Topic: The Founder of Bitcoin - page 5. (Read 1604 times)

The fact that the founder of Bitcoin appears there is common sense. Then people will learn the history of its creation and increase confidence.

As my thought, the founder of bitcoin shouldn't be revealed because it will make he/she/their life is dangerous with the huge bitcoin he/she/they have. Just stay anonymous and don't show up and the bitcoin is still growing up day by day.

Without knowing the identity of the inventor of Bitcoin, Bitcoin can grow rapidly even able to survive until now. will become dangerous if Shatoshi reveals his identity, because surely there will be people who do not want this technology to be present and intend to hunt satoshi. And some countries can catch it to reduce bitcoin and crypto markets as a whole.

I think that after all it is not one person, but the whole team which is behind this pseudonym. And in general frankly speaking, me in general вe it is equal who and if he wishes to remain an unknown, this his right.

Yes, if the founder of Bitcoin will reveal his identity, it might turn out that such a solution would be good for this market, but this is not true. First of all, revealing his identity, a person is at risk of death, he would become a target for all who wanted to make a profit. which would bring great turmoil to the whole market.

He probably does or did want to remain anonymous due to the spotlight that would inevitably be shined on him and all the pressures that come along with that. E-Gold is completely different though. That was a centralized service. Bitcoin is the opposite. Even if Satoshi's identity was known, it's not like they could go after him and try get him to shut bitcoin down because it's just not possible (but maybe he didn't want the stress and hassle of the government even trying). Bitcoin is out there now and I think satoshi just wanted it to become its own thing naturally without any further intervention needed from him.


I disagree. What's the logic behind him being publicly known helping the development of bitcoin or regulation thereof? I don't see how it would make a difference whether he was known or not, but I can't really see anything positive coming from it. People would attack his character and background, and also probably rely on his opinion too much and who's to say he's even happy with the direction bitcoin has gone in? He may want to steer bitcoin in a direction some are unhappy with, or the state could try put pressure on him to try push it in a way that they favor. I think it's best he just remains as he is as bitcoin is doing okay without him and that's probably how it should be.

One of the biggest mysteries in the technology world is the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the computer programmer who invented the digital currency bitcoin.
Experts agree that uncovering Nakamoto's identity could have an immense impact on bitcoin's economics and internal politics.
Nakamoto is believed to possess about five percent of the entire cryptocurrency. Today, that stash is worth over $5 billion.

In my opinion, this will not improve the greater development of the cryptocurrency world!  Why?  Because the banal persecution of this person or a group of people will begin.

Yes, bitcoin has the right to life. Exchangers working with the bitcoin for a long time. But to make money on Russian sites is very difficult. Payment is scanty and it is not worth the time spent.

If Satoshi Nakamoto show his identity at that time, than today he might have had to face many kinds of problems.
I think,today many rules would be put on him or he used to make it to the wrong people to use it according to his use. Whether it was prepared or a country could use it all at the same time as its own private property. Then might be direct impact fell on the bitcoin or perhaps it would have ended or its price would have been completely drowned.
On the other hand, if they knows Bitcoin and Blockchain would become so famous in the coming year. And the whole world follow it to adopt this technology, then may be he show his identity and patent this system. Then he could take royalty for whole life and also for his family.

"Satoshi Nakamoto" and the results will lead you straight to image after image of an elderly Asian man. This is Dorian S. Nakamoto, named "Satoshi Nakamoto" at birth. He is almost 70 years old, lives in Los Angeles with his mother, and, as he has reminded people hundreds of times, is not the creator of Bitcoin.

there's no need of doing anything like that. all that the person wanted was to create a technology that could solve the double spending problem and bring the digital assets dream come true for everyone. if he/she needed fame, it would have happened by now. many ppl love what they do, and this person did the same. what we can learn is that its imp to keep doing things that can support the society and rest everything comes after.

BTC is a unique digital no Founder or exactly what it is we don't know who is he. Shatoshi Nakamoto is considered the father of the BTC, but that is just the nickname to refer to the creation of the BTC system and Blockchain, but no one knows exactly who he is, in any country. And very difficult to he can reveal his identity because that could be dangerous for him.

He has done a lot! it sad that people create fake accounts and try to scam people with his name. The good part is that others who know more about bitcoin , don't fall for scams like that and let others know, especially newbies about the scam! we are a great community.

in my opinion there is no need to reveal the identity of the founder of bitcoin, only to make bitcoin increasingly popular, because with anonymity the founder of bitcoin bitcoin has become very popular and has more and more users.

I really agree with this, bitcoin must be accounted for at this time because this has become the largest and most influential virtual currency in the world. So this group of companies must be truly organized and regulated by the world. the world and benefits from use of bitcoin anywhere.

Now it seems that it will always be hidden identity and no one will know who is Satoshi. Whether a male or female or a organization etc. This will remain the mystery itself. But whoever it may be has bought the new revolution in the crypto currency .

Founding the founder will not be good for his life and for the existence of bitcoin. I believe that Satoshi Nakamoto is always interested in every bitcoin development and he will consistently not admit that he is a bitcoin maker at all.

I think Satoshi Nakamoto is the name of the inventor of Bitcoin, but he didn't make it himself, I'm sure he has a great team that doesn't want his identity known. In my opinion, it's better to remain Anonymous. because many will hunt down the system and will become individual property if satoshi is found. if it has become an individual property it will be very expensive to be able to have Crypto.

I bet that should he reveal himself, the country which he resides in would want to claim a lot of money from him because of taxation since he most definitely have a lot of Bitcoins in his wallet.