http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html?hp
F.C.C., in ‘Net Neutrality’ Turnaround, Plans to Allow Fast Lane
Topic: -- The Riddle of the Twin Brothers - Who Were, Are and Will Rule the World! - page 273. (Read 383571 times)
April 23, 2014, 05:51:28 PM
April 23, 2014, 03:33:37 PM
More on the Skynet theme: http://www.coindesk.com/jeff-garzik-announces-partnership-launch-bitcoin-satellites-space/
April 23, 2014, 12:27:00 AM
Glad you liked it, Tovarăși.
Some dictator humor goes nice with all this spooky conspiracy stuff.
April 23, 2014, 12:15:11 AM
Sort of off-topic but I figured it kind of fits on topic of world's most powerful figures whom I also think are hoarding the forever (*cough*) "decentralized" Bitcoin.
Basically, I laughed really hard when I saw this cause I can almost imagine Putin doing this so I had to post it. Hahaha!
Putin [the Russian Bear] coming at ya in 3D! Hahaha!
That one amused me
Comrade THIS IS MINE
Smashes out of TV
IN Soviet Russia you watch the TV
In America I Come to Crush YOU
April 22, 2014, 12:23:36 AM
I am willing to bet money on the fact that you smoke either crack or meth.
Smoking crack or meth?
Firstly, I'm not sure why you're using the word [or] - everyone knows crack AND meth go great together, right before a nice conspiracy theory binge-fest. Haha.
And personally, I think crack and meth are so played out. My preference, "when I'm trying to crack the code" is bath salts. Oh, oh - you will see the future but, unfortunately, you'll start craving an all you can eat [homeless bum face] buffet, so my advice is to have lots of crack and meth handy.
So if you wanna come up with even more BRILLIANT theories [than these] then you really need to stop mocking and start puffin'.
How I'm comin'?
April 21, 2014, 11:22:21 PM
I am willing to bet money on the fact that you smoke either crack or meth.
How much are you willing to bet?
April 19, 2014, 01:25:36 AM
Sort of off-topic but I figured it kind of fits on topic of world's most powerful figures whom I also think are hoarding the forever (*cough*) "decentralized" Bitcoin.
Basically, I laughed really hard when I saw this cause I can almost imagine Putin doing this so I had to post it. Hahaha!
Putin [the Russian Bear] coming at ya in 3D! Hahaha!
April 19, 2014, 01:00:02 AM
I am willing to bet money on the fact that you smoke either crack or meth.
Just because you don't like an idea doesn't retract from its validity.
Imagine all of the cars, yachts, houses, crack, meth, guns, plane tickets, and much more that has been bought with bitcoin.
These tangible objects were bought through the valuation of the currency network. The Bitnet is simply acknowledging this ecosystem of trading essentially 'free' virtual assets for material goods. The scope to which this network will expand is unknown to everybody. Perhaps it will expand to encompass it all. Perhaps not.
One things for sure: although every bitcoin could theoretically be purchased easily by a wealthy investor: It will never happen. Prices would skyrocket and holders would hodl.
If you can't understand it, oh well.
April 19, 2014, 12:46:26 AM
I am willing to bet money on the fact that you smoke either crack or meth.
April 19, 2014, 12:20:48 AM
Rise of the "Bitnet": http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/23aeim/i_think_we_should_rebrand_stop_referring_to/
Interesting.
Eerily similar to SkyNet from terminator.
This comparison is more fitting than you may realize. The bitcoin protocol allows for the creation of what are known as decentralized autonomous corporations, DAC for short. In a nutshell, a DAC is an entity that governs itself and makes its own decisions concerning future actions. Bitcoin is the technology that will ultimately lead to computers developing free will (i.e. freedom to deliberately act against human will). Throw in recursive programming and genetic algorithms and computers have the ability to upgrade their abilities and powers. Every depiction of the so called evolutionary tree of life I have ever seen is wrong. They never included "technology". If you look at the development of technology and compare it with various living organisms you will see that it is in fact alive, that it is evolving, and that in the very near future it will no longer be dependent on humans for survival. No one else is saying it yet, so I will say it again: the bitcoin protocol is the beginning of free will for the machines.
In other conspiracies, Antonopoulos has gotten himself in a pickle: https://coinreport.net/antonopoulos-statement-neo-bee/
April 18, 2014, 05:30:41 AM
Rise of the "Bitnet": http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/23aeim/i_think_we_should_rebrand_stop_referring_to/
Interesting.
Eerily similar to SkyNet from terminator.
April 18, 2014, 03:12:18 AM
April 16, 2014, 10:28:45 PM
Johnny,
I never heard of the Maxwell guy so no. This theory actually just hit me minutes before I wrote it as I was telling someone something on twitter which triggered it.
If Maxwell is reputable then I'm glad to hear he's got a similar idea.
In the end, such ideas or concepts simply make sense from a world domination point of view. I rarely watch news channels cause it upsets me to see constant lies and manipulation and I rarely read any conspiracy sites cause there tends to be too much wacky stuff which only confuses or upsets me so most of the stuff I come up with I do by simply imagining that I am a rich and powerful person with no further goals in life but to gain more power which automatically leads to thoughts of control.
It is in this state of mind where all of these ideas come from. So I guess you could say then that I'm no better than these power hungry elitist bankers but there is one difference between them and I and that is the simple fact that my moral compass still points north, most of the time.
But who knows, perhaps too much money and power eventually corrupts even a once morally sound individual. So that, which most of us seek [money] eventually corrupts our very hearts.
Pretty sad but I'd still like a few cool million dollars....just to test out this theory of course. Haha!
I never heard of the Maxwell guy so no. This theory actually just hit me minutes before I wrote it as I was telling someone something on twitter which triggered it.
If Maxwell is reputable then I'm glad to hear he's got a similar idea.
In the end, such ideas or concepts simply make sense from a world domination point of view. I rarely watch news channels cause it upsets me to see constant lies and manipulation and I rarely read any conspiracy sites cause there tends to be too much wacky stuff which only confuses or upsets me so most of the stuff I come up with I do by simply imagining that I am a rich and powerful person with no further goals in life but to gain more power which automatically leads to thoughts of control.
It is in this state of mind where all of these ideas come from. So I guess you could say then that I'm no better than these power hungry elitist bankers but there is one difference between them and I and that is the simple fact that my moral compass still points north, most of the time.
But who knows, perhaps too much money and power eventually corrupts even a once morally sound individual. So that, which most of us seek [money] eventually corrupts our very hearts.
Pretty sad but I'd still like a few cool million dollars....just to test out this theory of course. Haha!
April 16, 2014, 10:19:36 PM
Interesting, the media just flipped a switch and went from murdering Bitcoin's image to pumping it. Let's see if this becomes a media trend. I think it will and it will accelerate as the year goes on and especially into next year.
Not to butcher the quote, but are they through fighting us yet?
It's too early to say for sure but I did expect the media to get behind cryptos in a big way later this year. One can only speculate why they chose to hang up on Bitcoin but they would have to turn positive to get the masses to embrace crypto money.
April 16, 2014, 07:19:24 PM
Just thought of an interesting use in a world with Human Assets via what I call Life Shares.
When a sheep, err, human is born, it gets a set number of Life Shares, say, 1 Million shares in him/herself.
As the sheep, err, human grows, natural life events happen - like going to college or becoming some soccer phenom.
These events bring about opportunity for any Human Asset inside the World Human Asset Market. For instance, the 18 year old soccer phenom is spotted at some game and a number of people speculate on his Life Shares causing the value of his Human Self to go up.
He can now choose to sell any portion of his 1 million Life Shares.
The Good:
He now has options he wouldn't have had in an un-chipped world with no WHAM. He can use the proceed to better himself, pay for college or take the time off to train and become a professional soccer player. Or he can choose to buy tons of drugs and a ferrari and wrap it around a pole.
The Bad:
People make bad decisions, especially at an early age so many young people would sell too many of their Life Shares early on in life. This would eventually lead to the individual selling 51% of his life shares at which point he no longer controls his/her life.
The majority shareholders now control all aspects of his life, including major events such as marriage or if and when he will have children.
Refusal to play by the Market Rules would result in an automatic shut-off of the chip implant which would be a death sentence since without the chip you wouldn't be able to buy any food, so it's safe to say most would rather be slaves, err, Active Human Assets - so once again, this would only work if everyone is chipped.
The Ugly:
Like with any market, the rich and elite always find a way to abuse the system and get more rich and powerful. In this case world bankers can take advantage of food shortages, create wars, addictions, excessive debt and any other thing you can think of which would make someone desperate enough to sell their life shares for next to nothing.
How many people desperate enough, hungry enough, to feed an addiction, in too much debt or living in 3rd world countries wouldn't sell 51%+ of their life shares for a paltry amount of money, like $10,000? The elite would go on a massive manipulation spree and collect a few billion Active Human Assets.
The number 1 cost of most Large Multinational Corporations is the Cost of Labor.
I just solved their problem!
As majority owner you can now dictate your human assets to migrate to any location, fight wars, build infrastructure, work on massive assembly lines or any other task you deem necessary and labor intensive, for nothing more than the cost of living.
Of course in a free world like we have (*cough) there would always be an option to buy back Some of your life shares and become free again, but given your wages as a Corporate Owned Asset are so low, buying back your life shares would take you a long, long time.
This is of course nothing more than legal slavery. But it will be labeled something very PC or PS (Polite Society) like Active Human Assets (AHA), not slaves. Because slaves never had a choice, while Human Assets are free to willingly buy and sell their own Life Shares and just like Bitcoin has been recently labeled property [when it's clearly NOT] by extension, anything [or anyone] inside this property [Blockchain] will also be property or an asset, a Human Asset - as reclassified by the future Global Freedom Council on Active Human Assets Worldwide.
Are you guys getting this? GATT, WHAM and AHA. Lol....
Man, this would be an awesome movie to watch: Breaking out of the BlockCHAIN.
When a sheep, err, human is born, it gets a set number of Life Shares, say, 1 Million shares in him/herself.
As the sheep, err, human grows, natural life events happen - like going to college or becoming some soccer phenom.
These events bring about opportunity for any Human Asset inside the World Human Asset Market. For instance, the 18 year old soccer phenom is spotted at some game and a number of people speculate on his Life Shares causing the value of his Human Self to go up.
He can now choose to sell any portion of his 1 million Life Shares.
The Good:
He now has options he wouldn't have had in an un-chipped world with no WHAM. He can use the proceed to better himself, pay for college or take the time off to train and become a professional soccer player. Or he can choose to buy tons of drugs and a ferrari and wrap it around a pole.
The Bad:
People make bad decisions, especially at an early age so many young people would sell too many of their Life Shares early on in life. This would eventually lead to the individual selling 51% of his life shares at which point he no longer controls his/her life.
The majority shareholders now control all aspects of his life, including major events such as marriage or if and when he will have children.
Refusal to play by the Market Rules would result in an automatic shut-off of the chip implant which would be a death sentence since without the chip you wouldn't be able to buy any food, so it's safe to say most would rather be slaves, err, Active Human Assets - so once again, this would only work if everyone is chipped.
The Ugly:
Like with any market, the rich and elite always find a way to abuse the system and get more rich and powerful. In this case world bankers can take advantage of food shortages, create wars, addictions, excessive debt and any other thing you can think of which would make someone desperate enough to sell their life shares for next to nothing.
How many people desperate enough, hungry enough, to feed an addiction, in too much debt or living in 3rd world countries wouldn't sell 51%+ of their life shares for a paltry amount of money, like $10,000? The elite would go on a massive manipulation spree and collect a few billion Active Human Assets.
The number 1 cost of most Large Multinational Corporations is the Cost of Labor.
I just solved their problem!
As majority owner you can now dictate your human assets to migrate to any location, fight wars, build infrastructure, work on massive assembly lines or any other task you deem necessary and labor intensive, for nothing more than the cost of living.
Of course in a free world like we have (*cough) there would always be an option to buy back Some of your life shares and become free again, but given your wages as a Corporate Owned Asset are so low, buying back your life shares would take you a long, long time.
This is of course nothing more than legal slavery. But it will be labeled something very PC or PS (Polite Society) like Active Human Assets (AHA), not slaves. Because slaves never had a choice, while Human Assets are free to willingly buy and sell their own Life Shares and just like Bitcoin has been recently labeled property [when it's clearly NOT] by extension, anything [or anyone] inside this property [Blockchain] will also be property or an asset, a Human Asset - as reclassified by the future Global Freedom Council on Active Human Assets Worldwide.
Are you guys getting this? GATT, WHAM and AHA. Lol....
Man, this would be an awesome movie to watch: Breaking out of the BlockCHAIN.
Were you by chance watching Jordan Maxwell when you came up with this? Its damn near what you are talking about.
-Your birth certificate is worth $$$$, you are traded on the stock market already.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3RYTsz0EmU
April 16, 2014, 06:19:43 PM
CNBC pumping BTC: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000267349
What, the media is coming around? It may be time for BTC to change direction. It's not looking like we're gonna have another run at $300. What a missed opportunity $350 was.
Once the banks and hedge funds buy all they can we will see BTC run hard and alt coins will run harder yet!
And not to be out done, Bloomberg weighs in on the issue. Definitely watch this one Vlad...http://www.bloomberg.com/video/is-bitcoin-the-smart-bet-in-tech-investing-3eLyFaGTQOe_XQUoKGp6Kw.html
Interesting, the media just flipped a switch and went from murdering Bitcoin's image to pumping it. Let's see if this becomes a media trend. I think it will and it will accelerate as the year goes on and especially into next year.
April 16, 2014, 06:10:54 AM
CNBC pumping BTC: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000267349
What, the media is coming around? It may be time for BTC to change direction. It's not looking like we're gonna have another run at $300. What a missed opportunity $350 was.
Once the banks and hedge funds buy all they can we will see BTC run hard and alt coins will run harder yet!
And not to be out done, Bloomberg weighs in on the issue. Definitely watch this one Vlad...http://www.bloomberg.com/video/is-bitcoin-the-smart-bet-in-tech-investing-3eLyFaGTQOe_XQUoKGp6Kw.html
April 15, 2014, 07:22:50 PM
CNBC pumping BTC: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000267349
What, the media is coming around? It may be time for BTC to change direction. It's not looking like we're gonna have another run at $300. What a missed opportunity $350 was.
Once the banks and hedge funds buy all they can we will see BTC run hard and alt coins will run harder yet!
April 15, 2014, 07:13:10 PM
CNBC pumping BTC: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000267349
April 14, 2014, 11:39:58 AM
This 500,000 Ixcoins on Vircurex got really sold?
Yes, someone bought at 7000 Sat.
Jump to: