Topic: They are abusing their power. (Read 1428 times)

I think TMAN made a mistake by not knowing that you are not a decent poster. TMAN wouldn't reply for the 50 merits that has been sent to you. If you really did not copy paste then you have nothing to worry but if you did then good luck what happens next. Besr of luck.

How many times a man could repeat same mistakes? You should know what is the mistake and definition of mistake exactly.


You are apologising and on the other hand your title say they are abusing power. Can you explain it if you done multiple crime and judge send you jail then will you say that judge/police abuse their power? How could you expect that someone will excuse instantly after apologies? When you have done mistakes then you should change posting behaviour before make appeals or apologies. By wrong blame, you just drawn attention from more DT members and getting more tag.

Actually this is the result of quick merit scheme. You have chosen a shady way to earn merit quickly which is really punishable in my opinion. You should not create arguments if you are really not legit. You know very well what you have done. If I were you, then I would first change my posting behaviour instead of blame to DT members. This isn't right way to apologies, your thread and title conflicts each other.

Eh, at least he wasn’t the absolute centrepiece in a forum sex scandal over a scammer who fooled multiple intelligent people from theymos on down.  I retain that unfortunate distinguishment all for myself (though it was his +10 on alia which originally brought him/her/it to my attention—hrrrumph).  I doubt that this thread will run for five dozen pages, determined though The-Devil may be to attempt keeping it alive.  A bad character was revealed, TMAN’s +50 is now in an account tantamount to a burn address, and TMAN will probably be more careful about whom he merit-bombs between F-bombs.

So, it’s sad that TMAN got had; but he handled it in a stand-up way.  Meanwhile, I see that a dishonest dirtbag already caught in numerous lies is treating marlboroza’s evidence to the fantastic rebuttal of “deny, deny, deny”—yawn.  Scambusters will continue to investigate, no doubt uncovering more foulness; and this thread will eventually dribble off, leaving buried therein an off-hand comment revealing a datum far more important than such useless vile trash as The-Devil:  Birthday cake.


Well, a slightly belated happy birthday to you!

I didn’t know that the forum gave virtual cake.  I will must needs watch for my cake on 29 March, my account’s birthday—I entered my account registration date as my date of birth, for reason of anonymity.  And I would not want to miss cake. :-)

We really sometimes create mistakes, the only thing we should do is learn from it... There are too many cons in this times nowadays...
One of the saddest thig I've ever seen from the old guy. 😂

---

Oh well, Did You Know?(Even if you lots dont care, I,too dont care! 😂)
Its my Damn Birthday Today! And Guess what?! It about to end, so nothing serious about this, in the end Trolls will be Toys 😂😊


upload photos online

Still these pictures prove nothing. All of your photos are not acceptable. They couldn't prove anything. They are written based on assumptions. You can't prove anything here by force.

Fair enough. Let me try with pictures then (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1319678.1160):



"how to get one?" Lol! That shouldn't have been quoted. Nop? Still nothing? Hm, let's try different approach then. Only few posts above 3 not-alt accounts, 2 other accounts joined giveaway:



Morrisgonzalez shilled here:

...and it reminded me of this post (scroll down to "shilling for stake" part.

No, sorry, this is exactly something like this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50928921 !

Aaand, oh, what are the odds:


Not only that Geoffrey quoted morrisgonzales, they also typed "Astronaut is man in space. Space is up. So astronaut is up." type of post. Of course, why wouldn't they receive merit for that topic from "one of the accounts".

According to https://bpip.org/search.aspx?q=morrisgonzalez is banned.


Just lolz:

Dude.. give it up now. You tried, I fell for it. Others saw, investigated and now your account is fucked, why not head on over to bitcoin.com I am sure ver and his cronies aren’t as bright as the boys and girls in this place.

So fork off to bitcoin.com you skinny forker

Such useless link. They do not prove anything.

Flag came after investigations https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53552254. Evidence is mostly in morvilz7z's post (Only thing m didn't mention(or I missed it) are bunch of newbie accounts in loan threads). Please take a look:

Account coin-desk -> trust page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2507716 -> reference to account raffie35 -> trust page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2500042 -> reference to accounts "Rafie35/Rifat/Lafaka" -> trust page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1138127 -> reference to some other accounts https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22334499 / untrusted feedback -> reference to loan thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48973938 -> just one post under is Devid's post (it is in screenshot of my first post in thread which OP mentioned) and so on...

Oh.

It should be in topic. I completely forgot. Withdrawing support now. Thread should be updated for flag, then I will support it.

Getting warmer. If this post was the reference for the flag I probably wouldn't oppose it. I still dislike creating a flag first and coming up with evidence later.

The BIGGER question is why should we not consider YOU MORONBOZO as high risk??

I mean someone that goes to this much trouble for this kind of newbie low level borderline financially dangerous to prove or rather present reasonable case they are the same person.

BUT you totally support others with FAR STRONGER DIRECT FINANCIALLY HIGH RISK BEHAVIORS.

That makes YOU HIGH RISK.

This also DOES mean you are abusing this forum and the initial poster with DOUBLE STANDARDS you are scamming in effect.

You are PRETENDING and DECEIVING that you CARE about high risk to honest members BUT YOU DO NOT CARE AT ALL because you are supporting lauda, tman and nutildah who have ALL committed undeniable deception for direct financial reward in one way or another and ALL have abused the trust of honest members who have attempted to bring that to the attention of other honest members.

If you really cared about HIGH RISK to other members you would be spending all of this energy INVESTIGATING your pals lauda, tman and nutildah and getting them punished. Why are you NOT?? a touchy point I am sure.

The reader needs to consider this carefully and weigh this AGAINST what can be proven about the INITIAL POSTER who is claiming this is abuse. I totally agree this is abuse of the trust system. Forcing double standards inside the trust system is ABUSE and scamming.

UNDENIABLE hence why nobody dare tackle this point.

I mean moronbozo is said to control the zorrobeck account. I notice as SOON as it was mentioned by someone that marlboroza was NOT PERMITTED to post on their self moderated thread ZORROBECK turns up LOL
MORONBOZO told QS that ONLY video evidence of him using both accounts would be acceptable as proof. Perhaps all should share these high standards of proof he himself demands???  is this MORE double standards??

The trust system is simply a weapon a lot of scammers use to control their DT powers, merit allocations and rev stream control here. In other words it is all one big GAMED AND ABUSED SCAM which ensure the status quo of entrenched ABUSERS is maintained.

Debunk this or eat shit and accept you ARE abusing the trust system AND the initial poster.

If things mentioned in that other thread are not already enough:








https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lending-very-small-loans-5090579 some posts are missing in thread, but seems OP was scammed:




This thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/rafie35rifatlafaka-5119455


Notes: "I dont send first, I never send first, I cant send first", some random capital letters:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/the-devil-2726750

and:



This: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22334499


I don't even want to talk what I think of this account  



Why do you think account The-Devil is not "high-risk"? Everything is inside that thread, including trust feedback of other accounts which lead to some other threads.

---

Edit:


Dafak is Lite Coin?

Not to mention "ferrari and golf are good. Audi is also good. But I like to drive golf. That is why I like golf"  

---

(** edit2)

I am happy I don't seem as qualified as you to not understand the simple intend of using the flag system here. Get your frivolous flags off it is misuse of the system.



Nice, I atleast dragged something real out of you. Nice shades of darks you indicate in your creepy racist and low value thinking.

What is your problem if my account gets banned? Oil your own machine. View your profile. You already have a signature ban because of signature abuse. Prepare yourself first then give a speech. You have only a big mouth. You have no other qualifications.



Indian Noob.

I'd say it's shady/deceptive and is obviously going to be frowned upon, but whether someone thinks that is worthy of a flag is up to them.


Never underestimate how sneaky and conniving people can be here. Anyone with a bit of cunning can quickly learn how to game the system here and many do, especially on the hunt for merit. We used to see it a lot with feedback/trust where people would seek out cheap trades with the right people just to build up some 'green' (and I'm sure it still happens).

You got busted. You can either learn from the experience or become a bitter troll. It looks like the latter is your preference but you need to try harder - the troll niche is quite crowded these days.

This case clearly shows the dualism of the forum. The user in question was supported by a lot of well-meaning members including myself when they thought him/her to be a well-meaning and devoted member. But when evidence pointing to the contrary surfaced it was also investigated and acted upon.

There has been a lot of drama in between the line, to whether the merit dump was deserved or the trust flag justified, but it is a system that checks itself and balances almost in the middle, most of the time. So the right decision is taking 'most of the time'.

The trust system is unmoderated and checks itself, so this should invariably create an environment of fairness. The evidence was presented and the majority agreed with it. It doesn't have to be dragged on.
Anyone can leave feedback on your profile just as you did in retaliatory feedbacks and only the person can reverse it, same in your case.

Some advice; don't leave retaliatory feedbacks out of spite, it doesn't help anything.
For now, you've not been banned, so you can use your time on the forum to show your net positive input to the forum, and check back in a couple of months for any possibility of changes to the situation.
Good luck with the forum.

"They are abusing power"
Then goes to create retaliatory feedback plus flags against different members. Just Imagine how the state of the forum will be if such a person also gets the "power" they keep talking about.

Instead of complaining around the forum which i believe will only worsen matters, try to be exemplary. It begins with you.

Is it a good suggestion to delete the flags started by the banned members ?

I will show how it relates.

The-Devil getting banned soon as per the accusations here = All his fake flags getting deleted.

This would fulfil the overall purpose of an boycott from the community, and reduce the heck of opposing all of them.

I'm right in the middle on this one... It would appear this guy writes questions using alts and then answers with The-Devil. This is somewhat confirmed by these alts supporting his frivolous flags. Definitely not trustworthy behavior.

However, I don't think merit farming explicitly makes one "high risk" for trading. If it were trust farming on the other hand, then yes, I could see that being high risk behavior.

Either way, this guy has already been tagged, the jig is up -- I don't think he's gonna be executing any trades or asking for money here under that account.

Sorry guy -- your plan worked well, until it didn't.