Topic: The Trust System on Bitcointalk SUCKS ! here is why ! (Read 367 times)

Yeah, tell you what.  Why don't you start going through my feedback and start determining which ones are valid and which ones aren't.  And then once you give up in 10 minutes, you'll realize how silly your suggestion was.  That isn't the job of moderators, nor should it be.

The trust system is far from perfect and could use a lot of improvement--and no, I don't have any good suggestions--but every single one of us has to suck it up and deal with it.  And what I see is that it's not DT members who leave the most bullshit feedback; it's the scammers and spammers who do that.  They leave retaliatory feedback, and sometimes they make very specific claims that the DT member or whoever has scammed X BTC, or has had sexual relations with [insert family member here], or whatever. 

The issue is that DT feedback carries a lot more weight, and these poor shitposters can have their earnings slashed to zero because of it.  And they're so frigging loud and obnoxious when they get tagged.  But 99.9% of the time, the tag is on the money.

Do you know how much workload that would add to the staff? They already have to deal with an exorbitant amount of spam in the form of shitty thread replies. You want them to now go through every feedback sent? Unlike posts, feedback takes a lot more time to digest and review.

It's most likely never going to be reviewed. Scams aren't even moderated, never mind trust feedback.

I think personally, this Neg trust should be reviewed before its given. Reasons being anyone angered or with insecurity feelings can just Neg the other person. I would suggest the admin reviews all this Neg trust and determine which is really worth giving.

\ . i know 10$ means a lot to some people. it does to me too.
but i am not stupid enough to pay 50$ to  escrow a 10$ deal. i rather take 6 risks with 6 different people than having to pay 60$ in total for something that is worth 10$. ? do you get the point ?

plus you are not discussing the main point here.

Thats how big money businessman thinks, like you, why do they need escrow for a 10$ transaction while you already made deals that worth ++1000$, while not all people think and as rich as you. For some people, 10$ means much and maybe they cant afford to lose it and needed the money, so it is their right to make sure that they get the money.

My suggestion, dont underestimate small money and small customer. Sometimes small things can cost you big enough.

Who am I to judge you, but you lost something valuable for those 2 merits mate. If you wonder what is it, it's my respect  

I will answer your question once you answer mine

What's a merit?

Are there any posts about it?

Your are screwing the merit system too by sending random merits

you could be 100% correct.

but please explain to me, how do you know all this ? you just joined this forum like 3 hours ago !.
also you got 2 merits in like no time !.


so does this mean the merit system sucks as much as the trust system does ?

this is a great example. you have been here long enough to deal/talk/know with TMAN. so you do not give a fudge about the negative reviews because you do understand that this whole negative review attack is based on say " his  behavior" or " harsh words" yet when it comes to money you know he is a trust worthy ! so TMAN is not really affected by all this for members who have been here a while !

people like me on the other hand , i joined this forum less than a month ago ! . TMAN wants to sell something ! , i click on his trust page and i be like WTF !! . i will run away that's for sure, coz i dunno who the hell is this guy and why would he get all those bad reviews.

it's a human nature! people usually run away from sellers/buyers with negative reviews.

thanks for passing by ..

-----------------------

we are not here to discus "ME" , f**k me and my 10$ voucher :d. we talking about this whole trust system.

even a hero or legendary member would want to avoid keeping negative reviews so that he doesn't get them back so he can keep is profit RED-LESS.

here is the main point of discussion.

escrow is great ! but nobody does it for free, and nobody should because it's a hard work. for small amount transaction escrow is not the best thing! ,some escrow guys require min of about 50-60$ for their service.

i rather risk the 10$ !!, that's why the trust system should be modified to have some sort of better quality indicator than this " you hit me , i hit you back" bullshit.

-------------------------------------


this is  EXACTLY what this post is all about. coin5haker i know deep inside you want to leave all kinda negative reviews to help others know, yet to chose to run away. and i honestly can not blame you for this, nobody can or should
I think this place is only good for sharing knowledge, reading about new projects, disusing a hardware / software problem.
basically anything except for SELLING/BUYING.

it's only a matter of time for scammers to be left alone here trying to scam one another lol

It's not laziness, the pooposters don't want to give positive trust unless you pay them with merits.

definitely i wasn't going to go first , that was his first post ! . comon sense says he should go first or escrow !. i went first through out all the transactions i had so far because the sellers/buyers had a higher rank and only positive feedback.

this guy said he would go first and then changed his mind after seeing the negative feedback, so he changed his mind and went like " it's either you go first or escrow"

looking at the escrow system you can tell that it's not really worth it to go for escrow on a 10$ trade !! i rather just risk those 10$ instead!
------------------

that's another issue here, people are too lazy to give positive feed back. they get their money/product and leave. so i won't be begging for positive feed back !
..............

my concern here is not the 10$ voucher, it's nothing ! . i only talked about my story to give an example of the whole idea.
now i will have to think twice before leaving a negative review on a scammer profile !. and ya who cares about my review? but i would only think that most people are/will doing the same.

look at the comment below yours from "coin5haker" he is openly admitting that he is scared of leaving negative reviews for the same reason i talk about .



 
 

Isn't whole bitcointalk is fucked up?
Blackmailers are on Default trust, Admins who don't listen to you and are busy in making money from ad's, moderators who don't give a fuck, members who are spamming everywhere.
This forum is filled with filth, power and greed.

Somehow this trust thing seems required on some signature bounties which is a huge profit for bounty hunters

You're a Junior Member so somebody would have to be pretty naive to trust you or any other Junior or lower ranked member without using an escrow in the first place. The trust system is there as a guide and should be used by people to help gauge a user and probably worked well in this case as you certainly shouldn't be blindly trusted just because a Junior trumps a Newbie. Why not get the buyer to pay the fees or split the costs with them? I'm sure there are free escrow agents as well.

Thanks bud, even Theymos agrees that the trust system has issues. Certain posters do not trust me, so what? it wont affect me doing business or people trusting me if they already do.

The trust system seems to have become a reputation system, and it contains a lot of subjective opinions, and retaliatory negative comments, Ideally, it should be a report on successful trades, and include a value for the trade. However, maybe we also need a reputation rating as well. I can think of a number of forcefully critical posters that I would trust with a cash trade. You can also get negatives for reporting account and merit trades, and I believe that they should be banned, and not create the possibility of red paint on good forum members.

I'll go out on a limb here, and give TMAN as an example. He has got several red comments relating to his board posting, and I agree that some of his comments can be direct and less than diplomatic, but that seems to be what some posters need and deserve. When it comes to a cash trade, then I would trust him with a $1,000 trade without thinking about it. Maybe it is time to have a trading trust system, and a requirement to include a trade value in the report.

If you leaving a negative trust, expect a "trust war" started. This is inevitable and just human nature. But those trust doesn't mean a shit if you're not tagged by DT. Yours's still 0 until I click on it. Good idea is to report to DT instead, which is more productive as anyone could see "red trust" right on scammer's profile. I'm doing reporting and leaving positive one to members I like. Think I'm coward, I don't care  .

a newbie seller asked for an escrow on a $10 trade? which one of you will be trusted more?
why would he need an escrow if you send him $10 first, unless you want him to give you the voucher first
just ignore that untrusted feedback. it makes a dent but doesn't ruin your overall trust ratings
move on, find someone else who will sell you a voucher without escrow (I assume you are willing to go first)

too bad, none of them left positive feedbacks on your trust page
you can do the same thing with your $10 voucher trade, you can go first by sending him the money
if your concern is his newbie rank, then find higher rank member that you can trust who can sell you the same voucher