Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 32. (Read 7705 times)
Well, yeah, you can get less rewards if the bounty is too long and if it has a lot of participants, I think the later is the most contributing factor, after all, the earnings are distributed among all the participants once the ICO ends.
Yeah. The longer the reward, the more people will join and the money will decrease
This is a popular problem to bounty program. If the bounty lasts so long, but the pool is still the same then you earn not fair with the time you spent on that bounty program. I usually join bounty which 2 months or shorter, longer you do, less value you got!
Actually it will still depends in the situation. It depends on the of participants and specially their rank or your rank. Because the more members with higher rank that will joined the lesser of amount that you will received. Because the higher rank gets a high stakes. And also it will also depends on the project if it will be successfull.
In the bounty there are also names that are short term and long term. Short term with an allocation of around <$ 500k within 1-2 months. If long term with an allocation of> $ 500k with a period of 3-5 months there is even a 6 month period. However, if the extension of time without the addition of an allocation should leave it alone. Because it's just a waste of time.
In the bounty section you can find some campaigns going on for more than 6 months. I don't understand the point in participating in such campaigns. Anyway, why do they need such a lengthy campaign? If the investors are not interested, then they should rather declare that the ICO has failed.
In my personal experience was a bounty, which was about 6 months, and 2 months spent on payments - and it is very profitable to show itself. So even long-term companies are very profitable, but the risk of losing time is certainly high
last time I start think that better to participate short bounties but a lot of, that participate some less but very long, rewards dont depend from time participating
Not exactly, but If you think the team work without effort and result is project was delayed, you should reconsider about investing in this Project.
Some Project without potential but good promotion can sold out within 1 days or 1 week, but they can't success.
Let invest with your experience, brother.
Good luck to you.
Some Project without potential but good promotion can sold out within 1 days or 1 week, but they can't success.
Let invest with your experience, brother.
Good luck to you.
In my own experience, I don't think that assertion is true. Because, the longer the bounty, the more the stakes one gets and as a result, the more the earnings. Except that the bounty gets too exposed to so many participants on the long run and that will cause the earnings to be reduced.
In the bounty section you can find some campaigns going on for more than 6 months. I don't understand the point in participating in such campaigns. Anyway, why do they need such a lengthy campaign? If the investors are not interested, then they should rather declare that the ICO has failed.
That is correct. You have to calculate how much you get from a week's work.
If the bounty duration is very long and the reward is similar to a much shorter one, why would you take the longer one?
Another disadvantage of long bounty is that you risk more time if it is a scam.
If the bounty duration is very long and the reward is similar to a much shorter one, why would you take the longer one?
Another disadvantage of long bounty is that you risk more time if it is a scam.
I think it relies upon the abundance crusade itself, typically, they decide how much members will get in the first occasion when they began the abundance. here and there, the prizes are huge on the off chance that we can remain for quite a while after the abundance is done, here and there the fleeting abundance can likewise give a major abundance. what's more, it's our decision to participate in whatever abundance crusade and I figure we should know the amount we will get that prizes and on the off chance that we feel that the prizes are sufficiently bad for us, at that point we don't need to join.
For some reason i would say yes. Some reason of it why you will get fewer earnings/bounty, when the bounty that you joined become longer the time to advertise their tokens or endorsing their tokens and there are many participants that been joined on the campaign that you joined, thats the reason why you will earn a fewer earnings. The only way to avoid it is join on campaign/bounty which has limited participants and a big allocation.
Not in all cases. Personally, I participated in bounty companies that were delayed several times in terms. However, I was lucky that they were not scam.
I hope not, because my campaign has already been prolonged and I need to spend a lot of time on it. I would read reviews of people who faced this to find out the answer
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
True, in fact the longer the bounty the more the participants can join and means more people will divide the money. 
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
The much or little that you get depends on the bet you earn and your rank (if you follow the signature campaign), how many people participate in the bounty, and the allocation of funds. But, big or small that you get if the ICO project that you follow a great success, of course you will benefit from it.
This is very individual, I have already thought about this issue. However, I always stay in the Bounty, because I feel sorry for the time spent
It was not like he thought. Because the number of tokens you receive in each campaign depends on the number of participants. If there are more than participants, he will receive less of the token that he has previously calculated
I think he is right in this assumption. Actually when the bounty goes longer period then more and more people joins the project and the share becomes smaller and smaller. But still leaving a good project is not an option, if its a good project then you guys should have continued.
Jump to: