Topic: The Technological War: Distraction and Opportunity in the Bitcoin World - page 2. (Read 270 times)

There are plenty more lucrative and less volatile assets like NVIDIA stocks for investments.

Cryptocurrency stage is looking like a kindergarten full of kids who call themself investors but in reality know nothing about investing and just ride the wave of "number goes up" while closing eyes on everything else.

I mean, there's nothing wrong in investing in Bitcoin, but calling it "the best" is far stretched.


You should know Bitcoin is not good for economy as it promotes "not spending", what powers up the economy is the incentive to spend like base inflation in FIAT.
Spending does not mean burn your money on stupid things, it means investing as well.

FIAT money is often seen as devil by cryptocurrency enthusiasts but it's doing it's job well (until it doesn't - hyper-inflations etc) - it's stable enough to use everyday and has enough volatility to incentivize spending it, and this includes investing.

If you see everything black and white, you're not really an investor but a money driven lunatic.

Adoption will not happen as long as these older politicians are in power. They will not allow power to be transferred from their hands to the younger group that has technological experience but no political experience.

It is true that the elderly do not understand anything about technology, and it is difficult or impossible to explain to them exactly what Bitcoin is, but they are very experienced in politics and in the way of managing the country in a centralized way in which they control all its keys, so the only solution comes with time when these people leave and are replaced by young people.

very true. Strong foundational understanding on economics is the very important for students, before they can go into Bitcoin in full. If they lack this basic, they might get stranded along the line while trying to grasp everything concerning Bitcoin. In a more convenient manner, I think finer specialization on courses like Bitcoin should be at the PhD level, were all advanced and technicalities will be taught. issuing cert at the University level might just be enough.

These days, I am planning to start writing the first proposal for a PhD degree, so I looked at the academic programs of universities, and it is really bad. Some of the finer specializations and sub-disciplines are being taught at the bachelor’s or master’s level, so this kind of education will not change anything. If you teach students about Bitcoin and they have a certificate about Bitcoin, it will not change. One thing, students must include the basic concepts in economics, and Bitcoin is one of the solutions, but they must know how the economy works first.

You’re correct. Most governments are still walking on eggshells around bitcoin and crypto. They don’t know what to do with it except a lot of them are very much against with the idea of it. There are many conflicts around the world between different nations but I have never heard of crypto being utilized as a leverage against their opponents.
“Market manipulation” through whales does not have anything to do with its adoption. So the answer is no. It would be good to have more people educated about bitcoin but as long as there are rich people and the poor, whales will always exist.

I agree that the tech war is an important aspect of world affairs, and it's easy to get distracted by the noise while the real battle is taking place behind the scenes.
 The concept of cracking the price of BTC  to win this war is intriguing, and  raises questions about the role of cryptocurrencies in  future financial and power trends.
 The idea of ​​legalizing BTC without KYC (Know Your Customer) regulation is intriguing, as it could  democratize access to the financial system and create a more level playing field.
 Integrating complex algorithms and BTC education into the education system could be a game changer, especially when it comes to preparing the next generation for a world where technology and finance are increasingly intertwined.
  The idea that BTC has become the best long-term investment asset is currently debated, but there's no denying that it has sparked a global debate about the future of money and power.
 Your comment about the transfer of power from older people to younger people is particularly insightful because it highlights the potential of technological advances to break down traditional hierarchical structures and create new opportunities for those  willing to adapt and learn.
 The question of who will be the future rulers is troubling because it implies that there will be winners and losers in this technology war.
 It reminds us that we must recognize the consequences of our actions and strive to build a more fair and equal society in which the benefits of technological advances reach everyone.

That’s the thing, tho. Since bitcoin is decentralized and no one is in direct control of bitcoin, no one can actively influence the price of bitcoin by pulling a few strings. So in the end, no one can exactly “decrypt” as you say the price of bitcoin. All we can do is to try and predict the price the closest as we can and make a move based on that assumption.
Whales impact how other investors see bitcoin as an asset so individually we should know how to identify whales moving their assets to an asset actually losing value so to not raise panic.
The government will not allow that.

Nobody gives a flying f**k about what you propose. No government in the world is going to legalize BTC/crypto without KYC.
The "technological war" has nothing to do with Bitcoin/crypto. There is a cyber security war between Russia/China/North Korea and the western countries, but nobody of the two sides in this war is weaponizing blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies.
What do you mean by "to decrypt the price of BTC"? I guess that you think that the crypto markets are manipulated by the whales.
This might be true, but there's not enough evidence to prove such claim. Do you really think that mass crypto education would solve the problem of market manipulation? I don't think so.

That's pyramid scheme, Bitcoin doesn't work like that. People who want to sell their coins aren't always lose, they might already earn a lot profit by holding a long time. After all you only need to hold your coins if you're looking to earn higher profit.

There's nothing like that, legalization = tightening regulations.

That's terrible idea, I'm sure most people will not interested with Bitcoin since it's "complex".

The last battle of technology will not have much effect on Bitcoin.
Because the government of any country will not accept Bitcoin as the main transaction.
Bitcoin has already proven to be the power of people and will continue to be in the future.

I believe the new war is technological; what we are seeing is a distraction, a smokescreen to divert our attention, so we don't realize the technological war. Whoever manages to decrypt the price of BTC, they have won automatically. A few (multinational) guys conveniently moving whales, you lose, I win but I give you a bonus. And if that's the case, I propose the legalization of BTC (WITHOUT KYC), open discussion from the educational system; we will teach all subjects on a laptop with complex algorithms to pass the subjects. That would be an example. BTC has already become the best long-term investment asset. Adoption has to happen; it is necessary; it would be a transfer of power from the old with little technological knowledge to the adults/young people who are tired of receiving crumbs from the pie. What's truly interesting is that in every war, there are casualties. Who will be the future sell?