Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 35. (Read 7705 times)
yes generally this is true the longer it is the more people joins the smaller the ratio from the reward pool if this not occur you are with a bad project good luck
Yes exactly. In addition, If the number of people who participate bounty campaigns are much, the earnings are fewer.
If project are really cool and useful, if they have real product, great team and clear strategy, there is no need to extend ICO or bounty campaign. If ICO was extended a few times, it is not definitely good sign.
It depends on campaign you do, if it's signature, go on, continue, if it's media campaign, the reward will be still smaller, it's easier to join than into signature.
Well yes, because more and more people are joining, but then again in longer bounties prizes are bigger too, so sometimes it's the same, whether bounty is short and smaller prize or bounty is long and bigger prize. Just be sure that project is legit, becuase there are alot of them out there that will just waste your time.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
I might be late with my advice, but yes, if the bounty pool was not increased, and the campaign was extended, you will get a lesser reward.The number of tokens you get also depends on the number of participants as there is a certain formula used for calculation of stakes.
Basically, this happens if the number of participants is not limited. But it can be otherwise, so I think you should not leave the company after such a long period of work.
I think the time period of bounty doesn't matter and bounty earning depends on token volume allocated to the bounty campaign and also depend on the number bounty hunters /participants also the value of the single token.
It actually depends on the number of participants mainly, and some other factors, generally the fewer the number of particpants than the bigger the rewards for each individual, because the bounty is divided for a lower number.
Yes right. but It depends on the bounty and how many participations are in joined, them token allocation, supply and etc... Personally, I'm doing a lot of bounties. bounty is a very good opportunity to earn free tokens. Already bounty activities bring me good profit. Now I have 100+ types of tokens. These all are from the bounties. By the way, supply is very important to the token price.
The longer the campaign the more will come and join and the more participants the smaller it goes to your stakes and the earnings you will earn will be small only. There are some campaign that put a limit to there participants but not that much and hard to find already.
Yes right, this is certainly not in accordance with the target so the team extend ICO to achieve softcap or hardcap, but I think as long as we get additional payment then it is reasonable.
But most them not add allocation for this extending.and we must follow their rule in oder to get our reward.it is dilemma for us, if we leave it we got nothing, but if continue supporting campaign allocation still same
Yep the longer is bounty the less earnings, more people participate and budget is same, so its not wise to do bounty for year, best is 1 month length.
Actually it is fully depends on how many bounty hunter are joined in that campaign. When bounty run long, many hunters made engaged at that time and stakes come in low to every participants and it gone massive when ICO had gone to success or near to success. On the other hand you ranking is also a main fact of stakes high or low. I practically think that a bounty should long highest 2 months.
You can check on the spreadsheet how many participants who have joined on those project. And also checked how many member with high rank in the spreadsheet if there are so many high-rank member in there it will decrease the percentage of the stakes from the reward that you will get. The stakes will be taken many to high-ranked member and it is wasting so many time.
Yes.
The longer the bounty , the lower the earning of participants.
It means that the more participants join , the less the earnings as the allocation for that particular bounty would be stretched thin among the participants.
The longer the bounty , the lower the earning of participants.
It means that the more participants join , the less the earnings as the allocation for that particular bounty would be stretched thin among the participants.
If you start as early as your bounty , then you will have a higher bet and will give you more coins, especially if your bitcointalk forum is a hero or a legend. When I joined a reward for 10 weeks, I had a very high income. But remember, making a reward is a risk, because ICO must get soft bags to get paid.
Once you have decided to join the bonus campaign, you must accept the time of participation and the amount received. There are campaigns involved for long periods of time but too few bonuses. This also depends on the quality of the projects and their promotion in the electronics market.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Yes this is true, the more the ico is stretch the fewer bonuty rewards you will gain.
The term is stretched, so the payment periods will be more. Not 12 weeks, for example, but 16. And the amount allocated to the bounty remains the same. Of course you'll earn less. It is better to change.
Jump to: