Topic: -- The Riddle of the Twin Brothers - Who Were, Are and Will Rule the World! - page 130. (Read 383550 times)

He is apparently running an old bitcoin version pre initial soft fork and referring to this as the real bitcoin aka TRB.It mints v1 blocks, the network rejected them in 2012.Though it is just a number, easy to upgrade in the source but it would not have support for the Strict DER or CHECKLOCKVERIFY soft forks.

Those escrow services using Bitcoin native features would not work anymore.V1 blocks are rejected so you'd end up on your own fork.The network has passed the point of activation, there's no mining back to  undo SegWit.If that was a plausible attack vector then it anyonecanspend would not have been chosen.It's got to be core or nothing at all, there's been so many attempts to change Bitcoin with a fork and they've all failed. The majority of people will and do stick to core.Even to go back that far you would have to lose years of progress. Bitcoin has got better with so many BIPs implemented.I can't see how he has been developing this fork open source anywhere and if its so far behind core tech nobody is going to use it commercially anyway.

It sounds like a conspiracy theory.

I met a man who in my mind I compare to Mr. Wright - http://www.ricktheconman.com/. I first met him at a meetup at the Venetian here in Vegas, parting ways just two hours prior to the attack, for he said that he had to travel all the way to North Vegas to install a toilet for a client after he claimed how rich he was and had everything done for him.

About a week later, I attended another meetup so to warn the others about RJ, finding the link above after the fact. RJ informed me that he was at the attack site and transported victims to the hospital, an impossibility at best.

I then showed him the linked site, whereupon he claimed that wasn't him but thanked me for bringing it to his attention. Everybody else could see the resemblance but RJ who ... wait for it ... was holding the exact same cane as the other RJ is seen holding in the pics.

Afterward, RJ continued to mix with the crowd telling others about all the deals he made with others in attendance, including with myself. He bragged about his new team member, who looks like Frankenstein, as being his lead coder. A few minutes later I asked Frankenstein about his coding skills. He informed me that he studied HTML 20 years ago but gave it up [for Lent], and hasn't owned a computer for over two years.

Later, RJ gets in my face and says that he doesn't give a shit if I believe him or not because he's telling the truth. I guess that's why he was attending a VERY BASIC bitcoin meetup asking newbie questions after informing everybody there that he's been a Bitcoiner for years and owns mega bitcoins.

Frankenstein used to own bitcoins but he made the mistake of sending the balance for cash sans a fee, still waiting for his twenty bucks worth of coins to get confirmed, further stating that he couldn't eat for a couple days because he was broke, later able to eat because he did a side job.

RJ was talking to another dude about being a level-12 member at http://tvpnc.org/, stating that Frankenstein is a level-14 member. When asked how many levels are there, RJ said, "How many levels are there? Frankenstein, tell this dude how many levels there are." (paraphrased, but goddamn close) Not only didn't Frankenstein not know how many levels there are, but his answer went in so many tangents it made my head spin, and I was just privy to the convo, not one of the participants.

One more thing. At the second meetup I asked RJ about Ella (see link above). He said, "Who?" Oddly, Ella was at the Venetian meetup who he periodically had convos with, then informing me that he just met that woman (going by a different name) and that she seems bright in this space (paraphrased - taxing my memory). The truth being that she's his partner and they work as a team toward nefarious means.

Some confusion here.

1. Dr. Wright (thanks to vlads ramblings, I watched some of his most recent vids) is developing nchain technologies. From his talks he feels that nchain technology will require 1 gig blocks (for all the neat stuff he plans on packing into the blockchain) and that data centers/ light wallets are inevitable. Bitcoin cash is more in line with his vision so he will use it to be a testbed for his nchain technology (hence 10,000% increase). Dr. Wright feels that increasing the block size is consistent with satoshi's vision. Vlad is convinced Dr. Wright is Satoshi, ergo Satoshi backs BitcoinCash.

2. Anonymint is not in agreement with Vlad.

3. Vlad quote
Both posters are in agreement that there is a bait switch about to happen, but Anonymint is not in agreement about Bitcoincash being crowned TRB.

4. As per Anonymint blog, TRB (the real bitcoin)  is still underneath all of this mess and hasn't poked it's head out yet. What is called bitcoin at the moment had a rule change that was a softfork. This allows old miners to continue using their legacy code but it also allows new miners to run the new segwit code. The old legacy code as per Anonymint is TRB. He posits a scenario where these miners over write the segwit transactions and "steal" them. Thus TRB pokes it's head out and retains dominance. All the forks (three card montey) is a diversion to drive hash from the current bitcoin so TRB can dominate.

Above quote is probably more realistic re bitcoin cash market share going forward after november HF.It looks to be all a ploy to shake out real bitcoin (bitcoin core) hodlrs.It is also hypocrisy that 8mb block supporters on one hand spread fud about segwit and on other hand support 2x.It proves they are liars.

Hahaha, you’re lucky you always make me laugh, you sumbitch.

Wright and I are taking over.  The dipshits had their run, and they blew it, time for the misfits to take over. 

ButtCornCash is over   ~it figures you and dr. trolltoshi is touting it 

Bitcoincash is king of the dipshits.Its dippin right into the shitter as we speak.It touched cloth @ less than $300 a moment ago.

Bitcoincrash, bahahahaaaa, that’s good.

I don’t sell.

I don’t lie.

I may be wrong, but the odds are great that I’m right. 

Bet big on Dr. Wright!  Bet big on BitcoinCrash.  Haha.  I LOVE the name, cause BCC will crash the Bitcoin party. 

You might be like that used car salesman trying to sell us that old banger thats on its way to the dump hoping some noob pays the asking price instead of the scrap value.   Bitcoincrash going down to the junkyard now while BTC will touch 20K.Bets anyone??

I agree.  There are some nefarious games being played by parties with ulterior motives and secret agendas.

Blockstream (UASF) and DCG ( Segwit2x) are in bed together. And I’m going to restate this – big blockers have been played.DCG are heavily invested in Blockstream.http://dcg.co/portfolio/ https://twitter.com/barrysilbert/status/694883528937439232 UASF and Segwit2x are a dual effort to make something appear better than it really is. It is a way of creating a terrible compromise, seem half good.

Blockstream are not concerned by the NYA, nor Segwit2x.Why do BS/Core aligned forums not censor Segwit2x topics? By all means, all other forks or implementations of Bitcoin are very heavily censored. In fact, on reddit’s r/bitcoin, talk of altcoins is strictly prohibited, but LiteCoin had great advertising material throughout it during its Segwit campaign. When ‘Bitcoin Cash’, or Bitcoin Unlimited are strictly prohibited, but Segwit2x talk is welcome, you have to ask why…

They’re all on the same team, seeking the same outcome.

Big blocker miners have been played.

—�

CoinGeek [Oct 5th, 2017] -

A new coin is coming, and this time, it may lead to the death of legacy Bitcoin.

Six global banks—Barclays, Credit Suisse, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, HSBC, Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ (MUFJ), and State Street—have joined together to launch a new form of digital currency called the “utility settlement coin.”

The coin was created by Swiss global financial services company UBS based on a Clearmatics Technologies product “to make financial markets more efficient,” according to the Financial Times. USC’s goal is to enable financial groups to pay each other or buy securities using digital coins that can be directly converted into cash at central banks, thus removing the need for traditional money transfers. The coins are stored on the blockchain and can be converted into different currencies.

Hyder Jaffrey, head of strategic investment and fintech innovation at UBS, told FT they are in talks with central banks and regulators, a process they expect to continue “over the next 12 months with the aim of a limited ‘go live’ at the back end of 2018.”

USC’s first use case will be with banks looking to pay each other in different currencies, Jaffrey said. Then, the coins could be used to settle securities trades, although the securities will have to be transferred to the blockchain first.

If all goes to plan, banks will no longer have a need to go fiat anymore. Or even legacy Bitcoin and other altcoins for that matter, said Dr. Craig Wright, chief scientist of blockchain technology and research company nChain.

”USC will kill the BTC branch of Bitcoin as there is now no reason for it to exist,” Wright said.

It’s not news that banking giants are scrambling to either adapt to or kill off legacy Bitcoin, which will soon put an end to traditional banking. There are still plenty of issues surrounding cryptocurrencies, but one thing is for sure: Bitcoin, and now Bitcoin Cash, will render traditional banks irrelevant because it will give the financial system back to the people.

—�

The writing is on the wall.  And on the floor.  And the ceiling.  And even behind the doors and on the lampshades.

Wow man, that’s great.  I bet you didn’t insist on $100k for each domain.   

Update:

Sold all four domains to a Gold Bug dude outta Dallas with a D. (and I'm not some domain reseller; go figure)

No more clues.  It may make it too easy to figure out.

Where’s the win in that? 

Any more clues? How long ago did you drop your steganographic message?

Thanks for the tip on Monkey, I like the look of it and have taken a chance on it.  Great risk/reward as you mentioned.

I know you’ve got like 128 [banned] sock puppet accounts cause you told me.  Haha.

None of these posters are me.  I rarely use a sock puppet account.  Maybe once every few months when I’m bored. 

Stop being jealous, hater, and write a tune to my lyrics.  :p

~this thread should be renamed " the riddle of vlad2valds' sockpuppets"           #burnnn

Ripple is a delivery system using IOU’s which I believe take days to clear.

They BADLY need a token like BTC but BTC won’t work for numerous reasons.  Ripple will either launch their own clone or choose an existing one.  For faster adoption/acceptance and in the spirit of free markets I would easily choose an older scam-free well distributed coin.  But I admit that’s a really long shot, which is why the reward on such a coin, should you pick the right one, would be 10,000+ fold. 

Stellar is like ripple and it was a great buy around $10 million cap ~6 months ago, I think there are way better risk/reward coins now.  It’s possible it could compete against Ripple but the odds aren’t that good, especially after such a huge run.

Gleb.  Well, I was gonna say you’re a sumbitch, but I won’t.