

If you start doing something fishy within the exchange, what they are looking for is to be able to tag those activities and question it, which is where the whole idea of regulation kicks in. But multi accounts and few kind of malfunctionings are not new just due to cryptocurrencies. But, government may understand this not in near future unfortunately.
newbie
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
I can hardly say anything about it as I am totally new to this system
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 12
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
Is there a way they could implement kyc on wallets? If the wallets are not based on EU then they will not comply with that regulation.

KYC on exchanges should be because there are lots of movements of money in there. But KYC on wallets os an overkill.

This is true. Considering you could also potentially keep your bitcoin on a piece of paper. There's no way they could effectively implement this. I still think the best way to do it is through exchanges. Besides it's not btc is as liquid as fiat. Or at least at its current state, regulation on exchanges could still work.
newbie
Activity: 74
Merit: 0
They should better have erradicted the possibility if blockchain expansion rather than demanding for an impossible policy
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 15
The nain reason of the bitcoins for not being transparent is that, it a set of mere codes, that cant be kept track of
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1029
I think because of that monero cannot be listed on coinbase etc. But rather on decentralized exchanges. It may make them less valuable in the future, I don't think they will be valuable while no central authority sympathises it.
I would not say Monero cannot be listed. The way some of these exchanges that are fiat based works is not just basically to monitor the transactions from wallet to wallet, but the transaction within the exchange. That is where the whole money laundering thing comes in anyway, except for those who may want to go the dark way and preferably not go through exchanges to invest. With that, as long as you are registered on the exchange and you are making fiat-cryptocurrency transactions, all that will end up being monitored.
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
It can be possible because the people involved in transaction just are connected by their respected id. now we can see them in data mining
full member
Activity: 315
Merit: 100
Investing in the future development of blockchain
It's impossible, it's fighting against windmills. If they control one coin, we can simply create another one - completely anonymous.

I certainly agree with you, if Bitcoin was regulated it is very unlawful to this nature , people will soon change the entire existence of this currency which we should not let happened cause this forum had done very well this passed few years because people also maintain the nature that it keep to its system and putting some regulation to this might not be a great idea for me since thats what we take care of, personal information whether you are a scammer or not
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 103
This will surely happen and they have all rights to ask for more information if the exchanged amount exceeds 10,000€. This is anyway common standart for banks and as long as they do not prohibit crypto currencies, you can not really complain about it.

I see it possitive and this should motivate the crypto currencies users to use the banking and fiat money system less.
member
Activity: 331
Merit: 13
It's impossible, it's fighting against windmills. If they control one coin, we can simply create another one - completely anonymous.

Which other way can we guard against the evil uses of cryptocurrencies such as drug trafficking and the likes? They're obviously not trying to fight against cryptocurrencies, they're trying to see how users could be more transparent as many could hide under its anonymity to perpetrate evil. If you know a better way to go about it, suggest it here.
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 10
Actually in my opinion government in my particular country just wants to fave profit and taxes from those, who are not paying them yet from crypto.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
Stumbled upon this article today.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/security/20180404STO00913/plenary-vote-stricter-eu-rules-on-money-laundering-and-terrorism-financing

According to the European Parliament, in order to fight money laundering and terrorism financing, they proposed a new legislation to regulate cryptocurrencies. Quoting from the article:

Quote
The new legislation would also require virtual currency exchange platforms and custodian wallet providers to exercise due diligence and end the anonymity associated with such exchanges. “Now we say that platform providers and those who keep bitcoins in their wallet need to know their customers just as banks do. It is quite revolutionary,” explains Sargentini.

In simple words, they actually want wallet providers to require more information from us, similar to banks.

What are your thoughts on this? Could this ever happen?

I think that this will be another way for the government to place taxes on cryptocurrency investors so i do not think that this will be a great idea, they can catch people who are having illegal activities but they should not get our own informations because it can be used to threaten people who are holding a huge amount.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
if only the btcs be supported as well as blockchain ran partially by govt. then it could happen.
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 272
I don't believe this is possible. Many purses are outside the EU zone. These rules cannot be applied to them and will not be supported. Maybe some of the funds users will show to the government but the main savings will remain in the shadows and governments will never force them to show.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
More transparency is maybe the key for a massive adoption. Moreover, EU has to find a solution to take advantage of the crypocurrentcy, otherwise, it will be soon outperformed by other countries or regions, on a  economically plan;
Pages:
Jump to: