What is the definition of absolute freedom according to you? Everything is possible but not everything is beneficial. Everyone has a conscience and the right attitude to be good. When you are born you know immediately what is good and what is not unless someone distorts this image. You don't need any regulations for that. It is one thing to punish evil and another to regulate it.
In the most simple terms, absolute freedom means you can do anything you want, without limit, and without any constraint. That sounds sweet but dreadful.
Forget about beneficial; that's subjective. Forget about right attitude and conscience. Forget about good and evil. Those are meaningless concepts in a place where every single person is absolutely free.
I'm not so sure about you being born knowing what is good and what is not. What I'm sure of is that the rest of the human beings were born
tabula rasa.
My friend, in a human society, regulations are not exclusive for evil things. Everything is regulated.
I'd have to agree with Darker here, you were born as a clean slate, and any preconception of good and evil that you would have all came from whoever taught you. Killing people? From an absolute freedom perspective, there's nothing wrong, nor nothing right there. This would be the result of what you said earlier, "more regulated = better for authorities but worse for the rest". Even the way the "conscience" is defined should be biased by something one way or another.
Regulation is needed to control that "absolute freedom" since it isn't necessarily something good. In the end, the freedom most people seek is just something that is advantageous to them, not the "freedom" of being free itself. It's like skewing the idea of winners in investments not sharing their strategies with others to they "should".
It seems to me that you are confusing investment with trading, traders are the ones that speculate with the price of an asset on the short term, investors do not really speculate, they look at the fundamentals of an asset and then they try to project to the future whether or not that asset is going to be more valuable in the future and if they think that is the case then they put their money in that asset, this is precisely what is happening now with institutional investors coming to bitcoin at the moment
They're the same, both are involved in speculation, just that the time frame that the both of them look at is different.