This is why you shouldn't vote Hilary - page 3.

LostDutchman

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: bryant.coleman on May 14, 2014, 08:40:55 AM

Right now, she is leading all the potential GOP candidates, by a very large margin.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_christie_vs_clinton-3766.html

Christie vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9)
Huckabee vs. Clinton (Hillary: +12.4)
Paul vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.4)
Bush vs. Clinton (Hillary: +10. Cool

Ryan vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.3)
Cruz vs. Clinton (Hillary: +14.0)

So, it is almost certain. Angry

Yep and the election of Hillary will portend the end of the Republic.

niothor

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 501

in defi we trust

Quote from: bryant.coleman on May 14, 2014, 08:40:55 AM

Right now, she is leading all the potential GOP candidates, by a very large margin.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_christie_vs_clinton-3766.html

Christie vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9)
Huckabee vs. Clinton (Hillary: +12.4)
Paul vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.4)
Bush vs. Clinton (Hillary: +10. Cool

Ryan vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.3)
Cruz vs. Clinton (Hillary: +14.0)

So, it is almost certain. Angry

2016......2016
It's two years from now on.
I'm more concerned about bitcoin survival than her making it through.

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1217

Right now, she is leading all the potential GOP candidates, by a very large margin.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_christie_vs_clinton-3766.html

Christie vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9)
Huckabee vs. Clinton (Hillary: +12.4)
Paul vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.4)
Bush vs. Clinton (Hillary: +10. Cool

Ryan vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.3)
Cruz vs. Clinton (Hillary: +14.0)

So, it is almost certain. Angry

LostDutchman

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: Hazir on May 14, 2014, 01:33:33 AM

Quote from: LostDutchman on May 13, 2014, 09:11:16 PM

Quote from: hackjack on May 13, 2014, 08:29:40 PM

Quote from: Charlie Prime on May 13, 2014, 12:59:15 PM

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse.

Vote with me. Let's get this done.

good luck with that, but she gonna need more then pretty banners to win

And a better outfit for sure!

That one looks like those quilted things Chairman Mao was so fond of!

I don't know about that. It is pretty fitting outfit for me. Standing collar is so Mao'ish? I am sure PR specialist put everything in that photo, it is fully politically correct, haha.

Well, the collar is indeed not quite right but I think most get my point!

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1217

Quote from: LostDutchman on May 13, 2014, 09:11:16 PM

That one looks like those quilted things Chairman Mao was so fond of!

Trust me. Billary will be even worse than chairman Mao. The chairman caused some 60 million or so deaths, Billary will score many times that number. She will be most war-crazy president that the US will ever have in its existence.

Hazir

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1005

★Nitrogensports.eu★

Quote from: LostDutchman on May 13, 2014, 09:11:16 PM

Quote from: hackjack on May 13, 2014, 08:29:40 PM

Quote from: Charlie Prime on May 13, 2014, 12:59:15 PM

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse.

Vote with me. Let's get this done.

good luck with that, but she gonna need more then pretty banners to win

And a better outfit for sure!

That one looks like those quilted things Chairman Mao was so fond of!

I don't know about that. It is pretty fitting outfit for me. Standing collar is so Mao'ish? I am sure PR specialist put everything in that photo, it is fully politically correct, haha.

doubledog

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

mkay, i'll vote her, too bad~ Grin

LostDutchman

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: hackjack on May 13, 2014, 08:29:40 PM

Quote from: Charlie Prime on May 13, 2014, 12:59:15 PM

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse.

Vote with me. Let's get this done.

good luck with that, but she gonna need more then pretty banners to win

And a better outfit for sure!

That one looks like those quilted things Chairman Mao was so fond of!

hackjack

member

Activity: 63

Merit: 10

Quote from: Charlie Prime on May 13, 2014, 12:59:15 PM

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse.

Vote with me. Let's get this done.

good luck with that, but she gonna need more then pretty banners to win

Charlie Prime

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse.

Vote with me. Let's get this done.

umair127

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: niothor on May 11, 2014, 08:37:41 AM

Quote from: greenteanosugar on May 11, 2014, 08:33:11 AM

Hillary is too ugly to be a president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers too

I'll say that people don't always vote based on looks, and actually , thank god they don't.
Image the whole world run by pornstars

.

I would vote for Hilary because she is environmentally correct and wears nylon or wool pantsuits. Given the surface area between her thunder thighs, and calculating the static electricity she generates just by walking around, she alone could provide enough electricity for a city the size of East St. Louis.

umair127

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: bryant.coleman on May 11, 2014, 09:58:39 AM

Quote from: greenteanosugar on May 11, 2014, 08:33:11 AM

Hillary is too ugly to be a president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers too

100% correct. Whenever I think of Hillary, I remember this equation. Grin

+

==>

Ok Never mind Chelsea looks more like Mr Grinch.

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1217

Quote from: greenteanosugar on May 11, 2014, 08:33:11 AM

Hillary is too ugly to be a president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers too

100% correct. Whenever I think of Hillary, I remember this equation. Grin

+

==>

umair127

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: sana8410 on May 11, 2014, 09:12:09 AM

Quote from: noviapriani on May 11, 2014, 08:44:47 AM

Quote from: umair127 on May 10, 2014, 07:58:52 PM

Quote from: sana8410 on May 10, 2014, 07:49:35 PM

Quote from: bryant.coleman on May 10, 2014, 07:44:13 PM

Actually, this is why you shouldn't vote Hilary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I23fjRN-PGc

Well, she seems to say she supports the right to own firearms so everything depends on her actual nuances. For example, if a problem developed with actual assault weapons, at least my definition of assault weapons, then I would be for further restrictions on them. I'm not so sure it makes sense to keep some fully automatic weapons or SAM launchers, or bazookas in metropolitan areas. But I don't see it as worth dealing with until an actual problem develops.

The government can take my RPGs when they pry them from my cold dead hands.

What a terrible infringement to have a back ground check when buying a handgun. I mean the world is clearly ending.

I don't see background checks as much of an issue. The only thing that bothers me is registration of the real issue is hand guns and carrying them. When I look at the difference is lost between the US, and say Canada, the biggest difference seems to be carrying concealed or open carry handguns.

Also let's face it, if handguns weren't used in homicides, the numbers would drop dramatically. Rifles and shit are really small numbers, and as far as I know, there aren't many restrictions on long guns in Canada. I'm not sure what the solution is. It certainly isn't significant legislation, because the second amendment will hold up mostly. There needs to be reasonable discussion by people who know about guns, not the dipstick politicians who try for ridiculous changes based on emotion or looks.

There should be a way to deal with it, but it certainly won't be dealt with by pro gun nuts, or anti gun nuts. Those people only want to keep to their own agenda.

Its funny that you said this cause my freinds boyfriend is coo coo and I really dont know a guy with OCD or ACD get a gun so easily. HE would flip out if anyone challenges him.

sana8410

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: niothor on May 11, 2014, 07:10:03 AM

Quote from: Elwar on May 10, 2014, 11:24:55 PM

Her menstrual blood will attract bears.

Did you hear that? Bears.

Bears? Anyone seen any bear in this thread? =)))))
But honestly , wasn't this thread open to discuss her "plans" not her looks and smells?

I think shes starting to like Mr Grinch the one who stole cristmas

sana8410

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: noviapriani on May 11, 2014, 08:44:47 AM

Quote from: umair127 on May 10, 2014, 07:58:52 PM

Quote from: sana8410 on May 10, 2014, 07:49:35 PM

Quote from: bryant.coleman on May 10, 2014, 07:44:13 PM

Actually, this is why you shouldn't vote Hilary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I23fjRN-PGc

Well, she seems to say she supports the right to own firearms so everything depends on her actual nuances. For example, if a problem developed with actual assault weapons, at least my definition of assault weapons, then I would be for further restrictions on them. I'm not so sure it makes sense to keep some fully automatic weapons or SAM launchers, or bazookas in metropolitan areas. But I don't see it as worth dealing with until an actual problem develops.

The government can take my RPGs when they pry them from my cold dead hands.

What a terrible infringement to have a back ground check when buying a handgun. I mean the world is clearly ending.

I don't see background checks as much of an issue. The only thing that bothers me is registration of the real issue is hand guns and carrying them. When I look at the difference is lost between the US, and say Canada, the biggest difference seems to be carrying concealed or open carry handguns.

Also let's face it, if handguns weren't used in homicides, the numbers would drop dramatically. Rifles and shit are really small numbers, and as far as I know, there aren't many restrictions on long guns in Canada. I'm not sure what the solution is. It certainly isn't significant legislation, because the second amendment will hold up mostly. There needs to be reasonable discussion by people who know about guns, not the dipstick politicians who try for ridiculous changes based on emotion or looks.

There should be a way to deal with it, but it certainly won't be dealt with by pro gun nuts, or anti gun nuts. Those people only want to keep to their own agenda.

noviapriani

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: umair127 on May 10, 2014, 07:58:52 PM

Quote from: sana8410 on May 10, 2014, 07:49:35 PM

Quote from: bryant.coleman on May 10, 2014, 07:44:13 PM

Actually, this is why you shouldn't vote Hilary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I23fjRN-PGc

Well, she seems to say she supports the right to own firearms so everything depends on her actual nuances. For example, if a problem developed with actual assault weapons, at least my definition of assault weapons, then I would be for further restrictions on them. I'm not so sure it makes sense to keep some fully automatic weapons or SAM launchers, or bazookas in metropolitan areas. But I don't see it as worth dealing with until an actual problem develops.

The government can take my RPGs when they pry them from my cold dead hands.

What a terrible infringement to have a back ground check when buying a handgun. I mean the world is clearly ending.

I don't see background checks as much of an issue. The only thing that bothers me is registration of the real issue is hand guns and carrying them. When I look at the difference is lost between the US, and say Canada, the biggest difference seems to be carrying concealed or open carry handguns.

niothor

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 501

in defi we trust

Quote from: greenteanosugar on May 11, 2014, 08:33:11 AM

Hillary is too ugly to be a president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers too

I'll say that people don't always vote based on looks, and actually , thank god they don't.
Image the whole world run by pornstars

.

greenteanosugar

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

Hillary is too ugly to be a president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers too

niothor

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 501

in defi we trust

Quote from: Elwar on May 10, 2014, 11:24:55 PM

Her menstrual blood will attract bears.

Did you hear that? Bears.

Bears? Anyone seen any bear in this thread? =)))))
But honestly , wasn't this thread open to discuss her "plans" not her looks and smells?

Topic: This is why you shouldn't vote Hilary - page 3. (Read 4443 times)