The Faketoshi Craig Wright is very Narcissist, nothing more.
Try many times to be recognized as person he is not. What a damn shameful!
Finally the case is closed and it's a big win for Bitcoin community especially during the trial, many Cypherpunks raised their hands and provided evidence against Craig Wright. These actions from them, show that Bitcoin community are decentralized and strong.
Topic: The Faketoshi saga is now coming to a close... - page 3. (Read 392 times)
Thank God that this farce is finally over, this ruling that could've taken a quick deliberation but the lies that was being built led to much more stuff happening that wasn't necessary but fair I guess. Finally, people can move on with all this stuff that's been obvious for everyone. Craig is a really good man when it comes to wasting everyone's time and it's such a funny thing too for him to be providing all the falsified evidences when in reality, the people that wanted to believe that he's Satoshi was asking simple requests that would prove him to be the enigmatic bitcoin founder but no, he attacked and made a circus of himself and the hearings that he's been in. Appeal might still happen but who's the judge that would consider it? Laughable but definitely an admirable fight for Faketoshi's quest for proving what he's really not in any circumstances.
This just confirms what we have known all along, but it is nice to be vindicated, CW has spend so much time trying to convince everyone that he is Satoshi that it seems to me he really believes his own lies, fortunately for us the facts have demonstrated once again that he is not the person that created bitcoin or anyone related to it, still I do not believe for a second he will accept this and it is likely he will keep claiming that he is Satoshi despite the ruling. 
Finally that fake Satoshi get his answer from a reputed judge. Craig Wright isn't Satoshi and most of us knew that from the start, he was just claiming to be Satoshi because he wanted to have people's attention.
Fame and attention led him to claim that he created Bitcoin. But, lies can't stand for long and his lies took away everything from his. He has not only lost the case but also lost his reputation throughout all those years.
Fame and attention led him to claim that he created Bitcoin. But, lies can't stand for long and his lies took away everything from his. He has not only lost the case but also lost his reputation throughout all those years.
Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto or the author of the Bitcoin whitepaper, U.K. Judge James Mellor said after closing arguments in the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) trial on Thursday.
The evidence presented during the month-long trial was "overwhelming," the judge said, adding that he plans to write a ruling detailing his conclusions – including that Wright did not create the Bitcoin system.
"I will make certain declarations, which I am satisfied are useful and are necessary to do justice between the parties. First, that Dr. Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin white paper. Second, Dr. Wright is not the person who adopted or operated under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto in the period 2008 to 2011. Third, Dr. Wright is not the person who created the Bitcoin System. And, fourth, he is not the author of the initial versions of the Bitcoin software. Any further relief will be dealt with in my written judgment," Judge Mellor said.
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/03/14/justice-james-mellors-ruling-on-craig-wright-copa-trial/
This ruling will make it impossible for CSW to continue has campaign of lawsuits against developers and others in U.K. courts.
Some have the opinion that his actions in the trial could result in charges of perjury and forgery.
The evidence presented during the month-long trial was "overwhelming," the judge said, adding that he plans to write a ruling detailing his conclusions – including that Wright did not create the Bitcoin system.
"I will make certain declarations, which I am satisfied are useful and are necessary to do justice between the parties. First, that Dr. Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin white paper. Second, Dr. Wright is not the person who adopted or operated under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto in the period 2008 to 2011. Third, Dr. Wright is not the person who created the Bitcoin System. And, fourth, he is not the author of the initial versions of the Bitcoin software. Any further relief will be dealt with in my written judgment," Judge Mellor said.
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/03/14/justice-james-mellors-ruling-on-craig-wright-copa-trial/
This ruling will make it impossible for CSW to continue has campaign of lawsuits against developers and others in U.K. courts.
Some have the opinion that his actions in the trial could result in charges of perjury and forgery.
Good to see an update that all lies of CW has been ended and for sure there's no confusion will happen towards his claims that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto since the judge has closing any arguments and prove that he is not.
For sure this will serve a lesson to some other people that their lies will be busted and they can't easily claim that they are Satoshi since there are great guys that can investigate and verify their claims. Right now much really better for anyone to buried up their thoughts or curiosity about the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto and respect his total disappearance since this is maybe what he like so people could focus on anything they want to do with bitcoins he or they created.
It has always been obvious and known just like the judge said the evidence were just
too overwhelming and his stance was just ridiculous. It is regretful that
this whole process came too long but at least now we can put this behind and we can
focus on what lies ahead of us.
Let us not believe anyone claiming to be satoshi let us try to think more critically to
avoid being victimized or scammed
too overwhelming and his stance was just ridiculous. It is regretful that
this whole process came too long but at least now we can put this behind and we can
focus on what lies ahead of us.
Let us not believe anyone claiming to be satoshi let us try to think more critically to
avoid being victimized or scammed
Praise Jesus! Thank you Judge Mellor and COPA for putting an end to this ridiculous farce that has been going on far too long once and for all.
I hope Craig Wrong becomes bankrupted by this lawsuit and receives further future legal action against him including criminal charges for perjury and forging evidence which he richly deserves.
I hope Craig Wrong becomes bankrupted by this lawsuit and receives further future legal action against him including criminal charges for perjury and forging evidence which he richly deserves.
It is Faketoshi indeed! Everyone wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto and this is not new only that this is the time that the court would deliver a verdict in this regard. Well, I feel for the real Satoshi right now, I hope he/they are still alive to witness all that is happening as many people are shamelessly laying claims to it.
I know that the project is such that could be done by more than one person with each person given different responsibilities in the project. There could also be a division between them which makes the issue so confusing since it was a project done with the top aim of anonymity. I believe they never expected Bitcoin to be this successful and the pace of the success is so fast as well.
Well, the court has delivered its verdits, he may appeal it if he wants, but if he is not the one, then he could be charged for the whitepaper claims on perjury and forgery if there is a prosecutor.
I know that the project is such that could be done by more than one person with each person given different responsibilities in the project. There could also be a division between them which makes the issue so confusing since it was a project done with the top aim of anonymity. I believe they never expected Bitcoin to be this successful and the pace of the success is so fast as well.
Well, the court has delivered its verdits, he may appeal it if he wants, but if he is not the one, then he could be charged for the whitepaper claims on perjury and forgery if there is a prosecutor.
Thank God this whole drama is finally coming to an end. I saw this news yesterday but it's surprising how one will just be too thick skinned to let go off his false claims even from the first time in 2016 when he spoke about it, I wonder what was is drive all these years since we know deep down he knows that in the end he will definitely lose the case
Thank God that this farce is finally over, this ruling that could've taken a quick deliberation but the lies that was being built led to much more stuff happening that wasn't necessary but fair I guess. Finally, people can move on with all this stuff that's been obvious for everyone. Craig is a really good man when it comes to wasting everyone's time and it's such a funny thing too for him to be providing all the falsified evidences when in reality, the people that wanted to believe that he's Satoshi was asking simple requests that would prove him to be the enigmatic bitcoin founder but no, he attacked and made a circus of himself and the hearings that he's been in. Appeal might still happen but who's the judge that would consider it? Laughable but definitely an admirable fight for Faketoshi's quest for proving what he's really not in any circumstances.
Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto or the author of the Bitcoin whitepaper, U.K. Judge James Mellor said after closing arguments in the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) trial on Thursday.
The evidence presented during the month-long trial was "overwhelming," the judge said, adding that he plans to write a ruling detailing his conclusions – including that Wright did not create the Bitcoin system.
"I will make certain declarations, which I am satisfied are useful and are necessary to do justice between the parties. First, that Dr. Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin white paper. Second, Dr. Wright is not the person who adopted or operated under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto in the period 2008 to 2011. Third, Dr. Wright is not the person who created the Bitcoin System. And, fourth, he is not the author of the initial versions of the Bitcoin software. Any further relief will be dealt with in my written judgment," Judge Mellor said.
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/03/14/justice-james-mellors-ruling-on-craig-wright-copa-trial/
This ruling will make it impossible for CSW to continue has campaign of lawsuits against developers and others in U.K. courts.
Some have the opinion that his actions in the trial could result in charges of perjury and forgery.
The evidence presented during the month-long trial was "overwhelming," the judge said, adding that he plans to write a ruling detailing his conclusions – including that Wright did not create the Bitcoin system.
"I will make certain declarations, which I am satisfied are useful and are necessary to do justice between the parties. First, that Dr. Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin white paper. Second, Dr. Wright is not the person who adopted or operated under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto in the period 2008 to 2011. Third, Dr. Wright is not the person who created the Bitcoin System. And, fourth, he is not the author of the initial versions of the Bitcoin software. Any further relief will be dealt with in my written judgment," Judge Mellor said.
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/03/14/justice-james-mellors-ruling-on-craig-wright-copa-trial/
This ruling will make it impossible for CSW to continue has campaign of lawsuits against developers and others in U.K. courts.
Some have the opinion that his actions in the trial could result in charges of perjury and forgery.
Jump to: