My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
The ranks matters, when the bounty is longer the higher rank will benefits because they can get many stakes. While lowet rank will be suffer, they get stakes is smaller due to the stakes sink by the higher rank. This is how I understand who will get the benifits if the bounty is last long. 
Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 26. (Read 7706 times)
I can concur that. In long abundance battles, they have a great deal of clients who have sufficient energy to go along with them. So its conceivable that there will be more than a huge number of members on the finish of the crusade. Which makes the stakes little. So I like to take an interest in abundance crusades with less clients. These tasks are not exceptionally advertised, but rather its still better at that point gaining simply like twenty dollars for three months of abundance crusade!
I think it might be because of a long-running project so many participants are interested in joining and have no restrictions for the participants, so there will be thousands of participants, while the promised prize is limited to the participants so the prize will decrease while the number of participants increases.
You should stay if you see the prospect of this bounty, in this project in general.
The longer the bounty the bigger the stakes of these higher ranks will have,it means the low ranking signature participants will earn less that is why i am not joining these campaigns which has a lot of high ranking participants
Longer bonuses, the less income is obvious, but I hope that can earn more income.
It is true the statement. because if we are indeed the longer in crypto, we will more and more knowledge. And this will have an impact on the more advanced we get, the more intelligent us in crypto.
There is the risk of the project getting abandoned if it's taking too much time to kick off. If I must take part in a long campaigns, the project must have huge potential and I would prefer they don't use stakes to calculate rewards, just allocate tokens to certain activities. So you will be encouraged to stay longer
you can do whatever you want, especially on the bounty project. of course every bounty project has a difference. sometimes we find project barriers that are less good, as you say.
Longer periods are not always lower amounts. The amount of the bounty depends on the participant, the allocation, and the investment raised.
Long-term bounty may be due to the program not attaching their soft or hard hats in time, which would make the bounty program longer.
Long-term bounty may be due to the program not attaching their soft or hard hats in time, which would make the bounty program longer.
I think that the majority of ICO projects that extend the Bounty as a result turn out to be SCAM.
This is my personal guess. When I was engaged in social Bounty then I noticed such a negative trend!
This is my personal guess. When I was engaged in social Bounty then I noticed such a negative trend!
I choose campaigns that last no more than a month. You can get a lot more for them. Campaigns that last long have too many participants.
If bounty is based on stakes, then yes.
If it is fixed with token payments then there is an opposite situation
there are such projects where it was equally the duration of the company's ico and remuneration. An example is the ico of pundiX. If it is fixed with token payments then there is an opposite situation
If bounty is based on stakes, then yes.
If it is fixed with token payments then there is an opposite situation
If it is fixed with token payments then there is an opposite situation
If you participate in the signature, then maybe the longer the bounty the more steaks you earn. But not for bounty blogs and social networks.
And provided that your rank is "Hero". If your rank is "Jr.member" then the reward will be less if the campaign lasts a long time (subject to meeting the campaign requirements) My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
I can say that it is true but there are things that can contradict it. If the bounty manager manages to limit the participants in every category of bounty for sure the early participants will claim a big bounty on it right. If the bounty have no limits on its participants for sure many people in this forum will join on it especially when it has a good news that it is successful.
earning in bounty doesnt depend on how long bounty. not always longer mean more earning/ fewer
total participant, allocation, money reached, are more affect on earning bounty
total participant, allocation, money reached, are more affect on earning bounty
if in my opinion it depends on the number of participants if the participants are small you will get a fairly large income and if there are many participants you will get a little income.
If you participate in the signature, then maybe the longer the bounty the more steaks you earn. But not for bounty blogs and social networks.
Yes, the more drawn out the abundance would mean less profit on the grounds that the members would develop. Certainly the stakes would likewise gets greater as the members develop and the time spent is additionally more. Since the abundance is the same. So the coins per stake would get lower.
Jump to: