Three phases bounty distribution | Bitcointalksearch.org

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794

Quote from: scrypto on August 26, 2020, 01:59:29 AM

Quote from: lobo13hf on August 25, 2020, 05:27:48 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Paying bounty hunters in phases is a very good idea. I agree with those who also think it avoids dumping on the side of bounty hunters. Again it mostly helps the bounty hunter to make more money especially if the price appreciates although that is not always promised. I basically like the idea because it brings sanity to the project.

I do agree with your statement and we can learn a lot from there when the distribution will have divided into some batches and it's not only the price of altcoin will sustain even longer caused by the dump will not happen and then the hunters were also getting the advantages from there caused by they can sell their coin at the peak price. that's a win win solution

What I know that 1 year ago, there was a project that distributed the prize into 3 batch for 3 months, you can check Ferrum ~~(not promotion)~~. In my opinion doing this has a very good impact on the price of tokens in the market, it is proven that the price has continued to rise and of course the bounty participants will always support

Its good that it would only be on 1 month gap basis but majority that i have seen where they do it on 6 months basis which is bullshit but to think that this doesnt only limit out bounty participants which do mainly get the blame but actually the investors itself are the ones who are the main dumpers, no matter how they do delay it up it cant be helped if said supporters or investors would be just mainly trying to sell off
for profits and jump into other investments as well.It will vary if they would decide to support for long term aspect but these things are somewhat rare to happen nowadays.

Quote from: RabbiTANK on August 26, 2020, 03:28:23 AM

Quote from: amos77978 on July 16, 2020, 05:54:31 AM

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

whether 1 phase or 10 phase of bounty distribution.. a listed coin without good demand and market makers to drive volume will always go down to zero.. people who invest in crypto startup are those who likes to gamble with their hard earned money

What about a listed coin with a very good demand? If you are the CEO of such project will you release the whole bounty allocation bro bounty hunters? Let's judge others the exact ways we can judge ourselves, it depends on the bounty allocation, I believe if the allocation is much it will affect the project no matter how big it's trading volume is on exchanges

1% bounty allocation will really make such effect? I dont think so and this had been always the bad perception of most people towards bounty hunter dumpers.

RabbiTANK

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 18

Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin

Quote from: amos77978 on July 16, 2020, 05:54:31 AM

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

whether 1 phase or 10 phase of bounty distribution.. a listed coin without good demand and market makers to drive volume will always go down to zero.. people who invest in crypto startup are those who likes to gamble with their hard earned money

What about a listed coin with a very good demand? If you are the CEO of such project will you release the whole bounty allocation bro bounty hunters? Let's judge others the exact ways we can judge ourselves, it depends on the bounty allocation, I believe if the allocation is much it will affect the project no matter how big it's trading volume is on exchanges

scrypto

full member

Activity: 534

Merit: 100

Quote from: lobo13hf on August 25, 2020, 05:27:48 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Paying bounty hunters in phases is a very good idea. I agree with those who also think it avoids dumping on the side of bounty hunters. Again it mostly helps the bounty hunter to make more money especially if the price appreciates although that is not always promised. I basically like the idea because it brings sanity to the project.

I do agree with your statement and we can learn a lot from there when the distribution will have divided into some batches and it's not only the price of altcoin will sustain even longer caused by the dump will not happen and then the hunters were also getting the advantages from there caused by they can sell their coin at the peak price. that's a win win solution

What I know that 1 year ago, there was a project that distributed the prize into 3 batch for 3 months, you can check Ferrum ~~(not promotion)~~. In my opinion doing this has a very good impact on the price of tokens in the market, it is proven that the price has continued to rise and of course the bounty participants will always support

lobo13hf

hero member

Activity: 2268

Merit: 507

Quote from: ?? on ??

Paying bounty hunters in phases is a very good idea. I agree with those who also think it avoids dumping on the side of bounty hunters. Again it mostly helps the bounty hunter to make more money especially if the price appreciates although that is not always promised. I basically like the idea because it brings sanity to the project.

I do agree with your statement and we can learn a lot from there when the distribution will have divided into some batches and it's not only the price of altcoin will sustain even longer caused by the dump will not happen and then the hunters were also getting the advantages from there caused by they can sell their coin at the peak price. that's a win win solution

Jocuserious

sr. member

Activity: 1936

Merit: 290

Quote from: Shef198911 on August 21, 2020, 02:44:32 PM

Quote from: Jocuserious on August 21, 2020, 02:40:26 PM

Quote from: pallang on August 19, 2020, 06:36:23 PM

Quote from: Shef198911 on August 19, 2020, 07:54:47 AM

if the company really valued its tokens so much, they could, like some, buy tokens at a certain price, so that the price does not fall, and not block and divide the distribution.

Yes, like the DIA project they announce 3 phases of bounty distribution to prevent hunters for dumping the coin, and it will also make the price more stable and going up.

Yes right run! Not every hunter will ever hold a token because there are many hunters who are excited to sell as soon as they get a token. So it is better to distribute the tokens in several parts for this period then there will be no possibility of dropping the price. DIA bounty rewards is to low so i hope hunter can't dump this token.

Is that why you always blame the hunters when the price falls? Believe me! Investors themselves,many, lower the price even more than hunters, as many buy things with large bonuses, and these bonuses also strongly affect the price, enough to blame the hunters, believe them now is not as good as it was before!

I have pointed out the faults of some hunters. Besides, not all hunters agree to hold tokens, so read my mention carefully and you will understand. However, investors are also to blame for the fall in the value of a token because there are many investors who are tempted to sell tokens at a low profit.

Shef198911

member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 60

Bounty Campaign Manager

Quote from: Jocuserious on August 21, 2020, 02:40:26 PM

Quote from: pallang on August 19, 2020, 06:36:23 PM

Quote from: Shef198911 on August 19, 2020, 07:54:47 AM

if the company really valued its tokens so much, they could, like some, buy tokens at a certain price, so that the price does not fall, and not block and divide the distribution.

Yes, like the DIA project they announce 3 phases of bounty distribution to prevent hunters for dumping the coin, and it will also make the price more stable and going up.

Yes right run! Not every hunter will ever hold a token because there are many hunters who are excited to sell as soon as they get a token. So it is better to distribute the tokens in several parts for this period then there will be no possibility of dropping the price. DIA bounty rewards is to low so i hope hunter can't dump this token.

Is that why all always blame the hunters when the price falls? Believe me! Investors themselves,many, lower the price even more than hunters, as many buy things with large bonuses, and these bonuses also strongly affect the price, enough to blame the hunters, believe them now is not as good as it was before!

Jocuserious

sr. member

Activity: 1936

Merit: 290

Quote from: pallang on August 19, 2020, 06:36:23 PM

Quote from: Shef198911 on August 19, 2020, 07:54:47 AM

if the company really valued its tokens so much, they could, like some, buy tokens at a certain price, so that the price does not fall, and not block and divide the distribution.

Yes, like the DIA project they announce 3 phases of bounty distribution to prevent hunters for dumping the coin, and it will also make the price more stable and going up.

Yes right run! Not every hunter will ever hold a token because there are many hunters who are excited to sell as soon as they get a token. So it is better to distribute the tokens in several parts for this period then there will be no possibility of dropping the price. DIA bounty rewards is to low so i hope hunter can't dump this token.

Shef198911

member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 60

Bounty Campaign Manager

Quote from: ?? on ??

Paying bounty hunters in phases is a very good idea. I agree with those who also think it avoids dumping on the side of bounty hunters. Again it mostly helps the bounty hunter to make more money especially if the price appreciates although that is not always promised. I basically like the idea because it brings sanity to the project.

look at it from the other side " You come to work at some for example plant, you are told, your salary is 300 $, you agree, come vreya to pay, and you are told that they are afraid that you spent money, you can somehow cause them usher, and because of this, we will divide your 300$ into 3 parts and we will pay you 100$ 3 months. It's just that, as I noticed, a lot of people live on this bounty, it's their work and food, that's why they sell everything at once so that there is money, and this is their right, since they have earned it.

Shef198911

member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 60

Bounty Campaign Manager

Quote from: pallang on August 19, 2020, 06:36:23 PM

Quote from: Shef198911 on August 19, 2020, 07:54:47 AM

if the company really valued its tokens so much, they could, like some, buy tokens at a certain price, so that the price does not fall, and not block and divide the distribution.

Yes, like the DIA project they announce 3 phases of bounty distribution to prevent hunters for dumping the coin, and it will also make the price more stable and going up.

let's see within a couple of weeks, if the DIA will also continue to show good price growth, then I think it would be possible not to share the reward since the pool was very small to greatly affect the price with a volume of 40,000,000 $

pallang

full member

Activity: 518

Merit: 100

Quote from: Shef198911 on August 19, 2020, 07:54:47 AM

if the company really valued its tokens so much, they could, like some, buy tokens at a certain price, so that the price does not fall, and not block and divide the distribution.

Yes, like the DIA project they announce 3 phases of bounty distribution to prevent hunters for dumping the coin, and it will also make the price more stable and going up.

Shef198911

member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 60

Bounty Campaign Manager

if the company really valued its tokens so much, they could, like some, buy tokens at a certain price, so that the price does not fall, and not block and divide the distribution.

Jocuserious

sr. member

Activity: 1936

Merit: 290

This planned method is much older and in the past some number bounty tokens were distributed according to the three phases method. I think this method is fairly good and a token can stop dumped if the bounty amount of the project is high. However I think it would not be a problem if the tokens were distributed at intervals of 10-15 days instead of a few months.

fourpiece

full member

Activity: 821

Merit: 101

Quote from: ?? on ??

Three phases bounty distribution I like this.
This is good three phases bounty distribution.Alredy some bounty meneger distribution three phases.Many time bounty token distribution coin price huge dump than bounty hunter received low value.I like this phases distribution.I support this phases distribution & Best of luck this system.

For me i dont like it speccially when i need immediate funds, three phases of bounty only means your reward will be distributed in three phases. And your unlucky if the coin price gets dumped every week.

Shef198911

member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 60

Bounty Campaign Manager

Quote from: noorman0 on August 13, 2020, 10:46:20 PM

Whatever the policies regarding distribution I guess it doesn't matter. What hunters face and complain about is the fact that managers often delay payments and don't live up to their initial promises.

The hunters are running the campaign because they have read and accepted the policies, giving another policy after the job is done is not a good project which means the project team itself is not confident in their potential of their coins/tokens and I have noticed many of them have died slowly before even distribution is done.

Just many greedy, do not want to pay knowing that this is somehow, but will affect the price of the token, and why then restore it to wait, when you can just throw hunters? So they sometimes postpone for six months or a year, and then when they already want to pay, they come up with some conditions, in the hope that more than half of people have already forgotten about them, thereby reducing payments by 2 times

noorman0

hero member

Activity: 1778

Merit: 709

[Nope]No hype delivers more than hope

Whatever the policies regarding distribution I guess it doesn't matter. What hunters face and complain about is the fact that managers often delay payments and don't live up to their initial promises.

The hunters are running the campaign because they have read and accepted the policies, giving another policy after the job is done is not a good project which means the project team itself is not confident in their potential of their coins/tokens and I have noticed many of them have died slowly before even distribution is done.

Shef198911

member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 60

Bounty Campaign Manager

Quote from: bakasabo on August 06, 2020, 08:15:06 AM

Quote from: tukagero on August 05, 2020, 06:52:22 PM

For some reasons three phases of bounty distribution is good first to prevent bounty hunters for dumping, second to maintain the price or maybe price will go up because no one is dumping. But somehow there is also negative on three phase distribution especially on the part of bounty hunters, if the project cant stand for so long, price will dump rewards of bounty particapants will become lower and lower.

Why the fact that bounty hunters dump tokens is counted as negative? They worked to get a reward and can do with it whatever they want. It is like a person receives salary and government limits him from spending it all in one day. With current bounty pulls, bounty hunters cant dump there price. Project is fully responsible for hunters selling tokens and dropping price. Project doesnt do anything to protect altcoins price. Project did not do anything to impress hunters to make them keep rewards. If the project is promissing, bounty hunter will never dump his reward.

Yes, only bounty hunters are always blamed for everything, especially I noticed this behavior from the investors themselves, who themselves just want to sell more profitable, and ask the team to either block the tokens or divide them for a year, so that they could not normally sell what they earned, and at that time, investors really sell their tokens at a good price.
Currently, the whole truth is in the money, gave money, sold more or less, and those who worked and promoted the project to have such a price of the token, they are left with nothing

dunfida

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1140

Quote from: bakasabo on August 06, 2020, 08:15:06 AM

Quote from: tukagero on August 05, 2020, 06:52:22 PM

For some reasons three phases of bounty distribution is good first to prevent bounty hunters for dumping, second to maintain the price or maybe price will go up because no one is dumping. But somehow there is also negative on three phase distribution especially on the part of bounty hunters, if the project cant stand for so long, price will dump rewards of bounty particapants will become lower and lower.

Why the fact that bounty hunters dump tokens is counted as negative? They worked to get a reward and can do with it whatever they want. It is like a person receives salary and government limits him from spending it all in one day. With current bounty pulls, bounty hunters cant dump there price. Project is fully responsible for hunters selling tokens and dropping price. Project doesnt do anything to protect altcoins price. Project did not do anything to impress hunters to make them keep rewards. If the project is promissing, bounty hunter will never dump his reward.

Main dumpers are investors itself and project do always took the blame to bounty hunters? Thats totally a bullshit treat to bounty hunters since from the beginning
without even knowing or realizing that investors are the ones who do always come after for profits once the tokens/coins being listed out already on an exchange.
In mention in op about three phase distribution then i would surely bet that this one wont able to stop the dump. Dont forget that investors that do purchase up tokens
plus having big discounts and bonuses will be always in the head of the line when it comes on selling out their stashes.

bakasabo

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1215

Quote from: tukagero on August 05, 2020, 06:52:22 PM

For some reasons three phases of bounty distribution is good first to prevent bounty hunters for dumping, second to maintain the price or maybe price will go up because no one is dumping. But somehow there is also negative on three phase distribution especially on the part of bounty hunters, if the project cant stand for so long, price will dump rewards of bounty particapants will become lower and lower.

Why the fact that bounty hunters dump tokens is counted as negative? They worked to get a reward and can do with it whatever they want. It is like a person receives salary and government limits him from spending it all in one day. With current bounty pulls, bounty hunters cant dump there price. Project is fully responsible for hunters selling tokens and dropping price. Project doesnt do anything to protect altcoins price. Project did not do anything to impress hunters to make them keep rewards. If the project is promissing, bounty hunter will never dump his reward.

tukagero

full member

Activity: 994

Merit: 103

For some reasons three phases of bounty distribution is good first to prevent bounty hunters for dumping, second to maintain the price or maybe price will go up because no one is dumping. But somehow there is also negative on three phase distribution especially on the part of bounty hunters, if the project cant stand for so long, price will dump rewards of bounty particapants will become lower and lower.

Shohag123

member

Activity: 385

Merit: 12

I think its good that the distribution will be made by 3 phases.I have seen that some people blame bounty hunters for the price drop of the coin.If project has an X factor and good demand then it will be always on safe side.And if the bounty allocation is huge then 3 phase distribution is a best idea and then nobody will have much coin to dump.I have recently joined DIA bounty and here distribution will be on 3 phases.But if the bounty allocation is small and you use 3 phase distribution then its a very unfair decision.Nobody want 5$ every month.So if small allocation and price is not good then 3 phase distribution is very bad for hunters.

Topic: Three phases bounty distribution (Read 834 times)