Topic: The most liquid companies in the gambling industry - page 3. (Read 2467 times)

What I think it refers to is the situation that not everything lasts a lifetime, and that is something very true, you have to take advantage of the moments where the situation for some betting houses can be very profitable and when the companies win and They get their money paid, it is a casino, and casinos can go down due to any type of error, it is a company that when it does not receive good administration or attention everything can go down, that is what it means.

The circumstances that exist today are not the same as those of a few years ago, and that has to be seen, I am a person who has learned to see things that way too, because it is easier to take advantage of good things, and it is not They do so many things so that they can generate conflicts Regarding money, what drives everything in these industries is money and that is only the case of the rise or Bankruptcy of a casino.

I've got your point from here, however, should we make the standard of liquidity as our major basis for determining the reputation of a gambling company and such should be used in selecting for one or we should not only rely on that, we have to see them pass the test of time and see how reliable they could be in terms of quality gambling services and trust we have in them.

Well, really that is the ideal, generally I see USA as one of the countries with the most power in the world, in fact after the Second World War they have great respect from everyone in the world, and this is reflected in their currency that, as you say, is the one that manages finances worldwide, everyone works to obtain dollars, and that is a hegemony that has always existed, therefore it is something that will be seen as one of the most powerful countries in the world, and that is why it is that KYC is one of the things that they want to control, well not only them, I consider that the great powers are also on top of this, none of them are interested in private economies developing and achieving financial freedom, that is something that they do not allow themselves, and given this, they begin to take the main step which is anonymity, privacy, something that they will not allow.

Regarding  crypto payments, well that's what you say, I hope that these processes due to their KYC slow down and don't focus so much on it, previously, back in 2017 the importance of bitcoin and crypto was not considered so much , but since it is now very much worth money, they want to take slices from there.

I think that the example with the elections in the USA, when two old people are going to be elected president and there are no younger candidates from any of the leading parties in the country, this all reduces the image of the USA on the world stage and many countries will no longer consider the legislators of the USA as the base  legislators for the whole world. 
Gradually, the role of the USA in the world is decreasing. 
But their possibility remains of issuing the world currency $. 
But the role of this currency as a whole in the world is also declining. 
But what path other countries will take when regulating their financial systems and in particular the balance and ratio of anonymous/personalized payments in cryptocurrencies is a big and interesting question. 

I do not completely rule out that anonymous payments will continue to exist for a long time.  There will also be pseudo-anonymous payments in cash for a long time.
 All these processes directly affect KYC and the spread of this procedure throughout the world.  Let’s hope that the onslaught of KYC on crypto payments will slow down or perhaps begin to gradually disappear altogether.  And now there is already too much de-anonymization in crypto payments.

I don't know if this has much to do with KYC, but it seems that everyone looks for centralized casinos because the attention is immediate and problems can be resolved faster than casinos that are decentralized, but seeing the cases that exist it is very different when things are done when investors need to have their money safe, because you are right about that, casinos that are centralized tend to give trust, in a decentralized casino and in centralized exchanges I also trust more because any problem is easy solution, in a decentralized casino or in a decentralized exchange things are harder, because service usually takes longer.

Hours and days that pass with our money on a platform without giving a solution to anyone despairs, then this is the advantage that these sites have.

That's right, there has been quite a bit of a long stretch of good markets, good crypto and in general a good pace of growth mostly everywhere except in some poorly managed countries. We should not be thinking that this is going to be like this for a long time, there are periods in which all contract and then is when you will need to make sure the site is "liquid".

I think just as it be to exchange so it is with casino's,  for legislatmacy sake, it best to gamble on a KYC compliance casino,  because in terms of liquidity provision,  centralised platforms tend to have more liquidity compared to their decentralised contourpart, because investors investors will have more confidence in those platform that have some form of licensing for the operations.

Anyways if I am in position to chose at anytime a new casino then I will surly go for a good kyc casino and pass through the processes that enable me to withdraw my winning anytime I hit the jackpot, instead of relying on a no kyc casino that take my money and never pay out when there is winning due to low liquidities.

You know that time goes by and things continue to change, what we may e privileged to enjoy several years back may not be the same conditions of the requirements needed because obviously the economy and financial obligations have changed as well, we have to go along with the way thing operates now base on the current updates with the gambling sectors in this present conditions, those that have been seen as the most liquid gambling company then does not exist like before again and new one are taking over to make their own new offers and regulations concerning these.

Whoa, that's kind of Stake.com and I must say that I love to read things like this as their campaigner. We can't ignore the importance of the high liquidity of any company we are dealing with and it's no news that Stake.com is a well-liquid casino and sportsbook with a huge track record so far. This coupled with the huge reputation it has built in the course of years.

Now imagine a person gambling with such a company, the fear would definitely be alleyed, and no matter how much the money to be wagered and the winning possibility, it would be rest assured that it will be taken care of by such a well-prepared company. Needless to say, Stake.com is managing the risk internally as well which also depends on the multiplier in the game in question. By this internal management, they will reasonably avoid the risks they can't be able to honour its winning. This is wise and helps both parties, but such an amount would have been so huge to say the least.

You are completely right, but unfortunately, this is something that most gamblers always fail to understand, they tend to blame the casino or curse the casino for imposing kyc verification on their account, forgetting that without the casino doing that, the casino may one day go offline without the possiblity of them coming back online, and when that happens, same customer complaining about the casino asking kyc document for verification, may also lose his or her money.

It's like you've said, gone are the days when the government cared less about the people and their online identities, alot have changed in this regard and we mustn't hate and boycott our favorite casinos because they are implementing kyc verification system and seem to be imposing it on their customers, no business wants to lose their customers, most especially, their loyal ones, but when it comes to kyc, most casino can't do much is it's completely out of their control.

Gone are the days when one could deposit, gamble, and withdraw any amount in a cryptocurrency gambling platform without having to comply with AML and KYC rules because there was nothing of such kind back in the day. When we talk about privacy, reputable platforms always care about the privacy of their customers no matter what, some people think that the platform asking for KYC is hindering their privacy, but the reality is, that they are compelled to do that.

If a centralized platform doesn't comply with rules and regulations imposed by the authorities, they have the fear of their licenses getting cancelled and having their platforms closed down because they need to comply with the regulations, it's more of a necessity for them.

I believe the CEO's knows the importance of the privacy and at will continue to operate with all levels of privacy and this is why we have come to a point where all the facts and factors point to the casino with the highest liquidity this is like it will be measured in terms of high withdrawal,  and also how best the casinos act within the stipulated laws that guide the conduct of all the parties involved.


Some time ago, I read somewhere how Stake paid winners $150,000 without any demand for KYC which shows how well the company pays attention to privacy, and the high available liquidity to pay customers.

I got your points and you're absolutely right, in addition to it all, there are many things to consider before having a gambling platform established, the source to where this idea being generated is very important, some have it as a direct gambling business and they run their platform by themselves while some go into a partnership kind of franchise when the finance needed could not be able to catch up with the needs in demand, which is part of the serious challenges many platforms are having before the whole administration is being centralized into categories and you cannot easily effect any change or implement anything that has to do with financial liquidity.

It is very true, there is also something that the USA is Managing in a Great Way, it is that with their regulations they make the Countries of the world adapt to their measures, there it is, they say that it is going to Prohibit certain Countries so that they do not have Access to certain Privileges and the things are done as they say, so at a global level they pay a lot of attention to the power that the USA has, then these policies are passed on to the casinos, to the exchanges, and the main sites have regulations, then this type of thing has Decreased freedoms in Every sense, so when talking about KYC it is total control that is being Implemented, this is what is coming and each time anonymity, privacy is much less what People enjoy , the Flow Our data is quite Easy to find on the web, even so for people who do not like leaving traces on the Internet it is possible to find data about them, then, if they do not have social networks where their Names appear,  DNI, full name and sector where you live.

These are things that are Inexplicable to many , Because that is the Reason why people's Iinjuries sometimes Appear on the web and in reality

Yeah!  Of course, maintaining anonymity when gambling is much preferable to publicly disclosing such personal information.  Sometimes there are cases when even the closest relatives do not know that their loved one is an avid gambler.  Apart from the employer, from whom it is of course better to hide such data, sometimes this hobby has to be hidden from the public simply because of the government policies of certain countries where there is a direct ban or public condemnation of gambling.  So there are many options for people who prefer to remain anonymous.  Even I think that the vast majority of players would prefer not to undergo KYC at a casino if they were confident in advance that the casino would accurately and without any problems pay them the money they won at any time the player wishes.  But this doesn’t happen in real life and players have to go through KYC. 

Nevertheless, I see a clear gap in legislation here, primarily in US legislation, which does not properly regulate such an issue.  And this should finally be done simply for reasons of humanizing society and preserving the human right to private life.

I agree with that motion, because it is logical that an employer has a person who carefully studies the background of the potential employee and if he knows that he plays in a casino, the employer will want to watch his back, the first thing they think is that they are not going to hire to a person who is probably addicted (even if they are not) that is most of the Perception that they have about the people who gamble in the casino, of course not everyone thinks those things about the people who gamble in the casino, but Since we live in a society where they basically like to generalize and have the appearance of a typically perfect person, they cling to those standards to justify their decision, and not only for that, but if the person hires someone and has problems, the company is in the obligation that your employee needs specialized care, then the company has to assume those expenses, which is something that companies do not like to assume.

These reasons are extremely important when it comes to anything, not just a job, but anything in everyday life, it is a thousand times better to maintain privacy and anonymity for these reasons and many more, we live in a system that requires having certain rules, that when they are not followed you can be judged, although the truth is that it doesn't matter to me, if no one tells me in front of me anything doesn't matter to me, because I am a person who is so involved in my things that I don't care what people think.

I also know that in many countries employers very carefully and carefully study the overall lifestyle of the employee they hire.  Obviously this applies to well-paid jobs.  And such a hobby as gambling will definitely spoil the image of an employee if the employer finds out about it either when hiring, or this person is already working in this position.  This may even be a reason for dismissal.  And the employer can be understood simply because he can place the employee’s passion for gambling even on the same level in assessing an employee with such obvious human vices as alcoholism or drug addiction.  It’s just that the employer sees such a person as an avid gambler, even if the employee is not one.
 That is why maintaining anonymity, including the method you wrote about, is very important for the career and, in general, for the work activity of the employee.  And the loss of anonymity in this case can have catastrophically destructive consequences for this player.

There's also a means of making all these through the online gambling platform, some of them take advantages in making advertisements as well using adds but their difference is that you can have other things advertised on their platform than what they do as service while on the physical sites, you can buy and sell on real items and make business as well outside the contest of the gambling platform because their regulations does not restrict for doing such.

This is a very important point, there are many jobs that are very careful when choosing their workers, basically because in each company each of the workers are direct ambassadors of the company, for that reason they turn out to be jealous, and sometimes because The criteria and standards of the same company would not be good if they were discovered in gambling or something similar, sometimes it is not good seen in jobs that are more delicate, they can be banks or government entities, especially if they are regulators of the Likewise, if a casino could Offer a paid service that guarantees the non-identification of players who want to remain Anonymous , I think it would be a good option and that this data would be saved in a type of DeepVault that works only with the player's private keys. to whom you want to provide the service, that may be one of the things they can do , it doesn't Matter , it may be that for the service they have to pay 2 or 3 USD per month , but it would be worth it, of course it is a solution that It occurred to me, I Don't know how Viable it would be.

Regarding  crimes that can be committed, we know that criminals will always find any type of tool to use in their favor, that will always be something that cannot be avoided.

What you are talking about, I think, is the obvious dream of any normal cryptocurrency owner.
 It’s just that the cryptocurrency was originally created thanks to Satoshi’s brilliant invention as an anonymous means of payment.  And it’s not for nothing that the world still doesn’t know who Satoshi is. 
I hope that anonymous and private payment processes will still develop in parallel with personalized and non-anonymous payments.  There are simply areas of human activity where secret money transfers are preferable.  I am not talking about criminals, fraudsters and those who launder criminal money.  Law enforcement agencies must fight them; it is their task to track down and catch such criminals.  And put them in prison.  I'm talking about ordinary people who are law-abiding but who need anonymity.
 By the way, in a casino, in my opinion, most of the players would prefer not to reveal their identity.  And there are many reasons for this. 
For example, a player does not want his employer to know about his passion for gambling.  Since this can harm such an employee.  And there are many other reasons to remain anonymous.