Thanks for the objective point of view. As an escrow yourself if this was a deal you held the funds for, how would you deal with t?
If the accuser (in this case
shadallion) is unable to provide adequate evidence for his accusation, then I'd dismiss it. In this particular case:
1) You (TMAN) can provide reasonable evidence that the package had the estimate weight (which is reasonable evidence that the package contained something, i.e. at least was not empty).
2) The buyer signing on delivery. One would expect to feel the difference between an empty package and one containing a metal bar. He/she could even go as far as rejecting the package all together. Them failing to report this in time, in combination with 1) (once provided) would probably make me dismiss it all together unless new evidence comes up.
TMAN, in answer to why you would do this over such a petty sum, I honestly don't know. Again, all I know is that when I got the envelope it was sealed and yet empty.
It is not possible for both of these to be true at the same time:
1) The package having a certain weight when it was sent by TMAN.
2) The package being untampered.
One of them must be false. Maybe the apartment manager stole it?