Pages:
Author

Topic: The vaccination issue is not bipolar - page 2. (Read 440 times)

legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
October 11, 2021, 07:21:22 AM
#25
Something like 96% of the U.S. figures died of something like massive head trauma from a motorcycle accident, or a corpse from the hospice system which was tested positive in after-death PCR tests.
I appreciate that, unlike some anti-vaxxers, you do attempt to present a decent argument. However the problem here is that you are making a statement that is entirely unsupported by evidence. Do you just pull '96%' out of the air?

https://nbc-2.com/news/2020/08/31/cdc-report-shows-94-of-covid-19-deaths-in-u-s-had-contributing-conditions/

It's hard to argue that corp/gov tried any less hard to depserately keep the plandemic panic going since that time, so going with a 95%-ish number would produce a workable estimator for order-of-mag work.  And, due to the figures you snipped, even if you are going to take corp/gov estimates at face value, the number changes from 0.00002 to 0.0002 and the arg remains the same.

Regardless of official reason for death, it is quite clear from data made available from around the world (not just a single source), that there has been a huge increase in deaths from any reason recently, and that this coincides exactly with the Covid pandemic. We can't attribute this to motorcycles or to something strange happening in hospices.

[_img]https://i.imgur.com/jHpmJi6.jpg[/img]
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-excess-mortality-p-scores-projected-baseline?tab=table

I live in a certain English speaking SE Asian country, and the tricks they pull to pad the numbers are completely shameless.  There are fewer people here with the sophistication to spot the fraud so it seems, or if they do, they tend to keep their mouths shut about it.  Reminds me of the American War in Vietnam where someone tallied up the number of 'dinks' killed while 'our boys' were out on patrol, and it exceeded the population of the country.

I don't trust the data and definitions 'ourworldindata' uses.  They have all this 'sustainability' crap meaning they are great-reset fruadsters, and the funding demonstrates this too.

Quote
Grants

Our World in Data is supported by grants from the Quadrature Climate Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and a grant from the German entrepreneur, businesswoman and philanthropist Susanne Klatten.

In the past we have also received grants from the World Health Organization, the Department of Health and Social Care in the United Kingdom, the Centre for Effective Altruism – Effective Altruism Meta Fund, and the Nuffield Foundation.

To we who study this stuff, these are exactly the people implementing and funding the plandemic in order to usher in the Great Reset or 'Fourth Industrial Revolution.'  It's the same people who got their positions of unimaginable wealth and power during the last few monetary systems, and they want to hold onto what they got, or preferably use the monetary system collapse to get a lot more.  Classic 'order out of chaos'.  These 'altruistic foundations' are just their ways of enjoying their hobbies (usually eugenics) tax-free.

The web entity is probably partially about data fishing on user actions to a degree, and the graphs that are generated are usually incomplete and skewed by the algorithms (or simply crappy coding at best.)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
October 11, 2021, 06:21:35 AM
#24
Something like 96% of the U.S. figures died of something like massive head trauma from a motorcycle accident, or a corpse from the hospice system which was tested positive in after-death PCR tests.
I appreciate that, unlike some anti-vaxxers, you do attempt to present a decent argument. However the problem here is that you are making a statement that is entirely unsupported by evidence. Do you just pull '96%' out of the air?
Regardless of official reason for death, it is quite clear from data made available from around the world (not just a single source), that there has been a huge increase in deaths from any reason recently, and that this coincides exactly with the Covid pandemic. We can't attribute this to motorcycles or to something strange happening in hospices.


https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-excess-mortality-p-scores-projected-baseline?tab=table
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
October 11, 2021, 04:29:41 AM
#23

I want to say, that it is not true that generic immunity do not help for covid. The fact that some people died for covid doesn't mean that we should spend lots of money to vaccination for everybody, exactly like in the case of flu vaccines. There should be consideration of pros and cons.

Pro: 4.5 million people have died from Covid so far. A vaccine might be a good idea.
...

Something like 96% of the U.S. figures died of something like massive head trauma from a motorcycle accident, or a corpse from the hospice system which was tested positive in after-death PCR tests.  Tests which are themselves designed to give false positives and not fixed in almost 2 years now.

So, by order-of-magnitude sanity-checking, (4.5x10^6/.04) X 8x10^9 is around 0.0000225 or 0.002% of the worlds population succumbed to the 'deadliest pandemic in a century' in the last couple years.  And that's even before correcting for a lot of the obvious fraud.

See; even the official number pumped out by the perps don't make anything to panic about.  It also aligns well with what I am seeing.  Basically nobody I know has had any 'covid-19' problems in over a year, but around 20 people I know of within a couple degrees word of mouth have died within a week of the injection.

Again, please take note that anyone who dies within about 5 or 6 weeks from the injection will be labeled 'unvaccinated' in most places.  Also, in at least some places, people who die three or more months after their last injection.  We only know this because the criteria for labeling was accidentally leaked to the public.  It's since been memory-holed, but sharp people back up information like this when they spot it, and it's still not an smooth path to get things deleted off archive.org (but it is happening more and more...starting right after I made the mistake of making a relatively significant donation to them...Arg!)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
October 11, 2021, 03:51:58 AM
#22
I want to say, that it is not true that generic immunity do not help for covid. The fact that some people died for covid doesn't mean that we should spend lots of money to vaccination for everybody, exactly like in the case of flu vaccines. There should be consideration of pros and cons.
Pro: 4.5 million people have died from Covid so far. A vaccine might be a good idea.



How can you know that science data is not fake? It happened lots of time in history, that science data was custom-made for political purpose. I worked ten years in public university, science is funded exclusively on the basis of nepotism. I don't want to say that the situation is everywhere the same, I just wondering, why politicians in our country still have to lie and scare, when they have clear science data to persuade people rationally.
We are not talking about an individual paper or data report here. There are huge, independent datasets from most countries in the world. And not just from governments, but also from universities and professional bodies. Do you really think this is all fake? Why would it be?



So you are going above the scope of restrictions. Don't you mind that these restrictions caused collapsed economy? Don't you feel little bit guilty that you participate to cropper bussiness of some people?
This question makes me angry. I'm unable to respond without detailing how I feel about anti-vaxxers and their behaviour, which would create a lot of tension in this thread, and likely end the discussion.



  • politicians abused whole covid situation to tighten their power over people;
  • politicians abused whole covid situation to steal public money;
Politicians will likely try to exploit any situation to their own advantage. Doesn't mean the underlying situation isn't real.



  • I don't think covid vaccine will help (much), just like in case of flu;
Which data are you basing this opinion on?



That is not TRUE. and it is documented in medical paper.
Well, that's conclusive evidence, thanks. I've changed my position entirely as a result of your devastatingly insightful and painstakingly detailed arguments.  Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 19
October 10, 2021, 01:25:09 PM
#21
Many people died, but many people also hasn't any symptoms. Isn't it because of this general immunity?
This discussion point started on Jet Cash's assertion that vaccination was unnecessary. You are saying that some people have been exposed to Covid, and yet experienced no symptoms. Yes, agreed. You are also saying that many people have died from Covid. Yes, agreed. So why is vaccination unnecessary?

I want to say, that it is not true that generic immunity do not help for covid. The fact that some people died for covid doesn't mean that we should spend lots of money to vaccination for everybody, exactly like in the case of flu vaccines. There should be consideration of pros and cons.

What is the data supporting pro-waxers arguments? Those data comes from people directly motivated by finance income. Is those data reliable? Lets say it directly: politicians lied to us lots of time, how can I trust to them? So pro-vaxxers arguments are based on faith, that politicians do not lie.
The vast collection of data from ourworldindata is available for download here: https://github.com/owid/covid-19-data/tree/master/public/data
The list of sources is available here: https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19
It is not a question of faith in politicians. I have zero faith in politicians, and I don't trust our government at all. My background and expertise is in science and data. I look at the data.

How can you know that science data is not fake? It happened lots of time in history, that science data was custom-made for political purpose. I worked ten years in public university, science is funded exclusively on the basis of nepotism. I don't want to say that the situation is everywhere the same, I just wondering, why politicians in our country still have to lie and scare, when they have clear science data to persuade people rationally.

pro-waxxers (or generally pro-gov-restrictions people) contribute to these issues by obeying government.
I started working from home and taking distancing precautions whilst our government (UK) was still insisting Covid wouldn't be a problem. The data from Italy and Spain were clear, yet the fools in charge don't understand (or willfully misunderstand) the data.
Similarly I still wear a mask when I'm out, but our government have said they're no longer needed.
It is not a question of pro-vaxxers blindly trusting government.

So you are going above the scope of restrictions. Don't you mind that these restrictions caused collapsed economy? Don't you feel little bit guilty that you participate to cropper bussiness of some people?

Is your issue with the Covid vaccines in particular, or with the concept of vaccination in general? Historical data for smallpox and polio as two examples from many, are perfectly clear.

I am not anti-waxxer in general. I am just actual situation anti-waxer, because of:
  • politicians abused whole covid situation to tighten their power over people;
  • politicians abused whole covid situation to steal public money;
  • I don't think covid vaccine will help (much), just like in case of flu;
  • covid vaccine is not well tested compared to other vaccine, testers should get paid for this;
  • covid is not so deadly big deal, making expensive show is not worth of it.
hero member
Activity: 2954
Merit: 796
October 10, 2021, 10:11:58 AM
#20
you may realise that the government doesn't want you to be healthy and recover from the disease quickly. It is in their interest to keep you dependent on their synthetic health system, and to carry on the associated wealth transfer that distracts you from the other changes that are being introduced.

Always blows my mind that people don't realize that the greatest threat to safeyty are the people who promise safety.

Yeah, Good for people living in rich country but very bad for those 3rd world country that continuously buying this vaccine and just following what leader country move. Virus are already mutating in different variant right now so this vaccine will just make things work in the long run if people don't develop antibodies to kill this virus.

I agree on @Jetcash suggestion btw, with some minor addition like social distancing in public.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 10, 2021, 10:03:24 AM
#19

The number of variants that arise is proportional to the amount of the virus in circulation. Vaccination reduces the number of variants.


 

That is not TRUE. and it is documented in medical paper.



 
There is no medical reason to not wear a mask.

That is not TRUE. and it is documented in medical paper

 

Lol Cheesy Masks work, eh? Document this https://www.bitchute.com/video/rlWESmrijl8Q/.

Then document the dozens of of videos here https://www.bitchute.com/channel/okiFK5CwQrZS/ that show what's really going on with masks.

And if you want to see the danger of masks... https://www.bitchute.com/video/ypLjmXQoLygi/.

Cool
copper member
Activity: 155
Merit: 8
October 10, 2021, 09:54:02 AM
#18
you may realise that the government doesn't want you to be healthy and recover from the disease quickly. It is in their interest to keep you dependent on their synthetic health system, and to carry on the associated wealth transfer that distracts you from the other changes that are being introduced.

Always blows my mind that people don't realize that the greatest threat to safeyty are the people who promise safety.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
October 10, 2021, 06:56:34 AM
#17
Many people died, but many people also hasn't any symptoms. Isn't it because of this general immunity?
This discussion point started on Jet Cash's assertion that vaccination was unnecessary. You are saying that some people have been exposed to Covid, and yet experienced no symptoms. Yes, agreed. You are also saying that many people have died from Covid. Yes, agreed. So why is vaccination unnecessary?



What is the data supporting pro-waxers arguments? Those data comes from people directly motivated by finance income. Is those data reliable? Lets say it directly: politicians lied to us lots of time, how can I trust to them? So pro-vaxxers arguments are based on faith, that politicians do not lie.
The vast collection of data from ourworldindata is available for download here: https://github.com/owid/covid-19-data/tree/master/public/data
The list of sources is available here: https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19

It is not a question of faith in politicians. I have zero faith in politicians, and I don't trust our government at all. My background and expertise is in science and data. I look at the data.



pro-waxxers (or generally pro-gov-restrictions people) contribute to these issues by obeying government.
I started working from home and taking distancing precautions whilst our government (UK) was still insisting Covid wouldn't be a problem. The data from Italy and Spain were clear, yet the fools in charge don't understand (or willfully misunderstand) the data.
Similarly I still wear a mask when I'm out, but our government have said they're no longer needed.
It is not a question of pro-vaxxers blindly trusting government.

Is your issue with the Covid vaccines in particular, or with the concept of vaccination in general? Historical data for smallpox and polio as two examples from many, are perfectly clear.
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 19
October 10, 2021, 06:19:08 AM
#16
Of course that natural immunity exists - there is general non-specific immunity, which is used against new viruses. If something like this wouldn't exists, every new virus will exterminate whole mankind.
General innate immunity doesn't make you invincible. Many people have died from Covid. The way to achieve immunity to Covid is either catch it, or take the vaccine. There isn't a third option.

Many people died, but many people also hasn't any symptoms. Isn't it because of this general immunity?


I wrote a post to you in another topic, but you didn't answer. Why do you blame anti-waxers, but don't agree with contribution of pro-waxers to other issues conjuctive with covid restrictions?
Apologies, I either didn't see it, or else was too focused on responding to someone else. As for blaming anti-vaxxers, I have yet to see valid data to support their arguments, whereas there are mountains of data to refute them conclusively. Whilst Jet Cash is right that people are different, and certainly anti-vaxxers aren't all the same, many anti-vaxxer arguments are faith-based rather than fact-based. Their position is in direct opposition to all the evidence. I'm not sure what you mean in your second point "don't agree with contribution of pro-waxers to other issues conjuctive with covid restrictions" - please could you clarify?

What is the data supporting pro-waxers arguments? Those data comes from people directly motivated by finance income. Is those data reliable? Lets say it directly: politicians lied to us lots of time, how can I trust to them? So pro-vaxxers arguments are based on faith, that politicians do not lie.

To the last sentence. The gov restrictions has some negative effects (individual psychological condition, economy, education, individual bussiness, employment...). I thing (based on your argumentation), that pro-waxxers (or generally pro-gov-restrictions people) contribute to these issues by obeying government. Isn't they?

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
October 10, 2021, 05:50:04 AM
#15
Of course that natural immunity exists - there is general non-specific immunity, which is used against new viruses. If something like this wouldn't exists, every new virus will exterminate whole mankind.
General innate immunity doesn't make you invincible. Many people have died from Covid. The way to achieve immunity to Covid is either catch it, or take the vaccine. There isn't a third option.



Let your body get rid of the pathogens by not wearing a mask
There is no medical reason to not wear a mask.
Of course there are many reasons. I have some specific medical issues, which gets much worse in wet environment and wearing masks get it worse. Psychological problems exists too (these are medical issues too). Wearing mask for a long time is not natural, because people just had to breath...
I should have been clearer. I meant specifically in response to Jet Cash's argument that wearing a mask is counterproductive, and that no-one should wear masks. You are of course correct that sometimes people cannot wear masks for medical (including psychological) reasons.



I wrote a post to you in another topic, but you didn't answer. Why do you blame anti-waxers, but don't agree with contribution of pro-waxers to other issues conjuctive with covid restrictions?
Apologies, I either didn't see it, or else was too focused on responding to someone else. As for blaming anti-vaxxers, I have yet to see valid data to support their arguments, whereas there are mountains of data to refute them conclusively. Whilst Jet Cash is right that people are different, and certainly anti-vaxxers aren't all the same, many anti-vaxxer arguments are faith-based rather than fact-based. Their position is in direct opposition to all the evidence. I'm not sure what you mean in your second point "don't agree with contribution of pro-waxers to other issues conjuctive with covid restrictions" - please could you clarify?

copper member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1901
Amazon Prime Member #7
October 09, 2021, 09:15:19 PM
#14
For the overwhelming majority of people, they should get the Covid vaccine (and most other vaccines). But it should be their choice to do so. Government mandates are wrong and are not going to convince many people to get the vaccine.

In order to increase confidence in the vaccine, the costs (potential side effects and their prevalence) should be clearly disclosed, along with the chances of preventing various types of instances of the disease it is preventing, and the potential negative outcomes for people who are unvaccinated and catch the disease it is preventing. This information can be customized for an individual’s specific condition. For almost everyone, the above information will indicate the person should get the vaccine, but again the individual should be the one to decide.

For Covid specifically, if you don’t get the vaccine, you are almost certainly going to get Covid.

The description of how vaccines work in the OP is incorrect.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 2
October 09, 2021, 01:59:06 PM
#13
People don't seem to be addressing the main point of this thread. It is that there are not just two positions - vaccination or vaccination opposition. Measles, mumps and other diseases are referenced, but nobody points out that medical opinion states that vaccination is not required if a person has recovered from a prior infection. It admits that natural immunity is as good, or better, than vaccination. Covid is the first disease that is being promoted by governments in contradiction of this fact. I genuinely believe that I have strong natural immunity, and because of my lifestyle and age, I cannot afford to risk vaccination which research indicates that it will reduce my immunity, and will expose me to short and long term health risks. I'm not anti-vax, but I believe that vaccines should be tested comprehensively, and the result made available for public scrutiny. Also, I believe that adequate should be given to those administering them. For example, many of the vaccination failures may be the result of a failure to aspirate the syringe before pressing the plunger.

in short: you afraid of the injection.

No, doctors don't say it will lower your immunity. Maybe some weird blog becarefulpatriots.com says that.

WHO recommends that everyone get vaccinated. They're scientists, science works with consensus, based on studies. You don't choose to believe the doctor you like the most. This is opinion, not science.

There may be contraindications for a few people, very few. But basically those who refuse to be vaccinated harm the collective; selfish people who just don't care and put their fears above everyone else, sadly.
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 19
October 09, 2021, 07:37:46 AM
#12
medical opinion advises that vaccines are not needed where strong natural immunity is present. Again, this is the fist vaccine that goes against this advice.
There is no strong natural immunity. This is a novel coronavirus; it has not been encountered before. There is no pre-existing immunity. The two routes through which an individual can contribute to herd immunity are a) take the vaccine, or b) catch the virus. There's no third route.

Of course that natural immunity exists - there is general non-specific immunity, which is used against new viruses. If something like this wouldn't exists, every new virus will exterminate whole mankind.


Let your body get rid of the pathogens by not wearing a mask
There is no medical reason to not wear a mask. By refusing to wear a mask, you contribute to the spread of the virus. By refusing also to have a vaccine, you contribute to the spread of the virus. You are actively encouraging the rise of new variants by increasing the chances of catching the virus and then infecting other people. By refusing to take the vaccine you are also working to prevent herd immunity, and so increasing the chances of this becoming endemic (although this now seems an inevitability in any case).

Of course there are many reasons. I have some specific medical issues, which gets much worse in wet environment and wearing masks get it worse. Psychological problems exists too (these are medical issues too). Wearing mask for a long time is not natural, because people just had to breath...

I wrote a post to you in another topic, but you didn't answer. Why do you blame anti-waxers, but don't agree with contribution of pro-waxers to other issues conjuctive with covid restrictions?
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
October 09, 2021, 05:38:56 AM
#11
there are not just two positions - vaccination or vaccination opposition.
Agreed. Someone who sees things in shades of grey rather than black or white generally has a more considered perspective.


vaccination is not required if a person has recovered from a prior infection. It admits that natural immunity is as good, or better, than vaccination.
Yes, I don't think this is in dispute.


Covid is the first disease that is being promoted by governments in contradiction of this fact.
Well, not really. Your route to natural immunity is to catch the virus. If the virus can be fatal, it is preferable to take a safe, proven vaccine. Quite apart from the fact that if you catch the virus, you can spread it to others.


I genuinely believe that I have strong natural immunity
But if it's not proven, then it's simply belief, which may be flawed.


because of my lifestyle and age, I cannot afford to risk vaccination
It's not suitable for everyone. This is why there are screening questions. Even so, there is I suppose in theory a very small chance that you have an undiagnosed pre-existing condition, which means you're not suitable. In such instances the vaccine can cause problems... but it's highly likely that for such a person catching Covid would have caused more severe problems.


I believe that vaccines should be tested comprehensively, and the result made available for public scrutiny.
They have been, they are. It's understandable that the vaccines are released quickly given a global pandemic, but they have still completed the standard trials process, and data are available.


many of the vaccination failures may be the result of a failure to aspirate the syringe before pressing the plunger.
The people administering the vaccine must be properly trained, yes. Not least so that they accurately identify those who shouldn't take the vaccine.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
October 09, 2021, 04:37:07 AM
#10
People don't seem to be addressing the main point of this thread. It is that there are not just two positions - vaccination or vaccination opposition. Measles, mumps and other diseases are referenced, but nobody points out that medical opinion states that vaccination is not required if a person has recovered from a prior infection. It admits that natural immunity is as good, or better, than vaccination. Covid is the first disease that is being promoted by governments in contradiction of this fact. I genuinely believe that I have strong natural immunity, and because of my lifestyle and age, I cannot afford to risk vaccination which research indicates that it will reduce my immunity, and will expose me to short and long term health risks. I'm not anti-vax, but I believe that vaccines should be tested comprehensively, and the result made available for public scrutiny. Also, I believe that adequate should be given to those administering them. For example, many of the vaccination failures may be the result of a failure to aspirate the syringe before pressing the plunger.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 2
October 09, 2021, 02:02:24 AM
#9
it's really scary to read something like this in 2021.

I believed the antivax discussion had been dropped in the early or mid 20th century.

After eradicating polio measles and so many other stupid diseases that used to kill people...

but nowadays they even believe in flat Earth, don't they?  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
October 09, 2021, 01:30:14 AM
#8
Open VAERS

It's been pointed out to you many times, by me and by others, that this is a scam website. But here we go again...

Quote
OpenVAERS is a U.S.-focused site that was created in January this year. The project used to live on thearkivist.net, which was created in September 2019, until its owner created a separate website dedicated to the misrepresentation of COVID-19 vaccine data. OpenVAERS repackages raw federal data from the official VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) website to push an anti-vax agenda. The site misrepresents data collected on VAERS and publishes it in a way that has very likely made a significant contribution to vaccine hesitancy. The website publishes unverified data and statistics on how many people have allegedly died or suffered injuries after getting their COVID-19 vaccine.
https://www.logically.ai/articles/california-woman-anti-vax-site-openvaers

Even if you do at some point manage to find a site that reports impartially on VAERS data, it's hardly evidence of anything, given that VAERS is a self-reporting system. I've explained this to you before, too. But as we're regurgitating previous conversations that you may have "forgotten", let's have that quote again:

Quote
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA’s multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.” If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same scientific limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 08, 2021, 12:04:24 PM
#7
The issue of vaccination is not bipolar but can manage the condition of the human body itself. If any issue does not work after receiving the vaccine, the physical condition is maintained the vaccine does not bring any activity it is the result of frustration bipolar is a type of mental illness people with bipolar disorder lack confidence and sometimes become overconfident. Many people also have nightmares in this disease bipolar is a bad condition which lasts a long time.

Except, of course, when people take  the time to peruse Open VAERS and all its CDC backup data. Then they see the almost 2 million deaths from the Covid vaxxes, and the millions of other health problems the vaxxes create.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 326
October 06, 2021, 10:32:30 PM
#6
The issue of vaccination is not bipolar but can manage the condition of the human body itself. If any issue does not work after receiving the vaccine, the physical condition is maintained the vaccine does not bring any activity it is the result of frustration bipolar is a type of mental illness people with bipolar disorder lack confidence and sometimes become overconfident. Many people also have nightmares in this disease bipolar is a bad condition which lasts a long time.
Pages:
Jump to: