Topic: The pointlessness of terrorism (Read 2344 times)
Guerrilla fighters or resistance, despite being called terrorists by its opposing faction are a different subject. Unless when they resource terrorism itself, such as ETA or IRA. And here comes the point; those two waged nothing out of terrorism other than be wiped out.
Terrorism is just one of a cancer in this planet. Terrorist group wants only powers that defines there hatred against government. They only want to destroy government and rule the world of full of sin, hatred and crime. There ideology is pointless. That is why we need to destroy them as fast as we can.
A terrorist for someone may be a freedom fighter for someone else. For example, the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) is considered as a terrorist organization by the United States and the other Western nations. However, leftist nations such as Ecuador considers them as freedom fighters. Same with other organizations such as the Hizb-ul-Mujahideen of Kashmir and the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) of Balochistan.
Thanks for pointing out that what we call terrorism are heroes for their countries.
You can't expect a peaceful reaction when being at war with a country.
Terrorism is just one of a cancer in this planet. Terrorist group wants only powers that defines there hatred against government. They only want to destroy government and rule the world of full of sin, hatred and crime. There ideology is pointless. That is why we need to destroy them as fast as we can.
A terrorist for someone may be a freedom fighter for someone else. For example, the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) is considered as a terrorist organization by the United States and the other Western nations. However, leftist nations such as Ecuador considers them as freedom fighters. Same with other organizations such as the Hizb-ul-Mujahideen of Kashmir and the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) of Balochistan.
Terrorism is just one of a cancer in this planet. Terrorist group wants only powers that defines there hatred against government. They only want to destroy government and rule the world of full of sin, hatred and crime. There ideology is pointless. That is why we need to destroy them as fast as we can.
Not only is terrorism pointless, but think of how a terrorist bomb feels...
The End of Dark Star
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luaRtGn2tsI
The End of Dark Star
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luaRtGn2tsI
John Yager - Benson Arizona
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSseHpBH0E4
Not only is terrorism pointless, but think of how a terrorist bomb feels...
The End of Dark Star
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luaRtGn2tsI
The End of Dark Star
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luaRtGn2tsI
no one . no one wins in it.
Something got me wonder: Why are there terrorists?!
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
I guess you've been reading history books a bit quickly. Nelson Mandela has spent 27 years of his life in jail because of his conspiracy to overthrow the state. He was a terrorist. The American settlers who revolted against british rule in the 1770's were seen as terrorists before they created a new country called the US. The french resistants between 1940 and 1944 were labeled as terrorists by the German rulers. The people who created Taiwan were terrorists in China. Nasser was seen as a terrorist by the french and the british...
And those are just a few examples which came to my mind, there are countless others.
By terrorists and terrorism I mean plain terrorism of blowing the crap out of innocent civilians.
Not exactly those "the opposite force calls terrorists", usually due to convenience as those opposing forces are hard to distinguish from those they call terrorists.
The founding fathers weren't blowing up US or UK citizens, if they started their campaign by bombing Boston citizens there wouldn't be any independent USA as public support would be 0 afterwards. So they were striking military facilities, same for the French resistance or Taiwan... Mandela not quite, that was a case when propaganda and time in the "shade" made people forget and turn things around.
Something got me wonder: Why are there terrorists?!
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
I guess you've been reading history books a bit quickly. Nelson Mandela has spent 27 years of his life in jail because of his conspiracy to overthrow the state. He was a terrorist. The American settlers who revolted against british rule in the 1770's were seen as terrorists before they created a new country called the US. The french resistants between 1940 and 1944 were labeled as terrorists by the German rulers. The people who created Taiwan were terrorists in China. Nasser was seen as a terrorist by the french and the british...
And those are just a few examples which came to my mind, there are countless others.
Yes, that's what the history books say. But who, really, are the terrorists? For example. When government forces you to pay taxes so that you can't even support your family, then isn't government the terrorist?
Mahatma Gandhi was declared a terrorist by british parliament in 1932.
In Ireland, I know people who sincerely believe the british are terrorists, willing to impose their conditions by all means, including murder. There are facts to back up those claims.
In fact that's the very reverse of understanding.
Yet it isn't the terrorism that is pointless. It is everything.
Suppose you are wise and understanding, and of good knowledge. You amass art and wealth for yourself. You get yourself a harem of some of the most beautiful, gracious women in the world. You have loads of children by these women. And when you die, you leave great wealth to all of them.
But what good is it to you? It is all pointless. When a person dies, it is all gone.
Why do I even spend time on Bitcointalk? The only thing you ever get in life is the pleasure of the moment. The second thing is satisfaction when you do a job well. But none of it has any meaning, because it is all gone when you die.
Something got me wonder: Why are there terrorists?!
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
I guess you've been reading history books a bit quickly. Nelson Mandela has spent 27 years of his life in jail because of his conspiracy to overthrow the state. He was a terrorist. The American settlers who revolted against british rule in the 1770's were seen as terrorists before they created a new country called the US. The french resistants between 1940 and 1944 were labeled as terrorists by the German rulers. The people who created Taiwan were terrorists in China. Nasser was seen as a terrorist by the french and the british...
And those are just a few examples which came to my mind, there are countless others.
Yes, that's what the history books say. But who, really, are the terrorists? For example. When government forces you to pay taxes so that you can't even support your family, then isn't government the terrorist?
Mahatma Gandhi was declared a terrorist by british parliament in 1932.
In Ireland, I know people who sincerely believe the british are terrorists, willing to impose their conditions by all means, including murder. There are facts to back up those claims.
In fact that's the very reverse of understanding.
Something got me wonder: Why are there terrorists?!
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
I guess you've been reading history books a bit quickly. Nelson Mandela has spent 27 years of his life in jail because of his conspiracy to overthrow the state. He was a terrorist. The American settlers who revolted against british rule in the 1770's were seen as terrorists before they created a new country called the US. The french resistants between 1940 and 1944 were labeled as terrorists by the German rulers. The people who created Taiwan were terrorists in China. Nasser was seen as a terrorist by the french and the british...
And those are just a few examples which came to my mind, there are countless others.
Yes, that's what the history books say. But who, really, are the terrorists? For example. When government forces you to pay taxes so that you can't even support your family, then isn't government the terrorist?
Mahatma Gandhi was declared a terrorist by british parliament in 1932.
In Ireland, I know people who sincerely believe the british are terrorists, willing to impose their conditions by all means, including murder. There are facts to back up those claims.
terrorism seems pointless in the short term but humanity will have suffered from it a lot fifty years after. i think that terrorism is the new type of war so it should not be underestimated.
Terrorism is certainly capable of hijacking world media.
Seems all it accomplishes then is to make Islam look terrible.
terrorism seems pointless in the short term but humanity will have suffered from it a lot fifty years after. i think that terrorism is the new type of war so it should not be underestimated.
Something got me wonder: Why are there terrorists?!
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
I guess you've been reading history books a bit quickly. Nelson Mandela has spent 27 years of his life in jail because of his conspiracy to overthrow the state. He was a terrorist. The American settlers who revolted against british rule in the 1770's were seen as terrorists before they created a new country called the US. The french resistants between 1940 and 1944 were labeled as terrorists by the German rulers. The people who created Taiwan were terrorists in China. Nasser was seen as a terrorist by the french and the british...
And those are just a few examples which came to my mind, there are countless others.
Yes, that's what the history books say. But who, really, are the terrorists? For example. When government forces you to pay taxes so that you can't even support your family, then isn't government the terrorist?
The objectives of terrorists are not always illegal and immoral. Sometimes police actually have good in mind. But traffic stops are often at least partially illegal and immoral when there has been no harm or damage done, and when there is no threat.
For example. You are driving 100MPH on an open highway. Your car is good, and can easily drive 100Mph safely. There is nobody out on the highway except you and the state highway cop. The cop stops you and gives you a ticket for going 100 in a 75 zone. That is terrorism by the cop.
True, this is a broad example. But cops terrorize most of us just by being there. Although some of their terrorism is legal, some of it is also illegal, and most of it is unlawful. Watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twn96nj0jfw&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D&index=10.
The other name would be that America wants to control all the oil in the world
I live in an oil-exporting country, the fall in crude oil has really affected our economy.
I live in an oil-exporting country, the fall in crude oil has really affected our economy.
They are terrorists because they are wurthless scums who have nothing good to do in their lives. They can get manipulated easily by another countries and they can do exactly what they are asked.
War is the most profitable business in the world since the beginning. You sell guns, you profit. You sell medicine, you profit. You rebuild the cities, you profit. They waste resources in a war, so your resources become more valuable.
Terrorists start wars almost for free. In fact some of them are so stupid, they actually do it with their own will and completely for free.
Watch "Lord of War" then you ll understand.
The soldiers in any war, umeraet poor. And the generals are getting richer at a time when soldiers die. Similarly, conventional terrorists. Basically it is silly and not educated people. And those who manage an army of terrorists getting their profit. Therefore, your opinion is not correct. Terror, generates income and is very large.War is the most profitable business in the world since the beginning. You sell guns, you profit. You sell medicine, you profit. You rebuild the cities, you profit. They waste resources in a war, so your resources become more valuable.
Terrorists start wars almost for free. In fact some of them are so stupid, they actually do it with their own will and completely for free.
Watch "Lord of War" then you ll understand.
Although they might not admit it.
Except when they can use the situation to move their troops in to protect democracy and rebuild the infrastructure of the region which they destroyed (payed by the destroyed nation via US loans) and finally afterwards let patriotic corporations like ExxonMobil extract the oil.
Does it ring a bell?
The more I read this guy, the more I like him xD
But Americans will never admit that. Never heard of an American admitting they destroyed whole middle east just for oil.
Guess you'll just have to get another meme.
Something got me wonder: Why are there terrorists?!
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
I guess you've been reading history books a bit quickly. Nelson Mandela has spent 27 years of his life in jail because of his conspiracy to overthrow the state. He was a terrorist. The American settlers who revolted against british rule in the 1770's were seen as terrorists before they created a new country called the US. The french resistants between 1940 and 1944 were labeled as terrorists by the German rulers. The people who created Taiwan were terrorists in China. Nasser was seen as a terrorist by the french and the british...
And those are just a few examples which came to my mind, there are countless others.
Yes, that's what the history books say. But who, really, are the terrorists? For example. When government forces you to pay taxes so that you can't even support your family, then isn't government the terrorist?
The objectives of terrorists are not always illegal and immoral. Sometimes police actually have good in mind. But traffic stops are often at least partially illegal and immoral when there has been no harm or damage done, and when there is no threat.
For example. You are driving 100MPH on an open highway. Your car is good, and can easily drive 100Mph safely. There is nobody out on the highway except you and the state highway cop. The cop stops you and gives you a ticket for going 100 in a 75 zone. That is terrorism by the cop.
True, this is a broad example. But cops terrorize most of us just by being there. Although some of their terrorism is legal, some of it is also illegal, and most of it is unlawful. Watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twn96nj0jfw&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D&index=10.
They are terrorists because they are wurthless scums who have nothing good to do in their lives. They can get manipulated easily by another countries and they can do exactly what they are asked.
War is the most profitable business in the world since the beginning. You sell guns, you profit. You sell medicine, you profit. You rebuild the cities, you profit. They waste resources in a war, so your resources become more valuable.
Terrorists start wars almost for free. In fact some of them are so stupid, they actually do it with their own will and completely for free.
Watch "Lord of War" then you ll understand.
The soldiers in any war, umeraet poor. And the generals are getting richer at a time when soldiers die. Similarly, conventional terrorists. Basically it is silly and not educated people. And those who manage an army of terrorists getting their profit. Therefore, your opinion is not correct. Terror, generates income and is very large.War is the most profitable business in the world since the beginning. You sell guns, you profit. You sell medicine, you profit. You rebuild the cities, you profit. They waste resources in a war, so your resources become more valuable.
Terrorists start wars almost for free. In fact some of them are so stupid, they actually do it with their own will and completely for free.
Watch "Lord of War" then you ll understand.
Although they might not admit it.
Except when they can use the situation to move their troops in to protect democracy and rebuild the infrastructure of the region which they destroyed (payed by the destroyed nation via US loans) and finally afterwards let patriotic corporations like ExxonMobil extract the oil.
Does it ring a bell?
The more I read this guy, the more I like him xD
But Americans will never admit that. Never heard of an American admitting they destroyed whole middle east just for oil.
I also do not know why they do it. They even multiply even if they show terrors. Maybe they are all tired with their lives. Maybe they do not found their happiness. Maybe their lives are too boring that some terrorist will commit to suicide bombing and end their lives with innocent ones. They must be using lots of methamphetamine and just do not know the reality anymore. They are all sick people.
You're right! Terrorists, for the most part, sick people. Only a madman could put on a suicide bomber's belt and die for stupid ideas. Terrorists can not even really say it what they want. All the ideas of terrorists, complete abstraction. Rather, it is delirium of a madman. But those who run the terrorists only want your money. They don't consider themselves terrorists, they consider themselves freedom fighters and that's for them it is not a crime, but proof of their dedication to the religion.
Each has its own truth. But religious terrorism has no justification. Not a single religion in the world, does not say that someone has to kill someone in the name of their god. Freedom fighters have to fight on their land instead of globally. Jump to: