Topic: ✠ The Official AltCoin WhiteList ➢ For Real Coins☆With Real Devs☆With Real Goals - page 6. (Read 8599 times)
March 23, 2014, 03:41:52 AM
I think all altcoins will be added in the whitelist. There is always a good reason for something. I think its best that you add specific rules that you want to be added in the whitelist.
March 23, 2014, 03:39:57 AM
It's not just because the dev sold some of his coins.
It is because the Dev sold $30,000 USD of his coins and claimed they were stolen which was proven to be false via block chain analysis. At the same time dev was selling his coins, he was taking in investor funds. That's why.
~BCX~
It is because the Dev sold $30,000 USD of his coins and claimed they were stolen which was proven to be false via block chain analysis. At the same time dev was selling his coins, he was taking in investor funds. That's why.
~BCX~
Could you please post the block chain analysis, I am genuinely interested in this.
March 23, 2014, 03:39:12 AM
Quote
FYI, inthemoney25 and justice4all are the same user.
~BCX~
~BCX~
Yeah right whatever you say, I'm sure he lives in Japan too. More wild unsubstantiated speculation. FYI BCX and Bozo The Clown are the same people.
Quote
Like it or not, the block chain doesn't lie. Baritus sold his coins and lied about them being stolen.
~BCX~
~BCX~
Hahha yeah like a jury is going to believe that rubbish. Its speculation and you know it. What about Bitcoin? You going to accuse the devs of dumping bitcoin too after all the dumps previously lol.
Do you have any other coins you would like to talk about or are you just going to rant on endlessly about Digitalcoin?
March 23, 2014, 03:34:31 AM
Klondikecoin deserves to be on the whitelis.
I need reasoning.
And ,
its catch 22, I am trying to discern which coins are ethical and have valid justification, but I guess everycoin is going to provide reasoning for their existence,..
And regarding Baritus, he could have just as easily dumped all those coins and made up something to justify that,..
but who is to say, so at this point, I want to just add the coins that people are providing positive compelling arguments but that could just as easily mislead people when in fact some shady stuff is going on with the coin and it in fact should be discredited, there is no real way to tell, you guys see the what im saying right?
bcx may be right, maybe I should have just moderated the thread and use my own judgement,..
What I will do for now is continue posting both sides of the story as I am doing.
March 23, 2014, 03:31:56 AM
Mintcoin should be added to white list, it should start to gain traction in the market soon and has a very good future
website and more info
http://mintcoin.cc/
website and more info
http://mintcoin.cc/
March 23, 2014, 03:31:43 AM
What do you guys think, should I just delete the Black list and only listen to Positive Statements? and add them?
There are some coins that I am sure need to be blacklisted but that is not what this thread is all about,..
There are some coins that I am sure need to be blacklisted but that is not what this thread is all about,..
Yep i'd delete black/gray lists anything that has a shadow over it i wouldn't add it to the whitelist, in saying that there will be those who lie and give false accusations about some coins so they are not added.
Lock the thread and delete the blacklist... just the whitelist. I deleted my blacklist comments.
March 23, 2014, 03:30:13 AM
What do you guys think, should I just delete the Black list and only listen to Positive Statements? and add them?
There are some coins that I am sure need to be blacklisted but that is not what this thread is all about,..
There are some coins that I am sure need to be blacklisted but that is not what this thread is all about,..
You need to lock this thread and start "Self Moderated" thread to control all the bullshit.
~BCX~
Lol your saying lock it because of bullshit yet your the one peddling most of it in this thread? hahaha laughable.
March 23, 2014, 03:28:55 AM
Androids Tokens DEV is me 
( link in elrapido's pot doesn't work )
( link in elrapido's pot doesn't work )Good to meet you, how would you like to be added as dev? for now i will add as ZackClark70.
I don't mind how you put it
my name is Zack Clark so you can drop the 70 if you like March 23, 2014, 03:25:32 AM
Klondikecoin deserves to be on the whitelis.
March 23, 2014, 03:24:54 AM
What do you guys think, should I just delete the Black list and only listen to Positive Statements? and add them?
There are some coins that I am sure need to be blacklisted but that is not what this thread is all about,..
There are some coins that I am sure need to be blacklisted but that is not what this thread is all about,..
Yep i'd delete black/gray lists anything that has a shadow over it i wouldn't add it to the whitelist, in saying that there will be those who lie and give false accusations about some coins so they are not added.
March 23, 2014, 03:20:58 AM
I think there must be some test period (for new coins with theoretically good future), for example 2-3 months, before they'll be white/black-listed.
March 23, 2014, 03:18:20 AM
After Hearing all the Fuss
Graylist - Reasoning
=- Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev
Graylist - Reasoning
=- Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev
Thanks.
Agreed, we can just blacklist a coin for the following reasons - Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev - If we did that one could try to blacklist all of the coins with a dev that sells some of his coins or owns an exchange, however, I want to include all of the points of views so I will move to the whitelist for the compelling argument but I have to include the attempt to blacklist,..
It's not just because the dev sold some of his coins.
It is because the Dev sold $30,000 USD of his coins and claimed they were stolen which was proven to be false via block chain analysis. At the same time dev was selling his coins, he was taking in investor funds. That's why.
~BCX~
Speculation and heresay that would not hold up in court. Next.
March 23, 2014, 03:16:18 AM
What do you guys think, should I just delete the Black list and only listen to Positive Statements? and add them?
There are some coins that I am sure need to be blacklisted but that is not what this thread is all about,..
There are some coins that I am sure need to be blacklisted but that is not what this thread is all about,..
March 23, 2014, 03:10:50 AM
After Hearing all the Fuss
Graylist - Reasoning
=- Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev
Graylist - Reasoning
=- Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev
Thanks.
Agreed, we can just blacklist a coin for the following reasons - Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev - If we did that one could try to blacklist all of the coins with a dev that sells some of his coins or owns an exchange, however, I want to include all of the points of views so I will move to the whitelist for the compelling argument but I have to include the attempt to blacklist,..
Even if he did sell 30k of dgc which I highly doubt at a crazy low price isn't it his prerogative anyway? Also what about all the times Bitcoin has had huge price dumps?? Do people call for the head of the Bitcoin devs?? Nope. I guess we can class Bitcoin as a scamcoin too then? Quite ridiculous stuff from BCX really when you think about it in a fair minded and logical fashion.
March 23, 2014, 03:10:01 AM
Androids Tokens DEV is me ( link in elrapido's pot doesn't work )
( link in elrapido's pot doesn't work )Good to meet you, how would you like to be added as dev? for now i will add as ZackClark70.
March 23, 2014, 03:09:30 AM
Bitcoin scrypt - just a copy of bitcoin and litecoin. It does not offer any innovation at all. Just mocking the bitcoin algo.
Completely wrong I think you need to research bitcoin scrypt alittle more before blacklisting it. Its brave enough to do what Bitcoin Devs are too scared to do, change the algo to keep mining fairer.
March 23, 2014, 03:07:53 AM
After Hearing all the Fuss
Graylist - Reasoning
=- Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev
Graylist - Reasoning
=- Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev
Thanks.
Agreed, we can just blacklist a coin for the following reasons - Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev - If we did that one could try to blacklist all of the coins with a dev that sells some of his coins or owns an exchange, however, I want to include all of the points of views so I will move to the whitelist for the compelling argument but I have to include the attempt to blacklist,..
Unfortunately, I'm not sure anyone has proven that baritus himself dumped $30k, so that's more of a rumor.
March 23, 2014, 03:03:02 AM
After Hearing all the Fuss
Graylist - Reasoning
=- Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev
Graylist - Reasoning
=- Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev
Thanks.
Agreed, we can just blacklist a coin for the following reasons - Shady dev recently sold $30,000 of his own coins while soliciting investors, Developer has numerous other pump and dump coins, Conflict of interest being exchange owner and coin dev - If we did that one could try to blacklist all of the coins with a dev that sells some of his coins or owns an exchange, however, I want to include all of the points of views so I will move to the whitelist for the compelling argument but I have to include the attempt to blacklist,..
March 23, 2014, 03:01:13 AM
Androids Tokens DEV is me ( link in elrapido's pot doesn't work )
( link in elrapido's pot doesn't work ) March 23, 2014, 02:56:31 AM
Well now I don't know what to believe, but I'm inclined to lean towards the members who have been here for a while.
I'll just continue to form my own opinion over time rather than clusterfucking this awesome idea of a thread with shitty arguments.
I'll just continue to form my own opinion over time rather than clusterfucking this awesome idea of a thread with shitty arguments.
Jump to: