Most people only like to hear fraudsters tell stories, rather than listening to the facts of bitterness.Hello, I am a business manager from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (B-EX.IO). In order to express my meaning more clearly, I will tell some facts in Chinese. After all, this is my mother tongue. Then, I will use the crappy English to say the same thing again. Just now we learned that some people say that we are a liar, the post is here
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/95z7rm/rcryptocurrency_i_need_your_help_the_bexio/. Below I will reveal who is the real liar.
1、The author of the post said that he almost saved all his cryptocurrencies into B-EX. We don't know if his 480,000 UFR is all his. Of course, this is not what we care about. According to UFR. The market price is worth about $70,000. I would like to ask, but if a normal person, will deposit so much money into a new exchange at one time? I think there are probably two reasons. First, he knows that we must be very reliable, so we dare to deposit large sums of money at one time. Second, deposit a large amount of money to do the next step for fraud. Basics (more UFRs can be scammed to more UFRs). Why are fraudsters so rampant? Because he knows that as a new exchange, we don't have much weight to speak, and people are more inclined to like to hear stories like "fake exchanges, exchange frauds."
2、The post author said that our purchase order is fake. Let me explain now. After the UFR went public, we found that the purchase order was not active. At that time, the price of the whole network was about 1900 Cong, so we hung some purchase orders at the position of 700 Cong. Yes, the price was nearly three times lower, and then after about a few minutes, The author of the post (or the author of the token) deposited 480,000 UFRs and immediately slammed it at the lowest price, and the exchange's security policy prevented the event from happening in the currency of the transaction. Perhaps the author's original idea was to put all the 480,000 UFRs on the list, but after this operation was not successful, the idea of implementing fraud was born, and then he really did.
3、The author said that the balance is reduced. In this matter, he only said a part of the facts. Because the currency of the listed observation area is not involved in the “mining transaction”, the observation area rules have been announced very early on the platform homepage. However, our program seems to have a small problem, resulting in the transaction in the observation area still receiving normal trading rebates. We adjusted the users who trade UFRs after they found the problem. Part of the profit from the "mining transaction" is emptied. In the process, the technicians neglected to empty the frozen balance. The author found that the first time the problem was not submitted to us, but a variety of verbal attacks on social networks, and it was only a few days later to submit this question to us. We don't know what the author is doing for this kind of god-like operation. After receiving the questions submitted by the authors, we have returned all the balances of the problems after the investigation (141,551UFR and 0.016 BTC, the total value of 2.9 BTC tokens, why should the author say that the 4BTC tokens are missing?), the author A coin application has been made. Just because of the jet lag, we can't process the withdrawal request right away, but we will all deal with it within 24 hours. As a new exchange, we would rather slow down the withdrawal rate and ensure the safety of the user's funds.
4-5. The author will withdraw the token of 6.5BTC. Yes, he did this. The author divided the UFR in the account three times. The first two times are transferred to 2400 and more than 2800 UFRs to the address 0x83b8913dfeaaad5c0938b481cdfb278a4b3a809c. For the third time, the author transferred 340,000 UFR to the address 0x4260b79b4dcbf42a164744df8912f6d934d2b921, which is the beginning of fraud. The author has repeatedly claimed that we want to transfer UFR to the first address, otherwise it will do the action on the social network. But at this point the author has already raised the coin to the second address, we can't get the extra money and give him a coin. And we will only raise the currency according to the coin application. Since the author has already submitted the application, we are obliged to withdraw the coin from the application address submitted by the author. This is understandable. At first we thought that the author had made a mistake in the address. Later, we gradually discovered that this is basically a scam set by the author. It is a deliberate trap and I want to double the UFR. We will never compromise with any fraudster. We decided to fight the fraudsters in the end.
6. This problem has been said above, we apologize for the system BUG, and has returned the token of 2.9BTC value, the author has also applied for the coin, because of the time difference, will handle the coin application within 24 hours. For his screenshots, we don't think it makes any sense. If you need our evidence, we will always provide it. See who is lying and who is swindling.
7. The author said that he has more than 6 years of experience in cryptocurrency and never kept the funds on the exchange, very cautious. Then, why do you want to deposit UFR worth US$70,000 into a newly opened exchange B-EX.IO? Want to swindle on a new exchange? please answer me. Because you have 6 years of experience, so you have to rely on your qualifications to defraud a newly operated exchange?
8. Just because B-EX is in China, are you going to swindle us? You are so cautious, but you have saved almost all your savings in a new exchange. Ask all sensible people to analyze this behavior.
9. You can seek help from a Hong Kong law firm and submit an application to the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. At the same time, we will also submit evidence of the incident to the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
10. The author said that UFR does not have any exchanges. Please see here:
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/upfiring/#markets We can see that UFR has 8 markets, and the author actually said that there is no exchange. I suddenly understood why the author was obscured by the currency he deposited at the beginning of the post, not to mention UFR. Full of all are routines.
11. Let's talk about the eighth continent project. Why didn't we withdraw money for him? As the first free listing of B-EX.IO, the world's first project, the eighth continent (referred to as ECB), we have repeatedly communicated that we hope that the project will not have no pay, this will have a reputational impact on our exchange, ECB The team also repeatedly stressed that the market will detonate after the transaction, and the price is high. But after the ECB started trading, we saw an embarrassing situation, and there was no one pay. We hope that the ECB team will take some necessary actions to stop the embarrassing situation, but the ECB team refused. A large number of platform users asked about the status of the ECB because we decided to remove the ECB. For the listing of ECB, our colleagues in the three departments worked hard for ECB for 5 days, but did not bring us a penny of fee income. At this time, ECB users have to raise coins. Is this time we have to pay time? , pay the ETH transfer fee? This is what we don't want. Therefore, we decided to charge the ECB team for the cost of 1 ETH as the ECB coin handling fee and project default fee. We think this is completely reasonable.
12. Why are we listing for free? As a new exchange, we don't have much money to promote and promote. We can only rely on preferential policies to gather users. Change to be you, are you willing to spend money on a new exchange to list your project? No project team is willing to pay to list a new exchange. Although we are weak, which exchange was just very strong when it was founded? Aren't they all coming from the weak one step by step?
We refuse any form of fraud and we refuse to bow to any fraud force.When we tried to post on reddit, we were told that newly registered users could not post. I think all this is designed by the author.
