Pages:
Author

Topic: This is why you shouldn't vote Hilary (Read 4443 times)

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
May 22, 2014, 08:39:42 AM
#77
Dwank to this a few times.  It will help you poke the correct touchscreen button on your Diebold electronic voting device when the time is right.

Hillary Is Rebirth.

Hillary Will Guide America to Revolution.

Hillary Will Cleanse the Rot.

donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
I still say that the fact that she is pig ugly is reason enough on its face.

Yes. She is ugly. But that is just one of her less evil merits / demerits. For me, the fact that she took an active part in bombing the Serbian orphanages and old-age homes, is the number one reason to oppose her. She should be put in jail for the rest of her life for murdering innocent children in Serbia and other places.
Too wordy. That's why Ron fell flat on his face and Rand will, too. However, if you happen to end up working for the campaign in '15/'16, make sure randpaul2016.com points here: http://hillaryugly.com/

You can run a wordy one-minute television advertisement and waste bucket-loads of money, or just pay them to air various unflattering pictures of Hillary for a few seconds.

1 second:


1 second:


1 second (this is intentional):


2 seconds:
Hillary Clinton

The ugly's too damn high.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
I still say that the fact that she is pig ugly is reason enough on its face.

Yes. She is ugly. But that is just one of her less evil merits / demerits. For me, the fact that she took an active part in bombing the Serbian orphanages and old-age homes, is the number one reason to oppose her. She should be put in jail for the rest of her life for murdering innocent children in Serbia and other places.

Well, that too!

One of the most cruel actions of the Head Honcho of The Left!
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
I still say that the fact that she is pig ugly is reason enough on its face.

Yes. She is ugly. But that is just one of her less evil merits / demerits. For me, the fact that she took an active part in bombing the Serbian orphanages and old-age homes, is the number one reason to oppose her. She should be put in jail for the rest of her life for murdering innocent children in Serbia and other places.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
I still say that the fact that she is pig ugly is reason enough on its face.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
there is no difference between R and D in USA
USA doesnt have choice......

I'd say that there is no difference between the RINO and the D in the USA. The establishment Republicans have forgot the principles of their party, drifting too close to the Democratic lunacy. That's why someone like Rand Paul should win the Republican nomination.
legendary
Activity: 2124
Merit: 1013
K-ing®
there is no difference between R and D in USA
USA doesnt have choice......

legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
Good news for Hillary.... and that means bad news for the ordinary Americans.

Lewinsky and Rove -- Good news for Hillary Clinton?

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/18/opinion/zelizer-hillary-clinton-good-news/
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Tongue Hilary lost my support the first time I heard her cackle. I was like, "Goodness, she sounds like the Wicked Witch of the West's cousin or something."

And our gun rights, or any other rights, only mean a thing when we give a rip about them. The only way to get the attention of the Democrats and the Republicans (both parties have problems) is for everybody to just forget about being part of the Red Camp or the Blue Camp and vote for your favorite third party candidate. And I do mean EVERYBODY at this point. GO VOTE IN NOVEMBER!!!
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
...and then change again when they actually become president.

No.  In the 90's I worked in the U.S. Congress and participated in many national elections.  Politicians don't "change" after elected.

There is a long, carefully designed vetting process which weeds out any politician who is not corrupt (does not follow orders).  It starts in law school when the person is young.  Honest politicians are culled out and discarded.  The higher a politician rises, the more dependable they have proven themselves.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Knowledge is Power
i kinda prefer elizabeth warren. at least we'd start to see someone actually represent the people and hunt down wallstreet/bankers for wrecking our economy. but if she were the nominee, that would mean she'd have to "make deals" in order to fundraise, which means she'd just become a corporate billionaire.

Only problem is every candidate changes once they run for president, and then change again when they actually become president. Remember Obama's rhetoric? He sounded like the greatest guy ever who will fix all the problems. Then once he got into office, it's all the same bullshit as the presidents before him. Id rather have Warren where she is right now. She will get more done this way.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1071
i kinda prefer elizabeth warren. at least we'd start to see someone actually represent the people and hunt down wallstreet/bankers for wrecking our economy. but if she were the nominee, that would mean she'd have to "make deals" in order to fundraise, which means she'd just become a corporate billionaire.

What if it was Elizabeth Warren and Jesse Ventura?  Grin

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dream-ticket-2016-us-606706
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Working for Ron Paul in 2007 is what cured me of electoral politics.

Same thing will happen with Rand; dangle the carrot in front of the slaves to keep their hope alive.

Like the carnival worker at the milk bottle game told me when I was in 8th grade:  "Aw shucks Kid.  You lost.  Try again!  Surely you'll do better this time".

I never did win that Van Halen poster, but after my money from mowing lawns was all gone, I learned a valuable lesson.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
Some good news for Rand Paul... but this was more or less expected.

Rand Paul Leads Hillary Clinton in KY, NH, CO in Potential 2016 Matchup

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/378217/rand-paul-leads-hillary-clinton-ky-nh-co-potential-2016-matchup-eliana-johnson
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Well, as long as you are prepared to be able to survive in the aftermath of the inevitable collapse, I suppose so.

I am prepared.

Have you ever heard of the Alcoholics Anonymous concept of "find your bottom"?  It means that a person will continue being an alcoholic until the negative consequences of that behavior become so severe they decide to stop drinking.

America is like a heroin addict.  Injecting heroin feels GREAT.  Unfortunately, artificially induced happiness is an unsustainable activity.  In America it feels great to run up the national credit card so millions of people can live luxuriously without working.

After the reset, all those people will return to reality.  The withdrawal symptoms of kicking heroin are extremely painful in the short term, but totally worth it in the long term.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
i kinda prefer elizabeth warren. at least we'd start to see someone actually represent the people and hunt down wallstreet/bankers for wrecking our economy. but if she were the nominee, that would mean she'd have to "make deals" in order to fundraise, which means she'd just become a corporate billionaire.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
There is no doubt who is the media's favorite. The same people who had attacked McCain in 2008 (for being too old) are now showering praises on Billary Clinton.

Why Hillary Clinton Isn't Too Old for 2016

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/05/16/why-hillary-clinton-isnt-too-old-for-2016/
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
uh, i don't give a shit about gun rights.. what i do care about is how she is with her foreign policy. she just wants to continue on with the status quo with the military industrial complex. i'm guessing she'd be better than obama is with the politics though.

Gun rights are part of the Bill of Rights, so are we to believe that you do not give a shit about the Bill of Rights?

i don't give a shit about the gun rights in the bill of rights. 1 =/= all. the constitution is flawed, it's not some holy grail. remember the one that allowed slavery?

You are flawed.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
uh, i don't give a shit about gun rights.. what i do care about is how she is with her foreign policy. she just wants to continue on with the status quo with the military industrial complex. i'm guessing she'd be better than obama is with the politics though.

Gun rights are part of the Bill of Rights, so are we to believe that you do not give a shit about the Bill of Rights?

i don't give a shit about the gun rights in the bill of rights. 1 =/= all. the constitution is flawed, it's not some holy grail. remember the one that allowed slavery?
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
It may well be Hillary for the next eight years because no one seems to be able to get their shit together.

The GOP is in very bad state right now. With the demographic decline of the Non-Hispanic White population, their support also seems to be waning away. They are unable to get any considerable support from the minorities (especially the Asians and the Hispanics). Even among the non-Hispanic Whites, the youth seems to be deserting them.
Pages:
Jump to: