Pages:
Author

Topic: The Top 4 most reliable ICO Rating websites - page 2. (Read 2407 times)

newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
Btw, i usually check these four sites when i’m interested in some project and study the info. But i have took a note of this portal recently - http://brothersrating.com. Their approach to project estimation is different, and this made me interested.
Yep, i have already seen this site, but their attention to estimation is so serious… It looks like the projects have to work really hard to get at least  B+. In return, if they take into account all the recommendations of BrothersRating and improve smthng, the quality of all the ICOs will increase rapidly, in my opinion.
They consider a lot of factors when they estimate the projects. And, by the way, they replace text with diagrams. As for me, it’s much easier to acquire information in this way. I have never seen ratings for “Guarantees” criteria yet. It’s just necessary when there’re so many scam ICOs.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 12
Btw, i usually check these four sites when i’m interested in some project and study the info. But i have took a note of this portal recently - http://brothersrating.com. Their approach to project estimation is different, and this made me interested.
Yep, i have already seen this site, but their attention to estimation is so serious… It looks like the projects have to work really hard to get at least  B+. In return, if they take into account all the recommendations of BrothersRating and improve smthng, the quality of all the ICOs will increase rapidly, in my opinion.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
Btw, i usually check these four sites when i’m interested in some project and study the info. But i have took a note of this portal recently - http://brothersrating.com. Their approach to project estimation is different, and this made me interested.
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 14
I’m wondering whether it’ll be possible to get a positive rating for some amount of money. I hope that it won’t ‘cause i’m fed up with fake reviews.

yes mostly ICO sites have many fake reviews , everything depend on bid you make to them . from 100 to 5000 usd any amount can be charged by so called experts on such sites . one site published eve john mccaffe charge 100k usd for a tweet to promote any project .
member
Activity: 406
Merit: 10
I’m wondering whether it’ll be possible to get a positive rating for some amount of money. I hope that it won’t ‘cause i’m fed up with fake reviews.
newbie
Activity: 224
Merit: 0
The tab with partners is a real catch. There’re so many announcements of fake cooperation on the network now, but Brothers Rating don’t allow to deceive its visitors.
member
Activity: 406
Merit: 10
It seems that you need to be hard at work to get at least B+. I hope that the ICO teams will take into account all the remarks and solve the problems.
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
It’s nice that there’s such an element of estimation as “Guarantees”, especially in the modern world where ICO can deceive depositors without any consequences. 
member
Activity: 406
Merit: 31
Excellent rating! It is worthy of note that all the details of the ICOs held are displayed with the help of diagrams – this increases the level of demonstrativeness considerably.
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 100
Though all this rating sites are good but for me, the success and potentials of an ico depends on the effort and work of the team members and the developer in making sure the project is a success. It also depends on how well it is accepted by the community because most of this rating sites rate some ico more than they deserve and some less rated ones do very well in the end.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROTOCOL
thank you.I am bothering how to choose ico.now more and more projects are available for us to choose.we need choose the good of them.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
I also find intersting these 2:
- https://findico.io,
- https://www.coingecko.com.

But what do you think of https://icoholder.com ?


 So far in my personnal "ICO benchmarker" benchmark they are in the top 3.

newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
full member
Activity: 340
Merit: 100
You have a good listing of ico websites even if I am only familiar with the icobench and icoRating. Sometimes, ico rating websites can be very helpful but most of them do not take time to conduct a proper research about a project and just gives it rating as long as they will be paid in return. I think the success of an ico depends on the hard work of team members in making the project a success because some ico get good rating and ends up no worth investing in while some least rated ico becomes better and potential one.
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 508
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
As for me The top 4 most reliable ICO rating websites are:

https://foundico.com/ - List of actual ICO and pre-ICO cryptocurrency projects based on blockchain or without it.
Only trusted and relevant projects.

https://www.coingecko.com/ - Browse the latest and upcoming ICO (Initial Coin Offerings) in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and more.

https://icobench.com/ - ICOs ratings from top investors and experts

https://icobazaar.com/ - Find the most attractive ICO ever



Yes, in my ICO listing those 4 has good rating from the users because mostly some ICO are based on the rating given by the community. Consider another ICO listing website which is Icodrops.com, potential ICO are listing in the website.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Thank for this two sites! I can check on them!
newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
As for me The top 4 most reliable ICO rating websites are:

https://foundico.com/ - List of actual ICO and pre-ICO cryptocurrency projects based on blockchain or without it.
Only trusted and relevant projects.

https://www.coingecko.com/ - Browse the latest and upcoming ICO (Initial Coin Offerings) in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and more.

https://icobench.com/ - ICOs ratings from top investors and experts

https://icobazaar.com/ - Find the most attractive ICO ever

copper member
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
As a former investment banker and analyst, I can say without doubt that these ratings are fundamentally flawed. The sheer amount of new ICOs means that none of these so-called agencies have the time to do proper due diligence on any of these projects, so instead use some automated, arbitrary measurements. Our own ICO is ranked reasonably highly, but would rate as very high if we engaged in fake marketing, by which I mean buying members of a Telegram group, posting nonsense on social media etc. just to reach a specific number expected by these ratings sites. We singularly refuse to be dishonest or subversive in our efforts. Transparency, honesty and integrity are all measures that we consider extremely important, and none of these are realistically measured by any ICO ratings. Sad
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 14
newbie
Activity: 119
Merit: 0
Hi there,

I'd like to add our own website to the list: https://www.tropyc.co (you guessed it, it's an anagram of crypto)

Why are we better than other websites?

1. Rating is open source, we don't rate ICOs but our algorithm does. This means we cannot inflate a rate and cannot accept pay-for-rating.
2. Our focus is on token economics: we sort out the valuation of each and every token distributable (cost unit or stakeholder that earns/purchases the given token)

Hope you like the platform, more is to come, include a statistical tool for ICOs.

Regards,
Chris
Pages:
Jump to: