Topic: -- The Riddle of the Twin Brothers - Who Were, Are and Will Rule the World! - page 270. (Read 383196 times)

I wanna add a new element to my transfer of wealth theory.

I'm noticing an interesting trend:

The poorest countries are adding Bitcoin wallets at a much higher clip than rich countries.  Like China telling all their citizens to hoard Bitcoin last year.

What we've got here is the biggest socialist redistribution of capital the world has ever seen.

So the goal is 2-fold:  Banks, corps, govts etc., robbing the masses but at the same time, redistributing much of the western wealth (the "rich") to the east and other poor nations.

33% of Kenya's population has a Bitcoin wallet.  Imagine if the average person buys just half of 1 Bitcoin and then the pensions of the US and Europe, trillions of dollars, are pushed into Bitcoin (and other cryptos).

$25,000 for a guy in India or Africa is life changing money.

So we're about to enrich, not just the already powerful Elite, but also billions of impoverished people.

While that sounds nice, that means the middle class of the West will be devastated by Bitcoin.

End game:  To create a new global "middle class" so banks and corporations can then sell their shit to 7 billions customers.

Cut it loose already!

I think anyone whose been on coinmarketcap should know something about ixcoin or taken some type of interest in it considering how it has been immune to a "typical pump and dump". Something most other coins can't claim, or at least it's been stable during the time frame I've been looking at it for (granted that hasn't been for very long). You are right it would take only one of these guys to change everything. I suppose despite bitcoin's blemished record, the fact that it's used as a payment method to some degree is what gives people faith in it. There's no reason why this couldn't happen with ixcoin, but I guess it's a case of some psychological value bitcoin has as being first, which makes people all for it. People know, like, and trust it to a degree because of that.

The problem ixcoin faces imo is lack of hype to drive demand and raise the price. A lot of coins have had some gimmicks that have given them a lot of traction (though I'd say it's a good thing ixcoin isn't gimmicky). Blackcoin has had its multipool, Auroracoin had it's airdrop/being the first nation coin what have you, and for doge it was a meme of all things that got people into it. Price can be driven up for any coin rather quickly regardless of whether or not it's sustained. I think auroracoin and vertcoin are very good examples even if they are pumps that lead to dumps.

I remember going on coinmarketcap and seeing vertcoin at somewhere around $5-7 dollars and I had never heard of it the day before. Now darkcoin is becoming a big deal because of how anonymous it's supposed to be because of the darksend feature (at least that's my assumption I don't actually know or understand why darkcoin is popular). Not a techie so can't make any claims about how functional any coin is from that standpoint, but I guess a coin just needs something that makes it seem like it is standing out on its own even if it isn't and everything is open source and features can be copied from one coin to another.

It is interesting that people are so willing to buy fractions of bitcoins, but don't want to touch/never heard of ixcoin when it's only 5 cents and has a secure network. It is a very easy coin to get in on, even more so since it hasn't been dumped to oblivion. I think hype and "new innovative developments" is what ixcoin is lacking which keeps the average person away from it. I do agree with you on the security of a network playing more of a vital role than innovative features that can just be copied and pasted onto any coin, but things like that seem to serve as a fix for some people that drives demand for a coin, even if that demand is only temporary. Of course demand in the long term is the most important thing and should bitcoin need to be tripped over first before people can get into ixcoin then so be it.

You can see NautilusCoin right now. Brian Kelly is the creator/founder and the coin has a volume of $84,934 on coinmarketcap in the last 24 hours and is valued at 25 cents.

$4.5 billion in [circulation]?  Lol, who writes this stuff?

I've written to dozens of billionaires but not Novogratz.  

I'll try to find him on twitter and give him my "iXcoin will kill Bitcoin and takeover the World" spiel. Haha!  Who knows, it only takes one of these guys to change everything for iXcoin.

And he sounds like a technology investor:  If he likes Bitcoin's "technology" at $500 per coin, what's not to love about Bitcoin's Twin [iXcoin] at 5 cents?

This is what I don't get from guys like the Winklevoss twins who keep saying Bitcoin's technology [Payment System] is worth that much ["$400 Billion"].  What?  iXcoin is better in some ways and exactly like Bitcoin in every other way, so are these people lying to everyone or have they really NEVER heard of iXcoin?

Well, I'm shoving iXcoin down their troaghts. lol, just in the last 24 hours I wrote to Charlie Shrem and Brock Pierce.  

Unless I'm totally crazy [and that's entirely possible] one of these guys should have an:  "Oh Shit", moment.  

Haha, that's what I'm hoping for.  One big - "Oh Shit" - Moment!

Have you made a pitch to Michael Novogratz?  If he thinks Bitcoin is a bargain at 5 billion, he might well think iX is a giveaway at 1.2 million.


" There's a compelling reason to believe in the bitcoin story, Fortress Investment Group Principal Michael Novogratz said Wednesday from the SALT Conference in Las Vegas.

The cryptocurrency with about $4.5 billion in circulation made headlines after the failure of Mt. Gox, one of its exchanges, and its links to illicit online purchases. It has had its share of supporters and detractors, but for Novogratz, it was "a simple proposition."

"When I look at the amount of human capital working on this project, there are probably 30,000 independent programmers out there, coding and working on bitcoin and bitcoin derivatives in this open-source community," he said, citing well-known venture capitalists as believers.

"But almost every California shop now has got some focus on bitcoin. So I just think rarely has a project had this much human capital coming into it where you can buy it at $4½ billion. So, that's the easy pitch," he added."
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101674032

I'm not sure if I've said this before [on this thread] but after Bitcoin gets an ETF license it will be a green light for other cryptos to get an ETF license.

This is good and pretty much a guarantee for a number of reasons.

The biggest reason is that the best hedge against a Bitcoin collapse is the purchase of another crypto, or better yet, a Crypto Basket.

So it makes sense then to have a crypto basket ETF.  iXcoin would be a shoe-in for such a Basket due to its age, relative stability, very wide distribution, massive [rare] security, higher liquidity than Bitcoin and the fact it's the only Twin to Bitcoin.

My argument has been, since last year, that if any alt-coin can get an ETF license on its own it's iXcoin.  The reason is that once the SEC gives an ETF License to Bitcoin they would look like liars denying an equally secure, time tested [more liquid] and stable coin, like iXcoin, without Bitcoin's bad history, the very same  type of ETF license.  

The fact iXcoin is a more liquid version of Bitcoin actually makes it a better candidate for an ETF license than any other coin out there.

As I was telling Brock a couple nights ago, and others as well, iXcoin could be a target simply for the fact that it is the best candidate for an ETF license.  Such a license would make iXcoin worth at least $100.  But that takes $1 million and at least 1 year from the time of application.  

I don't have the money but I have tried to bring this simple fact to the attention of people with the right connections and money - like Barry Silbert, Brock Pierce and a number of top Hedge Fund managers and CEOs.

For them, risking $1 million to make $1+ billion is a once in a lifetime opportunity.  And I honestly think they're just waiting to be sure Bitcoin gets that ETF before they apply for another coin or a basket ETF.  

This is yet one more big reason why iXcoin is an incredibly good bet at 5 [friggin] cents.

As I predicted months ago:  Bitcoin Foundation Board members keep Rolling over.

Bitcoin is officially being ran by special interests:  Banks, Corporations, Hedge Funds, Wall Street and the Government.

How's that for decentralized, Andreas Antonopolous?

How's that for banks and government can NEVER control Bitcoin, Andreas, media Puppet?

There is literally nowhere for anyone to run to but iXcoin.

They can launch a new coin but it takes time to get traction, liquidity, a wide distribution and to be properly tested.  

How much longer before people [the experts] see what I've been saying since last year?

I have always said that banks and govt are behind the Bitcoin bull runs and they're the ones stepping in to stop the massive drops.

Well, until now.  You see, if a lie looks real enough, and big enough, it soon reaches critical mass and starts to live on its own, and becomes self sufficient.

Wall Street has now taken over and so the amount the govt has to spend to support BTC is now much lower.

And once the banks have loaded up on Bitcoin, they will do what they do best:  Drive it up like crazy.  This should happen in the second half of this year, Bitcoin should see $2,000+.

And that's when you'll see the media getting behind Bitcoin and cryptos in a big way and that's when the govt and banks will start using billions, hundreds of billions of our money (from pension funds (401K, IRA, etc.) via the ETFs) to drive Bitcoin and alts to unimaginable levels.

Buying begets more buying and soon Greed kicks in and the masses will start jumping in head first [in late 2015] after the ETFs drive Bitcoin to new highs - $5,000-$10,000, early to mid 2015.

If you do human studies you can actually predict at which point Wall Street gets in and at what point what demographics and what % of the population will jump in.

So they know ahead of time when critical mass will be reached and when and how much money will be pumped into this new GATT system.

That said:  The WinkleVoss twins are nothing more than scapegoats.

I think they were approached and given their Bitcoins and told to apply for an ETF because it was guaranteed.  Cause when the massive [voluntary] wealth swap is done, there will be a major crash where the rich, the ones buying Bitcoin right now hand over fist, will literally take [via voluntary transfer] from the masses, at least 50% of the world's wealth.  Banks, corporations and governments will be the biggest beneficiaries since they set this up and were in first.

But at that point people will go insane and will try to blame someone.

All the countries and Central Banks of the world will say:  Don't blame us, remember we told you again and again Bitcoin was dangerous and you could lose all your money and you should stay away (and then we gave Bitcoin an ETF license in record time so you could put all your pension money in it, lol), so blame those guilty of this Bitcoin Ponzi Fraud:  Oh, there's Satoshi and the Winklevoss Twins.

These 3 will be hung out to dry while the truly guilty parties will remain anonymous and will walk away with trillions in wealth, thus, effectively stealing hundreds of years of wealth accumulation from all the middle and upper classes of the world.

The most Brilliant part of all this is that they've set it up to make it all voluntary.  Fear, greed and sheer human stupidity will absolutely guarantee success of this mind blowing wealth transfer scheme.

This cannot be stopped so buy now while the world's elite are buying and try to find that currency which they will swap to after the biggest theft in history is complete.

"Anybody seeing one more big fat coincidence here?
How many coincidences are we at now?
My coincidence meter is busted from coincidence overload.  Haha!"

The coincidences are just beginning! Allegedly, the Fed essentially laundered $140billion between November 2013 and January 2014. They did this in an attempt to hide the fact that someone was dumping  US Treasury bonds. Interestingly enough, the start of last year's bitcoin bullrun (which has been attributed to China) was in the beginning days of November. My math tells me that these two events are connected.

And for your viewing pleasure I present to you the following links:
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/05/12/fed-great-deceiver-paul-craig-roberts/ (Fed money laundering)  
http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/statisticsdata.htm (Fed website)
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/ (Feds weekly balance sheets)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/10/10/this-surprising-chart-shows-which-countries-own-the-most-u-s-debt/ (Cool ass chart. I love charts)

I forgot to mention the name of the entity in Zurich which is responsible for renaming all new global currencies.  The entity [bank/exchange] which renamed BTC to XBT and may rename IXC to XIC.

The name of this entity is SIX.  

So...SIX may rename IXC to XIC which would stand for 616. [6 empowers 616].

Kinda has a nice ring to it.  Haha!


I couldn't help but notice yet one more big coincidence.  Look at the X in SIX and tell me it's not exactly the same X used in our new IXC logo.

Anybody in marketing here?  Is this a very common X used for logos?  Cause I have rarely seen it so I think it's at least interesting.  


Here are the images for comparison:







SIX Logo - The X is identical to the X used in New IXC Logo.





Our very professional new logo supposedly done by total newbies in a matter of days for a payment of just 100 iXcoins which came out to around $10.


Anybody seeing one more big fat coincidence here?

How many coincidences are we at now?  

My coincidence meter is busted from coincidence overload.  Haha!




Edit:



And the cute little SIX Building where Global Currencies are renamed for World Domination:

^

80 IXC?

Lol, no, that's not that good.  But that's to be expected given merge mining is very difficult.

Then again, if I had 80 BTC right now I would be thrilled.

about 80. is that good?
nope not buying, im just not that much into alts i guess.
good luck to you too

hdbuck,

I'm curious, now much did you merge mine?

Are you still merge mining IXC? 

What about buying, have you bought any?

It never hurts to diversify by adding one of only 4 ultra secure coins on earth.  Even if I'm wrong, at 5 cents, you're getting a good bet.

Good luck!

hmyeaaa, i guess i'd understand your point. time will tell. and im ready for either nothing. or everythingggg ^^

It's not a pitch but thanks.

All this crazy stuff is what I really believe.  So I'm either totally nuts or maybe some kind of idiot savant.

That's what's great and another unique thing about IXC.  I think IXC has a better distribution than any other coin in the world, even better than Bitcoin.

I wish I could afford to pay someone to do the analysis to find this out.  It just makes sense given that 2.5 out of 3 years, IXC has been merge mined so the difficulty was very high and at the same time, IXC was seen as a failure for lack of silly features so nobody had the foresight to actually accumulate it.

So imagine the uplifting effect of Bitcoin if it created tens of thousands of millionaires instead of a handful of big millionaires.  When you think about that real possibility then the hidden message within this coin really starts to make you think:  The Twin to Lift up the Colonies.

Thats quite an interesting pitch. I may agree with some parts but i just dont see why nor how XIC would take over XBT.

edit: however i think i might have unpurposely merged mined some XIC back in november

B I N G O

is this riddle just talking about your sponsored coin ixcoin XIC taking on Bitcoin XBT to finally trap mankind into some sort of hidden crypto-financial despotism; and whilst holding to our coin would (at least) make us rich, but not free of some sort?!

Hahaaaa.

I pretty much give it all away in this thread.

But there is an element of the devil in there in that there's lots of evil which can come from a permanent, traceable ledger like Bitcoin.

tough riddle, makes me think of the devil.