Topic: The Technological War: Distraction and Opportunity in the Bitcoin World (Read 263 times)

Countries, through multinationals (big tech companies), when they discover how to operate Bitcoin and win most of the time, will have access to a market that will grow their money and power, bringing more money to the national budget. That’s what I mean.

If a tech company does excellently with BTC (mining or trading), the state will collect good taxes from it.

BTC has already become the best long-term investment asset. Adoption has to happen; it is necessary; it would be a transfer of power from the old with little technological knowledge to the adults/young people who are tired of receiving crumbs from the pie.

I'm not saying the education system should be cryptographic or something difficult. I'm saying it should be in virtual environments so that the youngest truly understand how computing works and new paths are opened up.

Example: this is an addition, within a mathematical operation used to understand a process. In chemistry, this is silicon, what is it used for? to encapsulate a diode. This is the internet, it is used for communication. That kind of education, which ultimately aims at blockchain, and then at bitcoin.

No need to teach bitcoin, that's not necessary. I mean:
In school, they should teach all subjects relating to a computer.
Example: this is an addition, within a mathematical operation used to understand a process.
In chemistry, this is silicon, what is it used for? to encapsulate a diode.
This is the internet, it is used for communication.
That kind of education, which ultimately aims at blockchain, and then at bitcoin.

Bitcoin will continue to advance in terms of technology even if it is banned.

I believe the new war is technological; what we are seeing is a distraction, a smokescreen to divert our attention, so we don't realize the technological war. Whoever manages to decrypt the price of BTC, they have won automatically. A few (multinational) guys conveniently moving whales, you lose, I win but I give you a bonus. And if that's the case, I propose the legalization of BTC (WITHOUT KYC), open discussion from the educational system; we will teach all subjects on a laptop with complex algorithms to pass the subjects. That would be an example. BTC has already become the best long-term investment asset. Adoption has to happen; it is necessary; it would be a transfer of power from the old with little technological knowledge to the adults/young people who are tired of receiving crumbs from the pie. What's truly interesting is that in every war, there are casualties. Who will be the future sell?

There are many wars going on in the world, it's not all one process with one attribute. For instance, there's Russia's war against Ukraine, my country, and while technologies play a large role in it, it's not the kind of war the op seems to refer to.
If we're talking about the price of Bitcoin, there's nothing to decrypt here because it's not following any algorithm. Bitcoin's price is affected by global events, draft legislation, announcements by influential people, etc., and that all can't be predicted in advance.
Bitcoin is already largely legal (although it depends on a country), and it's a part of educational system in some places (like France).
But in general, I wouldn't call it a war while we live in the world where actual wars with people dying every day are still going on.

Day by day we keep hearing news about what some other people think concerning bitcoin, how they have seen it as a digital means of exchange as well as how some already have tagged it a means of making fraud and financial manipulations by whales, everything differently keeps popping up and we are now having a means to regulate them because we are dealing with social media, with what we have already on group with bitcoin, there's no revolutionary quest or war against the existence of bitcoin to other currencies and there were no casualties, what we are having currently is bitcoin and nothing more, this will still be more relevant in years to come as we haven't seen anything to serve more better than bitcoin has did in digital economy.

These days, I am planning to start writing the first proposal for a PhD degree, so I looked at the academic programs of universities, and it is really bad. Some of the finer specializations and sub-disciplines are being taught at the bachelor’s or master’s level, so this kind of education will not change anything. If you teach students about Bitcoin and they have a certificate about Bitcoin, it will not change. One thing, students must include the basic concepts in economics, and Bitcoin is one of the solutions, but they must know how the economy works first.

I agree that the tech war is an important aspect of world affairs, and it's easy to get distracted by the noise while the real battle is taking place behind the scenes.
 The concept of cracking the price of BTC  to win this war is intriguing, and  raises questions about the role of cryptocurrencies in  future financial and power trends.
 The idea of ​​legalizing BTC without KYC (Know Your Customer) regulation is intriguing, as it could  democratize access to the financial system and create a more level playing field.
 Integrating complex algorithms and BTC education into the education system could be a game changer, especially when it comes to preparing the next generation for a world where technology and finance are increasingly intertwined.
  The idea that BTC has become the best long-term investment asset is currently debated, but there's no denying that it has sparked a global debate about the future of money and power.
 Your comment about the transfer of power from older people to younger people is particularly insightful because it highlights the potential of technological advances to break down traditional hierarchical structures and create new opportunities for those  willing to adapt and learn.
 The question of who will be the future rulers is troubling because it implies that there will be winners and losers in this technology war.
 It reminds us that we must recognize the consequences of our actions and strive to build a more fair and equal society in which the benefits of technological advances reach everyone.

Nobody gives a flying f**k about what you propose. No government in the world is going to legalize BTC/crypto without KYC.
The "technological war" has nothing to do with Bitcoin/crypto. There is a cyber security war between Russia/China/North Korea and the western countries, but nobody of the two sides in this war is weaponizing blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies.
What do you mean by "to decrypt the price of BTC"? I guess that you think that the crypto markets are manipulated by the whales.
This might be true, but there's not enough evidence to prove such claim. Do you really think that mass crypto education would solve the problem of market manipulation? I don't think so.

That's pyramid scheme, Bitcoin doesn't work like that. People who want to sell their coins aren't always lose, they might already earn a lot profit by holding a long time. After all you only need to hold your coins if you're looking to earn higher profit.

There's nothing like that, legalization = tightening regulations.

That's terrible idea, I'm sure most people will not interested with Bitcoin since it's "complex".

The last battle of technology will not have much effect on Bitcoin.
Because the government of any country will not accept Bitcoin as the main transaction.
Bitcoin has already proven to be the power of people and will continue to be in the future.

BTC has already become the best long-term investment asset. Adoption has to happen

the legalization of BTC (WITHOUT KYC)

What's truly interesting is that in every war, there are casualties. Who will be the future sell?

It's not really just economics but also financial literacy that people have got to know. Because even if you think that Bitcoin is just a speculative tool to make people profit, how on earth will you use it properly if you do not know the discipline of an investor?

And most countries are doing a terrible job at teaching kids about financial literacy at the school system level.

These days, I am planning to start writing the first proposal for a PhD degree, so I looked at the academic programs of universities, and it is really bad. Some of the finer specializations and sub-disciplines are being taught at the bachelor’s or master’s level, so this kind of education will not change anything. If you teach students about Bitcoin and they have a certificate about Bitcoin, it will not change. One thing, students must include the basic concepts in economics, and Bitcoin is one of the solutions, but they must know how the economy works first.

These days, I am planning to start writing the first proposal for a PhD degree, so I looked at the academic programs of universities, and it is really bad. Some of the finer specializations and sub-disciplines are being taught at the bachelor’s or master’s level, so this kind of education will not change anything. If you teach students about Bitcoin and they have a certificate about Bitcoin, it will not change. One thing, students must include the basic concepts in economics, and Bitcoin is one of the solutions, but they must know how the economy works first.