Some of them might be scams or at least half dead project but I would not say that the rest of projects are in economic trouble. It is not a stock market, they can operate and develop very well regardless of their coin value.
They are not wanna spending their money to list their coin on the big exchange site to get a big volume while they are not even creating a proper product at the same time. this is a real problem in the crypto when you are seeing a project that created by amateurs that wanna fast money only. 
Topic: These 24 ICOs raised $2.8 Billion. They have almost 0 trading volume. (Read 565 times)
December 18, 2018, 06:34:55 PM
December 18, 2018, 06:15:55 PM
I know of Dragon, Hdac, Bankera, U.Cash and Zeepin.
Most of them had very good volume at the initial days of listing. I think the whole thing changed as a result of the bear market. As for bankera i got to know that the trading platform is about to lunch and that could have increased its volume.
Most of them had very good volume at the initial days of listing. I think the whole thing changed as a result of the bear market. As for bankera i got to know that the trading platform is about to lunch and that could have increased its volume.
December 18, 2018, 03:55:29 PM
Some of them might be scams or at least half dead project but I would not say that the rest of projects are in economic trouble. It is not a stock market, they can operate and develop very well regardless of their coin value.
December 18, 2018, 03:48:56 PM
I am not sure of the reliability of the figures that are listed in the list of projects, but if the daily turnover is low it means that the project is very weak marketing. Need more positive news and need to promote social networks and YouTube !
December 18, 2018, 03:34:26 PM
An excellent study once again reveals the imperfection of the ICO and the fundraising system as a whole. We can also see that a huge number of successful projects that have collected a lot of money, spat on the promotion of their tokens on the stock exchanges, because it's all about the money and not the development of the project.
December 18, 2018, 03:21:17 PM
I haven't even heard of the top 2 on this list. Is it actually proven that they raised these funds or did they just claim to do so to encourage other investment? I can only assume they're known scams with such low volume nowadays.
I know for sure that the Dragon project has fictitious fees, it collected about $ 10-15 million, the Envion project turned out to be scamming, the organizers simply deceived all investors and are now suing each other so as not to return the money. And so I think every project from this list can be described! 
December 18, 2018, 02:53:52 PM
I don't think taht all of these ICOs really collected these amounts. Most of them I've senn firstly. It's strange why these ICOs are in the top. But there are also good projects there. Now the market is falling so the trading volume is reduced. I think soon it will recover.
December 18, 2018, 02:53:19 PM
It's the same situation of all ICO projects at the moment 
). You can take a look at Bitnautic, it's a very successful project but BTNT token trading volume is under $1k and as I know all bounty hunters participated in Bitnautic bounty campaign has been cheated by dev team of Bitnautic )
). You can take a look at Bitnautic, it's a very successful project but BTNT token trading volume is under $1k and as I know all bounty hunters participated in Bitnautic bounty campaign has been cheated by dev team of Bitnautic ) 
December 18, 2018, 02:44:43 PM
Yes there is a problem,and the key it is that in 2017 they got it in ISO Ethereum at a price of 1200-1400 dollars,and now Ethereum is worth $ 90,and they are more than 15 times lost the price,and many projects have kept the money and kept in Ethereum,and thus they now have no money on the financing and development of projects,and they are bent,that's the problem
December 18, 2018, 02:38:10 PM
I know only a few of these coins and I am into crypto from more than a year now. And I feel most of them raised the money when the ico market was exploding and people were throwing money into ico's for getting maximum returns.
And maybe some of them have faked their money raised to encourage investors.
And maybe some of them have faked their money raised to encourage investors.
December 18, 2018, 02:28:47 PM
its all about the development and adoption of the tech that team promise to their investors if team does not ful fill the promises or do not make any progress about the project then investors just move on to the next project
December 18, 2018, 01:26:23 PM
Besides market analysis, price movements and trade volume are also influenced by fundamentals. So if there is no progress or the latest innovations from the project all this is useless, unless there is someone who manipulates the market. Although they has succes to raise more than $2.8 Billion, it does not mean that the trading volume in the market will continue to increase. Because they make fundraising with the aim to developing a project, not to manipulate the price of tokens in the market. So I think this is a natural thing
Correct, most of the new coins move based on speculation and on the news the developers of those coins give, if there is no advancement at all in the development of the project then the price is not going to move much if at all, but if suddenly there are positive news about the coin people will realize the project is real and not a scam and will begin to trade their coins or even to buy more of them. 
December 06, 2018, 01:23:33 AM
Besides market analysis, price movements and trade volume are also influenced by fundamentals. So if there is no progress or the latest innovations from the project all this is useless, unless there is someone who manipulates the market. Although they has succes to raise more than $2.8 Billion, it does not mean that the trading volume in the market will continue to increase. Because they make fundraising with the aim to developing a project, not to manipulate the price of tokens in the market. So I think this is a natural thing
December 05, 2018, 11:27:41 PM
Many iCO projects are scams, there are no actual products behind them, and the transaction volume of tokens is very low!
This is why many governments require ICO regulation!
Regulatory Ico can effectively protect the investment money!
It is difficult to apply this in this market because everything is anonymous making the control impossible. I personally believe that in the coming years we will see many new ICO projects and certainly will be future scam projects. This is why many governments require ICO regulation!
Regulatory Ico can effectively protect the investment money!
December 05, 2018, 11:13:57 PM
Many iCO projects are scams, there are no actual products behind them, and the transaction volume of tokens is very low!
This is why many governments require ICO regulation!
Regulatory Ico can effectively protect the investment money!
This is why many governments require ICO regulation!
Regulatory Ico can effectively protect the investment money!
December 05, 2018, 11:12:44 PM
Its because everything is pegged to Bitcoin market. And since Bitcoin has suffered as well, it trickled down to altcoin markets. Specially along the stretch beginning in June. There are some successful ICO is 2018, but there are no holders and buyers.
Mostly, bounty hunters just dump and then ICO projects as well. Just look at how ETH suffered and you will see how everyone is really dumping after the tokens have been released and listed on an exchange. So I'm not surprised if there no volume of most successful ICO's in 2017/2018.
With these money and if they can use it properly and it will be so easy to create something useful for us. Remember there was a lot of single developer in our real life create a game without needed a lot of money. They are creating a fully working product that can be sold through various market. Mostly, bounty hunters just dump and then ICO projects as well. Just look at how ETH suffered and you will see how everyone is really dumping after the tokens have been released and listed on an exchange. So I'm not surprised if there no volume of most successful ICO's in 2017/2018.
December 05, 2018, 10:43:24 PM
The ICO market boomed in 2017. The number of crypto startups is hard to pin down, but most sources agree that is over five hundred were launched in 2017.
In fact, every day last year at least one project was launched, and those ICOs raised more than $5 billion. This year the tendency has stayed the same. By mid-year, the number of ICOs launched was already over 550, and the total raised funds were over $12 billion. The industry is flourishing but is it as good as it seems to be?
The research shows that ICOs have significant economic problems.
*cut*
so much money has flowed into this ico and yet they have hardly any trading volume. i wonder if it reflects the reality and usefulness of the ico token. either way, it is somehow bitter that the token have no volume. In fact, every day last year at least one project was launched, and those ICOs raised more than $5 billion. This year the tendency has stayed the same. By mid-year, the number of ICOs launched was already over 550, and the total raised funds were over $12 billion. The industry is flourishing but is it as good as it seems to be?
The research shows that ICOs have significant economic problems.
*cut*
December 05, 2018, 10:29:26 PM
The ICO market boomed in 2017. The number of crypto startups is hard to pin down, but most sources agree that is over five hundred were launched in 2017.
In fact, every day last year at least one project was launched, and those ICOs raised more than $5 billion. This year the tendency has stayed the same. By mid-year, the number of ICOs launched was already over 550, and the total raised funds were over $12 billion. The industry is flourishing but is it as good as it seems to be?
The research shows that ICOs have significant economic problems.
In fact, every day last year at least one project was launched, and those ICOs raised more than $5 billion. This year the tendency has stayed the same. By mid-year, the number of ICOs launched was already over 550, and the total raised funds were over $12 billion. The industry is flourishing but is it as good as it seems to be?
The research shows that ICOs have significant economic problems.
That's impossible, reach billion but has 0 trading volume. When project reach their target it means they also have users/ members that use their product to get income, supply and demand already there. If only get 0 volume I can say only investor/ trader with short term strategy and have big fund join that ICO, but I'm afraid they already leave ( speculation ). Crypto is hard fields and everything could happen, not to scare you but never forget to learn from this condition.
or maybe the investors believe if the project is good for long term investments,,
so, the investors hold their tokens in their wallet,,
regards
December 05, 2018, 09:40:01 PM
The ICO market boomed in 2017. The number of crypto startups is hard to pin down, but most sources agree that is over five hundred were launched in 2017.
In fact, every day last year at least one project was launched, and those ICOs raised more than $5 billion. This year the tendency has stayed the same. By mid-year, the number of ICOs launched was already over 550, and the total raised funds were over $12 billion. The industry is flourishing but is it as good as it seems to be?
The research shows that ICOs have significant economic problems.
In fact, every day last year at least one project was launched, and those ICOs raised more than $5 billion. This year the tendency has stayed the same. By mid-year, the number of ICOs launched was already over 550, and the total raised funds were over $12 billion. The industry is flourishing but is it as good as it seems to be?
The research shows that ICOs have significant economic problems.
That's impossible, reach billion but has 0 trading volume. When project reach their target it means they also have users/ members that use their product to get income, supply and demand already there. If only get 0 volume I can say only investor/ trader with short term strategy and have big fund join that ICO, but I'm afraid they already leave ( speculation ). Crypto is hard fields and everything could happen, not to scare you but never forget to learn from this condition.
December 05, 2018, 09:26:15 PM
ICOs is very risky when the market is not good. Hopefully, it'll be better in the future.
so does other commodities or stocks when the market is not so good, it's just a really natural things. Most of the ICO ended up being worthless at the time of distribution because lacking of creative mind to prevent from massive dumping.Any developers should take a consideration into this
Jump to: