Pages:
Author

Topic: The mysterious bitcoin flower opens once a day and reveals a free bitcoin - page 6. (Read 18336 times)

legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
I don't see any ads on your site. How do you monetize this service?


I was so excited upon reading the original post and webpage for the first, I skimmed right over the part that doesn't mention it's animated. It was the animation aspect that inspired me to write post #25, which is entirely based on that falsehood. I guess I could now stop refreshing the page waiting to watch the Bitcoin materialize in real time. This is worst than last week when I kept refreshing the page waiting for little Jimmy to untie his left sneaker--Oops! Wrong board.

Seriously, post #25 outlines how this can be monetized (but not with a static flower or other--though possible) if this was an animated flower, toaster, wallet, purse, facet, traffic light, or politician telling the truth (of course there'll only be one a fraction of a Bitcoin produced from theirs ass lips once a month, on average), to name a few--the list is truly endless.

This idea has great potential but, once again, only if it is animated. You could even have an embedded video to get around the bots.


Discuss?


hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1008
I just gotta say this thread is awesome.  Where else can you get a discussion of a cool new and artistic bitcoin site, website monetization, bot arms races, and Tarantino films all in one shot (and for the record, I really liked Death Proof...the other one not so much).  
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending



How do you people know this stuff (in reference to knowing the movie title, of which I was unaware)?



I watched it before... I guess?

Something as unique as that sticks in my head.  Guess it does help that I am a fan of rodriguez/tarantino films also.

i gotta say, i think the grindhouse double feature was some of tarantinos and rodriguezs worst work...i wasnt a fan of either movie.

 i thought death proof was the marginally better of the two....but definiately not on par with pulp fiction or reservoir dogs...


You two Inglourious Basterds (Tx2000 & evolve)! You both forgot to mention Quentin Tarantino's cameo appearance in Little Nicky.


hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
daytrader/superhero



How do you people know this stuff (in reference to knowing the movie title, of which I was unaware)?



I watched it before... I guess?

Something as unique as that sticks in my head.  Guess it does help that I am a fan of rodriguez/tarantino films also.

i gotta say, i think the grindhouse double feature was some of tarantinos and rodriguezs worst work...i wasnt a fan of either movie.

 i thought death proof was the marginally better of the two....but definiately not on par with pulp fiction or reservoir dogs...
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100



How do you people know this stuff (in reference to knowing the movie title, of which I was unaware)?



I watched it before... I guess?

Something as unique as that sticks in my head.  Guess it does help that I am a fan of rodriguez/tarantino films also.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
I don't see any ads on your site. How do you monetize this service?
no kidding!
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
I don't see any ads on your site. How do you monetize this service?
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
Although I'm intrigued by the direction that this thread has progressed so far, I wish to get back on track with what the OP has introduced, before it forks to a discussion on the how and why the African swallows are non-migratory. Granted, all the posts are enlightening and on-topic, but I like to see how this idea can be taken to the nth degree in regards to strengthening Bitcoin's position.

With that said, I offer up the following:

Let's put bots and any security concerns to the side for the moment, because if, at the onset of Bitcoin, the founders spent all their time discussing nefarious schemes upon brainstorming the next-great-idea, Bitcoin wouldn't be where it is today--they'll still be hashing out the what ifs. I offered up a way to not use captcha in post #21 which is, BTW, a good way to increase your mailing list. The money is in the list!

Every now and then, a Remarkable idea blossoms from the Bitcoin community. I feel that this is one such Remarkable idea. See: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2007/01/how_to_be_remar.html

Imagine, if you will companies, of any size (not 1 or 2 or 9.5, but 100's/1,000's), incorporating this Mysterious Bitcoin innovation in their websites. These companies don't even need to embrace, nor believe in, Bitcoin to gain value by incorporating this gimmick, for lack of a better word. As an example, Moen.com could have a page showing an image of a facet (which reminds me of another idea) in the off position (not flowing). But randomly, once a day (or whatever the time frame), it start flowing--bitcoin(s). As another example, a seller of upper-end toasters has a dedicated page showing an image of a toaster with one of its levers in the down position (visualize toast being made). Again, randomly once a day that side pops up, revealing a Bitcoin. Afterwards, the lever on the other side goes down once the Bitcoin is claimed.

Every single product and service can incorporate this idea. If you doubt that statement, name an example--any example--and I'll tell you how it could be achieved provided, of course, the website owner wants it.

Another quick example: dictionary.com could have a special search box so one could type in a word (the use of cookies allows you to do this only once a day) and if it matches the magic word-of-the-day, voilà--Bitcoin(s)!

Now, further imagine a site dedicated to listing every site that has incorporated this gimmick (sorry for incorporating the word incorporated numerous times in this post, as well as the several uses of parentheses I incorporated to explain myself, but I can't help it because Bitcoin excites me--excites me so much that you may have noticed I incorporated the use of this parenthesized statement after the wrong word--but I digress). This possible site would not only list the above mentioned sites in categories, but also list the exact times (clock, as well as maybe the number of) the Bitcoin was last revealed at each site. Furthermore, it would show a "hot list" of sites fast approaching the deadline of when the Bitcoin is suppose to be revealed--colored coded red/orange/yellow. It could even list who the winners are.

As you can clearly see, more traffic is generated to each website that employs the use of the Mysterious Bitcoin (name change may be in order here--ideas?). More traffic=more sales (unless the product or service completely sucks--but Bitcoin doesn't hurt their endeavor). It'll be up to each site owner on how to implement this program to get maximum return on their $0 investment.

Although the OP has set the proverbial bar high with his Bitcoin producing flower, I'm sure other artists will soon be champing at the bit to showcase their talents, as well, to better the latest new graphic.

Remember, this is the time of year shop owners are jockeying for position to get their sites ready for the Christmas season. Here's one idea on the table they'll be hard-pressed to pass up.

Speaking of Christmas, pictured three socks hanging on the fireplace mantel...

newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
It's a nice concept, but the way it works now with a random number being generated for each day between 1 and 86400 is not the way to do it.

The way it should be done is to give every second a 1 in 86400 chance of causing the event. The way it works now is that every second on the same day has a 0 chance of opening the flower again once it's already happened.

For instance you'd just have a script that runs once per second and that script has a 0.0000115741 (to make it just slightly more probable than once every 24 hours) probability of opening the flower.

You could even pre-calculate each day if you like to save the script being run constantly and could do an interval smaller than one second.
aq
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
No, that is not accurate, and a critical mind would be totally right considering this dubious.

If you introduce a random time T between two openings, where T is on average 24 hours, you will have ON AVERAGE 1 opening per day, and ON AVERAGE 365 openings per year etc. BUT: You can (and will!) very well have time periods of more than 24 hours, too, i.e. you will have calendar days (and sometimes even two or more successive calendar days) with no opening at all.

So it is simply not correct to claim "that the flower opens "at least" once a day".


Wow, you even included a fancy graph, very cool!

Right now the system creates a random open time (between 0 86400 seconds) for every calendar day. So the interval between 2 openings is anywhere between 0 and 48 hours.
But the flowers still opens every calendar day, so I think it's safe to say that it opens up at least once a day. If the interval between 2 openings happens to be only 3 hours (one just before midnight, the other right after) it looks like as if the flower openend 2 times a day, at least for someone sitting in the right timezone.

Sure, to have it semantical correct you would have to define the exact meaning of the word day – is it 24 hours? a calendar day? in which timezone? etc.

But hey, I created this for the fun of it and I wanna keep it real simple without any lengthy explanations.
Thanks for your scientific thoughts though!

Just make that ever 86399 (86400-1) seconds, so that it on average opens more than once per day, as 1.00001 is more than 1.0. And the best part is you can do that without additional costs - well not really, but 1.00001 isn't that much more than 1.0 in the end Smiley

Actually if you also count leap seconds (happens every few years) and you have the service running a few years, every 86400 second (unix time) would still be more than once per day, because UTC time (calendar time) has on average longer days than unix time "days" (no leap seconds).
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
No, that is not accurate, and a critical mind would be totally right considering this dubious.

If you introduce a random time T between two openings, where T is on average 24 hours, you will have ON AVERAGE 1 opening per day, and ON AVERAGE 365 openings per year etc. BUT: You can (and will!) very well have time periods of more than 24 hours, too, i.e. you will have calendar days (and sometimes even two or more successive calendar days) with no opening at all.

So it is simply not correct to claim "that the flower opens "at least" once a day".


Wow, you even included a fancy graph, very cool!

Right now the system creates a random open time (between 0 86400 seconds) for every calendar day. So the interval between 2 openings is anywhere between 0 and 48 hours.
But the flowers still opens every calendar day, so I think it's safe to say that it opens up at least once a day. If the interval between 2 openings happens to be only 3 hours (one just before midnight, the other right after) it looks like as if the flower openend 2 times a day, at least for someone sitting in the right timezone.

Sure, to have it semantical correct you would have to define the exact meaning of the word day – is it 24 hours? a calendar day? in which timezone? etc.

But hey, I created this for the fun of it and I wanna keep it real simple without any lengthy explanations.
Thanks for your scientific thoughts though!


legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

Not a show. It's a movie: Grindouse: Planet Terror.  The other subflick is Death Proof.  Dual feature, if you will.


How do you people know this stuff (in reference to knowing the movie title, of which I was unaware)?

Captcha issue solved? (feedback welcome)

If it was my site, I wouldn't use a Captcha. Here's how:

To view the flower, you must first be logged in, therefore a member (so to speak). If you are the first to click the flower when the Bitcoin appears, a message pops up stating such, then directs you to check you email for instructions on how to claim your free Bitcoin.

sr. member
Activity: 278
Merit: 251
Bitcoin-Note-and-Voucher-Printing-Empowerer
Both very good suggestions – thanks for taking the time to share! I sure will implement this.

Great idea!

Two suggestions:
1) [...] if you technically open the flower once every 24 hours (not related to calender days), that could result in 2 openings on a single calendar day [...] As a result you could state that the flower opens "at least" once a day [...]


No, that is not accurate, and a critical mind would be totally right considering this dubious.

If you introduce a random time T between two openings, where T is on average 24 hours, you will have ON AVERAGE 1 opening per day, and ON AVERAGE 365 openings per year etc. BUT: You can (and will!) very well have time periods of more than 24 hours, too, i.e. you will have calendar days (and sometimes even two or more successive calendar days) with no opening at all.

So it is simply not correct to claim "that the flower opens "at least" once a day".

Here is a quick example, when implementing the time T as a random value following a Rayleigh distribution, with an average of T=1.0 days:

Matlab code:
Code:
>> N=1e7; x=randn(1,N); y=randn(1,N); T=sqrt(x.^2+y.^2)/sqrt(pi/2); mu = mean(T),
>> hist(T,50); title(['Histogram: rayleigh distributed random variable T, mean=',num2str(mu)]); xlabel('T')
>> 100*length(T(T<0.90))/length(T), 100*length(T(T<0.50))/length(T), 100*length(T(T<0.25))/length(T)
>> 100*length(T(T>1.0))/length(T), 100*length(T(T>1.5))/length(T), 100*length(T(T>2.0))/length(T)

Result:
* In 47.1% / 17.8% / 4.8% of all cases, the time duration T between two openings is shorter than 0.90 / 0.50 / 0.25 days
But also:
* In 45.6% / 17.1% / 4.3% of all cases, the time duration T between two openings is longer than 1.0 / 1.5 / 2.0 days

hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
daytrader/superhero
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Serge, you're right. Most of the CAPTCHAs (including the very common reCAPTCHA) nowadays can be solved by machines or manually by people sitting in some low wage country. But it still is a significant obstacle.

heard that CAPTCHA's are not unbeatable 100%
sr. member
Activity: 243
Merit: 250
BTCrow.com
Yeah, someone will obviously come up with a bot but I have some (top secret) counteractive measures up my sleeves Wink
Right now the winner has to solve a captcha so there's no way to automatically claim the bitcoin, this must be done by a human.

http://decaptcher.com/ > 2$ for 1000 solved captcha
IP basis is the best bet for this, 5k  private proxies (mostly botnet proxies) cost about 300-400$ weekly so not worthing buying thoses proxies only to get one bitcoin.

For free proxies you can use lists of softblocked proxies, so you don't allow any proxies IP to open the flower.

You can also use custom script to evade most of bot traffic
ex: block non JS / too old browser / softblocked proxy list etc etc

BTW, this is very awesome and generous to give away a free bitcoin like that and all I can say is thanks for this.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100

Not a show. It's a movie: Grindouse: Planet Terror.  The other subflick is Death Proof.  Dual feature, if you will.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

I don't have a clue what show it is. I Googled (the only verb in the English language that must be capitalized to be properly used in an sentence) for images (since a picture's worth a...) using the phrase "There's always a solution!" to express that there's a solution to every challenge. Believe me! I want to stay on topic with this great idea.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
heard that CAPTCHA's are not unbeatable 100%
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
Yeah, someone will obviously come up with a bot but I have some (top secret) counteractive measures up my sleeves Wink
Right now the winner has to solve a captcha so there's no way to automatically claim the bitcoin, this must be done by a human.

When I first read the concern, I envisioned the bot only being able to alert the bot-builder (or open on demand) that the flower has opened, then allowing him/him the opportunity to be the first to claim the prize.

I'm still penning that post, outlining how this is an excellent idea.


Here's hoping noone beats me to the flower patch.


Pages:
Jump to: