Topic: They are abusing their power. - page 3. (Read 1436 times)

Not defending him, just not supporting wrong use of something which is setup to be used abided by some rules for the betterment. I can't act like you making my own rules here, it would look bad on me.

Any kind of highly deceptive behaviour is flag-worthy, there is no going around this. Precedent has been set. Why are you guys  trying to defend people who are trying to defraud others (regardless in what way, even if it something as simple as merits)?

OP didn't asked TMAN to give merits to him or put on some highly intelligent trap to gain those merits hence not deceptive.


Hopefully, I am not.

How is that "a high risk of losing money"? Merit is not money.

Deceptive behaviour is flag-worthy, see theymoses quote on account sales[1].

Thankfully you are wrong about this.

---

[1] Quickie and Laudie agreeing may be the beginning of the end of this place.

Obvious merit farming. Using deception to obtain merit under fraudulent pretenses.

Thanks for pointing, I was bit dump while supporting it but I too think that it is not an proper use of flag system. Deleted my opinion on the flag.

I don't get the purpose of the flag. Is it for sockpuppeting? Or for plagiarism? Doesn't sound like a proper use of the flag system.

And now the true colors show. Insults, retaliatory trust ratings, fake flags, the works. This is straight out of cryptohunter's/TOAA's book, and look how it turned out for him. You really aren't helping yourself here.

@marlboroza and @Quickseller You guys are really illiterate and stupid. I made it clear in my post that you guys do not have permission to post here. I am sure you guys are really illiterate. Go to school to get educated. Noob.

I am not disputing your point around the 8 mins. Although it is conceivable possible. The points being made are very basic and actually correct in terms of the coins having their own blockchain and tokens primarily using eth. The other parts regarding spending/trading not so sure.

I think that sentence means (having read the passages above) that it can be spent in a store or traded at an exchange ... possibly??

To be so insecure where you won't create a platform for others to defend themselves (i.e. your local rule) but where you accuse others of misconduct and overexerting their 'power'...

---

By the way, the local rule will most likely not be enforced. If you really want to block their replies, you could create a self-moderated thread... but that probably won't stop anything.

Here's my objective stance:

There is no fucking way that you can have the same structure as an article within 8 minutes of the thread being posted without having prepared it beforehand.

This post:

---

It's also incredibly nonsensical. Almost looks ML-generated with the repetition of the words.

For example, what in the hell does this sentence mean? "It has the store value and the exchange value."

Right..

Please quote where it says "no moronbozo" and that account zorrobeck is not allowed to post here. Stop shitposting.



Please read post before spamming nonsense.

I am responding to a complaint about me and as a result any local rule prohibiting my posting won’t be enforced. The same tends to be true regarding ban evasion rules when someone is banned and responding to a scam accusation (or even to make one).

Sadly, I suspect that as a result of this, merit will flow much less freely to newer users.

Just because it says no moronbozo does not mean you can swap to your alt zorrobeck?? wtf -  I know we dont have the video evidence you requested but nobody else seems to require that to make concrete judgements.

anyway rather than chastising others please make an on topic point.

There is abuse or not? what are your thoughts and detailed explanations. We say there is abuse in the form of double standards, what do you say??
Also we restate they scammers should not have these powers in the first place.

What 'power' are you talking about?
Is this some super-natural power, and now you think you also have 'power' to stop them posting here  

League of Extraordinary Bitcoinalk Members

This account is not allowed to post here, it clearly says in rules:

Nah, admin created merit system because of YOU and then you tricked system with some plagiarist spin shit and there are some accounts and some other stuff.

NO that is not how it works. You want punishment for WRONG DOING. Then ALL wrong doing must be evaluated and the correct and consistent punishment must be given.

Else that means you are pushing for a  2 tier system that will always be WRONG.

A rapist, murdering, armed robber, peado , does not get to claim that guy stealing 1 cent candies MUST BE PUNISHED without themselves being punished in a fair and sensible way. Even worse that rapist mudering armed robber peado does not get to give the punishment out as judge and jury whilst loving the fact they are paid to push this double standards crap. That is extreme example but just so we are clear one is accepted generally as worse than the other.

I think though in this case if there are multiple counts of different "guides" being presented that are clear copy and paste with zero references WITH financial intent then yes a sig ban and merits stripped off.  BUT after we punish the proven scammers here and they get it first.    


They scammers, can point OUT wrong doing, but should not be screaming for what they think is the correct punishment whilst not being willing to discuss their own punishment.

Would be good to see the ORIGINAL guides and his guides so we can see how it really is.

Lauda giving out red to anyone is a joke. Same for his cronies/supporters.

These people should really have NO POWER to abuse. There needs to be a drill down on this "plagiarism" and sensible punishment depending on the intentions and consistency over time.  Let's sort it out right after those with scamming post histories start commenting on their own suitable punishments.


Were not all these HE MUST BE BANNED AND RED TAGGED pals with chibitchity or whatever and begging for him to be reinstated to this forum AFTER he admitted he did it for financial gain??? have they slapped him with red and flags yet?? DOUBLE STANDARDS>
YES OR NO??

The intent should be key here but both can get a sig ban, won't hurt to remind them. Sigs are the problem here anyway.

I think the evidence is pretty clear that you are involved in serious merit abuse and merit farming, I strongly suspect among other newbie accounts. The evidence can speak for itself. This goes way beyond giving a few merit you received via the merit airdrop to yourself(/your “friend”). You were likely using an alt to ask a question in very poor English, and immediately use a text spinner to give an answer to the question to get merit.

Simplified for support: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1208;support. Tagged as well. Add me to the list of abuse please.  Much appreciated.